1) Even if you successfully set off comprehensive demolition charges on only floors touched by the planes, the building could not collapse at free-fall either beneath the impacted floors or above. That is just basic Newtonian Physics. intact floors cannot accelerate through 80 other intact floors as though they were fresh air and experience no resistance. This happened with all 3 building although building 7 was a) accelerating the most rapidly and b) was hit by no planes. I cant help it if you have no grasp of the scientific principles but the way they collapsed is impossible according to the laws of the universe unless you can remove every floor before the floor above has a chance to reach it. The only known way to achieve this is by human controlled demolition.

2) The twin towers were specifically over-built to withstand airliner collision at any level.

explosives were attached to the structural members of each of these buildings, YES
underneath the fireproofing and office fitments, THE CRITICAL MEMBERS WERE THE CENTRAL CORE WHERE THE ELEVATORS WERE. THIS CORE HELD UP THE BUILDING. THE OUTER MEMBERS , EVEN INTACT COULD NOT HOLD THE BUILDING UP ALTHOUGH THERE MAY HAVE BEEN OPPORTUNITY TO WIRE SOME OF THOSE MEMBERS ALSO. THERE WERE SEVERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN THE TOWERS.

on just the floors into which an airplane would later be flown. NO, DEMOLISHING ONLY THE PLANE IMPACT FLOORS COULD NOT WORK IN A CONTROLLED DEMO. ALMOST ALL FLOORS WOULD NEED CHARGES AS WELL AS SUB’BASEMENT LEVELS (WHICH ARE TYPICALLY CUT FIRST BEFORE THE BUILDING IS IMPLODED.

This enormous construction project was somehow completely hidden, never leaving any clue. ACCESS TO THE ELEVATOR SHAFTS IS THE KEY. AN EXTENSIVE ELEVATOR PROJECT WAS UNDERTAKEN IN MONTHS PRECEDING 9/11. MANY CLUES WERE REMOVED RAPIDLY IN THE CLEAN UP THOUGH ENOUGH EVIDENCE WAS STILL FOUND BUT IGNORED BY NIST. BEAMS MELTED, UN-IGNITED THERMITE CHIPS IN THE RUBBLE DUST, AS WELL AS MOLTEN IRON MICRO-SPHERES. LONG LASTING MOLTEN STEEL IN THE RUBBLE, MOLTEN STEEL POURING FROM BUILDING. EXPLOSIONS WITNESSED AND SEISMICALLY RECORDED, SOME BEFORE AND DURING THE PLANES IMPACT AND COLLAPSE

timing system for controlled demolition was similarly hidden. THE TIMING SYSTEM COULD BE ANYWHERE IN RADIO RANGE, I.E. WIRELESS.

Then somehow planes were hijacked and flown into exactly the floors on each building where the explosives were hidden (wath the videos – the collapse clearly starts exactly in the impact zone). THERE ARE 2 BASIC POSSIBILITIES-1 THE PLANES WERE AIMED AT PRE-ARRANGED FLOORS. 2 THE EXACT SEQUENCE OF THE CHARGES WAS FINALIZED BETWEEN THE PLANE IMPACT AND COLLAPSE

The controlled demolition system and explosives was 100% intact after the impact and survived intense fires for a prolonged period. Them somebody triggered that intact demolition system and the building collapsed. SOME CHARGES MAY HAVE MALFUNCTIONED WITHOUT IMPACTING THE OVERALL EFFECT. THE IMPORTANT CHARGES WERE IN THE CENTRAL CORE WHICH WAS NOT WHERE THE PLANES FIREBALL WAS CONCENTRATED AND THE FUEL FIRES LASTED MINUTES FOLLOWED BY LOW TEMP, SCATTERED BURNING OF OFFICE CONTENTS. THAT TRIGGER PERSON(S) WERE NOT IN THE BUILDING, TRIGGERING THE SEQUENCES VIA COMPUTER PROGRAM SENDING OUT RADIO COMMANDS FOR EACH CHARGE.

