Sadly most people under the spell of the media have the attention span of a fish but for anyone paying attention the “COVID” narrative was an immediately recognisable scam, given what they did and tried to do before with “HIV”, “SARS”, “Ebola” etc.

And of course it always comes from Africa and never from, say , South Carolina or, God forbid, Jerusalem!

Viruses are theoretical constructs that are only “real” within computer models. They use the presence of arbitrary genetic sequences to “identify” them. Virology is a scam science mired in obfuscating jargon, deliberately induced ignorance and passive complicity in the scam.

Or it might turn out to be quite a lot more lethal than they’d expected, demolishing advanced civilisations. 

But it won’t, and can’t. There are no biological weapons of mass destruction despite the fearmongering efforts of many, piggybacking on the “nukes” fearmongering.
That’s because there are no “pathogens” that can be “released” to cause mass death or even mass disease. That is best accomplished by vaccines and the voodoo of mass media. Use the behavioural conditioning techniques to tell people they are getting sick and you bet some of them are getting sick. “Long Covid”, like AIDS, is forever!

The “reality” is that viruses are theory only. They have never been proven to exist. Read the articles and books by Sam and Mark Bailey.

What is your views on it now?

That might confirm that there aren’t any viruses, or maybe just that we can’t capture a virus in a way to satisfy Cowan.

If there aren’t pathogenic viruses then Lanka (it was Lanka who offered 100k) or Cowan or Bailey etc. could easily run a controlled study of Tobacco Mossaic Virus symptoms to see if they are transmissible between plants. If the symptoms aren’t transmissible then there’s some solid evidence; if they are transmissible then someone would need to research the phenomenon and proceed from there.

It’s not acceptable to continually make claims in a vacuum! :)) A2

Perhaps I shouldn’t mention this because now you’ll EYE me down but I must say, whenever you write any comment or article you are trolling, which is a leftist term I do not like.

Suffice to say, I would not delete anyone but am for BLOCKING. Let the readers decide and just because you don’t like what someone says is no reason to censor them but I do agree in EXTREME cases where they are purposefully being obnoxious in a really dumb way, perhaps but only if they keep repeating ad nauseam.

I was recently banned because I realize practiced FREE speech but the owner did not like what I was saying and threaten to remove me. Hence, I left because it was free speech I was practicing and opinions but it was obvious the owner just did not like what I was saying.