All of this combines to make me think it won’t be long now before the Israel script fully flips and they become “the bad guy”.

I’ve been thinking that for some time, now. The controlled right have grown much more open in their criticisms of Israel. It is becoming acceptable to see Israel as the bad guy. Even the narrative about the Holocaust (Israel’s default justification for massacring Arabs) is now starting to be questioned: it’s known Tucker Carlson reads and has shared the work of David Cole, the Jewish journalist who made a sceptical documentary about Auschwitz.

If Americans were finally to see what Israel has been doing and what Zionism is all about, they’d be war-mad. And if it is finally revealed to the masses that Israel was behind 9/11, it would quite probably spell the end of the Israeli state.

More like slaves of the West following the slave religion from the Middle East..

The second reason is practical. To effect control you need people to do the “wet work”: i.e. to crush dissent via mass arrests and kill or incarcerate large numbers of non-compliant individuals. Just running an automated social credit system with QR code access won’t cut it. And even if it did, there are enough folks out there with angle grinders and sledge-hammers to derail the system!

It looks to me that people offline are coming around to seeing it could have been a hoax now. I reckon it was purposely meant to be a sloppy hoax though, and as many people are saying: we’ve definitely entered false flag season.

I’m down-voting myself as I’ve realised I was wrong about Icke in this instance: I got Charlie Kirk confused with Ian Carroll, duh! (told you I didn’t know who Kirk was until the incident, and I plainly don’t know who Carroll is either)! To be fair though, Icke STILL hasn’t come out and said that the Kirk thing could be a hoax which is definitely suspect – him being in ‘lockstep’ with all the other so-called alternative media shows them for the controlled opposition that they all are (one of the few good things to come out of this psyop is outing all the shills we suspected)!

Again to warn: cookies are refused with “Learn More” -> “Disagree to All”. The dumb ads are from wordpress.

“…creative pursuits, community engagement, and uniquely human activities like care, emotional support, and philosophical exploration.”

How similar it is to the activities of Internet societies (especially with regard to the extremely acute problems that have emerged one after another and intertwined with each other in recent years, which at the same time have increased and upgraded these human phenomena.. Data, reactions, blocks of data interconnected… Almost, as recently the head of Iran’s Ministry of Communications and Knowledge Economy described to the triple-covid-vaccinated (on TV) Ayatollah Khamenei their new national AI system as “It is like a living being and needs to be constantly updated.” I like them more than Americans and “Israelis” – I have a penchant for the Persian Empire – and that’s why I quote them, otherwise Americans and East Asians are the undisputed erudites in the field.

And besides, the human brain is extremely much more energy efficient than AI, I forgot exactly how it was… For the same tasks, “the brain uses energy as much as electricity light bulb, 20-30 watts, while AI uses many more”… Here, just some random search engine results (I’m lazy right now):
https://blog.neurozone.com/energy-efficiency-in-artificial-and-biological-intelligence
“The human brain is a marvel of energy efficiency. One group of researchers illustrates this well. With roughly 100 billion neurons, it uses just 12 watts of power—less than an average light bulb. In contrast, the energy requirements for AI systems are staggering. A typical laptop processor needs about 150 watts, while the world’s fastest supercomputers use over 21 million watts for all their applications – one of which is simulating AI. According to estimates based on Switzerland’s Blue Brain Project, simulating a human brain’s thought processes would require around 2.7 billion watts. This makes our organic brains many million times more energy-efficient than current AI systems.
This vast difference in energy consumption suggests that developing general AI, which can think as flexibly and creatively as humans, would require overcoming significant energy challenges. While the idea of an “AI takeover” stirs debate, the sheer power demands of such systems make this scenario unlikely in the near future.
…
Another advantage humans hold is the ability to work together to generate truly innovative solutions. When individuals collaborate effectively, they often achieve results that exceed the sum of their parts. The combined effort of a team of people, each bringing their unique perspectives and skills, can generate creative and intuitive solutions that even the most advanced AI, for all its prowess with calculation and data analysis, currently struggle to achieve. This collective creative intelligence, driven by the energy efficiency of multiple human brains, offers a formidable counterpoint to the capabilities of AI. The challenge, of course, is to create the right kind of team dynamic so that collective human intelligence can thrive.“

