What’s the capacity of Belmarsh ?

Logistically, I see no problem, mark . . .

There are many ways to notice this ate different levels but not while it operates AS a sense of power and protection or possession and control. It may not SEEM powerful and protective to the fearful – but the fear of losing even ‘the little that ye hath’ operates a ‘survival’ drive set against the nature of recognition of relationship and communication.

Mind capture is operated by the mind-blinded to effect a loss of true awareness for a fantasy gratification given power. But all dream turns to nightmare. The defence of a fantasy or self-illusion, is by definition set against true relation (of ‘what Is’) and passes off as a substitute-life seeking power of reinforcement in self validation. Mind capture is fear, born of division or conflicted self. The attempt to escape or overcome it IS its ‘power struggle’ in conflict asserted over communication.

The mind of fear invokes power from OUTSIDE to hide, deny or displace (outsource) conflict WITHIN.
Noticing and owning inner relational conflicts through a willingness to bring them to Awareness and Communication is the UNDOING of mind-capture or mind-control.

To the self-invested ‘control-mind’ undoing means death and so is defended against by every means of deceit and sown confusion by which to protect war and sickness from a true peace of healing. Running on borrowed time is the nature of using time to hide in denial. But now is where a grace of noticing rises from a different perspective than fragmentation of hate and fear. A perspective from which to recognise that what seemed real is not and never was but a ‘take’ or mistaken identity running for it’s life in its own framing.

The mind of the judgement of good and evil (angels and demons) is the personal claim, wish or assertion of power to a PRIVATE AGENDA. Once ‘invested’ one protects one’s investments as ‘self’. This applies to all form, image and symbol manipulations; what we give self to, get a self from or make identity with, is invited in like a trojan horse.

Phishing is the nature of taking the FORM of anything as its reality. This denies or blind-sides relational or contextual awareness. Without or apart from such a present awareness we KNOW NOTHING and ARE nothing but given to noise at cost of signal, and with “All the king’s horses and all the king’s men”
struggling to make and maintain sense out of nonsense or ‘put Humpty together again’.

When I write to the issue, those who seek returns on an investment in hate do not find it – and so can only NOT understand or project their fears into a misinterpretation by design.

Humankind CAN uncover its own devices of self-deceit, but only from willingness NOT to use them.
Even a moment of release from a hate and fear division can shift the quality of our day to a connected appreciation in place of a self-vindicating assertion of grievance, dressed in complex instruments by which to package and hide toxic debt or in raw hatred of war and pain of loss.

In part thanks to Bernays, such people have however been adept in manipulating the masses to rally around flag and nation, evoking an emotive misplaced sense of patriotism to pursue their militarism or justify their exploitation.

All of which makes me wonder if the system is now in real trouble. Apparently, the Royal Army officers are now being warned that “soldiers calling themselves ‘patriots’ or who make ‘inaccurate generalisations about the Left’ could be right-wing extremists in their ranks.”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7082855/British-army-officers-told-soldiers-calling-patriots-extremists.html

Are they afraid that some sort of mutiny might occur? And if they someday decide to exclude ‘patriots’ from the armed forces, who else will serve unless there’s a draft?

I don’t know if Göring had access to Bernay’s books, but apparently Goebels was a big fan: https://theconversation.com/the-manipulation-of-the-american-mind-edward-bernays-and-the-birth-of-public-relations-44393

Apologies, that was in response to USAma Bin Laden above you RE: social media being weaponised

Thats why I laughed when Zukkerbergs satellite launch last year failed and blew up a few seconds in. He said he wanted to connect the African continent to FacePalm, in a new digital era of global inter-connectedness. My first thoughts were, no you don’t, you want your satellite there, so you can control the narrative and effect regime change..