The Invaders
Todd Hayen
Is anyone old enough to remember the Quinn Martin television series The Invaders starring Roy Thinnes as David Vincent? Vincent is an architect in the series who happens upon a UFO landing carrying aliens bent on taking over the planet.
The aliens managed to look like ordinary human beings (easy on the budget) with a few peculiarities that were subtle enough to keep them from being easily discovered. Some of these oddities included a weirdly deformed little finger, a heart that has no pulse, and blood that doesn’t bleed out (I guess that stands to reason considering no pulse).
For the 41 episode run (1967-1968) Vincent wanders around the country scouting for these heartless creatures, trying to convince others when he has discovered any. Of course he does just that in every episode and has a difficult time convincing folks that the deformed-pinkied-aliens are on earth to wreak havoc.
He has all kinds of adventures with these invaders, even falling in love with one of them (maybe more), some become friends before being discovered, and quite a few along the way are killed — conveniently disappearing in a puff of red smoke so no traces are left to expose the once living, grotesque, creature (they are indeed aliens and are only faking to look like humans—not pretty to look at under the guise of human skin).
The part of this story that is apropos to this article is the fact these aliens looked just like everyone else but did have some disparate features—not only physical, but psychological and behavioral as well. They were aliens, strange, different, untrustworthy—inhuman. But for all intents and purposes, from a distance at least, looked just like Uncle Joe and Aunt Phoebe.
Still don’t get the connection?
We now live amongst invaders.
But the kicker is that they are not aliens, they are human beings. The sheep in our midst are NOT from outer space (although their DNA may be scrambled enough they may as well be). But something is different about them, something that isn’t easy to pinpoint at a glance, but it is there.
This is just the thing that jumbles up stuff in our heads, this feeling that we just can’t put a finger on. But it is there—a person walking down the street on a nice sunny day donning a paper mask, a lone person in a car with a similar face covering, and dozens of high school kids leaving campus for lunch—many of them wearing masks. It just isn’t right; it presents a cognitive dissonance.
The masks seem to be the deformed pinky from The Invaders—a rather obvious physical attribute you can see plainly if presented. We usually don’t get close enough to check out the heartbeat, and of course there isn’t any correlation with that feature from the TV series and our own vaccinated sheep-types.
But there are indeed other things we can notice if the right setting presents itself—an unusual sense of fear regarding anything Covid related, a pandering loyalty to any sort of state authority, a complete trust in whatever that authority decides is best for them, an irrational glee in complying to mandates, vaccines, and manipulations as in, “I am doing this to be part of my community and follow orders for the good of the community”—all this with little critical reasoning or thought.
“So what?” one might say. “That is their business isn’t it?” To a point, yes, but we also have “human community” standards. Usually the “state community standards” coincide with the “human” ones, but it seems we are pulling further and further from that assumption.
A human community has standards regarding public behavior, public sexual conduct, wanton harm to others, and an intuitive “right way” to think. I know that is a dangerous thing to say considering our current attitude regarding diversity, equity and inclusion, but think about it.
Most things people do in private have little impact on our daily way of life so we let it be, but when a certain type of thinking and behaving is identified in public as being dangerous to ourselves and others we suddenly see how that may indeed affect our “human community standards” and we become rather concerned about it.
Think of a public Nazi display, or a crowd of people wearing KKK sheets, hoods, and other regalia. They appear to be a threat (maybe they are, or maybe they are not directly) and as a community we become concerned, to say the least. We don’t consider ourselves to be bigots if we are bothered by a crowd of swastika-wearing goose-steppers or hooded KKK members.
Are mask-wearing individuals taking a stroll on a public sidewalk the same as strolling Nazis? Of course not, but they may generate the same feelings of threat, uncertainty, distrust—as a potential to destroy our world, just as David Vincent’s invaders did to him.
A person who is willing to wear a mask while riding a bike in public becomes a danger, at least potentially, because something is suspect regarding their ability to think straight, and if there are enough of these types milling around, then our alarm bells go off.
“Danger, danger, Will Robinson, these here are invaders”—invaders in what we thought was a safe community. It seems strange to be making the same evaluation of vaccinated people as they did of us unvaccinated people—that they are dangerous, as we were considered dangerous. But there are distinct differences, one is that the unvaccinated are not dangerous, and never were.
The other is that I am not advocating that the vaccinated be treated any differently than any of us are treated. I am merely pointing out that if we feel strange around them, as if they are dangerous, what I am explaining here could be the reason. And we need to strive to make that reason conscious so we don’t start doing stupid things, like spitting on the guy walking down the street with a mask.
What is presented to us in a rather objective way is that we are faced with the fact that most people around us are not really to be trusted. They are not to be trusted to vote for people in office who are proper leaders, leaders in a country with a constitution that we have all thought for hundreds of years was pretty good in representing what we, as a human community, thought was just and right.
We cannot trust them to “do the right thing” with our children due to a “distorted” way of thinking that “just doesn’t fit” (see the latest news on some teachers in Ontario).
Is this all due to vaccination? Of course not, but I think you can safely say that the masses getting vaccinated and following this mainstream narrative are following the “form” of thinking I am describing here. And yes, it is not across the board, and any feeling we may have from it is largely (not completely) fabricated in our own mind—just as profiling and bigotry is.
So it is something we definitely have to get a handle on.
These people do indeed have the power to change our life radically in a negative way (leading us all to slavery, for one?) but we must keep conscious of the objective and rational reality of all of this and not allow sadness, confusion, disgust, or even hate and anger to take control.
I am not suggesting at all that we treat our fellow humans, vaccinated or not, as “invaders”—they have ALWAYS essentially been what they are today; we just didn’t notice it. There were no deformed pinkies to identify them, now there are.
It is hard to say what to do about this, but it is still very disturbing. In my own work as a psychotherapist one of the central intentions is to bring unconsciousness into consciousness. This is a case in point.
If we are somehow deeply disturbed by mask wearing, or whatever we experience that identifies an “invader” but become conscious of the true reasons we are disturbed, it will help by allowing the full story to emerge—these people are basically no different than they ever have been, and to forgive them, and love them for who they are, fellow human beings, but at the same time strive toward a culture that doesn’t create this way of distorted thinking for the generations to come.
Todd Hayen is a registered psychotherapist practicing in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He holds a PhD in depth psychotherapy and an MA in Consciousness Studies. He specializes in Jungian, archetypal, psychology. Todd also writes for his own substack, which you can read here
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
idk, I’m just not feeling it.
Maybe because I shun MSM (& barely have time for alt-media), I’m not aware of which way the current is flowing, but I doubt it will ever run in our favour.
Sure, there is some hint of narrative adjustment, but I doubt that the worst of the sheep, the Kens & Karens, will ever be required to seek forgiveness for ostracising us.
There will never be a “PureBlood Lives Matter”.
On the contrary, it is the facially-distorted spike-protein-blooded GMO’s, who have always seen us as a threat.
I do agree with the sentiment behind the article, but that’s because I am like many nonCovidians, who are “live & let live” kind of people.
The sort of person who is okay if someone else wants to boost themselves to the max, so long as they don’t inflict their religion – “The Science” – on others.
Scientism of Covid is not going away.
I see too many people wearing masks these days when it’s no longer required nor enforced.
People proudly announce how many jabs they’ve had, or are getting.
“Vaccine hesitancy” is a step closer to being considered a mental illness.
Far corners of the empire are quietly inserting laws in place, ready for the next lockdowns to be a magnitude more brutal.
They really weren’t going to let all those gulags be built for nothing.
And what is successful there, could be replicated anywhere.
Perhaps most disturbing, and least surprising, is that the alien technology is going to appear in a lot more things than we might realise..
I notice that you’re not using “shrew / sheep” here ~ I was getting quite used to it.
I too have my own way of classifying people according to how they respond to to coronapox:
“Sheep” are of course the brainwashed.
The sort of person who welcomes the lockdowns & jabs, and fears those who don’t.
{I may need another category for the Kens & Karens – “Ukrainian Sheep” has a ring to it, since they likely swing that way, & avoids the N-word}
“Black Sheep” are those who suspect it’s all hokum, but play along to be part of the flock.
I think most people fall in this category.
