Comments on: The Forbidden Question

By: dimami

dimami — Thu, 04 Sep 2025 15:29:15 +0000

Thank you Todd and Thank you off-guardian.org for highlighting this.
The unsafe and effective!!! seems to accelerated pre existing conditions.

By: C.M.

C.M. — Sun, 24 Aug 2025 21:23:07 +0000

This is highly interesting, without question.

The damage that the vaxx has done and is doing makes me wonder — given that they know that most people are onto the “fake pandemic” thing now — I wonder why they at least appear to be planning another one. (Reportedly for October or November.) What twist can explain why they think they’d get away with it?

I suggest that in addition to analyzing the facts and consequences of the vaxx, etc., that we also consider alternate hypotheses that don’t rely on anything so far evident. The bad guys always surprise the world by doing something we never saw coming. They have almost certainly been using their own, much more advanced version of AI, to design all their plays for them.

Here’s one (disturbing) fictional premise, as an example, among other things we might come up with, including the possibility that there won’t even be another pandemic despite appearances:

https://theunexpectedworld.substack.com/p/pandemic-triplecross-the-end-of-all

“Pandemic Triplecross” – The End of All Truth and the Greatest Perfect Crime of All TimeFictional premise: What if the people who ran the world figured out a way to disappear all voices of opposition in a single stroke, all while appearing to be completely innocent of any crime at all?
“It is a simple and ingenious two-step that accomplishes, essentially, the selective disappearance of all voices of truth at once. All without guns or roundups or camps or killing. Everyone will say nature did it, and that will be the end of it, and that will also be the end of the world as we know it.“

By: Todd Hayen

Todd Hayen — Thu, 21 Aug 2025 22:08:28 +0000

In reply to Pam. Moi?

By: Manfred Johann Schmuckers

Manfred Johann Schmuckers — Thu, 21 Aug 2025 20:04:17 +0000

And then:
–
Breaking the silence: Recognizing post-vaccination syndrome
https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440%2825%2901864-X
Matthew Halmaa ∙ Joseph Varon
Helyon – Review article – Volume 11, Issue 11e43478
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e43478
June 2025
–
A beginning.
One concern of the autors however seems to be at the center of the observation – an excerpt and one paper to it:
–
” … 2.1 Public perception and vaccine hesitancy
Concerns about vaccine safety have contributed to an increase in vaccine hesitancy, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic, and extending to other vaccines besides Covid-19 [126]. Trust in scientists and medical authorities has decreased since the pandemic, possibly making future public health measures more challenging [127,128].
One oft-cited reason for vaccine hesitancy is the possibility for vaccine adverse events [129–131]. This safety concern has persisted despite consistent messaging on the safety of vaccines by health authorities. One German survey revealed that 42 % of vaccine-hesitant survey participants desired a greater level of detailed and numerical information on vaccine side effects [132] *). Communicating with certainty, as opposed to acknowledging uncertainty around vaccine risks, can produce unintended and unwanted backfiring [133].
Vaccine hesitancy may be alleviated by no-fault compensation schemes for vaccine injury which assure potential vaccinees that if a rare serious adverse event occurs, they will be able to access medical care and compensation [134,135]. In practice, however, the process can take years, has a low success rate, and can be laborious. As mentioned previously, the average time to complete the initial eligibility check and medical review for the CICP was 24 months [111].
Perceived health risks are one of the primary reasons for vaccine hesitancy [136]. These concerns may potentially be allayed by providing accessible compensation for rare vaccine injuries when they occur [134,135].
–
*) Here the German survey and their concerns.
–
132.
The impact of nontransparent health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine-hesitant people’s perception of vaccines
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256829/full
Odette Wegwarth, Ralph Hertwig, Helge Giese, Harvey V. Fineberg
– Heisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-Based Decisions, Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
– Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany
– Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, United States
Front. Public Health – Sec. Public Health Education and Promotion – Volume 11 – 2023
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256829
08 January 2024
–
And so we may convince the hestitant people educating themselve to get a clear stance in regards to vaccines by simply rejecting them.
All of them – as “Vaccines” are a fraud.

By: Manfred Johann Schmuckers

Manfred Johann Schmuckers — Thu, 21 Aug 2025 19:59:15 +0000

Let me introduce recent discoveries confirming Your observations - First Peer-Reviewed Paper Defines COVID-19 Vaccine-Induced “Turbo Cancer” https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/first-peer-reviewed-paper-defines „For the first time, “turbo cancers” move from censorship into the peer-reviewed medical literature.“ Nicolas Hulscher, MPH - Aug 19, 2025 ... introducing COVID-19 mRNA-Induced "Turbo Cancers" https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/articles/v01n03a02/ ... in full https://journalofindependentmedicine.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/ima-jim-v01-n03-a02-covid-19-mrna-induced-turbo-cancers.pdf Paul Marik, Justus Hope J Indep Med 2025 Vol. 1 No. 3 https://doi.org/10.71189/JIM/2025/V01N03A02 Published: August 12, 2025 - And before: Les vaccins ARNm anti-COVID peuvent induire le cancer de 17 manières distinctes selon plus de 100 études https://lepointcritique.fr/2025/06/19/vaccins-arnm-anti-covid-peuvent-induire-cancer-de-17-manieres-distinctes-selon-plus-de-100-etudes/ Mathilde Debord | 19 juin 2025 ... introduced ... 17 Ways mRNA Shots May Cause Cancer, According to Over 100 Studies https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/17-ways-mrna-shots-may-cause-cancer "Comprehensive literature review reveals how mRNA injections may induce, accelerate, or reactivate cancer through 17 distinct pathways." Nicolas Hulscher, MPH - Jun 25, 2025 ... and interpreted incl. the 100+ references. COVID mRNA shots may induce cancer in 17 distinct ways based on over 100 studies! https://www.soniaelijah.com/p/covid-mrna-shots-may-induce-cancer Sonia Elijah - Jun 28, 2025

By: Pam

Pam — Thu, 21 Aug 2025 13:16:50 +0000

You should see a competent psychiatrist yourself, covidiot!!!

By: judith

judith — Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:13:50 +0000

In reply to Blunt Gaper.

My YES was agreeing that these doctors come up with the best excuses.

And that maybe the grandson did develop his eczema from an allergic reactin to his mother’s breast milk – if indeed his mother had had the cvid jab during her pregnancy.

I remember one of the first things that Dr. Peter McCullough was adamant about at the beginning of the injection roll-out –

DON’T get the cvid shot if you are breastfeeding.

By: Todd Hayen

Todd Hayen — Wed, 20 Aug 2025 03:21:49 +0000

In reply to J. Dena. Thank you...

By: Todd Hayen

Todd Hayen — Wed, 20 Aug 2025 03:20:35 +0000

In reply to RKae. I do this all of the time, and never knew I should use brackets. Thanks for the tip.