Figuring Out Their Angle
Todd Hayen
A federal law was recently passed in Canada called the Online News Act, or Bill C-18. Basically, this bill stops major online giants such as Google or Facebook (Meta) from posting news articles or links from any source deemed a “news outlet.”
For example, when I post a link to an article I’ve written that OffGuardian, the link disappears from my Facebook feed and a blurb shows up that says this link is blocked from Canadian readers. (UPDATE: I am barred from even posting links to articles from any news source because I am Canadian.)
Apparently others, in other countries, can see it, but no Canuckistani citizens can. Even though OffGuardian doesn’t give a hoot in hell if their articles show up on FB without compensation (an assumption on my part). In fact, I would assume they would encourage it as that is how they increase circulation.
The lawmakers claim that this bill was designed to protect the news source, such as The Washington Post, The New York Times, or even alternative news sources like the one I just mentioned, from lost revenue. The writers of the bill, coming straight from their big hearts of love and concern, claim they are looking out for the big news outlets as well as the little guy by blocking social media, including Google, from freely distributing their proprietary property: The News.
Right.
First of all, I have never heard a complaint from Big News about people posting links to their online pages. And surely they can all take care of themselves, as they do when they put up paywalls and limit the articles a person can read before having to purchase a subscription. Do they really need the government looking out for their interests?
I think these guys know how to market and how to advertise and how to effectively use the internet to sell their product. Censorship? Oh no, no, no, that’s not it at all!! “We are trying to make a law that is fair, thus correcting something that has not been fair for a long time.” Ha ha.
Seems like this fits the old adage “if it looks like a duck, if it walks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, it is a duck.” Or “you can dress a pig up in satin and lace, but it’s still a pig”—Ergo: “if it looks like censorship, reads like censorship, and has the overall effect of censorship, then it is censorship.” Do they really think we can’t see through this?
I remember the old Cheech and Chong joke (remember them? If you are ancient like me, you will) “Two guys walking down the road see a pile of dog poop. One says, “hey that looks like dog poop.” Then he bends over and touches it. He says, “feels like dog poop.” The other bends over and sniffs it. Says, “smells like dog poop.” Then he sticks his finger in it and tastes it. He says, “tastes like dog poop.” The other one says, “Well, good thing we didn’t step in it!!”
This applies to most sheep (sorry! I used that damn word again!) I mean really, folks. You all do your little “vetting”…“does this look legit? Does mommy and daddy government say this is good for us?” Along with a few other “tastes, touches, and feels” and then you all determine it is just fine (when I say “you” I don’t mean all of you reading this, I don’t think YOU fall for it. And I know the Cheech and Chong analogy doesn’t really fit but twist it around a little bit and you’ll see why I thought of it.)
I use this example to illustrate the fact that many indeed can’t see through to the dog poop. As amazing as it seems, this sort of thing flies right past the sheep-types. If one of these poor mindless creatures came home to a house that was being bulldozed and were told by the government, “we think a spy lived in your house 20 years ago and we want to make sure he doesn’t come back,” they would shrug their shoulders and look for a refrigerator box under the freeway to bed down in that night. Nothing fazes them. It is all ok if Big Brother says it is ok. Big Brother obviously knows what is best, and he is always looking after us.
Sorry to those sensitive ones out there, I am being mean to our fluffy friends. Trust me, I still love them.
Just for yucks, here is the Facebook explanation blurb they pull up when you click “learn more.”
I love the last line: “My comment has been labeled as sharing news content. What can I do?” And the answer is, “Shut the f-ck up and follow the rules, you little pissant!!” Nice.
If you look at the actual bill, it is interesting how the focus is entirely on this ruse of protecting the news source and plays this game of “good guy” trying to do what is fair by the poor hapless news purveyors. “Big bad Facebook is stealing your property, and we are here to protect you.” If that were really the truth, why not make a law that requires the “news intermediaries” (Facebook, Google, et al) to pay a statutory fee for news they present on their pages. No, no, no, instead they just deny the link some poor bonehead (like me) innocently puts on his Facebook feed—they censor it so no one sees it and puts up a disclaimer so all can see what they are pretending they are up to.
Since all the big legacy news sources are in on the whole agenda, they don’t care at all. It doesn’t do them any good, nor does it do them any harm. They already have their paywalls, their subscription requirements, all Facebook et al to them is free advertising. It is, in fact, the smaller alternative news sources that will suffer greatly. They depend on the “intermediaries” to spread their word, which often is in contradiction to the mainstream media, i.e., the news they report is actual truth. This is the real target of C-18 —“misinformation”—again, i.e. the actual truth.
Sheep don’t care about any of this. In fact, even if they knew the prime directive was to keep truth from the public, they would be all for it. The truth, to sheep, is viewed as misinformation and thus it is typically annoying. Anything that ruffles their natural wool coats is to be avoided. None of them wants to take any sort of responsibility. It’s just easier that way.
Many have said in the past that the “angle” the big boys take is to entice with the carrot, and then whack with the stick.