They will probably not comply with any further mandates – if resisted even passively, any questioning of The Science risks a domino effect.
So that’s why the pressure has eased, this is the population that needs controlling the most.
“Wild Sheep” or “Goats” are those who fight this with all of their will, the flock be damned.
That’d be a lot of the folks who frequent here.
So anyway, the touchy-feely, “we are doing this for your own good” part of the narrative has run its course.
They aren’t going to fool anyone who hasn’t already been willing.
To target the Black Sheep they will use subterfuge, and more covert means of corralling – eg social credits and digital currencies.
The brutality is for the Wild Sheep, who may just have to be culled in a more traditional manner.
What a stupid bullshit!!! Just 2 words: FUCK OFF!!!
they , them , the other – is destructive thinking from any side . I think it’s a fair article Todd . It won’t please many , but peace is hard won
I have long “operated” socially upon the presumption that everyone is an Alien, from some sort of Outer Space ( be that extraterrestrial or landlocked ) until I can prove inexorabiy otherwise. Also, I assume everyone to be an agent of someone(s) else, especially of Deep State actors, though there are also a lot of mystery shoppers, most of them though are corporate, thus allied with the Deep State in almost all the wrong ways.
Since inexorability is one of the more precious commodities, so very rare, on any plane, I continue to presume away, and am grateful for the op to ingrain that as a latter-day habit, personally. Very much.
It impacts my daily life in the sense that I now am just starting, recurrenty, habitually, to approach any social contact with extreme ideological caution. It just makes more sense in what we have learned about the infestation of our societies with Aliens/Agents, to begin with that presumption, then with the most mincing minuteness, to walk it back, or rather crawl back, from there.
Not cynical, as some Aliens will be quick to accuse the mindful likes of me, with such obvious motives.
Just so very practical. And ever more so, more by the day, and by the hour.
I only wish I had begun with this criterion about 67 of my 70 years ago. Or so. (The Aliens do too. Another very clarifying way to test or prove them.) It solves so many practical problems of living and greetings, and all the rest of that spectrum, seriously.
Oh yeah. Sure. Lot’s of love for the folks that fired me and countless other people for refusing the poison injection for super Pfizer/Moderna/J&J $$$$PROFITS$$$$. Compassion for the horse mounted Police goon in Melbourne who intentionally trampled an elderly woman who chose to protest against mandatory death injections. Creams of ice cream to all those cops who threatened, beat and arrested thousands upon thousands of innocent citizens around the world for not wearing masks/violating lockdowns (prison term by the way). And love to Croatian Nazi Sieg Heil football bullies down in Stralya: the place where Indigenous peoples are subject to arrest, torture and murder, and ongoing since January 26, 1788. Where corporate mining thugs continue to rape and plunder the ancient continent’s pristine natural habitats. Oh yes let’s have a great big lovey dovey fest.
SHEESH!!!
Agree, what utter bollocks –
“these people are basically no different than they ever have been, and to forgive them, and love them for who they are” –
I’ve never loved them in the first place
The written wisdom of the past says: only forgive those who repent.
Good point.
The best wisdom, forgive them all, and whether they are aware of it or not, you invite them more warmly to repentance. Not that there aren’t spiritual wars. But more achieved with honey, than vinegar, and it’s ALWAYS great spiritual hygiene, to boot:
“Nothing that is worth doing can be achieved in our lifetime, therefore we must be saved by Hope.
Nothing which is true, or beautiful, or good, makes complete sense in any immediate context of history, therefore we must be saved by Faith.
Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone, therefore we must be saved by Love.
Nothing we do is as virtuous from the standpoint of our friend or our enemy as it is from our own standpoint, therefore we must be saved by the final form of Love, which is Forgiveness.”
~ Reinhold Niebuhr
“Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?”
~ Lincoln
Well, he’s just offering the biblical COMMAND(MENT): “Love your enemy.” (As our Brit Rugby coach offered to me once, when I was so concussed I saw triple, at least, and refused to leave the field, refusing to cede it to my arch-rivals: “John, when I told you to take a shower, that WASN’T a request.”)
The wisdom of that is unfathomable. None of us is necessarily a rose garden or even a bed of roses, so humility is always called for, knowing that the biggest problem of all is each is a shard broken off God’s perfect mirror, and in need of ever-widening perspective. Einstein often shines the way for me, since he is/was indomitably independent and as critical of certain qualities of mindfulness as he was of theories of physics, and all that had gone before (as always incomplete). As when he was summoned before HUAC and answered some drawling, twanging “reb” senator: “No, I am not a communist, but if I were, I certainly wouldn’t be ashamed of it.” Chapeau, mein freund!
He said a bit I read for the first time the other day, or rather, had forgotten from long ago: that our spiritual progress depends entirely on ever widening our circles of compassion.
Sure, mask-wearers do not present as fit objects of tolerance or compassion, but maybe we don’t know the whole book, the whole story. Patience has been the one activity that has brought me all the richest rewards, an adjunct of humility, trulyThe Final Frontier, not Space (since so very few explore it, right? Can you hear me up there, St. Francis?).
~~~~~~~~~~~
“We are ordered to love our neighbours, and we are ordered to love our enemies, probably because they are often the same people.” ~ GKC (owtte)
“We may make our friends, and we may make our enemies. But God alone can make our neighbours.” ~ ibid.
I thoroughly get it…you have a very clearly valid point, and I am more on your side of it than you realize. But I am sure you understand the real enemy is not the sheep, it is the sheep herders…yes, sheep carry the ultimate responsibility, as you say here, but what are we going to do with them all when when we win this war? Exterminate them?
It is precisely those kinds that need the most of it, as predicated upon the Gospel Luke 6:28, that “echoes down the ringing grooves of Time”:
27But to those of you who will listen, I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, 28bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you. 29If someone strikes you on one cheek, turn to him the other also. And if someone takes your cloak, do not withhold your tunic as well.…
Admittedly, not the conventional wisdom that you might find on some threads, but a resilient, and rewarding, thread. For us all.
(To a writer who complained to the editor, that Christianity had been tried and found wanting, GKC replied: “It has been found hard, but it’s never been tried.” So, there’s that historical footnote!)
Speaking of…
I’ve wondered for some time whether or not the true believers will eventually turn on the unvaxxed once they learn how bad the shots really are. Will they hate us for not falling for the narrative, or for not persuading them to not get the shots, or for some other reason? I know I’d not be happy to learn that I had poisoned myself and was likely to die in 3-5 years.
I have a bad feeling if the herds of vaxxed truly get it, it will indeed be the unvaxxed they turn on…for whatever reason, jealously being one of them…or even because the unvaxxed will be a source for healthy organs…the sky’s the limit. But if psychology tells us anything, it tells us about human behavior, and when people start dying in doves and losing their loved ones and the truth finally sinks in, they will have to project anger onto something, and I doubt if it onto the true tyrant, it will be onto us.
that is what i see: it was the way so many chose to become willing enforcers 2 years ago. Not a +ve at all. That observation was as bad as “Their” evil ploy, all dem willing ‘germans’…
i do not see those types going quietly, and they will take it out on the easiest victim they can, : (
dark times ahead for many, all part of the plan…..
I call them humanoids.
Close to the real thing, but not close enough.
Millions of them.
There is not a soul afoot, or asleep, or even sleeping the Big Sleep, who isn’t in need of healing of some deep and ontological kind. That only comes, ultimately, from Beyond us.
As R.D. Laing put it so well, “Even broken hearts can heal, if we have the heart to let them.” He was thinking about the “living dead”. And so are we.
On the sidewalks of Tokyo it seems things have loosened up a bit and a fair few of the “invaders” now may remove their masks while walking about. But there is a new etiquette. The polite invader must either be seen conspicuously dangling their mask from their fingers or they strap it like a chevron onto their upper arm.
Similar in China. What gets frowned on (if you’re a foreigner, anyway) is not wearing a mask at all. Wearing a mask just over your chin is perfectly ok. Since the masks chafe against the skin and the temperature is still in the 30s, this is very uncomfortable. For the first time, there are groups of volunteer mask enforcers walking around. Luckily, I don’t have long to go before I leave this dystopia.
Of all the perspectives revealing the human conditioning as an ego-alien encounter, A Course in Miracles stands clear as a witness to its lack of true substance – regardless our invested identity by reaction.
