Sam Sabet.
Sarcasm noted. Sorry. Did we usurp your superior position on this matter(as an American Weapons Trooper)when all we did was listen and learn from several ex US CW and explosives military experts?
Were you an ex-spurt all those years in the military(seeing as how you know so much more than those who design and test such weaponry)?
Which field of expertise with regards CW and explosives, did you contribute to, you forgot to mention that particular qualification?
Many thanks for your substantive comment.
Susan O’Neill
(That’s Mohandeer for ex spurts like yourself)

I guess all my years as an Air Force weapons troop doesn’t equate to the knowledge all of you have regarding chemical weapons. But hey…you say your the expert…personally I think your all ex and just a little bit of spurt. Oh, please call me an idiot to my face, please…I’m not hiding behind a screen name like you???

How do you wanna know from one short article with a precise topic, if someone, more generally “turn a blind eye to the flaws in one person while highlighting them in another.”, do you not see you are absurd? You simply do not have the material base for such a statement.
And if these guys WERE incapable to face the tzar side of Putin, which you do not know, the fact of showing the truth in the given context, still is worthwhile. Since the mainstream media 100% do what you criticize, namely lie and turn a blind eye, two blind eyes, blindness in itself. So some alternative is helpfull, if we miss the better, people able to face the dark side of all parts.

Aaron Lowe – You are off topic. Simple as that. There is no demonisation here, and there is not praise for one or the other side. There are fact. Everybody knows that Assad NEVER threw chemical bombs to which population, everybody knows that the white helmets have always played the role of puppets for creating false scenarios, and not real fighters. NOTHING new about that.
As to the West — as long as you identify the poor West to the propaganda machines which produces mostly lies, when it comes to topics like Syria, for instance: FORGIVE me, this is entanglement in decadence, the West still has much better sides to itself. So stop these simplifications, please.

Aaron Lowe: First paragraph “it’s about truth”. Second paragraph: “Oh no it isn’t.”

yeah let’s just continue lying to ourselves about the facts. The opposition to the MSM should be extreme. They deserve to be demonized. in fact, in my view, they should be prosecuted.

AGAIN, “the people” do not love violence.
WALL STREET loves violence, the small segment of the pupulation that invest that are in the entrenched power elite – both Democrat and Republican. No lies now.
That the SOROS owned MSM, Hollywood, et al make violent content is NOT a reflection on “the people”. Many of the films nowadays do very poorly both in theater releases and video sales.
Sports is also doing poorly in the U.S. when you view ticket sales. On the other hand, other countries sports are much more highly attended and much more rampantly violent.
AGAIN stop telling lies and using smoke an mirrors to obfuscate the truth. It’s demeaning and denigrating to all people. Or, is this last your sole intention?

Yes, that’s a common use of the term demonise, but there are more subtle ways to demonise, like to turn a blind eye to the flaws in one person while highlighting them in another.
I’ve yet to see anyone point out one article I can read that shows a balanced view.

And pointing out that someone has lied is not “demonising” .
Demonising means to use unfair or untrue allegations to blacken someone’s reputation. If a person lies and has his lies pointed out he is NOT being demonised.
Ooookay?