Bill C-18 is a case in point. But have you noticed how the carrot is becoming less and less sweet?
I have read that this is typical as well. Pretty soon there will just be a stick. No carrot. The carrot in this example is more of a neutral sort of thing. It isn’t really enticing, but it also isn’t pure stick. They have disguised their little C-18 bill by pretending it is about something it isn’t.
The carrot isn’t as sweet as usual because having news articles you post on FB just ripped out of your feed is not very appealing. But at least they have what seems to be a fair reason—or is it? Point being, the carrot and the stick are disguised as something they are not.
Many fall for it and just shrug their shoulders figuring it is some copyright thing no one in the free world has ever quite understood anyway, and we’re done with it. Whatever. We are slowly being acclimated to the brave new world where it will be stick only.
The march toward totalitarianism rambles on, like Sherman’s “scorched earth” March to the Sea during the American Civil war—this march toward censorship and dictatorship is a march of utter destruction of freedoms and rights, designed to leave us destitute and hopeless—only right now the scorching is a little disguised, soon it won’t be so much. Bill C-18 has upped the ante a notch or two. This law is much more than it seems.
Todd Hayen is a registered psychotherapist practicing in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. He holds a PhD in depth psychotherapy and an MA in Consciousness Studies. He specializes in Jungian, archetypal, psychology. Todd also writes for his own substack, which you can read here
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
When we see what’s happening outside the political arena (supposedly outside that cesspool), it’s easier to see how they expect to get away with abject censorship.
The Nobel Prize – which of course has been little more than a joke since Mr. Obama received the Prize for Peace Oct. 9, 2009 – went (for Medicine) to Katalin Kariko and Drew Weissman for their “discoveries” leading to the Clot Shot.
When the most prestigious “Prize” in human history goes to enablers of mass murder, censorship almost looks like a cakewalk.
Posting anything (links) beyond funny cat videos on social media, especially FB is a completele waste of time because it will be shadow banned or covered with a notice claiming going to the link will destroy your computer and you will also be investigated by some agencies for viewing the linked content.
However, a workaround is to paste a Headline and juicy section of the article along with clear information on where to find the article.
Yes, you are right. But the point is that they are censoring, the value of the platform they are censoring on is irrelevant. It is still blatant censorship, and that is the problem.
Thanks for the workaround…of course most people will not bother. Personally I don’t post anything on FB except articles from my substack and from OG, which is where I first encountered the problem.
For me censorship means you want to hide other angles to an event for a solo show of your own.
Trudeau wants to hide plenty: the foreknowledge of the NAZI they applauded in parliament the other day, 5 Ayes contacts with assassinated terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, illegal immigration facilitation for cash, his WEF life etc.
This is a bit off topic, but how in God’s name can these people (the “agenda”) post such a blatant lie as this??
This if from here: https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/peter-mccullough-makes-multiple-false-misleading-claims-covid19-vaccine-safety-efficacy-podcast/?fbclid=IwAR0DRwWXauG2SpcjKF2WTnJ3UkLVXQrsZGL2NePoBhDDS671X7O8VU0dShc
And is in response to Peter McCullough’s speech to the European Parliament (which was excellent by the way.) How can they lie like this? Here is the quote from the above website…
“No evidence suggests a link between COVID-19 vaccines and a rise in deaths and medical conditions. Robust clinical trials showed no benefit of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin treatment in COVID-19 patients”
The poor dears haven’t one shred of Truth to offer the public. So what are they going to do but offer lies? and hope no one notices. It’s cold and lonely and oh so cruel at the top.
“What’s wrong with lies?” they sadly ask the rest of the world (rhetorically, of course).
I remember when I was a kid there was a bully at school who used to tell the other kids bald faced lies. He knew he was lying, and just wanted the yucks when he saw gullible kids fall for his lies. This drove me nuts. Feels the same today,
If they build their tower of lies much higher, it’s gonna topple and CRUSH those hubristic pricks.
That’ll be sad.
Oh God I hope so.
I think that’s one of the scam ‘fact checker’ sites…
It’s disgraceful, of course, the (as you say) blatant lies that they spew out.
I did not look into the site, thanks for letting me know…it is such bullshit.
Yes, you’re spot on: it’s BS, what (all) the ‘fact checkers’ write… they should be ashamed of themselves.
I’ll say it again: beware the word robust. It’s the new rigorous. Any time you see it — ‘Robust clinical trials showed’ — you’re being fed a line of shyte.
Yes, I know that. Why did you send that comment to me? Perhaps you meant to send it to Todd Hayen, who posted the link to the article?
Since Twitter/X (Twix?) is 95% news content, it’ll be much harder to implement than on FB/Meta. What if the “news source” is a comedy platform, like the Jimmy Dore show? Should we all just become comedians, commenting on clown world?
If they want to weaponize compassion, we can weaponize comedy. Del Bigtree gave one of his best interviews here, talking about this “because we care” wolf in sheep’s clothing:
THE PLACEBO LIE
People aren’t “anti-vax”, they are pro-vaccine safety trials.