But an alien will is in this case assigned to ‘Other’ seen as threat to be masked and distanced from or denied–and attacked as a means to maintain the split of a private mindset of control from fear, guilt and hate cast out or projected away – as if to get rid of or limit it. Such is the mind set against itself unknowing. Such is a mind driven for getting, pun intended.
We receive life miraculously – that is by no means of our own laws of cause or effect. That we are, is prior to any thought or experience by which we recognise or accept a sense of self and world. Yet our mind is a capacity to think or imagine its own creations as a going forth of ideas given value, priority, significance and identification, such as to ‘Fall’ into vanity and self-conflicted limitation – AS IF at the hand of an Other.
Sovereign integral recognises ‘Brother’ as all creation within one life we both are and share in. An alien thinking sees ‘other’ as witness to separate sense of self-autonomy locked down to a body. An ‘alien’ world of bodies and things reflecting a fragmented and dissociated fear over which a drive to get fulfilment ‘externally’, runs as shifting narratives for ‘continuity’ or unified sense of self set over masked or manipulated conflict.
‘The Men in Black’ serve a believed need for unconsciousness within a ‘Matrix’ of manipulated or machined predictive controls.
It remains evident that our narrative or mythic archetypes run beneath and within all unfolding drama, and yet are not Divine Platonic templates, so much as entanglement of victim and perpetrator arising from a split mind of Separation Trauma – by which a covert identity THINKS to have taken itself from God (As in Prodigal Son) or from the Gods (as in Prometheus). A mis-taken identity runs guilt as its primary directive against Disclosure.
Yet what is truly Revealed is far deeper than any ego-alien encounter rendered as grandiose, for the lack of substance to the basis for ‘Separating’ reveals a lie that was but is not. Awakened responsibility for thought is no longer compelled to victimhood or perpetration of coercive judgemental self-convictions. But true freedom is not at the level of the body, the self-automata of its mindset; however intensely or ingeniously we may seek, demand or take it for ‘ourself alone’ – regardless such self hides in collective mythic or ideological symbols of virtue or war against vice.
What is ‘bottoming out’ in terms of recognising and releasing and addictive dispossession we could not really see because it ‘saw’ for us?
It is a tipping point of tolerance for entangled complicity in pain to a recognition of primary connection within our being, but outside our sense of control.
The nature of a real relationship is a contextual alignment regardless the form it takes.
The nature of assigning fixed meanings of past associations to perceived forms or behaviours runs a predictive control that was invoked to ‘make you safe’ from an experience of conflict you could not or would not resolve, and so it made time and space for elements held apart in concept through which a mindset in reaction runs as if in reversal of effect driven causes – normalised to social masking to a ‘prison planet’ locked down in ‘solitary’ running on dreams of its own self-imaged reflection for a ‘special love’ that for a moment seemed within grasp to be snatched, broken or betrayed.
So the Pharaoh/King was set to restore the Golden Age, to assume the power of divine vengeance as both Terror, and sacrificial obeisance and appeasement to limit its dictates.
Assignment of destructive intent to life ‘puts it there’ rather than own a mis-guided attempt to fulfil a true need falsely framed. To a guilting mindset, owning error attracts damnation of social rejection and exclusion, but to the desire to release and be released, it is where a poor choice can be replaced by a better one, in terms of its true fruits lived and felt.
What is the nature of a recognising and releasing of an ideological capture perceived only in Others, but restored awareness and responsibility for judgements by which we want to give to ‘others’ to get rid of in our self?
But giving – at the level of thought given acceptance as our own – is the way to KEEP.
What we give we share and strengthen. Everyone demonstrates or embodies their thinking by teaching it and learning it – as a self-reinforcement for what is given value now.
The shift is of an awareness of a true desire to learn a better way than a mind set in its own spin. Opportunities to learn were never withheld, but we could not see them while we sought what we thought would ‘make us safe’ or powerful in a world of ‘others’ who do not see or recognise us.
By what we bring TO relationship is what we draw forth. As we sow, so shall we reap applies a blind justice. But a releasing of time and space is given in our true created nature as an innocence of being – prior to and beyond the world we think to know by ‘thinking’ set in robes of knowledge against fear of disclosure.
It is this Innocence that guilt would destroy or deny to mask in ‘representation’ of grievance given power. Gaslighting our own mind attracts or becomes a ritual ab-use of relationship to mutual manipulations set in darkness. Lest light reveal hollow, false and sacrificial of all that is true.
Denial projected out has never really left the mind, but the insinuation of a reintegrating wholeness will seem to be an invasive violator, a seeming enemy of shifting shadows kept from light by gaslight or guilting blame setting blame as a social debit system of covert ID masking as power struggle for survival in its own im-pacted terms & conditions.
Beware fascination with horror and addictive compulsive identity in the ‘dynamics’ of conflict. I don’t say this or anything from anything but a willingness to share in what it invites or reveals worthy of acceptance as a renewal of living presence rather than the stamp of a past made in anger. This world holds both as if to join them.
Humpty Dumpty sat on a wall,
Humpty Dumpty had a great fall.
All the king’s horses and all the king’s men
Couldn’t put Humpty together again!
But I don’t want to go among mad people,” Alice remarked.
“Oh, you can’t help that,” said the Cat: “we’re all mad here. I’m mad. You’re mad.”
“How do you know I’m mad?” said Alice.
“You must be,” said the Cat, “or you wouldn’t have come here.
~ Lewis Carroll, Alice in Wonderland
Wha?
ffs, just give us a link to the encyclopedia…
Brevity is a point of valour.
However, the best point of your post is quoting “Through the Looking glass”.
I tell the masked that have a problem with me being unmasked to go and re-read it.
i leave it to their devices how they may re-interpret the stories within..
Humans
The post hunter gatherer human is a domesticated creature. The state of being tame has it’s advantages. Specialisation and organisation result in inventions going into production and extending our reach and security and life spans. As a species we have become masters of all we survey. There is of course a price to be paid for Faustian bargains. We are masters of the world but we are also the slaves of our masters. Human society irresistibly becomes stratified. Those at the top need tools like corporate religion, legal systems, the constabulary and the military to govern us. They need laws and they need propaganda systems. Unlike other domesticated creatures like sheep, the complex human with it’s potent brain hand power requires complex and sophisticated propaganda systems to be controlled. As we progress and procreate these systems grow in sophistication. Simultaneously more powerful societies conquer and subdue weaker ones. This process has proceeded for millennia and has resulted in nation states that all report to a concealed but omnipotent central power. Propaganda mills are now universal monopolies and are backed up with powerful militaries and covert agencies.Clever devices like apparently independant nation states and political parties that are allegedly voted for by the people give us the illusion of freedom. The net result is that the invisible world government has complete power over us. Which means that it can greatly reduce our numbers if they feel they need to. The tragedy is that they can force us to commit mass suicide. More tragically, as we have found out since 2020, they can get sections of society to collaborate in herding all of us towards vaccine abbattoirs.
I think we know who the invaders and subverters are.
Hopefully OffG will cover this:
https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/uk-labour-files-al-jazeera-revelations-blown-hole-media-corbyn-narrative
The Oborne piece seems decent enough but I feel the old guffaw threatening when I read this about the “Labour anti-semitism issue”:
Was it? Were there uncovered plans to build the new Auschwitz in England’s green and pleasant land? Did anyone even dare to use dodgy expressions?
Didn’t you know that the Parliamentary Labour party are all enrolled as members of ‘Labour Friends of Israel’ Starting with Starmer. Of course the same is true of the Conservative and Liberal Democrat Parties – in both Houses, Lower and Upper.
I’ve heard more than one writer say they are married to someone who has fallen for the covid psyop completely. They haven’t said they will leave their spouse, they seem to accept it simply as a differing view. I have relatives also that have fallen for it. I suppose it’s similar with other things, like religion, or other beliefs. I don’t think we should view these people as being body-snatched, but as our neighbours, friends and loved ones. We can be true to ourselves and still love and accept them.
Good onya Steph.
Put Love first.
i tell my relatives and sibs that I love and support their efforts to reverse their pandering to self-annihilation.