https://blog.neurozone.com/artificial-intelligence-biological-intelligence-and-the-power-of-emergent-flow
“..the future of leadership lies not in resisting AI, but in strategically weaving it into human systems to amplify creativity, trust, and resilience..while AI mirrors our decision-making, it still can’t match the embodied flow and emergent intelligence of human teams. For leaders in the AI era, the key isn’t competition—it’s integration.
Discover how to lead high-performance human–AI hybrids:
“…
What is the one thing AI has not yet replicated, and what does it mean for leaders in high-performance environments? I believe the answer lies in emergence, interconnected embodiment, and the optimization of energy flow in biological systems. And understanding this is critical— not just for AI development, but for leadership, team performance, and the future of human collaboration.
..
Interconnected Embodied Intelligence and Emergence
The one thing AI has not yet replicated is the deeply interconnected, embodied, energy-efficient, emergent flow state that humans achieve in biological systems.
The Role of Biochemical and Physiological Interconnectedness
Unlike AI, humans do not just compute decisions—we make them within an entire physiological context, shaped by hormones, neurotransmitters, and real-time bodily states.
..
The Leadership Lesson: How to Cultivate Flow in Human Teams
AI does not self-organize into high-yield, low-energy states of emergence—but humans do. And this is why leadership matters. To lead in the Age of AI, leaders must master human flow. -Create environments where teams self-organize. -Understand the biochemical drivers of performance. -Use AI to offload cognitive load, freeing teams for creativity and intuition
A current major frontier between AI and BI [biological] is emergent intelligence through embodied flow—and that is where human potential is still unparalleled.
..
Beyond Competition: Toward Hybrid Transcendence
Where does this leave us? I believe leadership in the Age of AI is not about opposing biological intelligence to artificial intelligence. It is about integration. To form a hybrid. AI offers unprecedented capabilities—relieving cognitive load, processing vast data streams, and optimizing repetitive tasks. When used wisely, AI does not replace human intelligence; it scaffolds it. It frees teams to redirect their energy toward intuition, creativity, and collective emergence.

Leaders who embrace this integrative strategy will cultivate hybrid systems where biological interconnectedness and technological capability synergize. By building environments where human teams self-organize into high-yield flow states—and by strategically using AI as an extension of perception, not a replacement for connection—leaders can catalyze a transcendence of collective intelligence. This is not just survival; it is amplification. The next era may well belong to those who can weave AI into the biological fabric of living systems, creating teams that adapt, cohere, and thrive at scales we are only beginning to imagine.“
—
…Obama, the left is becoming more and more extreme, Trump1, the left is becoming more and more extreme, culture wars, “pandemic”, “vaccines” – debates, debates, the 100-covid theses, the stolen elections, the rise of the far left (trans, antiwhite) + the struggle for the salvation of normalcy (activism to resist), Ukraine (Putin started the struggle of the century), Gaza, “The Savior’s Return” after 101 difficulty levels (and a ketchup-Pennsylvania show)…

I recently read, they say that the first war on available social networks was Syria.(Smartphones also rised somewhere there, shortly before that, 2010, if I’m not mistaken?) Then there was Maidan2013-2014(Feb.). This was a real real one, you know – a bunch of counter-establishment (only counter-west, not counter-Russian, actually 99% pro-Russian) investigators confirmed it. “Then we took the right and fair position (on the Russian side, “as the facts showed”), but after the plandemic no longer – there we again took the right position against all outrages, including Russian.”
That kind of thing.
https://e4everi.wordpress.com/2025/09/09/what-at-the-end-of-2014-did-the-president-of-the-last-guardian-of-the-orthodox-faith-and-traditional-values-propose/

But, as we constantly see, here, too, for example as in this thread starting here, there is absolutely no problem with length, the problem is in what is considered valuable and important, and the collision with the unknown, which contradicts and sometimes changes pictures that we are used to and comfortable with. Because this happens on the Internet, it looks even worse: people rather feel the (their places in) Internet as their physical home, where it is more important than anything else to feel comfortable (hence the low ratings + lack of ratings for violations of the space order).

Here’s an example of a small relatively democratic virtual community, people who communicate decentrallized, using an evaluation system, and so on… People have their say and decide; What could be better?
(Later – just as it has become much more pleasant now compared to the Internet in the beginning – after the nowdays pre-neuroweb, it will get even better, with new, even more pleasant levels of communication, opening up new possibilities…)