Naomi Wolf Joins WarRoom To Drop Bombshell Report Over FOIA Request Findings
They KNEW back in May 2021 that jabs were causing blood clots but continued to lie!!
Why should it always be about me me me being censored by FB or government and not about the capitalist system having crises and not being able to serve everybody as we suppose it to do? Also, not being published by a privately owned social networking service, within the regime of private lucrative property of which many however accept the principle, is IMO not equivalent to a breach of freedom of speech in the proper sense of the expression, as meaning being free to speak one’s mind, directly, not necessarily in a mediated way.
To clarify the point, believing that not being published by technological media is equivalent to being prevented from speaking one’s mind is the same as believing that being refused glasses and other industrial containers is equivalent to being prevented from drinking water. That industrial and technological developments molded our way of life is true but shouldn’t make us forget that those developments are stages of History have a beginning and thus are not absolute. We shouldn’t forget what speaking one’s mind means and has always meant, intimately connected with us as a species endowed with language.
Examples of true breach of freedom of speech abound in history nevertheless, for instance Stalinist Russia where one thought it up several times and looked around carefully before opening one’s mouth.
What we are witnessing here in my view has nothing particularly to do with us; it is a yet new spectacular display of contradictions within Capital.
AFAIK, the story goes like this: Canadian News industry, as distinguished from social media networking, is in bad shape (pdf from Canadian Local News Research Project) and wants, in times of global crisis, to settle accounts with its competitors, be bailed out, or whatever. The specific situation is that the public is mostly accessing the news through search engines or social media rather than going directly to the website of the news, with reason though for, generally, the information on the news website is behind a paywall or only a minimum view is accessible. But there being alternative ways to access that content elsewhere from contributors in massively accessed places, people just go to a search engine and type what they are looking for; also, even free content is likely, as by a reflex, accessed through social media where some users publish it or link to it. The point is that traffic is drawn away from the digital News platforms to mass social media platforms and search engines. Notice one, among many contradictions: social media and search engines are first choice method to make a company, in this case News outlets, known and traffic to that effect is a godsend; it’s a marketing tool; but int these times of malaria, they are perceived as “unhealthy” competitors sucking traffic away. You see, perception varies depending on whether there is or there is no money.
So people in the News industry are saying to government: “Look here, we are a bunch of hard working people here trying to make a living with a hell of added value (yes I know, they produce government approved, agenda driven, scaremongering, warmongering information, etc, but that doesn’t change the fact it’s an entreprise with the constraints inherent to capitalism), then all that hard work gets repackaged into links and made available in search engines and social media (a good thing and a bad thing at the same time as Capital fancies) which profit from each click on the link without adding any value to our production. We want a piece of that revenue.” So the government set up a legal framework (C-18 bill) within which News production firms can negotiate with technological social media networking the pecuniary right of the latter to make revenue out of the former’s labour without adding value to it. This bill dates from April 2022.
Note that it is not the Canadian government that is preventing people from posting News links; it is social media (FB in this case) that finally refused to share its revenue from traffic (no value added and practically no cost incurred that is) of News content (some of it at least) and therefore simply disabled sharing such content to avoid infringing the law. As indicated below, it is “in response to Canadian government legislation,” that “news content can’t be shared,” which sounds like it’s the government’s fault but is really nothing more than one instance, within the regime of lucrative private property, of the right not to be subjected to a legislation by opting out of its conditions of application.
This is a result of the necessary contradictions within capitalism whereby “sharing”, from being a marketing tool, is perceived as a tool of “unfair” competition, as a result of previous developments (the medical theatre). This also shows the only interest, however disguised as a “service”, these companies (both of them) have and must have within this regime, and therefore we shouldn’t be surprised when their actions don’t conform to their discourse.
There’s one fly sitting in the “private property” ointment – and it’s a big one.
Those who set the stage for censorship also happen to be the very ones working day and night to make sure the Internet with its plethora of privately held concerns is the ONLY means of self-expression left on Earth.
Try standing on a street corner speaking truth to power. It’s no longer possible – you’d be arrested five minutes into your manifesto for disturbing the peace. Or placing flyers on windshields – your flyers’d be crumpled and thrown on the ground.
“We have a perfectly good Internet for that sort of thing!” they will say. And then turn around and make it impossible for you to use that Internet as your mouthpiece by playing the “private property” card.”
That’s the contradiction inherent within lucrative private property: Commodities have two contradictory values: use-value and exchange-value. The commodity must be useful, wanted and cheap enough to be sold, whose usefulness mustn’t decline over time (by concocting new uses); at the same time, there must be room enough to adapt the commodity or its use so as to remain profitable, in response to independent conditions such as the larger economic context. So they do everything to make our stay online enjoyable and useful (that, they amply achieved IMO), but they must preset strict rules that limit our use, the most important one being securing their right to change the rules.
That’s why our use of the Internet is felt like a catch-22 or a stalemate situation. In any event, it’s the word “censorship” in the case of our (voluntary) use of their services that I take exception to, instead of, say, rules of use.