I hate to say this CMB but you are wearing some shaded Glasses. Science is Science not some stupid gut feeling or emotional need to feel secure. Our history is full of mysteries were political and/or wealthy people have conspired to either hide facts or at least confuse them. Oliver North, an officer of the US Military sworn to uphold the constitution and the laws of this land, on live TV before congress admitted to witnessing the auctioning of TONs of Cocaine to Drug Dealers in Chicago off one of those military Cxx cargo planes. The man did nothing about but keep his lips closed. He destroyed documents to protect those higher up. Do you really think some Drug Dealer in LA figured out how to make crack when it was the CIA that was having trouble unloading the Cocaine they were selling to finance their agenda the congress would not support? The CIA benefited from Crack in a big way. How many Americans and American Families have been destroyed by Cocaine/Crack that a branch of our own government sold. Do you think the “Cartel’s” just sprang up when the CIA came to by or does it make more sense that they looked for locals that knew the many small growers to act as their “Agent/Buyer” ? I am certain CMT that you are not brain dead and do have at least the average ability to connect dots. The Trade Center Buildings did not fall like they partially severed in the middle, they fell like something took a chunk out of ALL the supporting steel structure in the middle that held the buildings up at onetime so that a very small free fall of 1000’s of tons could accelerate and multiply its force times 100 so that there was nothing below it to stop it. The Laws, Rules, and Regulations with regards to failing construction are mandated to be investigated. They are investigate for several reasons like : (a Determine if there was faulty construction, (b determine if proper construction existed but it failed anyway meaning that there was something wrong with the building design which would exist in the 10,000’s of buildings relying on this technology what could be done to fix or reinforce the weakness in standing buildings or alter the loading limits, (c. if it was not a or b, determine the cause. Generally speaking if something happens when it should not we would want to see who profits from the event. One Company DID profit heavily, Halliburton. Never before was a single company given all the war support functions for which they were paid and in turn paid sub-contractors to perform task they did not want or were unable to supply themselves. I have personally worked with Dick Cheney and have no respect for him as a person in as much as he has no respect for people in general. It is also interesting that all our military forces were occupied elsewhere on activities leaving our eastern seaboard in that area without the ability for immediate response. We later learned that there was some intelligence that this whole attack possibility existed, but no one knows the details of what was actually known, but it was passed off as some communications screw-up. It is also interesting that Cheney had written some paper or speach where he stated that our country needed some sort of major calamity to “SOLIDIFY” the people which 911 certainly did. If you feel more secure believing that the only three Steel framed buildings to have ever experienced a total structural failure in exactly the same way as to appear to have been a precision demolition on the same day at the same location due to the might of Muhammad and the righteousness of the Jihad, then I am happy for your security. For me, I will always sleep with one eye open as log as there are greedy people with little or no respect for the lives of others, or think they know better what I want or need. (PS. I mentioned Oliver North because all that I said was documented in hearing before Congress on live TV but maybe before your time.)

Wow. That’s one heck of a robust yet completely hidden system and precion suicide flying. Wouldn’t it have been better to set off the explosions as the plane hit (or milliseconds before), rather than risk damage to the hidden demolition system from the fires? Why wait so long?

Or was every floor rigged, and it took that long for the conspirators to figure out which button to press to get the collapse started on the actual impact site? And not one unused explosive or control system was found in the wreckage.

Was this amazing system put in place when the building was built? Or in the weeks before the planes hit?

If the collapse had started a few floors above or especially below the impact zone, the controlled demolition scenario might be worth looking into. But to believe in that requires that we buy into an ever escalating series of conspiracies – among the builders, or the maintenance crews, or believe that the planes were holograms and the passenger families paid crisis actors, etc.

One characteristic of what people call a “conspriracy” theory is that it patches over every evidential flaw, large or small, just by expanding the conspiracy or implausible technology, wash and repeat. If the theory requires that there was no actual plane (some do, some don’t), then it must have been a hologram and hidden loudspeakers (altho that’s not how holograms work, except in movies). Oh, but that’s just what THEY want us to to think, however they have alien holographic technology from Area 51. Or all the physics researchers have been paid off to mislead us about how holograms work. Basically, it becomes unfalsifiable, a work of creative fiction.

There of course ARE real conspiracies. But they come to finite limits and bounds when seriously investigated, and they leave loose ends. They don’t blow up exponentially, requiring ever more implausible extensions to cover the flaws in the earlier versions. And they discard the disproven bullet points in favor of only the solid ones, rather than stubbornly refusing to budge an inch and repeating endlessly every single bullet point assertion that some conspiracist has come up with. Like the idea that insulation and water sprinklers are unaffected by an airplane impact.

So what about building 7? “Well, WTC 1 & 2 weren’t due to controlled explosives, but they did rig WTC-7”. Yeah right. I read about the first report on WTC 1 & 2 and the lead investigator said they hadn’t studied WTC-7 but that he thought it would be more difficult to explain. (The eventual report on WTC-7 did answer his concerns). But if the fix was in and his job was to cover it all up, he would never have said such a thing in the first place. And the first speculation was that the collapse of WTC-7 might have been due to all of the various fuels stored there – a plausible explanation for the layman. But when they spent a lot of time modeling it, this easy speculation was disregarded in favor of a more complex and harder to explain engineering analysis. If their job was just to cover it up, they would have seized on the easy to understand (but false) explanation, rather than doing extensive modeling which ruled that out as a major cause in favor of a harder to understand outcome from the modeling.

But most people believe what they want to believe, and evidence is distinctly secondary.

“You don’t need an engineer to tell you that the hole in the Pentagon was half as wide as the wingspan of the plane which supposedly went through it ”

Did you expect the plane to make a cartoon shaped hole in a wall like Wile E. Coyote?

If you click on the link you have provided, Chris, you will now find this:

“Are you sure you want to view this community?
This community is quarantined
It may contain a high degree of misinformation. If you are seeking historic information about the September 11 attacks, please visit the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (https://www.9-11commission.gov/).”

Hilarious.

Has Albury Smith shown up here yet?!😀

According to the official story the force of gravity pulled the top fifteen percent of the north tower through the bottom 85 percent !!! This violates two of Newton’s laws of mechanics which are taught in High School Physics classes all over the world….. Thos cannot be a gravitational collapse , there has to be other energy to disintegrate the thousands of tons of steel and concrete! Best source for further understanding : YouTube “ experts speak out”

It has a weight of both WTC1&2. It explains why there was no rubble of a 200 stories, concidering the last 15 to 20 stories and the rooftops were freefalling after the explosions like there was no construction beneath them. It explains the whole incident to the tiny detail. It also kicks out thermite theory.
Thermite tech was always here to move you from the truth. Except for the WTC7 which was obviously conventional demolition.