VIDEO: The Latest Wikileaks a Bridge Too Far for Hillary's backers?

Chapter 1 of Noam Chomsky’s “Masters Of Mankind” very much speaks to this. (I have to look into ‘this’ more. Still…) He quotes Barrington Moore (who I want to look into more closely) who talked about the vile “predominant voice of America at home and abroad” and discussed the attitude of the 1% toward their rule and our (99%’s) place in ‘their’ world. Chomsky notes that “In Moore’s informed judgment, the system “has considerable flexibility and room for manuever, including strategic retreat.”” (pg 22) Perhaps that’s what we are seeing here. (italics mine)
The 1% and it’s tools are insane, but not lacking cleverness. By chance (let’s say), they have not yet blown themselves and the whole world to smithereens. Given time, and no intervention from a higher power, they would no doubt do so.

Wow! Interesting. Horrifying. Much to think about here.
*I recently applied Microsoft updates and after, I have had more trouble than ever logging on here. At one stage, I’m aksed for an OG / WP log in and password and given the option to have that page remember me. I check it every time and it doesn’t stick. I understand that OG is overhauling it’s site. I will try to patiently wait for that. But boy o boy!

A I see it, the charge and the spark were generated, quite deliberately. An insider outside bet on the ‘big man’ for the people. The shock was genuine for the mainstream establishment – just as in an orchestrated Crash – where again the charge is set up by which to harness the discharge by insider, insiders who are only riding on the folly of others – in their eyes.
There is no reason to expect ‘democracy’ to be given even a possibility of upset to the core agenda of such deeply established power structures – in which so many are invested and have become dependent – even if just for the managed ‘reality’ of ‘freedom and democracy and protection against the bad stuff. But discharge and re-adjustments can be effected in seismic steps
Managing this re-defining narrative as a populism vs globalism paints populism in smear and fear associations while using its ‘elected’ ‘freedom’ of ‘righteous’ change to pass the laws that suit. Make the globalism seem sane – and if it were a more holistic diversity of free willing cooperation rather than a wielding of corporates by shadow financiers with armies of lawyers – then it would be sane – because a global communication and transportation network does oblige us to communicate in ways that the old world insulated from. But the ‘old world’ only sees ‘new wine’ as something to bottle and sell – or weaponize.
How to ‘read’ any of what goes on as our world?
The narrative continuity of identity investment operates against the recognition of a true reality by definition. The power struggle in asserting and effecting the ‘word’ or definitional structure is the almost universal presumption or agreement that our reality is established by coercive narrative assertions that pay out as an overlay matrix upon what is already a communication of a different order – but which no one can read or recognize while engaged in their own assertive identity investment.
This mutually reinforcing pattern of oppositional conflict operates to maintain conflict AS the blocking condition to the signal of an original nature.
The fear and shame of disclosure of a powerlessness and lack of validity beneath the asserted covering cannot be overstated – for terror and rage operate the fear of loss of life and call for protection – and the rage at the sense of being denied or deceived out of one’s life by betrayal or evil of others.
Though the story-symbol of the Fall is very simple – it still holds a reflection for extremely rich and complex information within our being – not to ‘explain away’ or justify – but as a part of a willingness to look AT fragmentation of Consciousness – as a result of embodying the idea OF Coercion in deceit upon it.
Political level communication has to be engaged in as the channel of current willingness of communication (and I mean the whole spectrum of thought and act that is communication) but without being truly grounded in an integrity of being – will embody triggered reactions of learned – or unconsciously imprinted conditioning.
PERHAPS the checkmate of the situation we have knowingly or not, co-created, will raise fear to the level where we no longer invest allegiance in its fragmented and fragmenting mind-set – but awaken a deeper curiosity as to who we are, what we truly want, and why we are not living from such an intimate sense of our presence – and aware of that also as the truth of others.

No, she lost because of her previous actions. She is a certified warmonger, elitist and demogogue. She also treats democratic processes with contempt. How else do you explain the Sanders debacle?