Well, it’s past time we stood on that box in a public square and spoke our mind to power!!! Seriously! Instead of whining like spoiled children over Zuckerberg or Musk not conceding to us the publication of a string of 0’s and 1’s. If we’re taken away, as it is happening already, then that’s it, censorship that is, but at least it’s worth it, and we’d know where we stand. That’s where things are heading anyway.
Now the big fishes (social media, where the money is) are having scraps with the little fishes (news business, the poor parent). It’s fated.
Look on the bright side. Perhaps we’ll be inspired to actually meet and talk with sheep in person, face to face, heart and soul to heart and soul . . . rather than just sharing links on social media and thinking we are helping dismantle the machine.
No. I think that we need to get outside it. In the real. Facebook is a big dollop of molasses in which frenzied ‘truthers’ beat their wings in fervent dissemination. Only to wither up, spent and disillusioned. I have some personal experience with this. Sharing shit online gets us almost nowhere. I’ve taken to direct conversation with others, and it has a real effect. Hearts and minds are best connected to with all the faculties and appendages that make us living beings. The 6 senses, the material reality of us. Not the bullshit text blob or image repost that you’re reduced to online, here in these ‘spaces.
So, fuck C-18. Yep, it’s a shit sandwich. But pushing us out of the crappy online limited hangouts and back into the real, is a good thing, IMO.
It’s contagious – all Western governments are doing it:
legislating laws that are ‘vaguely defined’, ‘nebulously defined’…
All such laws are open to interpretation to suit the occasion…
And all government spokespersons respond to criticism with
claims such as “getting the balance right”…(Orwell’s duckspeak ?)
What the fuck is “The Balance” – that clearly governments claim
the right to decide…(more duckspeak ?)
https://reclaimthenet.org/tv-networks-join-the-pushback-against-australias-proposed-anti-misinformation-law
Good Thing ?
Did you say that the facebook fellow doesn’t allow canucks to link to the Warshington Post or the NYT ? Surely that must be a good thing ? Why would any truther link to these fountains of bankster misinformation ?
I hear ‘ya, but that’s not the point. The not linking to the big boys is the cover, the damage is that they don’t allow links to ANY news source. And the point isn’t even that “people won’t get the news” the point is that it is blatant censorship. ANY censorship is bad, even censorship to propaganda.
Thank you for leading a conversation long past due. May it continue.
Note: the carrot/stick metaphor refers to the best way to get a mule cart moving. Dangle a carrot before the mule’s nose at the end of a stick. The poor mule chases the carrot all day long & pulls your cart right along.
So, it’s not carrot or stick, but both. Human smarts! Such a beautiful metaphor, almost poetry. Too bad we’re so far from the experience.
Could it be you can’t even post links to external sources any more on FB because social media (and other??) platforms are now being threatened with hefty fines, 5% of their annual world-wide profit, if I remember correctly, if they permit the posting of so-called misinformation?
In this case, it would be easier for the platform to disable the posting of any content that isn’t just photos of your McD meal and such. Heck, why stop there!
Well, more than likely this is one of the reasons cited for this move. But it is of course bogus. This is mass, broad, censorship…”with a good reason” of course. And yes, who cares about FB. But considering that many people do get their “news” from the platform, this is an effort to clean it up. It is so “Brave New World”…keep everyone stupid…pacified…looking at only cat’s a McD meals…that’s the real point to all of this.
I would rather have a “all news” out there than “no news”…the agenda will still find its way into the collective psyche whether that is on FB or not. The contrary news, the truth, will have a much harder time getting out there. Garbage will get out there as well, but then we are expected to have enough common sense to dismiss that for ourselves. We don’t need mommy and daddy to do it for us.
Agreed, I’d rather get all the “news”, rubbish inclusive, than have it vetted for me.
And even for those too naive to discern, they too should have the right be hoodwinked IMO 😉
As a Canuckistani myself, I cannot tell if my wasteful comments appear or not.
However, I conclude that content is often shadowbanned, through simple life experience:
If one is obnoxious in real life and encounters push back, why should that be entirely absent online – silence.
You know something is not right.
Damn good point.
For those who have not dug down deep into the details of the covid op, the following interview is a must read. Sasha Latypova is remarkable for her knowledge, hard work, and clarity of expression, particularly as English is not her native tongue.
I found this excerpt toward the end of the interview remarkable.
Mr. Jekielek: You’ve been in the middle of the biopharmaceutical industrial complex. You’re aware of its size and power. Did you think twice about disclosing these things as you started?
Ms. Latypova: I don’t worry about it. If they wanted to kill me, they would kill me, but that doesn’t concern me. Because the evil that has unfolded in the past three years is unfathomable to most people. They prefer to deny it, rather than to deal with it. I don’t want to deny it.
I want people to have the knowledge that I do from my professional background and to understand what’s going on. In fact, we have been successful so far, because the uptick in these shots now is practically zero. There’s a huge distrust of the pharmaceutical industry and of the health authorities.
