Remember the German news editor forced in Germany to publish a fake CIA story about Gaddafi’s gas chambers? The story was completely fabricated. He had no choice but to publish it or the CIA would take his job away. Germany seems to he CIA run. Any country with a u.s. base is a vassal of Zionism.

I’d like to think that people are more sceptical and are switching from the MSM, I fear though that people are just reading the same stuff but on-line because it’s free and quicker….

Surely every one thinks their own ‘take’ but the conspiracy theory presented as the ‘official’ account is absurd – given what has been discovered since.

The term ‘conspiracy theory’ is itself a psyop term to apply to any critical exposures to what goes on beneath official narrative presentations.

On a ‘need to know’ basis along with the non disclosure contracts operating, what any participant in aligning that event know would be what they are fed, what they can see from their limited perspective, and what they feel safe to look at, think about or speak openly of.

Considering the almost TOTAL lack of political challenge or oversight to the wars and laws transpiring immediately after that event I would surmise that US Americans were triggered by ‘attack’ to first shock, then anger and revenge – and it didn’t really matter who – because Iraq had nothing to do with it. Likewise a blank cheque from the international community.

Victimhood ‘works’ in terms of directing reactions and outcomes – but at expense of collective disintegrity of investment in its framing and disinvestment of allegiance and support of those whose trust is revealed mistaken.

All theories are valid as theories, but are they supportED in fact or merely supportING of official narrative control?

In absence of direct proofs many issues become weighted with probability – along with at least a sense of conviction that what is being ‘fronted’ by the ‘authorities’ is more about their notion of personal security than any true account and response. Perhaps a full disclosure would expose elements that are considered totally unfit for public consumption by those who are insiders to secrets – but again in partitioned ‘need to know’ versions.

Whatever else I can say is that people act in what seems their best interest according to their beliefs and definition of the situation in which they find themselves. In other words the active narrative at the time is what perceptions and reactions are framed by and evil acts can be committed from a belief in averting a greater evil, or bringing forth a greater good for which cause sacrifices have to be made.

I see that living under such a mind-framing is relatively normal and so of course evil acts are relatively normal.
Now it has become ‘ok’ to kill people anywhere who MIGHT become terrorists or ‘threat to national security’ in future – along with people who happen to be in the vicinity when the drone fires.

The pre-emptive strike is a ‘post truth politic’. To in a sense Kill or degrade you BEFORE you think and do something that challenges the ‘power class’ of the intent to engineer and control humanity on a global scale. Sealed unit – no user access! You have become a disposable utility.

I sense the ideas we hold true and live from are the real issue, that powers or spheres of influence adopt and align in them is because they seem true – perhaps initially as some sort of answer to what was before. As if nationalism and religion were the evil and so all would be well once they are utterly undone as a credible or practical rival to state controlled corporately owned financially directed system of unassailable monopolar power.

And the globalist agenda is not a conspiracy in large part. Its all out in the open.

I’m all for a global cooperative but the idea of domination and control is the mind I look to leave behind me.

Every one here thinks 9/11 is officially bogus? The problem with such conspiracy theories is that they detract from the genuine hidden-in-plain-view conspiracies. We don’t need to invent more; we have enough on our plates as it is.

Yes, humiliate, shame, vilify, invalidate etc. It is a terrorism of the mind – speak out and be damned. Comply, conform or at least self censor so as to only a token ‘criticism. But often the ability to speak clearly is hampered by the way the psyop is framed.

Coercion by ‘guilting’ is always some kind of victimism – whether the victims are real or conflated or imagined or computer models and regardless of the ‘victims’ own voice, a voice takes on their cause as if a spokesperson and protector of the denied and persecuted in such a way as to reinforce victimhood and use it and them for political or corporate ends. Thus an insidious hate operates the role of the accuser of hate in the non compliant.

‘Dont go there or ELSE!!’ is the herd conditioning – and thus the mechanisms of power are hidden behind what cannot be openly discussed without risk of report and penalty – which in the age of the Net can back track to anything you have ever said should you become anyone of influence or a suitable ‘example’.

So I feel that victimism in all or any of its forms needs to be desisted from employ or acceptance – ie find a better or more honourable way than seeking to morally shame others into compliance or withdrawal of protest, and stop using emotional manipulation as the currency of exchange – which of course includes manipulation or coercion of our self.
Moral guilting is an export business. And a significant undercurrent to the appearance of moral compliance that is only held in place by fear of exclusion and not a free alignment in one’s core integrity at all.

I do not say penalty should not exist for unacceptable behaviours but the use of force as an appropriate restraint as an opportunity to re-educate, whilst also limiting further harm is not an unkindness or indeed hateful intent but it can be very firmly bounded. The idea of justice as vengeance undermines any such movement in human society and this is an example of the mutually cancelling polarities of a split mind in which two mutually opposing directions are undertaken at the same time in the same mind.

BTW The media increasingly treats people like idiots or infants such as to make satire redundant. Emotional manipulation whereby to become more passively accepting OF emotional manipulation. Questioning what is being presented rather than letting it run, is more than criticising the statements or assertions at a rational level. The post truth method bypasses the rational to work directly upon mapped out and targeted unconscious or subconscious reaction. The presumption of reasoned pursuance of a shared or common Good is no longer more than lip service under the corporate capture of all vectors of influence or ‘broad spectrum dominance’. This is abandoning our ‘Humanity’ for a split race just as H.G Wells posited in the Time Machine. Those who eat and those who are eaten.
While this can be said to have always been with us in some degree, the development of systemic control at a global level via the use of technological developments to which we have outsourced much of our own active intelligence (ie become dependent) is a critical culmination of the ‘managed scarcity, lack inducement or reinforcement, and control of the needs generated.

Perhaps there is a different order of ‘splitting’ more like a prism, in an idea for the period in which we are now living, in which different vibrational realities are in effect called forth by those who accept and align in them as their ‘chosen’ sense of self and world for the next era – and that parallel Earth realities branch off as timelines of continued but vibrationally distinct experience whereas Earth for some time has been the Planet of Choice amidst a juxtaposition of competing and conflicting identities. I cannot prove that is not so, but I feel the value of conscious choice as the way to grow a new consciousness in place of the old habit.

In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse, when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is…in some small way, to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist what’s counter to one’s best interests is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to manipulate and or control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

AwwwwWWWW…. reading comprehension problems again? Don’t sweat it, you’ve got your whole life ahead of you to correct that (I’m assuming that you’re in about the 7th grade, as evidenced by your referring to the person that you replied to just now as ‘dude’) and what you lack in reading abilities, I can see that you overly compensate with your ongoing studies into HOW TO BECOME A PEDANTIC ASSHOLE and INFLUENCE ALL THE RIGHT PEOPLE.
Good luck, sonny boy! And don’t forget to stop by later and shave your mama’s back now, hear?