<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Further Signs of More War: A Most Dangerous Game	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/</link>
	<description>because facts really should be sacred</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 22:28:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: flaxgirl		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flaxgirl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 22:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17281&quot;&gt;Admin&lt;/a&gt;.

I see. What a duffer. It would have been a little too much, wouldn&#039;t it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17281">Admin</a>.</p>
<p>I see. What a duffer. It would have been a little too much, wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Admin		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17281</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17280&quot;&gt;flaxgirl&lt;/a&gt;.

The pic at the top of this article has been photoshopped to make the point of the similarity. It’s not a genuine pic of May.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17280">flaxgirl</a>.</p>
<p>The pic at the top of this article has been photoshopped to make the point of the similarity. It’s not a genuine pic of May.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: flaxgirl		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[flaxgirl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re making fun, aren&#039;t they? The power elite love to play their little games. Now you don&#039;t think Theresa&#039;s holding of the prop matching Colin Powell&#039;s waving of his prop representing alleged Iraqi anthrax (anthrax which turned out to have originated in a US laboratory) is a COINCIDENCE, do you?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/27/bush-administration-sold-iraq-war]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re making fun, aren&#8217;t they? The power elite love to play their little games. Now you don&#8217;t think Theresa&#8217;s holding of the prop matching Colin Powell&#8217;s waving of his prop representing alleged Iraqi anthrax (anthrax which turned out to have originated in a US laboratory) is a COINCIDENCE, do you?<br />
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/27/bush-administration-sold-iraq-war" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/27/bush-administration-sold-iraq-war</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mikalina		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikalina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17277&quot;&gt;MichaelK&lt;/a&gt;.

Ask any teenager in Britain how WW1 started and they will tell you that the it was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the archduke of Austria-Hungary by Gavrilo Princip.
I could never understand how one incident could cause such global massacres.  It&#039;s as though after the shot everything stopped and someone said &quot;Archduke&#039;s been shot&quot;.  And the response was, &quot;oh, well, that&#039;s it, then, we&#039;re going to war&quot; and the world began killing each other.
In the light of the Tolkin hoax; the weapons of mass destruction hoax; the pushing of Milosovic to sign an unsignable agreement fix; 9/11 plot to kill anyone anywhere in the world; the refusal to sign the Peruvian agreement over the Malinas islands (as you mention); ignoring warnings at Pearl Harbour; the lies about the need to drop atom bombs on Japan in order to end WWII - fake history, indeed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17277">MichaelK</a>.</p>
<p>Ask any teenager in Britain how WW1 started and they will tell you that the it was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the archduke of Austria-Hungary by Gavrilo Princip.<br />
I could never understand how one incident could cause such global massacres.  It&#8217;s as though after the shot everything stopped and someone said &#8220;Archduke&#8217;s been shot&#8221;.  And the response was, &#8220;oh, well, that&#8217;s it, then, we&#8217;re going to war&#8221; and the world began killing each other.<br />
In the light of the Tolkin hoax; the weapons of mass destruction hoax; the pushing of Milosovic to sign an unsignable agreement fix; 9/11 plot to kill anyone anywhere in the world; the refusal to sign the Peruvian agreement over the Malinas islands (as you mention); ignoring warnings at Pearl Harbour; the lies about the need to drop atom bombs on Japan in order to end WWII &#8211; fake history, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MichaelK		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17276&quot;&gt;Frankly Speaking&lt;/a&gt;.

