“Device-Level” Nudity Detection: UK Gov’t Blackmailing Public into Digital ID
Kit Knightly
British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced plans, in a speech earlier today, to introduce “device-level controls” that will prevent children from viewing, sending or taking naked photographs:
This government will not stand by while children are put at risk online.
Today I am calling on the tech companies to introduce device-level controls to prevent children from taking, sharing or viewing nude images.
And if they don’t act, we will.
— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 8, 2026
According to Justice Minister Catherine Atkinson, the UK will become “the first country where it will be impossible for children to take, share or view naked pictures”
The UK will be the first country where it will be impossible for children to take, share or view naked pictures, a justice minister tells @LeahBoleto.
The government says tech companies must stop this happening within three months or they’ll be forced to act through legislation. pic.twitter.com/ZQ3MWobQ2X
— Sky News (@SkyNews) June 8, 2026
The only way this is even close to enforceable is if one or more of the following measures are in place:
- You must verify your age by linking your digital devices to your ID.
- You must allow the government – or whatever private third-party agency the government employs – access to your phone’s data and files at all times.
- You must allow third-party software to scan every attempted photo.
It means “nudity detection” on every app on the device, at all times. There’s literally no other way of doing it. From the government’s website earlier today [emphasis added]:
Apple recently introduced age checks for iPhone users, making it the first company to activate safety features by default for those who are not verified as over 18. This is a significant step forward following the government’s commitments to work with industry, and one this announcement builds on.
Despite this, the nudity detection is not applied to the camera or broader apps, third-party messaging services, or search functions, meaning children can still take, view, share and save nude images. The government therefore wants Apple and Google to block nudity across the whole device by default
…but don’t worry, just verify your age via digital ID or biometrics or whatever, and the government won’t look at your internet history or share your nudes.
Over-18s will still be able to view adult content by providing proof of age.
It’s the basest of blackmail, that’s all.
The UK government wants to make it mandatory that everybody verifies their age by linking their ID to their smartphones or other digital devices.
That’s ALL they want.
We all know what this is really about.
Thanks for reading...
You can help us keep doing what we do. Every little helps and is hugely appreciated.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
I am not sure their claim is correct anyway. There are plenty of nations where all forms of pornography are outright banned even for adults. Presumably even access to ‘nude pictures’ by minors would be impossible, and taking and sharing of private photos would be very harshly dealt with.
Starmer wants stricter online regulations to piss-off Musk – Musk has spoken out about things in England – like the murder of Henry Nowak – the latest attempted beheading in NI by a Somali man (covered up by the BBC) will play right into Musks, and Hegseth’s hands.
Gee, I wonder if there is a device, or perhaps an app, that could encourage British police to check for “stab wounds” when they have been informed of such?
OT:
Notwacked
https://francisoneill.substack.com/p/the-big-picture-548
OT
BBC lying and mocking you at the same time.
So who will be liable?…
https://dumptheguardian.com/society/2026/jun/09/doctors-nhs-could-be-sued-mistakes-ai-tools-medical-protection-society-report
The machine will be liable. The machine did it and is responsible. Beat it, condemn it, and hang it. Problem resolved.
Part of the “AI is shit, don’t worry” psyop
The military level AI is unlikely to be shit
You missed man. BECAUSE AI is military, AI is corrupt shit.
What do military do?
Military kill, murder, wound, disable, dismember, destabilise, “the enemy”.
Military develop lethal weapons, kinetic warfare, psy-op warfare, bio warfare, chem warfare, against “the enemy”.
Military is a death cult. Civil life and civilisation is alive living
But once they have collected all the kids and parents proving they are not kids faces along with there address and phone numbers and bank details. What could possibly go wrong.Will they be able to keep the data safe. The simple answer is no .So they are hoovering up all the data that can then be used for all sorts of things. From selling stuff they don’t need, online gambling , lots of scams one of purchases or free gifts with hidden contracts and subscriptions that they cant cancel and other nasty stuff. Meanwhile the kids are more computer savvy than there parents and find away around the verification some time involving dodgy apps designed to steal even more not to mention secretly downloading stuff to your phone or computer that can be used to entrap or blackmail you,
It’s all as predictable as sliced bread now… they’re not even trying to hide their intentions, and yes, those of us on here and other alternative media sites know what their agenda is really about, however, I’m sure there’s still quite a lot of people out there who actually believe this is about keeping children safe, because, you know, governments everywhere really care about the safety of children. And at the same time as wanting to keep children safe, the UK Government is allowing weapons to be manufactured there and sold to Izrahell that is killing vast numbers of children in Palestine and now Lebanon. Maybe only some children in certain parts of the world are more important than others? The bottom line is they want everyone to get digital identity to be able to go online. Problem Reaction Solution. I’m surprised the eSafety Commissioner in Australia, Julie Inman Grant, who previously worked in senior managerial positions at Microsoft and was once offered a job at the CIA hasn’t thought of this. We are living through very surreal times.
Here are some words of wisdom for those Folks who are interested, curious, searching or looking for a path to take in these weird times:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/becoming-architect-your-love/5929101
No bullshit, just the simple Truth.
Saved !
(not me, just the link !)
