Further to my post above, I wonder if this money is to be forwarded to the White Helmets to make their propaganda videos even more professional. That is the only reason I can think for the UK Govt handing over this money. I have been unable to find any msm reference to this funding, only Peter Hitchens reference where he says that “the Foreign Office have just confirmed to me…”. Methinks a letter to my MP is called for.

Chomsky’s main problem is/was that he never really understood the technical side of financial markets and their inherent weaknesses in regulatory designs: that have always favoured continuously the hegemony & control of all markets, via ‘their’ five point strategic plan of the ruling corporate class ‘elites’, who control also all & any info. flow one way or another.
A well proven, documented and fully admitted Mossad tactic.
Communications the key ..
After Enron & 9/11 , Chomsky really should have woken up to the systemic regulatory failures, from pensions to derivatives, & much much more >> given that the SEC Investigative Records for Enron were in WTC 7 , at the moment of WTC 7’s miraculous & scientifically impossible “Freefall” ..
9/11 really does represent Chomsky’s ‘Freefall’ from any notions of intellectual grace & respect, because like many other systemic ‘tools’ , he is in total denial of all Science, both Physics & Humanities (inc. Sociology & Economics) & therefore represents today, the perfect societal example of cognitive dissonance, which serves as a disservice to any of his philosophical notions , because he fails to evaluate the whole picture and would prefer to believe that the aluminium ‘nose cone’ of an aircraft could fly right through steel columns, indeed a whole walled building, in one side and out the other side wholly in TACT &&& .. in tandem with scandalous bond(age), stock market , insurances & financial fraud of the hugest scale ever witnessed in the history of Economics and Central Banking. That can being kicked down the road until 2008 & onwards again to today .. Government Bonds anybody ? Let’s ask Chomsky if he wants all his pension tied to
Bond-age-relief funds, lol
I could of course ridicule him much more, scientifically, but that would be wasting time on an old fool of fools, that lost the plot !

Excellent comment on matters which cross my mind daily ..
My heart bleeds for the ole’ school journalists, like Robert Fisk, far removed from the ‘office politics’ of armchair & keyboard warriors back in London: office politics , which have been heavily infiltrated by a wide variety of undercover operatives, of differing nationalities but common objectives : especially in particular relating to any “Comments” sections of any publication open to the public.
Who controls and regulates the Moderators ? Certainly no-body ‘independent’ , with a focus on community regs & the relative Laws pertaining ..
It is no longer even worth mentioning ‘The Guardian’ in this regard, logic: but it is worth mentioning Fisk’s recent report from Douma, in the ‘independent’ and the fact that it was ‘tucked’ away out of sight, speedily, and with ZERO possibility to comment ! Poor guy, Fisk doing his best , not without ‘Risk’, only to be scuttled and sunk in the quagmire of various Faux/Foe/False colleagues/operatives, with ulterior media agendas & strategy & backers in London.
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/syria-chemical-attack-gas-douma-robert-fisk-ghouta-damascus-a8307726.html
No comments !
I mention this because, many people have fled the Guardian comments in disgust, e.g. like the ‘GreatRonRafferty’ and therefore tried their hand at the ‘independent’, only to realise after a while that “Birds of a feather flock together” , also across the boards of broad control by subversive mainstream media ‘Moderators’, (read: undercover censors & suppressors of dissenting opinions & legitimate questioning).
When off-guardian first started, there was certain USA fellow involved, who I suspected was wholly untrustworthy from the outset, (researching his history), in precisely the manner you mention & in his subversive intentions, he proved you & me correct. Even trying to stake a claim to the “Name” online of http://www.off-guardian.org ..
Tortuous moments of realisation for well intentioned souls @OFFG , that frustrate, costing much time & wasted mental energy expended to resolve with legitimate constructive solutions.. but they battle on, wiser in future to the immoral games that deviants & miscreants play, today ! 😉
Fortunately for all 🙂
P.s. I was surprised you did not mention Sibel Edmonds .. 🙂
Lol, more important is that the reporter , Dilyana Gaytandzhieva , is credible (imo), even if she became confused in whom she could place her Trust .. a bit like Robert Fisk , in reality .

I tend to side with you that Chomsky is indeed a “gatekeeper” for the western faux-left intelligentsia. His refusal to even discuss, when he should have devoted at least one of his enumerable tomes, to 9/11 was likely the circumstance that exposed his deviousness to the awake. Indeed his collective narative is actually quintessentially that of the Zionist ego that absolutely has to brag about it’s motives and methods in clever ways that fall short of prosecutable confession. By presenting as critique you can disseminate policy hidden in plain sight.
Having met and associated with many exiled Kurds in the town of Argos in southern Greece in the late 1980s I have some sympathy for them and would support their cause for a home to call their own. However their struggle has been thoroughly usurped by US/Israeli infiltration of the Kurdish leadership’s in Turkey,Iraq and Syria. So alas I can have no support for them any more and do not see an end to the suffering of this noble stateless people any time soon.

So, if we were to slander you as you have Chomsky, we could say that you are an apologist for Wahhabist terrorist butchers, with your nonsensical reference to the Uighurs in Xinjiang. Their terrorist attacks on China being a prime US endeavour, perhaps you are posting from Langley, or somewhere close by.