are geiger counters still banned at ‘ground zero’?

hard to believe i’ve witnessed the death of the human mind in my lifetime. sadly the body follows soon thereafter…vaccines

talking about disinfo: http://aitia.fr/erd/les-associations-pour-la-verite-sur-le-11-septembre-la-cherchent-elles-vraiment/
use google translate if you don’t speak french..
english subtitles available: http://aitia.fr/erd/le-11-septembre-une-mine-pour-les-physiciens/

Monbiot is ‘generably reliable’ these days ONLY in pushing the Fraudian line, in regard to the jihadist war on Syria and the White Helmet butchers in particular. He has sold out, but the arrogant presumption remains the same. I see him ending up at The Spectator or somewhere similar, after the Fraudian is euthanised.

Monbiot has sold out on numerous fronts, no doubt a required stance at the Fraudian. His position re. the White Helmets jihadist butchers is DESPICABLE, but he brings his customary arrogance to the task of defending child murderers.

i agree, it is you opinion, nothing more. facts and only facts matter. Veterans Today has published many papers about 9/11 false flag. the disinfo are the stories about the Little Grey Ones or anything nuts.
the nuclear attack at Nuked York City on september 11, 2001 is proved by hard-evidence. up to you to cross the rubicon or to stay with only thermite and regular explosives.
ae911truth is not able to answer to the following questions, or they ignore them which make them a scam!
http://www.911memorial4kids.org/911_flyer/911_flyer_en.pdf
http://911history.de/aaannxyz_ch08_en.html
at the bottom: questions to ae911
how do you explain – without a nuclear charge – the formation of a mushroom cloud over Building 7, towering one mile above the City?
how do you explain – without a nuclear charge – the formation of a vortex in the mushroom cloud over Building 7?
how do you explain – without a nuclear charge – the non-conservation of angular momentum when the South Towers Top toppled over and stabilized suddenly in freefall at 15° (a nuclear charge would produce a rising fountain of material acting as a stopping bolt)?
how do you explain – without a nuclear charge – the eruption of white gases from underground, mixing with the black clouds of the Tower’s dust?
how do you explain – without a nuclear charge – the scintillation phenomena of the cameras, which started to register green dots, blue stripes etc, as soon as the fleeing cameramen were engulfed in the [e.g. radioactive] dustcloud?
have you taken into account that the primary uranium fission products (confirmed by the USGS) will nearly all decay within a few days, with the exception of modestly radioactive Zirconium)?
have you taken into account that many iron isotopes are stable an will not be activated by neutron radiation?
have you taken into account that iron will rather scatter and not absorb neutron radiation, thus NO ACTIVATION will occur?

Disinformation, designed to discredit the rational explanation of a controlled demolition.