Especially, “LEAVE YOUR F***IN’ KIDS ALONE!”
the obsession with viruses? What saved mankind in The War of the Worlds.
they are aliens!!! Just look at Tam.
I have felt this way for a while about religious people. I trust them less than atheists because they indulge in magical thinking and I wonder if they apply the same radical belief to other areas of their life? It’s not a BIG thing, I’m just suspicious of their thought processes. Same now applies to the vaxxed. The erroneous thinking that lead them to inject themselves willingly, multiple times with an experimental drug, may it also be applied to other areas of their life. Does it cloud their ethical reasoning? Are they a danger? Further one could suggest that the S-protein is actually having an iatrogenic effect on their neural chemistry. I have nothing to substantiate this but it could be occurring.
Funny, I’m starting to distrust the Godless. I’ve noticed that COVID fanatics are also climate Change fanatics, “Trust the science” fanatics and they are also proud atheists. I think what is disturbing for me is they believe in the supremacy of Man. They think that with the right committee they can solve the all the worlds problem, including yours and mine. They lie in bed at night frustrated that they don’t have dictatorial powers to make people do the right thing. They love government because they want to be government. To believe there is a higher power can be humbling. You let go of the reigns, que sera sera.
Yes, this arrogance that humans are now so developed that we can cause and solve a perceived climate crisis because we are so clever and powerful now. That 2020’s humans have cracked it. We rule the world. It’s the same with mrna cr*p.
I venture it will have been the same attitude for the industrial revolution, the renaissance, probably the iron age etc etc.
Meanwhile the Universe just keeps doing it’s thing.
Hello Speedwellian: Erm… I’m atheist – perhaps proud. But my pride is limited to my own ethical conduct. I trust my own observations, rather than science, and have realized that man is only supreme in his own stupidity.
I’ve thought about dictating to others, but don’t want to control anything or anyone but myself. This makes my life much more manageable…
Committee: Ten arms. Ten legs. Five assholes…
They entertain and live with contradictions (double-think). There are claims that neurology (proportions of the brain, etc.) can indicate “conservatism”; I suppose that refers to gullibility and rigidity. However, it is hard for anyone to resist modern propaganda and coercion.
(This, after all, only repeats what has already been said many times, but.. I wrote it anyway.)
I totally agree with this approach when it comes to ordinary people. (There may be people of some position among them; but it must be well checked and considered whether they have even committed a mere solicitation to participate in the covaccination, and generally to believe in the narrative of those stupider than themselves. If they are, that changes things for me. I do not forgive clever people who mislead their subordinates in an emotional or mental way. Even for simple things, what’s left for that?). I agree with this approach to ordinary people for myself, neither recommend nor even imagine that I will tell anyone else what to do. I don’t want anything like that.
When it comes to mature, intelligent, educated people in a position who have led someone to the injection or helped develop the covidic narrative, then how can we forgive them even if they have made mistakes and can change? Where was their sharp mind when they had to understand the rather simple deception that many stupider people than themselves understood?
Is it because they have realized that they have no personal benefit, but have realized that they will be harmed by this understanding?Because they understood how it would affect their reputation, career and income? So: let’s just do our job and lead the fools into clots and transition to a future of technocratic dystopia? And for this, take a huge amount of money against the background of your previous salary / honorars? Do you know how all these monkeys were paid for this inspiring work to be so calm and peremptorily concentrated in their deceitful, murderous and soul-destroying actions? They have taken and continue to take as much as they have earned for one year, years, and even more.
Ordinary people, minor unintentional malefactors, the confused, even the inoculated, are another matter. I communicate with them in a different way, similar to the one described in the article. (As said in “1984” ,” If there is hope, it is in the proles.”)
Very good.
Beautifully put, and from an English as a second language speaker, even more impressive.
Antonin Artaud (I’ve posted parts of this on other threads):
“So a sick society invented psychiatry to defend itself from the investigations of certain visionaries whose faculties of divination disturbed it.”
Off topic but I just read about “LGBTQ2S+” and initially thought it had to be a parody extension effort. But apparently not. It means
“Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Two-Spirit.”
I wasn’t sure what “questioning” meant in this context. It apparently refers to the “questioning of one’s sexual orientation, sexual identity, gender, or all three” and “is a process of exploration by people who may be unsure, still exploring, or concerned about applying a social label to themselves for various reasons”. (i.e. people so understandably sledge-hammered by the blizzard of whack-a-doodle neologisms assaulting them that their craniums have caved in.)
And “Two Spirit”? Well according to the infallible Wiki,
“Two-spirit (also two spirit, 2S or, occasionally, twospirited) is a modern, pan-Indian, umbrella term used by some Indigenous North Americans to describe Native people in their communities who fulfill a traditional third-gender (or other gender-variant) ceremonial and social role in their cultures.”
I was curious about that “traditional third-gender”. Over to Wiki:
“Third gender is a concept in which individuals are categorized, either by themselves or by society, as neither man nor woman. It is also a social category present in societies that recognize three or more genders. The term third is usually understood to mean “other”, though some anthropologists and sociologists have described fourth and fifth genders.”
Furthermore,
“While found in a number of non-Western cultures, concepts of “third”, “fourth”, and “some” gender roles are still somewhat new to mainstream Western culture and conceptual thought. The concept is most likely to be embraced in the modern LGBT or queer subcultures.”
Note the curious phrasing, “still somewhat new”. Implication: We’ll be hearing a lot more about them shortly.
Well I don’t want to be horribly bigoted about the rich cultural heritage of our multi-faceted humanity. Nor do I want to be accused of “going global” but wouldn’t you think that various localised “traditional” ways have become increasingly rare, especially as regards these exotic notions of “non-binary” being? And I don’t want to be accused of being cynical (not me!) but isn’t it curious how these recent “discoveries” happen to dovetail wondrously with the LGBT etc. thing?
That’s it: multipolar-multipolar new order. In the Metaverse (or in the Metaverse-nature-like reality) there would be no problem, so if it turns out that in the real physical life on Earth becomes unbearable, and already – by 2035-45 for example – there is the technology to transfer genetic data to another place, and reproduce existence in a natural-like copy of it there…
2s “dovetailing”.
It doesn’t sound like it’ll be long before free thinking “freaks” like us will be tagged onto the end of the acronym…FT’S maybe or disparagingly NB’s (nutbags) more likely 🙂
QWERTY gender is nothing but politicizing whoever one chooses to go to bed with.
What the miscreant researchers deliberate do is try to create a continuity from ancient times to today, attempting the misnomer of projecting the ancients being tolerant of anything present day society says we should be tolerant of!
It’s always the KKK, Nazis and Soviet style [ fill in with anything nefarious ] Censorship and fear have made this site dull.
Still reeking of controlled opposition, or maybe it’s Canadian Stockholm syndrome.
I believe the expression goes something like this;
Fool me once, shame on you;
You don’t get a second chance, so go fuck yourself.
Forgive, lol. I’m in the process of moving continent because, arfter a rudimentary risk assessment, it’s pretty clear that the majority here present too much of a danger to my longevity.
Oh, and instead of the mask analogy, maybe re-read the article with the following suggestion in mind.
If they did that there would be nobody left.
Except the psycho$.
And they would self destruct in no time.
(There’s always a light at the end of the tunnel isn’t there?).
Depends on which end of the train your watching from. At the back the light always gets smaller and smaller.
The main thing is that life is not about the many NPCs. It is about us and our choices.
The tight-knit seamless blending of “news” and “entertainment” can be seen in the phenomenon of one Nazanin Boniadi whose curriculum vitae reads like the stuff of Ickean networking.
She was born in Tehran, Iran, in the aftermath of the Iranian Revolution, become a political refugee in London, attended an independent school in Hampstead and earned a bachelor’s degree, with honours, in biological sciences from the University of California, Irvine.
She has written op-eds for media outlets such as CNN, The Washington Post, and Defense One, and appeared on BBC World News.
She was selected as a term member by the think tank Council on Foreign Relations.
And she was a dedicated Scientologist (as was her mother) and was vetted as a potential wife for Tom Cruise.
But here is where it becomes truly bizarre. All of the above would, you think, be enough for someone only into their early 40s BUT ….