Labour&#039;s &#039;hard right&#039; are a despicable bunch of wankers and dangerous too. I always expected this to happen. They want to portray Russia as an outlaw or pariah state; with Hitler-like demons in charge of its political system;  like one does in preparation for war. I doubt a boycott will succeed. But if we bomb the Russian infrastructure, that might work! Still, in that scenario a cancelled football tournament will be the least of our problems.
The West&#039;s been on an aggressive militaristic and imperialist &#039;roll&#039; since the breakup of the old Soviet Union, when there was only one super-power left standing. We shameless attacked country after country and virtually wipe them off the map. Millions died, massive material destruction and colossal suffering on a gigantic scale.
Super power corrupts... totally. Then, having no other choice, Russia stepped into attack on Syria and stopped the West&#039;s latest attempt to destroy a state. The rolling juggernaut was opposed and stopped, even pushed backwards. It was no longer rolling in quite the same way. For that alone, Russia must be punished. But the West has gotten so used to having its own way that changing its ways, being forced to change and opposed, is a very, very, difficult thing to accept. But  Russia isn&#039;t Iraq or Libya or Syria. It has the capacity to defend itself and its legitimate interests and strike back if attacked, and it will, make no mistake. And this time the war wont just be fought on Russian soil. They will take the fight to those countries and cities attacking them. City for city.
So the West should be very careful of what it starts in relation to Russia and think of the consequences. But are our leaders so wedded to attacking other nations, wedded to militarism and imperialism, that they don&#039;t know any other way forward? The big battle is about who controls the heartland of the Eurasian continent, with its massive resources. Currently Russia and China control it and are &#039;standing in the way&#039; for US ambitions and plans for the area. They have to be pushed aside, one way or another. Arguably the only way for the US to do that is through war. I&#039;m not optimistic that this coming conflict can be avoided, without some kind of &#039;collapse&#039; in the United States.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17276">Frankly Speaking</a>.</p>
<p>Labour&#8217;s &#8216;hard right&#8217; are a despicable bunch of wankers and dangerous too. I always expected this to happen. They want to portray Russia as an outlaw or pariah state; with Hitler-like demons in charge of its political system;  like one does in preparation for war. I doubt a boycott will succeed. But if we bomb the Russian infrastructure, that might work! Still, in that scenario a cancelled football tournament will be the least of our problems.<br />
The West&#8217;s been on an aggressive militaristic and imperialist &#8216;roll&#8217; since the breakup of the old Soviet Union, when there was only one super-power left standing. We shameless attacked country after country and virtually wipe them off the map. Millions died, massive material destruction and colossal suffering on a gigantic scale.<br />
Super power corrupts&#8230; totally. Then, having no other choice, Russia stepped into attack on Syria and stopped the West&#8217;s latest attempt to destroy a state. The rolling juggernaut was opposed and stopped, even pushed backwards. It was no longer rolling in quite the same way. For that alone, Russia must be punished. But the West has gotten so used to having its own way that changing its ways, being forced to change and opposed, is a very, very, difficult thing to accept. But  Russia isn&#8217;t Iraq or Libya or Syria. It has the capacity to defend itself and its legitimate interests and strike back if attacked, and it will, make no mistake. And this time the war wont just be fought on Russian soil. They will take the fight to those countries and cities attacking them. City for city.<br />
So the West should be very careful of what it starts in relation to Russia and think of the consequences. But are our leaders so wedded to attacking other nations, wedded to militarism and imperialism, that they don&#8217;t know any other way forward? The big battle is about who controls the heartland of the Eurasian continent, with its massive resources. Currently Russia and China control it and are &#8216;standing in the way&#8217; for US ambitions and plans for the area. They have to be pushed aside, one way or another. Arguably the only way for the US to do that is through war. I&#8217;m not optimistic that this coming conflict can be avoided, without some kind of &#8216;collapse&#8217; in the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MichaelK		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17277</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17277</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Eventually this entire &#039;circus&#039; will come tumbling down, but by then the damage will have been done and who will even remember, will there be anyone left alive to remember?
By interviewing Craig Murray the Guardian is attempting to &#039;wiggle&#039; a bit, because if this thing falls apart like the Iraq dirty dossier and non-existent WMDs, it&#039;ll substantially damage the reputation of the mainstream media and severely undermine what&#039;s left of its legitimacy. So the Guardian will be able to point to at least one piece that didn&#039;t completely swallow the bait.
The depressing thing is, this whole story, with emphasis on &#039;story&#039; has more holes in it than a Swiss cheese, yet, one would never know that from the way our media has covered it. Completely uncritically and taking the word and version of events from the state, a state that wants regime change in Russia, as the gospel truth, despite the patent absurdity of the narrative that doesn&#039;t stand up for a moments scrutiny. I suppose this kind of patriotic willful blindness and credulity is only possible in wartime.
Even if the story was true, who really cares? Two Russians killed? So what? Does it matter? Does one really choose to go to war over something as insignificant as this, unless it&#039;s an excuse to go to war, a pretext?
Think of the Falklands War. That war was totally unnecessary, there was a perfectly acceptable compromise on the table, which the British pushed aside because they wanted a short, sharp, successful war with Argentina, a war that saved Thatcher&#039;s bacon and ushered in and unleashed a virtual Thatcherite dictatorship and did immense damage to the UK and its people. Yet, that isn&#039;t part of the official history or consensus, also know as... fake history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eventually this entire &#8216;circus&#8217; will come tumbling down, but by then the damage will have been done and who will even remember, will there be anyone left alive to remember?<br />
By interviewing Craig Murray the Guardian is attempting to &#8216;wiggle&#8217; a bit, because if this thing falls apart like the Iraq dirty dossier and non-existent WMDs, it&#8217;ll substantially damage the reputation of the mainstream media and severely undermine what&#8217;s left of its legitimacy. So the Guardian will be able to point to at least one piece that didn&#8217;t completely swallow the bait.<br />
The depressing thing is, this whole story, with emphasis on &#8216;story&#8217; has more holes in it than a Swiss cheese, yet, one would never know that from the way our media has covered it. Completely uncritically and taking the word and version of events from the state, a state that wants regime change in Russia, as the gospel truth, despite the patent absurdity of the narrative that doesn&#8217;t stand up for a moments scrutiny. I suppose this kind of patriotic willful blindness and credulity is only possible in wartime.<br />
Even if the story was true, who really cares? Two Russians killed? So what? Does it matter? Does one really choose to go to war over something as insignificant as this, unless it&#8217;s an excuse to go to war, a pretext?<br />
Think of the Falklands War. That war was totally unnecessary, there was a perfectly acceptable compromise on the table, which the British pushed aside because they wanted a short, sharp, successful war with Argentina, a war that saved Thatcher&#8217;s bacon and ushered in and unleashed a virtual Thatcherite dictatorship and did immense damage to the UK and its people. Yet, that isn&#8217;t part of the official history or consensus, also know as&#8230; fake history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Frankly Speaking		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frankly Speaking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I posted earlier on another topic, I predicted earlier this year, during the Winter Olympics, that there would be some false-flag event against Russia that would lead to a boycott of the World Cup in Russia, on the basis there’s no way that the neocons can allow Russia to be portrayed positively.
Roll forward to events in Salisbury...
Now let&#039;s roll forward to the article in today&#039;s Guardian... Labour MP calls for debate on World Cup move
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/16/russia-row-labour-mp-calls-for-debate-on-world-cup-move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I posted earlier on another topic, I predicted earlier this year, during the Winter Olympics, that there would be some false-flag event against Russia that would lead to a boycott of the World Cup in Russia, on the basis there’s no way that the neocons can allow Russia to be portrayed positively.<br />
Roll forward to events in Salisbury&#8230;<br />
Now let&#8217;s roll forward to the article in today&#8217;s Guardian&#8230; Labour MP calls for debate on World Cup move<br />
<a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/16/russia-row-labour-mp-calls-for-debate-on-world-cup-move" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/mar/16/russia-row-labour-mp-calls-for-debate-on-world-cup-move</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: M.		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17269&quot;&gt;BigB&lt;/a&gt;.

