The bozo in the video seems to literally get his expectations of space technology from Hollywood films and children’s coloring books. Just because something “looks like paper type material” to his untrained and ignorant eye doesn’t mean shit. Maybe if he actually looked at the specifications available online of the lunar spacecraft, he’d have to stop appealing to the ignorance and incredulity of his audience. Instead, he offers nothing but his big-jawed opinions that “this doesn’t look right.”

Note that he’s also saying that NASA spent billions on the hoax, but that it cheaped out on the actual lunar lander and left “obvious” “mistakes” in – but that the Soviets didn’t pick up on this because their engineers were too incompetent. Or something. I honestly don’t think he thought that far ahead.

Videos like this only strengthen and corroborate my conviction that moon landing deniers are corrupt and debased, and are willing to lie and mislead without a morsel of shame.

All the evidence points to it being on the moon. No actual scientist, aerospace engineer or former Soviet official disputes that.

So nonsenseneedstobefought, please can you watch this critique of the Apollo 11 moon lander, supposedly on the moon? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s6vAiyUIQog
If you are short on attention span, as the video does clock in at a whopping 17 minutes, please forward to 7 minutes and 14 seconds in. Correct me if I’m wrong, but it looks a lot like a paper type material. After you have watched the film, or at least that section of it, please can you confirm that you are happy to endorse the validity of Apollo 11? Please will go on record to confirm you have:
1) Watched the film, or at least the section I have highlighted
2) That you are 100% sure that despite the major flaws the author of the video highlights, you disagree with him and you 100% believe that this craft was genuinely on the moon?

Whatever you say big-jawed imb,ecilic child who thinks he’s more resourceful than the KGB. You’re an IMBECILE with nothing valid to say. You mistake your pathetic bleatings for “valid opinions.” You literally get your expectations of space technology from children’s coloring books. You probably think that the lunar landing module wasn’t shiny enough.

But I could be wrong! I’m sure the world’s aerospace companies will be very “interested” in your “opinion.”

I make no apologuies for trying to highlight that the Apollo 11 landing module was quite clearly made in a studio, not by the world’s “leading” space agency.
If you actually watch the video, you will realise just how ridiculous it is to believe NASA did land that piece of shit on the moon. But you won’t……scared of the cognitive dissonance maybe?
NASA is 100% fraudlulent

“might conclude that they should reconsider their opinions, and adopt some which could be rationally defended. ”

Says the dishonest coward who slunk away from even the bare minimum of acknowledging that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about in regards to the Apollo moon missions, preferring instead to adhere to the party line that it was “fake” because his pathetic little tinfoil hat cult needs it to be. You need to drain the slime, piss and effluent from out of your head, though I’m afraid that whatever brain matter you have left won’t be able to do without the sustenance thus lost. Fascist scum like you are a disease.

“You’re not an anti-zionist, you’re a Mossad hasbara troll.”

FASCINATING. The baboon is making clicks and movements with his mouth, but seems unable to mimic anything true. Scientists will have to learn more about this.

The animal “milosevic”, who would have been equally at ease on the killing fields of the Baltics and the Balkans during WW2 eliminating vast numbers of Jewish women and girls as an auxiliary of the Nazis, still hasn’t defended his imbecilic bleating about the moon landings. All he can muster is “Why haven’t they gone back?” How does one deal with such committed simpletons who refuse to inform themselves about even the bare basics of science, engineering and history? Such commitment can only be regarded as a particularly obtuse variant of cultural and intellectual vandalism and terrorism.

“fascist shill”, says the Holocaust-denying, red-baiting, David Irving-linking, Jew-obsessed, “International Jewry”-meme spreading intellectual vandal, terrorist and fraud. It would hilarious if it wasn’t so utterly disgusting and debased.