I would suggest that you pass it on to any acquaintance who has an even vaguely open mind to the reality of what has occurred.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/pharma-insider-speaks-out-about-vaccine-batches-5371394?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
She spoke at this symposium recently.
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/on-guard-for-the-liberty-of-mankind-event/on-guard-for-the-liberty-of-mankind/
Well, here in the United States of Imperialism, we’re going to fight totalitarianism by having another election for President between Joe Biden and Donald Trump. And projections are that at least 180 million people will vote for one or the other. So there, eat your hearts out, other countries. That’s democracy in action! This is land of the FREE, man! And home of the, ahem, uh, brave?
“DeSantis: “I think we need accountability for what this government did to this country with the COVID restrictions, mandates, and lockdowns. Donald Trump is not going to do that.”
Cheers and applause from Maher’s audience.”…No one ever talks about this so I appreciate DeSantis bringing it up. There’s a good chance RFK Jr. is going to run as an independent, so he’ll be in best position to provide needed accountability.
We’ll see. I’d agree that Trump can’t do that, i.e., accountability, because he did it. So, DeSantis has him there. I was being a little facetious, there’s over a year to go and I still can’t believe Biden will run again, let alone Trump. We’re going to find out a lot of things in the next year.
Biden is not going to run even though he was the most popular president to be voted in, ever!
Hilary is preparing to get herself nominated for the job. She is going to stand for freedom, prosperity and a Humanitarian foreign policy bringing democracy and liberation from tyrants and dictators the world over.
Perhaps the solution to this is not to participate in any of these Deep State social media. Facebook was developed by DARPA as Lifelog, and when it felt it was ready for prime time, they turned it over to the nothingburger nerd, Suckaturd, as their frontman. Google was developed by the CIA venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel. I think Corbett has the right approach. Let the Sheep enjoy their pablum in peace.
The “lawmakers” are not on our side nor do they have our best interests at heart. Sadly we are caught in the grip of a deadly vice: we are dependent upon the government for “protection” and other services while we are obligated to pay taxes for this protection and service but the plutocrats have totally high jacked the government (they always had major influence on policy). The fact is, we are being betrayed daily by the miscreants in the ruling class. Follow the money to see who this benefits. Check out the WEF, the Bill and Melinda Gates, Johns Hopkins and others’ 2019 Event 201 especially their recommendations particularly # 7 to see what they have in store and where this is heading. https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/tabletop-exercises/event-201-pandemic-tabletop-exercise#recommendations
The global coup d’état is in full effect using health, climate and war as the rationale.
The fact that some Ukrainians collaborated with Nazis is no secret, but it’s been whitewashed and even celebrated in Canada
https://forward.com/news/562504/yaroslav-hunka-anthony-rota-canada-ukraine-nazis/
Daria Kubijovych was Ukraine’s chief collaborator with Hans Frank, the Nazi governor of occupied Poland. Kubijovych played a crucial role in convincing the Third Reich to create SS Galichina.
(What they skirt is that Galicia’s Nazi commander, while Canada’s most famous SS alumni was on duty in Ukraine, was Ursula von der Leyen’s forebear by marriage.
His full name was Freiherr Joachim Dedo Otto Georg Dietrich Adolf von der Leyen zu Bloemersheim. The family made its fortune in the textile business.
So did the patriarch of the Quandt family, Emile. Another Nazi in the garment trade.)
In comparison to Kubijovych, Rudling said, Hunka is “small fry.”
Got that ADL bot down vote. The relentles head bash against reality. Forvarts evah, bakvarts nevah.
The quote, you numpty, is from your own bloody newspaper.
Trouble is, figuring out their angle just inspires them to come up with a new angle. Case in point, specifically regarding the mRNA vaxx, per the “link.”
The irony is, geoengineering already uses polymers to carry aluminum et al to the sky.
FWIW, here’s my take: ALL science MUST be halted or humanity is doomed. No more namby-pamby “good science/bad science.” At this state in our species’ existence ALL science is bad. (Though it’s actually doubtful that this latest academic madness will work at all.)
Air Vax — The Latest mRNA Delivered Into Lungs. No Jab Required – Global ResearchGlobal Research – Centre for Research on Globalization
I like this Howard…I have not had the nerve to say it myself…
Thanks for this horror link.
Perhaps wearing a mask is not such a mad idea after all 🙄
I thought of that too. Then I realized: these polymers of death are nano-particles, so the mask wouldn’t work any better than it does to prevent normal disease.
Great – deal with the respiratory problem by killing the lungs. This supports your ‘ ‘Polyplex-delivered mRNAs were efficiently translated into protein in the lungs of mice with limited evidence of toxicity.’ means there is some evidence of toxicity.
This is a lot more insidious than just ‘protecting news organizations’ interests’. I don’t share news and magazine articles often but I occasionally come across something interesting that I can’t describe in a sentence or so — so just reference the article.