It was very disappointing indeed. He felt the pressure and started a gamble that he can only lose. He now seems to be juggling with two positions that are contradictory. I think that those who, like me, saw him as a common sense alternative, felt very much let down. While for making just a couple of fair points regarding the evidence, he has been portrayed as a Soviet agent in BBC´s Newsnight (with red screen and St Basil´s cathedral on the background and all!) and the rest of the press. He seemed to be wanting to beat  the devil in his own game, but as soon as he tried to touch gloves, he got a couple of nasty punches.
I don´t know who is advising him nowadays, but it is astonishing to see that they don´t seem to understand that they got a good electoral result precisely because he seemed completely detached from the antics, the discourses and the interests of mainstream politicians. He just put himself in a losing position.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17269">BigB</a>.</p>
<p>It was very disappointing indeed. He felt the pressure and started a gamble that he can only lose. He now seems to be juggling with two positions that are contradictory. I think that those who, like me, saw him as a common sense alternative, felt very much let down. While for making just a couple of fair points regarding the evidence, he has been portrayed as a Soviet agent in BBC´s Newsnight (with red screen and St Basil´s cathedral on the background and all!) and the rest of the press. He seemed to be wanting to beat  the devil in his own game, but as soon as he tried to touch gloves, he got a couple of nasty punches.<br />
I don´t know who is advising him nowadays, but it is astonishing to see that they don´t seem to understand that they got a good electoral result precisely because he seemed completely detached from the antics, the discourses and the interests of mainstream politicians. He just put himself in a losing position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joerg		</title>
		<link>https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17274</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joerg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://off-guardian.org/?p=45486#comment-17274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17273&quot;&gt;Joerg&lt;/a&gt;.

Why don&#039;t you Brits call your Prime Minister(ess??) from now on:
&lt;strong&gt;THERESA &quot;CONSPIRACY THEORY&quot; MAY&quot;? &lt;/strong&gt;?
Your country needs You!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://off-guardian.org/2018/03/15/further-signs-of-more-war-a-most-dangerous-game/#comment-17273">Joerg</a>.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t you Brits call your Prime Minister(ess??) from now on:<br />
<strong>THERESA &#8220;CONSPIRACY THEORY&#8221; MAY&#8221;? </strong>?<br />
Your country needs You!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk

Served from: off-guardian.org @ 2026-07-09 12:55:30 by W3 Total Cache
-->