Unless you are purest of prudes there is probably some type of porn you’ve looked at that you don’t want other people to know about. So this is a way to blackmail EVERYONE
Interesting angle. Give the entire population carte blanche to look at whatever they want for a couple of decades and then, through ominous insinuation, suggest that everyone could have “items of interest” on their history files, thus terrifying them into submission. As if the whole world has become a kind of cheapskate polystyrene virtual variation on Epstein Island.
Apple recently introduced
In the covid frenzy era, Apple claimed that it was introducing a hardware block on pedophelia. So, either that failed or this new announcement is a distraction.
Think of the children…. Powermongers appealing to people’s welfare with this ploy are often otherwise busy bombing them into oblivion or robbing working families of resources. And recalling Henry Kissinger’s observation that power is the ultimate aphrodisiac, one might also wonder how many pedos are striking another pose on top of that.
Detecting nudity sounds like a good thing. The neighbor’s kid detected it under his father’s bed in a pile of magazines.
Over a couple of decades The Authorities captured and stored six
million datum of Jeffrey Epstein’s – data, you can bet, Jeffrey felt was
Private, even Quite Secure from Snoops… Imagine how much of yours,
and everyone else’s data, They have collected and stored, and you’ll
realize why They need THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of data
storage centers…
The Moral ? If you dont want your energy and water bills to skyrocket
dont give Them reasons to build MORE AND MORE data centers. ok…
And now for some real news: 24 Indian sailors rescued from ship hit by U.S. missile
This happened yesterday close to Duqm far from the straight of Hormuz.
If Kit’s piece didn’t make you laugh, this one will:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-09/happiness-index-shows-we-were-more-satisfied-in-covid-pandemic/106764966
This piece was penned by a member of the Chosen.
Is that just a coincidence or am I being paranoid and/or anti you know who?
Children today must be a damned depraved lot !! Watching ‘online
porn’, sending ‘nudies’ to each other !! Wot Next !?
Is it only only White Children whom the government believes are
Decadent, who need Protecting from themselves ?
Ludicrous level of totalitarianism. They can’t possibly have thought this out and how people will eventually react. We are at peak “leader” stupidity and someone is feeding them braindead stupid ideas.
There is an easy answer to this. Smartphones are adult only, kids get flip phones, both purchased at brick & mortar shops where age checking can take place. Laptops for kids have only Library access to the net, just as schools implement. Parents will have to police this at home. Period.
I just read a piece where an open source guy said building a parallel internet is totally possible, so bifurcation should be a no-brainer. Then read below Goggle’s hyper totalitarian upcoming menu item. Off the charts insane…
https://dailysceptic.org/2026/06/05/googles-new-captcha-plans-will-create-a-two-tier-internet-only-accessible-to-those-with-approved-devices/
Why ‘bifurcate’ when the Corparasites can MONOPOLIZE.
After all, that is their mantra.
Wonderful – a boost to the digital camera industry. People walking around with real (digital) cameras, leaving their phones at home or swapping them for dumb phones (can those still be purchased?).
Though what will happen if we want to post our photos of beautiful wildlife/plants or artworks on social media via our computers, I wonder….
Better still, do the kids of today have a work-around for what’s coming?
IT giant Meta (at least) wants you to buy glasses that scan and label everyone and everything around. That means more accidents. The earlier Google glasses may have failed.
Protecting the children? How wonderful it is one of Dame Kweir’s priorities.
He knew the man for the job who could fix it.
Yep, the world is getting safer and safer every year.
And such a snappy dresser 😖
“Rule Britannia! Britania rule the waves!
Britons never never shall be slaves.”
Pinocchio: “I want to be a real boy!”
10-year-old Keir Starmer: “I want to be a puppet!”
And both children got their wishes and lived happily ever after.
Yeah, but whose nose grew the longest?
Isnt it just the old “This film is prohibited under 16 years”, “Adult movie”, “warning…contain scenes…….”, and the like?
I praise any sweeping out of dirty porn and bad films. If children are denied or have difficulty to access these, this could have a good influence on adults too.
This is not a hill I would die for.
Very twisted English (die ‘for’ a hill ? I think the expression goes otherwise) but I understand it, Erik : you would like to ban whatever you don’t like or you think is bad for the others. What happens with the Christian ‘free will’ that the Lord giveth us ? I am just ‘pushing your leg’ if you know what I mean. I very seldom interact with other participants and very seldom go back to see if anyone replied so you can write what you want, maybe I will read it, maybe not 😁
I note you have not observed the article and the case is about children.
“Free will” is for adults and not for children.
As an responsible adult I feel called to support this case here on behalf of all children, and some inconvenience for the do-gooder leftists who are in it for ‘freedom’ – dont bother me 😊 .
You are always welcome to pull my leg. I deserve it.
After puberty I stop calling them children, even without online porn they do what they do. The young ones can be protected by their parents by not buying them phones.
So, you’re looking forward to putting your mug online (facial recognition/age verification) in order for you to be able to post or view some photos?
Never ever. I also avoid subscriptions. In a few cases I subscribed on some “alternative progressive” hero sites, but regretted it later on.
If important key information has to hide behind subscription m.m. maybe it is not so important.
If it one day becomes norm with face and voice and ID to participate on Internet I will give it up completely, and love to be without all this digital shit.
I really dont like it as it is an artificial substitute for human interaction.
Yet travesties of child sexual abuse undertaken by high profile public figures go largely unpunished, if not altogether ignored…
Good job government. You do a fine job exploiting public trust and public investment; now you’re monetizing on societal control.