She has an acting career and has starred in the medical drama General Hospital, the CBS sitcom How I Met Your Mother (2011), spy thriller series Homeland, historical drama film Ben-Hur, Starz sci-fi thriller series Counterpart, thriller film Hotel Mumbai, and (just when you thought it couldn’t get any weirder) Bronwyn in the Prime Video fantasy series The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power.
The interesting upshot of this is that if you fancy tracking possible links to the Deep State and search using her name appended to e.g. “intelligence operative” or “CIA asset” you will be directed to shows she has appeared in e.g. “Homeland” where she appears as a CIA analyst. And you will be rebuked for failing to tell the difference between fact and fiction!
Meanwhile, the BBC use her as some kind of “expert” on foreign affairs as witness here from the 40 minute mark onwards:
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-28th-september-2022
As Gore Vidal once said, a funhouse hall of mirrors!
Not ignored nor dismissed as Trumptard QAnoners:
https://dumptheguardian.com/business/2022/oct/01/huge-turnouts-reported-at-uk-cost-of-living-protests
The Fraud loves this utility bill non-payment protest – a wedge to bring in carbon credits?
Yep–I got the connection & was 1 of those who watched The Invaders!
Totally correct. They chose to give up their souls for temporary coddling of their egos. This is nothing new, but the latest scam made it clearly visible to the current generation.
Yes.
Toxic Narcissism.
https://zeroanthropology.net/2022/09/30/why-did-the-left-fail-the-covid-test-so-badly/
Points:
After the PR disaster of the 60s Vietnam project, the obvious determination to never let that happen again. Thus the gradual elimination of truly alternative views from a sleekly organised war game presentation. Leading to an impoverishment of the public capacity for true discussion. Thus:
“It is no exaggeration to say that a person born in 1990 or later has little if any understanding of what it means to disagree in detail and in good faith with someone whose political and/or social ideals are different than their own…. The ever-increasing dialectical poverty of those who have been socialized and educated in this environment is evident to anyone who has served as a classroom instructor during the last quarter century.”
And a canny transition from “Left” to “Right” rhetoric:
“Seeing the exhaustion of the Bush brand after the Iraq debacle, the Deep State switched party allegiances in the run-up to the 2008 election. And it has stayed firmly on the side of the so-called “left” ever since, encouraging the use of Bush-Cheney-style government-media mobbing against those who might dare to question the motives of the sainted warmonger Obama…”
All of this setting the stage for “the largest and most aggressive “perception management” campaign in recent times, and perhaps in the history of the world” i.e. covid. On the topic of which,
“…almost all my go-to people on propaganda analysis had little or nothing to say. And when I sent contributions outlining my doubts about the congruity of the emergent Covid discourse to places that had generally welcomed my analyses of pro-war propaganda, suddenly there was hesitation on the other end.”
Then an interesting aside on one of the “saints” of the designated opposition, John Pilger. He ticks the right boxes: a mention of Leni Riefenstahl’s belief that “the bourgeoisie are those most amenable to influence campaigns, a reminder of Julian Assange’s horrendous and undeserved fate, much deserved praise for Harold Pinter’s absolutely extraordinary if largely ignored Nobel acceptance speech” before going on to talk about “the strategic disappearance of essential historical realities and truths”.
But then,
“Reading this final flourish while remembering the lamb-like silence of John Pilger in the face of the sustained Covidian onslaught of institutionalized lies and Soviet-grade censorship, one doesn’t know whether to laugh or cry.
And when considering that virtually all those he endorses as exemplars of propaganda-savvy journalism—people such as Chris Hedges, Patrick Lawrence, Jonathan Cook, Diana Johnstone, Caitlin Johnstone all of whose work I have frequently and enthusiastically championed over the years—took the same cud-chewing path, the sense of farce only grows.”
Conclusion: this “opposition” now stands as yet another skin in the onion, the last weapon of the ruling class itself. And this is so whether these “oppositional writers” know it or not.
Outstanding.
The “alien among us” is a common trope that was widely used in the Cold War to educate us about the dangers of communism. We were never told what those dangers were, just that they were a threat to “democracy and freedom”. Popular culture as a propaganda medium has been around for ever but the idea that it could be both entertainment and profitable originated with Dr. Goebbels.
All culture delivers a message which is why censorship has always been so pervasive, outside the Establishment message its always been a game of cat and mouse with the cultural gatekeepers. Its only relatively recently that the role of gatekeeper has shifted from the old school offending public morals to more subtle and yet more pervasive messages that influence the conduct and direction of society as a whole (in other words, what used to be an art has now become a science). Today’s messaging seems more confused but if you think of it in terms of ‘establishment maintaining status quo by promotion of dystopia for the masses’ then it starts to make sense (think of it as ‘mainstream punk rock’ or similar — promotion of nihilism and division as a way of keeping the anthill just disturbed enough to be not a threat while still remaining as productive as it needs to be).
I’m in two minds whether all this anti-mask / anti-Covid / anti-whatever is a reaction to this — or a product of it. It will be interesting finding out.
Incidentally, on the power of propaganda anyone notice that after years of smearing Jeremy Corbyn and the UK Labour party as “antisemitic” the long running inquiry ended with a bit of a whimper. But it doesn’t matter now, the damage has been done. The bandwagon as moved on.
I went to a comedy show the other night in my city. As we went through the doors to the venue, the woman in front of us waiting to enter quickly put her mask on. I wondered what her thought process was at that moment. She had just been walking on busy city streets with lots of people around but did not need her mask. Was it a habit that had been ingrained over the last 2+ years of living in this clown world? Was she doing what she felt was expected of her in a public place? Did she feel threatened and decided this little piece of paper haphazardly positioned over her mouth and nose would protect her? Did she think in advance about the risks of being in a room with a large crowd of people (and maybe some of them hadn’t been vaccinated! OMG!!!) and did the risk assessment and decided her trusted mask would save her because it hadn’t let her down up to now.
When I went into the theatre, there were maybe 20% of the non-staff people who had masked up. I was just shaking my head. Who needs to pay for a comedy show when there is one playing out in front of me every day (a tragic comedy no less).
But then the show started, the lights went down, and I found I could forget all this nonsense for a couple of hours. It turns out it was just what I needed. And it’s been a few days since I went but – fingers crossed – it looks like my “risk” of not wearing the wafer thin paper on my face has paid off and I have not caught “the covid ™”.
Great article, Todd.
Those trusty fact-checkers expose that it’a nasty disinfo that Biden said people should prepare for hurricanes by getting vaccinated:
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/09/scicheck-posts-take-bidens-vaccination-and-hurricane-prep-comments-out-of-context-again/
Yes – he said it a year ago and in the middle of garbage waffle. Take that, social media!
‘quite a few along the way are killed — conveniently disappearing in a puff of red smoke’
This was during the advent of color tv’s into American households (we had yet to get our first, a cheap Zenith; the Corroons were already on their second, a huge, heavy, half-wood Quasar). The show may well have been developed around that puff of red smoke.
(It is a little-known fact that every color in the spectrum is evident in the train car in The Wild, Wild West.)
The writer assumes free thinkers are in the majority in this society and the world, this is not so! The masses unfortunately are steeped in a mind fog, mesmerized by the globalists’ COVID, Ukraine, GMOs are safe, the economy is sound narratives. While not as many wear masks out in the park or while driving alone these days, the masses still believe some or all aspects of the COVID BS. I was speaking with a friend the other day and she told me her thirteen year old grandson contracted COVID. I said I thought young children couldn’t get it, she said “oh yes but her grandson’s bout with it showed itself as the flu or a cold because he was vaccinated!
I was stunned, I didn’t know what to say. The fear based mind control campaigned has been a huge success even though some of it is wearing off due to psychic fatigue of the sameness of the propaganda and a return to some semblance of “normalcy”.
The globalist overlords are still at it ramping up for the next pandemic (Monkeypox proved to be a dude) or social crisis to keep us anxious divided and at each other’s throats. Hopefully more people will begin to think for themselves, become more discerning and skeptical as THE TRUTH becomes more evident and the narratives continue to unravel.
Why do you think I assume free thinkers are in the majority? I don’t at all.
