Comments on: Super Tuesday: Bernie vs The DNC – Round Two

By: stupid iriot

stupid iriot — Wed, 18 Mar 2020 02:30:12 +0000

In reply to Guy. Thank you Guy - and to you too.

By: Guy

Guy — Tue, 17 Mar 2020 21:01:21 +0000

In reply to Anonymous Bosch. You have a good point .I am late in replying but back in my home country after a break and glad as it is pandemonium all over the world in airports theses days. Cheers and stay healthy .

By: NOBTS

NOBTS — Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:57:32 +0000

Well, I guess • it’s time to finish off my Bombay hand sanitizer, stirred not shaken, and try again to explain why Bernie must drop out and endorse Tulsi.
1: Bernie’s toast, burnt! The math simply does not give him any viable path forward. Tulsi has virtually the same policies domestically and adds a foreign policy and anti-militarism dimension that Bernie embarrassingly lacks.
2: With Bernie’s endorsement and his pledged delegates Tulsi might actually have a shot at winning the primaries. She has a much broader appeal than has Bernie. She is not self stigmatized with a bogus socialist identity. Bernie might think that TG would be unacceptable to his base because of the diligent slander and innuendo dished out by his own campaign through Mockingbird outlets like the New Yorker, the Jacobin and the Intercept. This campaign however only reached the few gullible wannabe revolutionaries who read that crap. The great majority of Bernie followers would enthusiastically switch their support to Tulsi when faced with the alternatives. Biden-Obama, Obama-Buttgeig or Clinton-Schiff .
3: Unless he throws a, just in time, Hail Tulsi pass Bernie will go down in history as a minor footnote an unwitting dupe of the ruling Kakistocracy That is unless he goes down as a witting dupe.
It’s time for Tulsi!
Hey Bernie, throw that Hail Tulsi pass!

By: Roberto

Roberto — Sun, 15 Mar 2020 23:38:09 +0000

Just contemplating the astonishing fact that Russia spent 100,000 dollars on social media to influence the 2016 election thereby handing the presidency to Mr Trump but Bloomberg spent 700 Million dollars, had the DNC jigger the rules to enable him to ‘debate’, and he only managed to round up four delegates from American Samoa and is now not a contender.
Value for money spent – a lesson well taught by ‘the Russians’.

By: paul

paul — Sun, 08 Mar 2020 14:49:41 +0000

In reply to Klipfisk.

That’s entirely plausible.
The DNC is going into overdrive to produce the shiniest, most highly polished turd possible.
And it looks like Creepy Joe fits the bill.
Super Tuesday was blatantly rigged against Boynie, with a highly improbable unprecedented “mass turnout of black voters”, hundreds of thousands suddenly materialising out of nowhere in individual states.
They’ve already used the failed voting machine excuse, so they had to come up with something different.
Being in the Clintons’ way can be very detrimental to your life expectancy. There is a trail of dead bodies marking the path of their careers, Seth Rich being the latest in a long line.

By: Klipfisk

Klipfisk — Sat, 07 Mar 2020 20:32:21 +0000

I just wrote on Caitlin’s Johnstone’s site, but I would really like to see this idea aired (in the hopes that talking about it will ensure it won’t come to pass):

All the candidates that the DNC has some sway with (all but Tulsi) must have had a little talking to, and pulled out to leave the field for Biden. They likely figure that will be sufficient to get Biden the nomination.

Enter Clinton (“Wicked Witch of the West”) as VP candidate. If all goes according to plan, they win.

Shortly thereafter, poor old demented Biden will have to step down for health reasons (or be forced to do so) and voilà, Clinton has her presidency to use as her personal tool of vendetta with the planet.

I really can’t figure out why else they would be making such an effort to push an obviously ailing man as their chosen candidate. Hillary still out there spinning her evil plans with her evil minions…

By: Charlotte Ruse

Charlotte Ruse — Sat, 07 Mar 2020 01:30:07 +0000

In reply to Richard Le Sarc. Pocahontas and Mr. Mularkey are full of shit.

By: Charlotte Russe

Charlotte Russe — Fri, 06 Mar 2020 23:37:24 +0000

In reply to Martin Usher.

“Every time this happens we lose a bit more ground until
what was everyday 40 years ago is now a radical, “revolutionary communist” demand that will bankrupt us all.”

I think we’re heading towards neo-feudalism. Worldwide gangster capitalism. The economic system is based on financialization policies which are more virtual than real. Monopolization of businesses will continue to intensify. Ultimately they’ll be a worldwide showdown over resources.

The ruling class does not want to make concessions to the working-class. They’re only interested in securing more wealth by promoting austerity. The parallels to the 1930’s are not truly similar. FDR was “forced” to implement economic social safety nets. The US no longer has powerful labor unions or Leftist organizations. The greatest parallel to the 1930’s is that we might be gearing up for another world war.

By: Richard Le Sarc

Richard Le Sarc — Fri, 06 Mar 2020 22:58:33 +0000

In reply to Charlotte Russe. They're ALL phoneys, Warren particularly. She lies as much as Bidet.