(For example:- https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/09/airlines-banks-mileage-programs/675374/ )
But then I don’t use Facebook. This really isn’t a good platform to share ideas and information on because its the epitome of Big Brother — FB likes to know all about you and your friends, ostensibly to sell you a better detergent but in reality to sell you propaganda and so shape your perception of the world.
(I always thought that countries like Canada (and Sweden) were hyper liberal, laid back and generally OK to live in. Shows how much I know…..)
If you sign up to the Climate Change hoax, Bill Gates always wears a smile.
To put it politely, though the point must needs be crude:
“Bill Gates always wears a smile.”
Yeah. It’s called “duper’s delight.”
Extreme Weather Fluctuations as the Climate Reacts to Geoengineering
“Global geoengineering/weather modification programs are completely disrupting the planets natural weather patterns from top to bottom. The entire climate system is so totally out of balance at this point that it is swinging radically from one extreme to another. These massive fluctuations are being “forced” by the global climate/weather modification programs known as “solar radiation management” (SRM) and “stratospheric aerosol geoengineering” (SAG).”
Anyone who believes this bullshit deserves a mouthful of shit. .@BillGates .@BeyondMeat
https://x.com/ANTlWEF/status/1708039075486150797?s=20
That’s how we roll.
Thanks for the link. Its like plastic leather, we will not be able to feel nor taste the difference.
The meat will be full of mRNA jabs, nanobots, graphene antennas, which they will define in their regulations and commercials as vitamins.
When you consider that a lot (if not all) of MSM so-called “news” is pure bunkum, can you link to it in Canada after proving it’s not news?
Good point. MSM doesn’t need FB to spread its lies. Alt news does. That’s the point in the new law.
“Imagine still using the phrase “conspiracy theorist” as a pejorative after the events of the last three years. That’s like making fun of Noah for building the ark AFTER the flood already proved him right.”
Toby Rogers
https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/thinking-points-september-30-2023?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
“Sheep don’t care about any of this. In fact, even if they knew the prime directive was to keep truth from the public, they would be all for it.”
I would not insult the majority of people They are the first victims.
The criminals are the media, alt or state, who fail to charge the barricades. The watermelon milquetoast wannabe resistance.
So long as it costs them nothing.
https://moneycircus.substack.com/p/mauis-lights-burn-brighter-than-ever
Come on Todd. “Totalitarian march toward censorship and dictatorship”…..???
I see it the other way around. MSM are no more allowed to free commercials of their doubtful product “news” on social media.
If someone are in need of making reference to for example your articles or something in msm in social media, it is easy to write this reference in an anonymous manner.
It will only force people to buy the product they like. You like NYT, CNN, BBC, Faecesbook? Well then go there and buy it.
You want to promote a product? Then buy a poster on the public buses, print an A5 paper and spread it in people’s postbox or among other commercials.
Isnt it a whiner just because of personal revenues?
It’s always about money. Mammon worshippers have nothing else.
When their money is gone, their power is gone, and they know it. They know the end is coming.
Yet they’re still trying to save themselves, meaning their money.
Since money is all about believing, the power of money doesn’t really exist. Money, in itself, is non-existent.
Those who don’t know what money is can succumb to its power. Money is a method of violence, so those who have it can use their money to kill other people. Kill their freedom, including freedom of speech. Kill their lives, since only those with money can have a life. All wars and famines are created by money to kill people.
Those who believe in money hardly ever know what money is and they don’t even want to think about it. The brainwashing is deep. Love of money instead of their own life makes people take these vaccines that are poisons, makes people kill other people, makes people slaves for money. So money is anti-life. It’s been created by the Devil itself for this purpose: to make you its slave or to kill you.
The false god of Mammon is only one of the false gods. But all false gods are false. None of them is true. None of them is good. None of them is real. And when people are believing in these big lies, false gods, they have no truth in them.
But, here’s the good news: truth exists, truth is real and truth is good.
Great point about money; but probably, as you suggest, the most difficult thing in the world to get into people’s heads.
“Money is just a convenient medium of exchange, nothing more,” they will say. To which I say “Bull!” Money exists for no other reason than control. If it were this “medium of exchange” then what’s the point of accumulating more than just enough to exchange?
There are those for whom money means survival.
“If it were this “medium of exchange” then what’s the point of accumulating more than just enough to exchange?”
For the same reason my troupe of chimps isn’t going to let your troupe of chimps eat from the fruit trees that my troupe controls.
‘The poppy is the Devil’s weed’
He said to me, I disagreed:
‘The Devil has not any flower
But only money in his power’.
(James Stephens)
It’s a big club, and we’re about to get clobbered with it.
It’s really not that big of a club, quite small actually, but it’s heavy beyond belief.
I don’t know…
They all seem a bit light in the head to me…
@If it were this “medium of exchange” then what’s the point of accumulating more than just enough to exchange?
You might have to save up for more than one lifetime, the second lifetime appears as greed if looked at from the one lifetime point of view.
Not really, it may have been in Babylon that they figured out that you could do debt slavery with ever rising interest rates.
