Stanley Ann Dunham’s role could have been that of infiltrator into radical groups with the intent to influence them into committing acts of violence or otherwise that would get them in trouble with police and put away in prison, when instead they should have been spreading their message through education and peaceful means. Infiltration is a practice well known and used by UK police and the FBI in the US.

Who are you talking to? Why do you think your “pity” is of any interest to anyone but yourself? Are you able to rebut any of the assertions made in the article? Unless you are claiming that the author hallucinated everything, the source of his “hatred” is evident to anyone. What a waste of time your comment is.

Right… it is like saying that USAID staff will work with Venezuelan Chavistas.

I am sure that an internet cleanup operation was run an that they commissioned stories from the media to hide that horrible past. Even few years ago I remember reading about this in different webpages, now that I wanted to refresh my memory I could only find one. This one gives a good summary:
http://www.thesecrettruth.com/obama.htm

As far as I know the massacres were still ongoing when she arrived in 1967.

UK’s Independent claims in an article that in Indonesia Durham supported “radical groups opposed to the military dictatorship.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/the-untold-story-of-obamas-mother-1787979.html

I find this a little difficult to credit as USAID staff are not known for ever engaging in such activities, especially not in countries in which the US actively supports the military dictatorship du jour.

Something is amiss here, because Wikipedia and Biography.com both place Ann Dunham in Indonesia only from 1967, a year or two after the massacres.

That is the background of the drone lord, and it shows.