Are you the same person who used to post on common dreams under Charlotte Ruse?

If you have listened to that interview, why do you continually push the fiction about Trump being removed by the deep state when you must know that the bankers control the world, not just the US of A?

You should also know about Trump’s history with Rothschild, Rockefeller, Resorts International, Deutsche bank and his family connections to the cryptocracy and the military. And Trump’s ancestral connections going back to Europe.

Have you read Hoffman’s books too?

What books have you read about the cryptocracy, secret societies and Freemasonry?

Because your analysis of 9-11 seems to focus on the PNAC and miss out on the connection of the Saudis, the British, the Israelis, and the US as a joint operation. In other words, a global military-banker – security state terror operation with the help and knowledge of Democrats who purposefully obfuscated enquiries post 9-11 and were wholeheartedly behind the Afghanistan and Iraq war crimes.

You also haven’t mentioned the investigations that were underway in the FBI offices and at the Pentagon before 9-11 occurred.

I’m sure you’re going to tell me you know all about those investigations too.

I mean, you know everything already, right?

But if so, why do you only proffer minor pieces of information like a 9th grade regurgitation essay exercise?

Yes it is although it seemed such an obvious one and no one’s ever challenged it before but, of course, Im always open to other hypotheses. Can you suggest other hypotheses for why the perps have implemented a propaganda campaign targeted to the truthers to ensure they maintain their belief in death and injury. Of course if you believe there is no propaganda campaign implemented for that purpose please tell me why you don’t think there is.

They may not SAY they refuse to believe it because of that but it will be in their minds, even if not consciously. 

ah. So you’re just assuming. Your entire theory is based on one single assumption

ok thanks

Like Kevin Ryan, he’s controlled opposition, Jogger, pure and simple (well I guess not pure and simple but they are both controlled opposition). How the guy keeps it up I do not know. I mean he seems to be “on” all the time.

Yes, you say this a lot – the trouble is I have literally never seen anyone refuse to accept 9/11 was an inside job based on the belief the govt would not kill its own people. That’s just not a common argument.

They may not SAY they refuse to believe it because of that but it will be in their minds, even if not consciously. I am quite positive it took me far longer than it would have had death and injury not been involved to recognise “inside job” because of the stumbling block of the government killing its own citizens in that particular way. The fact of the US government killing its own citizens in that way is simply taboo. And it completely changes what KIND of event it is. Also, if you recognise that death and injury were staged it gives you a much better understanding of other events too and the psyop MO generally. They don’t want that.

The point is the evidence supports my hypothesis, doesn’t it?

They managed to bring down WTCs 3, 4, 5 and 6 without us having a clue. So why did they bring down WTC-7 in a perfect implosion with all the journalists commenting on it?

I asked you in a previous comment whether you believe that from the words of their conversation, Brian Williams and David Restuccio were obviously in on 9/11. I ask you again. Do you think their words indicate they’re in on it?

This is a link to the end of the Free Fallin’ song where we hear their words after a few words from other reporters.
https://youtu.be/i5b719rVpds?t=188

Steve Jones and NIels Harrit et al are spreading a half-truth. Half-truths make great lies.

That’s a bridge to far for folk proving Petra wrong and winning a cash prize !

‘if you don’t have support on OffG’

Somebody is going to (have) to take this up. Why hasn’t it been done already ?

Maybe offer a prize for that !

Go Petra !

The perps correctly anticipated that a small but not insignificant percentage of the population, the “truthers”,would put their minds to working out the truth of “inside job” from the controlled demolition and, in some cases, faked planes so they had a propaganda strategy in place for us, the truthers.

and the strategy was…rigging WTC7 to be an obvious controlled demolition??

ok – the perps say “guys a few people are inevitably going to see this is a controlled demolition, so this is how we deal with them – we make the controlled demolition totally obvious!”

how does that help them exactly?

The truthers armed with an important truth, controlled demolition, but an equally important lie, real death and injury, will get nowhere because the general population will not come at the US government killing all those people in the building 

Yes, you say this a lot – the trouble is I have literally never seen anyone refuse to accept 9/11 was an inside job based on the belief the govt would not kill its own people. That’s just not a common argument.

The most common reasons given for supporting the official story are all based on failures to grasp the science. And the thing that seems to most powerfully change hearts and minds is the footage of WTC7.

So, while you’re theorising that AE911Truth, Steve Jones and Niels Harrit are ‘controlled opposition’ it’s actually their work that is reaching people and spreading the message.

How does this fit with your belief system?

Not getting it is what makes one desirable to play the role of useful idiot . I’ve been fitted out for that role and have played it on several occasions , friendly bots advising me to rein in my opinions , before being banned.Try coloring outside the lines established by the owners of the site to see how quickly one is attacked and banned , something that happens much more often on poorly resourced leftist sites , always scrambling to make the payroll.