You dig 16 tons, and whadd’ya get
Another day older and deeper in debt
St Peter donch’a call me
‘Cause I can’t go
I owe my soul to the company store.
Tennessee Ernie Ford – 16 Tons – YouTube
1 Timothy 6:10
7 For we brought nothing into this world, and it is certain we can carry nothing out.
8 And having food and raiment let us be therewith content.
9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.
10 For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.
11 But thou, O man of God, flee these things; and follow after righteousness, godliness, faith, love, patience, meekness.
Copyright The Bible.
At least recognize the cycle of money:
Here are the 7 stages of wealth that have been used for centuries since the Roman era to extract wealth from nations and concentrate power into the hands of a select few.
1. “Good” Money –
Every major empire starts out with “good” money, either gold or backed by gold.
2. Social Programs –
As a country develops economically/socially, it takes on more public works, adding layer upon layer
3.Military Spending –
As a nation’s affluence grows, so does it’s political influence and spends massively on the military
4. Wars –
Nation puts military to use and expenditures explode and nations go to war
5. Fiat Currency –
To fund the wars, the costliest of endeavors, nations go off the gold standard start spending trillions on defense spending
6. Inflation –
Wealth transfer begins as hyperinflation sets in; Price of all commodities and goods go up.
7. Wealth Transfer-
Final stage, in mass movement, nation moves out of the currency and into precious metals and other tangible assets. The currency collapses. This results in massive wealth transfer to those who positioned themselves in the right asset class in advance.
This cycle is predictable. Now we are headed back to the gold standard.
From a scrubbed article at investmentwatch.com:
Here is what i learned from a millionaire about the 7 stages economies go through and how to profit
There is a massive push to acquire accurate behavioral data (stimulus/response) for each and every ‘digital twin’ in their continuously running & improving simulation of the real-world called the Metaverse.
“Links” from one platform to another are probably no longer needed to steer behavior as in the past and only serve to ‘muddy the water’ from a data acquisition & predictive behavior point of view.
SO glad I didn’t relocate to Canada 13 years ago.
Rapidly becoming the authoritarian shithole of the world.
And half of them speak french!
I mean, what could possibly go wrong?
Here in Nova Scotia, the health authorities are still requiring…..wait for it…..THE ORIGINAL COVID VACCINE, or you can go work in another province.
My wife works as a nurse in New Brunswick, just across the invisible border.
She isn’t fired from NSHealth, she didn’t quit in December 2021 when the hammer came down.
No no no, she is HELD ON UNPAID LEAVE, for over 2 years, effectively breaking the UNION CONTRACT which states, that is is a breach of contract to be held this way for over 2 years.
We anticipate a massive settlement as the union lawyer is on the case and has told her, they will be settling in some way, with some amount.
ALL THE WHILE KEEPING THE FUCKING POLICY!!¡
CLOWN WORLD 🤡🤡 🤡🤡🌍🌍🌍🌍
It’s even worse than you can imagine.
You definitely made the right choice.
You would now be planning your next relocation, having learned you could not even leave or cross the country during the inititial phase of domestic occupation, go out after 8pm in Quebec, that your passport was void, and that neither the constitution nor the law protected you and your fundamental rights.
Many of us will follow love anywhere…
The Indian saying is that if you run after the Goddess she runs away from you, but if you run away from Her, She will pursue you.
So it isn’t the news item itself the good ol’ boys in Ottawa hate: it’s only that there pesky “LINK.” So if you post the whole article, top to bottom, and just don’t link to your source, would that be okay?
Or better yet, you could always stop this silly habit of thinking something must have a God damn link before it can be accepted as legitimate.
Maybe we could, oh I don’t know, start respecting each other’s opinions and stop relying on someone else having said it first to legitimize it.
Maybe I’ll move to Canada after all – I’m so freakin’ sick of wading through comment replies that demand “WHERE’S YOUR LINK?????”
Q: What’s the difference between a “sheep” and someone bleeting about some infringement on their facebook use? That’s not a rhetorical question, I honestly don’t see any difference.
This video is 6 years old, it’s not a conincidence I deleted my FB profile 6yrs ago.
How Facebook tracks and manipulates everyone, everything, and everywhere – Delete your Facebook now
I am not commenting on being sad or upset that FB is corrupt. I am commenting on the government moving in to censor news links on what is a very popular platform. Whether we hate FB or not, it is still a concern that the government is blatantly censoring on ANY public platform.
As for me, I use FB to keep in touch with hundreds of friends all over the world I would otherwise not be in touch with. I really could take it or leave it other than that. Many of these friends are people on our side of things. And although the censorship is expected inevitably, it is still concerning to see it come about in this form. But yes, what difference does it really make…we are all doomed, and I suppose I should just shut up about it.
As if FB is the only way to keep in touch.
https://smartblogger.com/facebook-alternatives/
It could be a way to find out how many of those “hundreds of friends” are just people you know, rather than real friends, but you may not like that reality.