It wasn’t anything you wrote per se, I got the impression (I probably projected onto you) when I read your last paragraph, “If we are somehow deeply disturbed by mask wearing, or whatever we experience that identifies an “invader” but become conscious of the true reasons we are disturbed, it will help by allowing the full story to emerge—these people are basically no different than they ever have been, and to forgive them, and love them for who they are, fellow human beings, but at the same time strive toward a culture that doesn’t create this way of distorted thinking for the generations to come.” Creating a culture requires intention, purpose, consistence cooperation and a way to maintain it. From my experiences the people who drank the COVID Kool-Aid far outnumber free thinkers and unfortunately do not seem willing to abandon their “beliefs” and create such a culture that lasts for generations to come. I apologize for my error.
He never said that and it isn’t even implied.
From someone who knows what has become of standard operating procedure:
A person who is willing to stare at a cellphone while riding a bike in public becomes a danger, at least potentially, because something is suspect regarding their ability to think straight, and if there are enough of these types milling around, then our alarm bells go off…
Your little innocuous cellular toys are turning you into rear-brain operative zombies – unable to discern reality with your own eyes and ears.
One example of how these devices affect brain function: >
Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms
Military Medical Research
December 2015
DOI:10.1186/s40779-015-0033-6
“The damaging effects of MW radiation on the brain include brain dysfunction and brain structural damage. An epidemiological survey found that MW radiation caused human fatigue, headache, excitement, dreams, memory loss and other symptoms of neurasthenia [20]. In addition, there were impaired learning and memory abilities in rats after MW radiation, as determined by the Morris water maze [5,6,21,22].
MW radiation may also lead to neuronal shrinkage, nuclear condensation, mitochondrial swelling, an expanded endoplasmic reticulum, alterations to the synaptic gaps and widened vascular endothelial connections, where mitochondrial injury occurred earlier and more severely [5,21,23-25].”
Like thousands of similar studies exposing direct evidence of mitochondrial damage to brain structures, the authors conclude that “more research is needed”. In the mean time, hundreds of millions of humans are being reduced to idiocy by exposures to microwave and radio broadcast frequencies.
Full text: (PDF) Effects of microwave radiation on brain energy metabolism and related mechanisms (researchgate.net)
The MW or RF is worse inside cars with closed windows, and close to phone towers.
Hello mego: Yes. Newer model cars and trucks are electromagnetic nightmares. Many engineers know these cars are bio hazards, but they continue to design convenience garbage no one needs.
‘A considerable percentage of the people we meet on the street are people who are empty inside, that is, they are actually already dead. It is fortunate for us that we do not see and do not know it. If we knew what a number of people are actually dead and what a number of these dead people govern our lives, we should go mad with horror.’
A big proportion of people are of inadequate intelligence, trapped in dogma or mentaly ill. This in itself would not be cause for alarm if there was no parasitical oligarchy.
There is also
:- deliberately undermined schooling
:- the life-long stress of political and commercial propaganda, social or personal dogma, making a living, and getting along with relatives or neighbours.
‘It is hard to say what to do about this’
I agree. I can’t really say what to do. Where to do (or what has caused all of this) seems an easier question.
The art of story telling and the belief in stories as if they are real, is where the where to do starts (what has caused all of this).
It’s an old problem and it’s a difficult problem. The master of story telling (Plato) somewhere suggests (I forgot where) to completely forbid story telling. But humans are weak, and will not allow this, they need stories (or art).
How to overcome this problem. Two ways.
-Plato suggests to make stories that are ‘useful’ (like the lordly lie). And this is what of course happens on a daily basis (covid, Ukraine, Nordstream). Problem is: what is the definition of useful aka useful to whom?
-Artists overcome this problem by making their own stories. Stories that are useful to them only. Like Vincent van Gogh who paints sun flowers. ‘Art for art sake…’
A third way, is to combine these two: make your own story, but never forget that it should be useful for someone else (a master). That is intellectual prostitution, in which academics, politicians, propaganda writers or other sort of grant and fame receiving individuals are very capable of and/or are trained to do. ‘Money for God sake…’
The problem of intellectual prostitution is that you think too much about how to please others, while forgetting what would be useful for yourself. But, being a capable story teller (otherwise you would never have become an academic, politician, propaganda writer, etc as the system filters out bad story tellers for such professions), there are endless ways in how to deceive yourself in the why your intellectual prostitution is useful to yourself. The bottom line is: it isn’t. Pleasing others for the sake of pleasing another for a little fame or fortune is, like prostitution, always a bad idea.
Okay, but what is worst. To me: the people who have never thought for themselves or even tried for instance by writing an essay or even a comment below the line! – This is applicable to the far majority. Yet these people, like all people need stories. Now I think there is an excuse for some people, maybe even the far majority of the population: that is people who simply don’t have the luxury to think for themselves because time is money, and since the money is so little they need all their time to make ends meet. Okay, they are in a bad situation and they have my empathy.
But what about the main stream academics? – These people from the western world with all their credentials who had all the time and money in the world prior to covid (and still are pampered). What is it that made them decide to not, even once, think for themselves? To me, that seems a terrible waste of energy. Not everyone needs to build his own world view like Vincent Van Gogh, or David Rockefeller made their own world view, and made it. But there is an art in trying.
What is it that people who could try, don’t try? – To me that’s just laziness and it’s hard for me to feel sorry about people who could do better but are just lazy. Why don’t they think for themselves but prefer to be living like automatons, repeating the standard line that someone else made for them, and which is generally not in their interest… This is why I agreed that ‘It is hard to say what to do about this’. I really find this problematic and I do not really have a solution…
Okay, I’ll be silent now. Sorry for the double post (I should not have submitted my previous post earlier, since it was not complete), but wanted to write this of my chest, so there you go…
The only mind you can control is your own.
Todd’s conclusion here is irresponsible and dangerous. There is no place in a sane society for people who aid and abet mass murder and child abuse.
No, these people he is referencing should at best be ostracized from society.
Were all the ‘Good Germans’ “fellow human beings” too that we should fully embrace in our shared humanity?
That many of these people are as they have always been but only now we have visible evidence is not a worthy explanation of anything- many of us have known who these people are for years.
If you think these careerists, apparathciks, professionals etc. won’t nosedive the plane with you sitting right there before ever admitting their errors you’ve got another thing coming. Anyone who needs more evidence of this is not paying attention.
We are talking about people who have been cheerleading for and are continuing to promote some of the most massive crimes we’ve ever seen.
This sort of mush-mouthed quasi-Zen “understanding” and “love them for who they are” rubbish is in itself a form of psychosis.
Maxwell: Boom!!! Right on target. Stockholm Syndrome (a condition in which hostages develop a psychological bond with their captors) is alive and well. At least for some…
Absolutely Maxwell.
Were I one of the psycho few I’d love it if my ‘awake’ enemies were showing such understanding of the collaborators/compliant/cowards who are helping to further my interests.
I call them out whenever and wherever I encounter them; it’s cost me friends and made me enemies. I do it as some are complying for the social approbation; if that’s all they get, they will be more likely to continue.
”No, these people he is referencing should at best be ostracized from society.”
NO, people can’t be ostracized from society. Society is not a cult.
Society means all people, hermits included. The state is a different matter, it being an organization of few people that has been infiltrating and invading society.
Human society at large is Humanity. We are all in humanity as we are in society. Even murderers belong to society and to humanity.
Ostracizing murderers is not a good idea. Justice must be served.
All cults are social organisations and are therefore societies; these societies are woven from the fabric of humanity; there is indeed humanity but there is not one humanity… Much as there is indeed science but there is not one science.
Sometimes when the answer seems elusive it is because the question is amorphous.
In his article Todd was not condoning mass murder and child abuse…nor was he saying to love these people no matter what…Geez…comment on what was ACTUALLY said.
Nor is there any place in a sane society for anyone who commissioned, financed or gained from these massive crimes. A Purge of these criminals and removal of all their assets is required.
He’s just displaying the usual meek mindset that is one of the most expressive traits of the herds of MMS/3i’s.
I love this article. I often feel unease when I am out and about… and Todd’s words help me make sense of this. I saw someone in the comments take offense at forgiving these people who are on the other side of the fence with all of this. I believe Todd is certainly not condoning people’s blind acceptance of the lies being told…I think by us forgiving these people, it helps lessen the anger and fear of their crazy choices that are impacting us all…helping us focus instead on the most powerful ways to present the truth.
