Comments on: WHO (finally) admits PCR test is potentially flawed

By: CathyV

CathyV — Sun, 04 Feb 2024 21:00:27 +0000

That’s the problem it does NOT test for the virus. It tests for a fragment of DNA or RNA of pathogenic material…any pathogen. NOT specific! That’s the point. It does NOT diagnose a specific disease or pathogen. Any old fragment of genetic material will do. And yes, false positives galore, especially when amplified to the degree that was done…over 35 cycles. Do a little research on PCR and what Dr Kary Mullis himself said, many times. He invented the PCR test. https://youtu.be/FEMNAZ_0JX0?si=3giKqHRVWN8sTYCD …for starters…

By: CathyV

CathyV — Sun, 04 Feb 2024 20:16:40 +0000

In reply to Karen. Exactly! It's about depopulation with the hype to incentivize taking the kill shot. Conspiracy to murder Americans and people globally.

By: Karen

Karen — Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:45:54 +0000

Pcr is not a detection test…..its an amplification test…..it cannot diagnose anything…..come on…..

By: Karen

Karen — Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:43:12 +0000

It’s not about a virus its about global takeover by the elite….come on wake up you lot…the PCR was just the tool used so they could produce FEAR across the globe ready for the genocidal jab….its not a vaccine….the PCR only picks up debris in the system of the human body which is why you can PCR test your dog, the pavement, an apple banana etc etc and they’ll come back positive……if your not awake now you never will be…..

By: Mark

Mark — Wed, 07 Jul 2021 12:55:54 +0000

In reply to ZenPriest. Superb comment.

By: Love Liberty

Love Liberty — Wed, 31 Mar 2021 17:24:56 +0000

There is a difference between having virus in you (which the test is very sensitive at detecting) and having a disease. The test does produce a small number of false positives and that can be a problem if no one actually has the virus. In that extreme all the positives would be false ones. But if lots of people have the virus then the small number of false positives don't matter much. If you want to diagnose a disease, proof they have the virus is just part of the process. What makes any of that an admission of something bad? I really don't get what you are seeing.

By: Jude

Jude — Mon, 22 Feb 2021 00:35:35 +0000

In reply to ZenPriest. in what way did you separate? Pl explain. I’m interested.

By: Nick

Nick — Mon, 01 Feb 2021 18:57:10 +0000

In reply to Willem. The laziness too Instead of doing proper clinical diagnosis,they just blamed this new disease. They've been doing this for years

By: Mon

Mon — Mon, 01 Feb 2021 05:32:54 +0000

In reply to Digger. God damn these evil mongers.