The Western media refute their own lies on Syria
by Michel Chossudovsky, 7 April 2017, globalresearch.ca
The Western media refute their own lies.
Not only do they confirm that the Pentagon has been training the terrorists in the use of chemical weapons, they also acknowledge the existence of a not so secret “US-backed plan to launch a chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime”
London’s Daily Mail in a 2013 article confirmed the existence of an Anglo-American project endorsed by the White House (with the assistance of Qatar) to wage a chemical weapons attack on Syria and place the blame of Bashar Al Assad.
The following Mail Online article was published and subsequently removed. Note the contradictory discourse: “Obama issued warning to Syrian president Bashar al Assad”, “White House gave green light to chemical weapons attack”.
This Mail Online report published in January 2013 was subsequently removed from Mail Online. For further details click here
The Pentagon’s Training of “Rebels” (aka Al Qaeda Terrorists) in the Use of Chemical Weapons
CNN accuses Bashar Al Assad of killing his own people while also acknowledging that the “rebels” are not only in possession of chemical weapons, but that these “moderate terrorists” affiliated with Al Nusra are trained in the use of chemical weapons by specialists on contract to the Pentagon.
In a twisted logic, the Pentagon’s mandate was to ensure that the rebels aligned with Al Qaeda would not acquire or use WMD, by actually training them in the use of chemical weapons (sounds contradictory):
“The training [in chemical weapons], which is taking place in Jordan and Turkey, involves how to monitor and secure stockpiles and handle weapons sites and materials, according to the sources. Some of the contractors are on the ground in Syria working with the rebels to monitor some of the sites, according to one of the officials.The nationality of the trainers was not disclosed, though the officials cautioned against assuming all are American. CNN, December 09, 2012, (emphasis added)
c
The above report by CNN’s award winning journalist Elise Labott (relegated to the status a CNN blog), refutes CNN’s numerous accusations directed against Bashar Al Assad.
Who is doing the training of terrorists in the use of chemical weapons? From the horse’s mouth: CNN
Sources: U.S. helping underwrite Syrian rebel training on securing chemical weapons
And these are the same terrorists (trained by the Pentagon) who are the alleged target of Washington’s counterterrorism bombing campaign initiated by Obama in August 2014:
What is unfolding is a diabolical scenario –which is an integral part of military planning– namely a situation where opposition terrorists advised by Western defense contractors are actually in possession of chemical weapons.
This is not a rebel training exercise in non-proliferation. While president Obama states that “you will be held accountable” if “you” (meaning the Syrian government) use chemical weapons, what is contemplated as part of this covert operation is the possession of chemical weapons by the US-NATO sponsored terrorists, namely “by our” Al Qaeda affiliated operatives, including the Al Nusra Front which constitutes the most effective Western financed and trained fighting group, largely integrated by foreign mercenaries. In a bitter twist, Jabhat al-Nusra, a US sponsored “intelligence asset”, was recently put on the State Department’s list of terrorist organizations.
The West claims that it is coming to the rescue of the Syrian people, whose lives are allegedly threatened by Bashar Al Assad. The truth of the matter is that the Western military alliance is not only supporting the terrorists, including the Al Nusra Front, it is also making chemical weapons available to its proxy “opposition” rebel forces.
The next phase of this diabolical scenario is that the chemical weapons in the hands of Al Qaeda operatives will be used against civilians, which could potentially lead an entire nation into a humanitarian disaster.
The broader issue is: who is a threat to the Syrian people? The Syrian government of Bashar al Assad or the US-NATO-Israel military alliance which is recruiting “opposition” terrorist forces, which are now being trained in the use of chemical weapons.” (Michel Chossudovsky, May 8, 2013, minor edit)
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
The britam hacked documents etc, can be found here.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/drive/share?ie=UTF8&s=G6_SxjA3RnEpXfvn8WZ8Aw
You can certainly see your enthusiasm in the article you
write. The world hopes for more passionate writers like you who
aren’t afraid to say how they believe. All the time go after your heart.
We have a quaint convention in the UK parliament that all MPs behaviour is ‘honourable’ and you can in fact be thrown out of the House of Commons for implying any fellow MP has behsved dishonorably?
In that situstion, Jeremy Corbyn should ask the PM the following question:
‘Would the Prime Minister confirm thst no member of the UK Government, Civil Service, Armed Forces or Security Services have had any part to play in facilitating the supply of chemical weapons to Syrian rebel groups, nor in training such groups in their use? Would she further confirm that, in the absence of being able to supply categorical assurances on this matter that she and Mr Speaker consider illegal supply of chemical weapons to the Middle East to be honourable behaviour, since I have no wish to breach the long standing traditions of this House?
That should put Mrs May in a right pickle, as it is also tradition that any Minister who lies to Parliament must resign without discussion……
“The Western media refute their own lies.”
All media does this to some degree because all humans do this to some degree. You can tell when’s human is lying because they are claiming to tell the truth.
Many thanks Vaska, a timely article well worth circulating.
The truth will out. Thank you for keeping your eye on the ball and excellent record keeping.