‘Truth’ did not persuade the compliant/collaborators/cowards to behave as they do, ‘truth’ will not persuade them to change.
It’s taken me a long time to understand this ‘truth’.
We are all doomed no discussion we are going to die
Some truth hurts too much, which is the root of the main problem too.
If the tooth hurts too much you may need to see a dentist but try to avoid a root canal.
Invaders, like it. Enablers is another label that fits. The mask wearers, like the voters for the oligarchy’s political parties, like all the lemmings lined up crying about the so-called Queen dying, are the enablers. They make it all work. Without them, it would not work, in effect. Ya, it’s difficult now for me to see people wearing masks voluntarily (i.e., outside of medical facilities where I’m at, other than that it’s not required). Going to the supermarket and seeing them, at the mall, at the park, outside! People walking down sidewalks with no one within hundreds of feet, wearing their masks while it’s 80 degrees out. I’ve been pointing out since the beginning how these people can be seen as the enemy at this point. They are enablers, and they’re quickly becoming enemies. They are the globalists’ army. If we really are in a war here, with real consequences concerning life, death, liberty and freedom, the battle lines are going to have to be drawn. I don’t know, maybe I’m being too severe, and we should all be nice to each other. Maybe we’re all enablers of some kind or another.
None of us are perfect, accept imperfection and you will accept yourself.
Stress Kills.
I already accept myself man and there’s a difference between imperfection and active collaboration with the enemy.
Whose side are you on? Accept imperfection! Love thy neighbour! Well they don’t so why should I.
Interesting post. But what if your wife, child, uncle, aunt, second cousin twice removed. is one of them. More to the point I hate and detest everything about them. The are utterly loathsome; they have been emptied out and filled up with shit. Sorry, I am getting a bit carried away. But this Covid crap – I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
Maybe it is aliens. Maybe it always has been.
You might be right…
Perhaps humans are the aliens…
If all humans vanished tomorrow, how do you think the rest of life on Earth would fare?
Edward Curtin’s latest piece is a RIPPER:
http://edwardcurtin.com/only-adult-children-still-believe-u-s-propaganda/
Todd…
What’s that?
I am making an assumption.
Ah! Good to know… I’ve been wondering for many years what the hell does those two words mean and what animal are the ones writing/saying them are refering to.
No luck so far!
‘It is hard to say what to do about this’
I agree. I can’t really say what to do. Where to do (or what has caused all of this) seems an easier question.
The art of story telling and the belief in stories as if they are real, is where the where to do starts (what has caused all of this).
It’s an old problem and difficult. The master in story telling (Plato) somewhere suggests (I forgot where) to completely forbid story telling. But humans are weak, and will not allow this, they need stories (or art).
How to overcome this problem. Two ways.
-Plato suggests to make stories that are ‘useful’ (like the lordly lie). And this is what of course happens on a daily basis (covid, Ukraine, Nordstream). Problem is: what is the definition of useful aka useful to whom?
-Artists overcome this problem by making their own stories.
A third way, is to combine these two: make your own story, but never forget that it should be useful (for a master). That is intellectual prostitution, and in which academics, politicians, propaganda writers or other sort of grant and fame receiving individuals are most capable of.
The “COVID vaccine” is not enough…?
If You Are Over 50 Your Government Wants You Dead
The following part is from Vernon Coleman’s book
Why and How Doctors and Nurses kill more people than Cancer:
In Britain, it is now official Government policy to ignore the needs of the elderly. Doctors and nurses are told to let old people die – and to withhold treatment which might save their lives. Hospital staff are told to deprive the elderly of food and water so that they die rather than take up hospital beds. Nursing home staff have even been given the right to sedate elderly patients without their knowledge. The only -ism that no one cares about is ageism.
But at what age are patients simply allowed to die? And how old is too old for patients to be resuscitated? At what point does society have the right to say ‘You’ve lived long enough, now you must die and make way for someone else’? And why should resuscitation be decided by age? It is possible to argue that it would make as much sense to decide according to wealth or beauty. But ageism is now officially accepted. Anyone over 60 is now officially old, though in a growing number of hospitals the cut off age for resuscitation is 50.
We live in a politically correct world but the elderly don’t count – particularly if they are white and English. Report after report after report shows elderly patients being left in pain, in soiled bed clothes. Elderly patients in hospital are ignored by staff and left to starve to death, denied even water if they cannot get out of bed and fetch it themselves.
Old people are a burden which the Government cannot afford and so the politicians will continue to authorise whatever methods are necessary to ensure that the number of burdensome old people is kept to a minimum. The existence of an absurd branch of medicine called geriatrics is used as an excuse to shove old people into backwater wards and to provide them with second-rate medical treatment. In February 2011, an official report condemned the NHS for its `inhumane treatment of elderly patients’ and stated that NHS hospitals were ‘failing to meet even the most basic standards of care’ for the over-65s. It is no exaggeration to say that the NHS treats the elderly with contempt. (It used to be said that you can judge a civilisation by the way it treats its elderly.)
Read More: If You Are Over 50 Your Government Wants You Dead
Old people are a burden which the Government cannot afford
“Cannot afford” because the oligarchy has misappropriated most of public wealth including taxes, pension funds, facilities and natural resources that would be more than enough.
The bastards tax people to death for nearly fifty years, them look to murder them to save money.
This is not the case here in the US. When an old person enters a hospital, he brings with him a very big Cash Cow – Medicare. Keeping the old person alive then becomes an exercise in self-interest.
An old person is best defined by the medical establishment as “the sicker the better.”
God help old people if doctors stop caring about money.
Wow. Someone didn’t like my take on old people. Sorry if I offended someone by suggesting there might be reasons here in the US for “allowing” old people to live.
Now it goes without saying that ANYONE without medical insurance – regardless their age – is too great a drain on the system to keep alive. But if they have insurance, and so long as the insurance keeps the money flowing…they will live.
In the good old USA: They Live. (Except for those in care facilities whose bills go unpaid.)
Old people are a burden which the Government cannot afford and so the politicians will continue to authorise whatever methods are necessary to ensure that the number of burdensome old people is kept to a minimum.
The real burden is the Government and the lying politicians NOT old people – so why keep on voting for them to run the dog and pony show of a system that is now so corrupt it would even embarrass Lucifer and almost put Satan (aka Ahriman) to shame as well?
Quote of the day for lying and conniving politicians:
“Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it”. (John8:44)
body snatcchers, as many of us, who see, have said since march 20.
Well sabel… we were clearly the outsiders!
as things unfolded, donald sutherland’s scream/howl/thing became “society”, too right,
was one of first images in my mind then : [
Well what I believe about all those who PUBLICLY called for the unvaccinated to have their human rights basically stripped away is that, now the vaccines have proven to be:
a) NON-Efficacious; and
b) DANGEROUS to more people than any other vaccine in history
then we should NOT be forgiving toward them, since mostly those people were:
a) Highly visible public figures (I include media prostitutes in that);
b) In general earning far, far more than the median income;
So when you speak disgusting and despicable evil, from a position of highly paid, highly visible pulpits (sark), then they should be punished 100 times more fiercely than a reprobate MP who satisfied the lust of his throbbing dick with a consenting escort, research assistant or ambitious 21 year old on the make (and probably on the take).
Now I’m sure you are all aware about the absolute intolerance of the British media for any senior politician caught with his trousers down with a consenting female not his wife. OFF with his political career HEAD!
So quite how any of these media shysters like Owen Jones, Piers Morgan, David Aaronovitch and dozens more like them can conceivably be allowed to work, ever again, is beyond me.
There needs to be a reckoning, there does NOT need to be an amnesty and these rich psychopaths, sociopaths, narcissists and prostitutes need their careers ended, their assets seized and their futures to involve being unemployed for the rest of their lives, upon pain of being shot through the back of the head.
OK, I’m picking on the media here.
But I’m deadly serious about this for all academics, for every consultant doctor, for every MP and civil servant and for every financier, billionaire, arms dealer, pharma employee/executive etc etc.
We, the vaccine skeptics, got it right.
So we, the vaccine skeptics, dictate the terms of resolution and future direction.
