Comments on: WATCH: Interrogating Cold War 2.0

By: Ernest Judd

Ernest Judd — Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:20:32 +0000

In reply to New Name. You forgot Judaism.

By: Ernest Judd

Ernest Judd — Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:18:58 +0000

In reply to Victor G.. It's called trolling, now.

By: Name

Name — Sat, 30 Jul 2022 10:03:48 +0000

@11:00 “Rockefeller know that it will come to the end of monetary system in the future and that real resources would be only real value” – question: which country is resource richest? (and not under Rockefeller control…)

By: LeZ

LeZ — Sat, 02 Jul 2022 01:51:56 +0000

In reply to NickM.

Very prescient quote Nick.

If one wants the detail, how Castro emerged from a US Mob, US Capitalism controlled Cuba – T J English Havana Nocturne. A very good take on contemporary Cuban History of The Revolution. It has everything. https://tj-english.com/havana_nocturne.php

My take on The Decline Of The West here . . . https://les7eb.substack.com/p/ukraine-notes-the-long-proxy-war

By: LeZ

LeZ — Sat, 02 Jul 2022 01:41:30 +0000

Indeed does War makes for distractions.
Along with narratives emblematic of a Westernized False History, that one being as taught and generally the basis of media commentary.

The reality, beyond the high minded theories, examined here without fear or favour . . .
https://les7eb.substack.com/p/ukraine-notes-the-long-proxy-war

By: Hector

Hector — Fri, 01 Jul 2022 06:58:24 +0000

In reply to NickM. Check out the books by Guido Giacomo Preparata on the Anglo funding of the Nazis.

By: Edwige

Edwige — Thu, 30 Jun 2022 07:57:21 +0000

Patrick Wood was a very welcome addition. The ideal balance would be something between the first two debates – a bit more disagreement than is on show here but less trying to control the discussion to a particular viewpoint than on the first one.

It’s a lot to get one’s head around but the discussion never quite got deep nor broad enough. Were the Russian and Chinese Revolutions ever real? The discussion didn’t get further back than the 1970s. I think the evidence about Trotsky is overwhelming – Lenin, Stalin and Mao remain more ambiguous as indeed does Marx himself. It was also as if bio-security and (except a little near the end) climate change didn’t exist. I know all our thinking has been compartmentalised but the attack is holistic and the response has to be too. Geo-politics is one dimension of a bigger game.

By: TomUSA

TomUSA — Wed, 29 Jun 2022 20:06:19 +0000

In reply to Mucho. Been to Glastonbury m'self in August 2012. We got the impression that the " seeker-of-knowledge " types were rather less than genuine, merely wanting the cachet they think that brings, dressing the dress and chatting the jargon. This applied as much to the shops and street vendors feeding on them. We did find a genuine tea parlor amid the fakery though and the Chalice Well is well worth contending with all the wannabees.

By: les online

les online — Tue, 28 Jun 2022 20:54:39 +0000

In reply to Ort. I've read 'In America there is no working class as workers all regard themselves as (lower) middle class.'. In marxism there's only two classes. In American sociology there are six. (last count). In Australian politician-speak we have 'aspirational class' and 'aspirational middle class.' The only reason i can think of to explain such inventive nomenclature is to supress awareness of the existence of the Working Class and/or Class Struggle. (The Labour Party became the Labor Party. No longer a working class party but a party of the 'aspirationals'.)