The prostitutes got it wrong. They sang for their pimps’ suppers. They pay the price for their immoral earnings.
We should be so lucky Rhys.
The justice system of every nation is designed to either punish or perish JUST US. Not them.
Funny how that works.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
The problem with academics (ie those that fully went into the covid mania) is that they truly believed that their intentions were good.
Question: how to punish a person who truly believed in its own good intentions?
Better than to individually punish the foolish academic, would be to get rid of the academic system where, most definitely, roads to hell are paved with good intentions.
Any ‘academic’ that truly believed that their intentions were good, is not worthy of the title … NOT w-o-r-t-h-y. There are far too many who go along with the ‘party-line’ and are only in their positions for the $$$$$. Enough already.
You think academics have “good intentions?” We must live on different planets.
I am surrounded by them and get to read their exchanges. Nothing could be further from the truth.
These are some of the most self-serving, psychotic humans walking the planet- most of them are completely divorced from reality and disdainful of those who do not live in their delusional world- hell they are disdainful of each other half the time.
Most academics are seriously sick people.
Exactly. Academics have always been like that (compromise: the huge majority of them, with a few exceptions) before the covidism. And adding to this, complicity in a criminal conspiracy to impose technocratic totalitarianism (which is undoubtedly one of the main goals of the covidism), to wipe out part of humanity, and to confuse the genome of humanity in order to change and control it, then what are they?** The same as the notorious Nazi scientists and those of the secret and some overt American projects, only worse because of the scale and importance of the covid operation. Have they, who are smart about everything, been stupid about understanding covid, which even many quite stupid and uneducated people understood (at least in general, the main thing for the purpose)? There is no such film.
**(Of course, there is one more thing that no one without a lot of experience with “sticking to magnets” can understand – neither by reflection nor by information can one be as sure as by direct experience. And it was abandoned…Mainly because, in my opinion, of the same academic FactChecker attitude in people to reject by default things that sound audacious at first glance.
And another, even more important reason: for convenience. Most people can’t even think about how they would try to get someone, even one inoculated, to want to participate in such a strange (but very simple) experiment. How about 5, and 10, and 50 or 100, to be credible with a large number of participants?
Most cannot ignore their ego (at great risk of ridicule, rejection, anathema; or simply futile efforts due to failure) in order to make even one such attempt, but now with much talk of some real resistance, I must believe them that they will make effective such resistance, which is 100 times more serious act than the said experiment?
I’m sorry – only actions solve things and give faith or disbelief in someone or something. In this sense, where we are, we have arrived with the active participation – in the face of their inaction – of the vast majority and, so to speak, of conscious people who understand the narrative, sometimes in great detail. So today it is also the exact result of shared actions between good and evil people.
Just think what it would have been like if this had become a buzz and been consistently held in reality for covid, compared to now that it has sunk in and become part of the “fake news about inoculation” even in much of the minds of covid-understanding people. Anyone can tell the difference between the two.
Non-participation – not just for the reasons mentioned, but for other reasons – of people who understand the narrative of getting the state of things to what it is today is fake news for self-esteem. Which in no way lessens the guilt of the malevolent academics.)
Fear is the oil that lubricates the gears of mind-numbed compliance.
Right.
Good to see you on the line. Many feel the opposite way, but… this is life. We cannot and should not have the same feels. 🙂
A plague of hubris Maxwell?
Or is it intellectual narcissism?
Perhaps if they had followed the creative instinct they would be more in harmony with humanity.
“how to punish”… 7 booster doses in one single JAB. If it fails repeat the process.
You can start with very low level of awareness Jedburgh’s! This is the only way to return Balance.
NON-Efficacious?
In the circumstances that sounds like a misnomer.
In 2018 four of six family here were seriously ill. Flu tests (no idea what form they took) all came back negative and diagnosis was of “a viral” ILI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7127078/) from which (2014):
So, how, based on the reported ILI studies, can the presence of any single pathogen be said to be causative of an ILI (rather than asymptomatic for that pathogen) in light of the fact that there was no pathogen found in all studies (at a rate of between 20% and 72% cases). Is co-infection from the unknown “no pathogen found” pathogen(s) not as likely/more likely to be causative of the ILI?
The same question applies to the “novel” virus of 2020.
Since the, alleged, novel 2020 pathogen is widely reported to be highly asymptomatic
(1 in 3 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/wuhan-novel-coronavirus-background-information/wuhan-novel-coronavirus-epidemiology-virology-and-clinical-features), it’s difficult to know whether to call it or any other, alleged, pathogen as pathogenetic.
Correlation is not proof of causation.
Around 2016, the US Human Microbiome Project found that many healthy people carry supposedly dangerous microbes. That finding was promptly buried.
Relative to Covid-19, I’m not skeptical, I’m certain.
Hello Rhys: I think it interesting that technocratic elites and gooberments of many Nations have effectively:
Ended careers, seized civilian assets, and forced millions into being unemployed for the rest of their lives – because they care so much for human health and freedoms…
The threat of being shot through the back of the head needs to be reversed…
Forgiveness does not mean condoning harmful actions of others.
The prostitutes got it wrong. They sang for their pimps’ suppers. They pay the price for their immoral earnings.
And who is going to make them pay that price Rhys – YOU?
Or perhaps you might be thinking that justice could be obtained via the corrupt legal system with its courts and lawyers – along with the policy officers that are employed to enforce the statutes of the UK Parliament (Corporation) aka the Police (another Corporation) – no chance!
So, what options does that leave us with for obtaining justice? And what are your suggestions to achieve that objective??????
You never seem to answer my questions these days Rhys for some unknown reason, but some kind of answer would nevertheless be appreciated.
“The War Racketeer Corporate Fascist Eugenicist Oligarch Mobster Psycho Nazis are using all this as cover to steal even more from WE THE PEOPLE (Humanity). The Psycho Nazis need to go.”
Not just USofT navy it was a NATO* drill/exercise!
*NAZI ATLANTIC TERRORIST ORGANIZATION (but not limited to the Atlantic!)
“Moocher Jens and his ilk must have their war racketeer corporate fascist handouts. Cavier, Pate and Filet Mignon are expensive…and getting even more expensive.”
“Only the little people eat bugsz”
“Close It Down!”
“Jens does not just use Drugsz…
https://twitter.com/saabarms/status/629552623742492672/photo/1
https://imgur.com/gallery/tbpxFQi
... he abuses them.
Hear, hear.
“They” needed to know who the invaders are.
As you say, the invaders have always been the way they are, it just needed a catalyst to make it evident.
It must have been nerve wracking for them to press the panic button and reveal the success rate of 50 years of social conditioning.
They’d pressed the same button on other invisible threats (terrorists etc) and knew it worked. Their monitoring of attitudes and behaviour is obsessive.
Anyway, they have a tried-and-tested exit strategy from any narrative that’s failing too badly – release new distractions and throw a few underlings under the bus.
Loved that show! Guess it generated healthy skepticism towards the government…
Surely the real invaders are the weirdo elites pushing the agenda. Some of them don’t even look human so fit the concept better.
Agreed – this is like soldiers being encouraged to vent all their spleen on the NCOs rather than looking at the generals.
BTW I happened to be watching an early 1970s’ BBC series THE EDWARDIANS. One episode was about Daisy Greville, subject of th song ‘Daisy, Daisy’. It was mentioned one of her many affairs was with Douglas Haig. Was he compromised? That, plus his Freemasonry, might explain his strategy in WW1 more than the explanations we’re usually given. She also happened to be one of those aristocratic socialists.
The scary thing is, the idiots have a vote , and they always vote for politicians.
“Rigged elections are not The Vote. They are shams put there to give the illusion of choice.”
“We do not have choices. We have owners.”
Who else can you vote for?
Everyone is a politician… Just some get paid while others pay.
Be the change.
Apparently ‘Invaders’ are thin on the ground in Africa Todd:
https://dissidentvoice.org/2022/09/i-bless-the-covid-stats-down-in-africa/
The cluster of symptoms known as covid is already taken by malaria and AIDS in Africa….
AIDS is fiction. Like convid. Poppers caused immune system in the West. Perhaps malnutrition in Africa. I wonder if the ban on hydroxychloroquine was an attempt to let malaria kill more Africans.