It’s just convinient eh? like getting the jab to go on holliday, or using digital payment methods instead of cash, or a plethora of other things that help the agenda you want to be seen to be actively against, but when it comes down to it, you choose convinience, just like the rest of the sheep. Instead of the virtue signalling protest writing, try being the change you want to see.
So what happens if you post the archive link?
You know, I have not done that experiment yet. Maybe I did and forgot. If anyone has an archive link to an old news article and want to post it here I will try it out…or if you are Canadian you can try it out yourself…
Here is what you get when you post a news article…unbelievable.
I could proxy into Canuckistan but don’t have a fakebook account, so here is a harmless little AP link you could try
https://archive.ph/6QH1v
https://web.archive.org/web/20230920211139/https://apnews.com/article/google-maps-lawsuit-north-carolina-death-f4707247ee3295bf51bbcb37bd0eb6c8
They posted it…so I suppose they don’t have a problem with “old news”…thanks for sending me the link. It was a useful experiment.
Oh come ON. We always/ well, from the beginnings of the internet/web, knew that they were going to do this/start doing this. It was always a matter of when, not IF,
It made all our thinking processes visible and evidential, just like this comment section does.
I suppose some of us are still in draw drop mode. I have not yet learned to take this all in casually.
Spell check…I meant “jaw drop mode”
I wrongly assumed you meant “drawers-drop” mode.
I’d never come across this seeming idiomatic expression, and wondered how it applied. 🤔
It is, indeed, unbelievable, and it has to be stopped.
“news source, such as The Washington Post, The New York Times”
10-15 years ago it was common currency that these “news sources” would be going bust – yet somehow it seems as if none of them have. It’s almost as if they have a backstop….
who owns reuters is that a controversy ?
of zion
Didn’t they buy a controlling interest in 1890-something?
The management of news carries on with the apparently endless drones of information management, the egregious Naomi Klein being one. Here she delivers the desperately needed moral lesson to guide us back to the path of truth, beauty and harmony:
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/naomi-klein-russell-brand-tate-b2419533.html
The Emmanuel Goldsteins are Russell Brand and Andrew Tate. But mainly Brand whose hour in the stocks has clearly come. And with the mandatory psychologising, Klein delivers the lesson:
“Of course, Russell Brand’s followers deny the allegations. He has groomed an audience to deny/disbelieve everything they see and hear, which is very different from healthy scepticism. This knee-jerk denialism is precisely why people with plenty of skeletons in the closet love conspiracy culture: they have a built-in defense against accountability.”
Very interesting. Those who are speaking out are distasteful individuals with “skeletons in the closet” who must be “made accountable”!
Now this is concerning:
“Discussing her recently published best-selling book Doppelganger, Klein explained the book begins from the “personal jumping off point” of exploring the fact she is “perennially confused with” Naomi Wolf. She explained Wolf, a feminist writer, has gone from being part of the “liberal establishment” to being a doppelganger of “her former self” – now engaging in anti-vaccine conspiracy theories.
Wolf, who was suspended from Twitter in 2021 after disseminating misinformation about the Covid crisis, had her most recent book Outrages revoked and pulped in America after concerns emerged about inaccuracies.”
A book burning, no less!
More wisdom from Klein:
“(Wolf) is now somebody who is one of a not insignificant cohort of ex-liberals and leftists who have flipped to the right, particularly during the pandemic”
And what’s wrong with “conspiracy theories”?
“Discussing the broader question of why conspiracy theories are so appealing to some people, Klein argued this is partly to do with the “cartoonish” solutions they invoke which involve arresting “all the bad guys”.
Klein added: “Whereas, on the left, we’re offering a systemic critique, and that actually is quite frightening in the sense of telling people that we are up against really entrenched forces. It’s the system itself. It’s not a few aberrant individuals and that means that we can only really do anything about it through a lot of hard work and organising and political change.””
Exciting!
But let’s cut the crap. We know that Klein is a venal liar backing undeniable scams (the unholy trinity of covid, climate and transgenderism). Therefore we know that her plea for a systemic solution is pure bullshit. This view of “entrenched forces” needing all that hard work to dislodge is therefore a device to negate actual change because the hard work she is really proposing will be a futile engagement with meaningless displays of glamorous and utterly manufactured protests involving disruptions which will only affect the general public whilst any true voices of dissent will be trashed by the likes of Klein.
Well stated George.
Naomi Klein has lived in her little bubble of self importance for quite a while now.
Pity, she’s probably a reasonably intelligent woman, but she has succumbed to a Messiah Complex and the insidious, irresistible pull of Mammon.
From The Independent piece:
“Klein argued “toxic influencers” are honing in on the “anxiety” and “confusion” felt by many and realising dishing out advice on “how to live their lives, or how to be a certain kind of person” is likely to be a “very lucrative” career path.”
Reads like the playbook for the WHO, Big pHarmer and many, many politicians.
Talk about pot calling the kettle.
Transgender is not a scam.
There may be an agenda being pushed by the same people that have pushed Black Lives Matter, Sustainability, Woke culture, etc, that is a scam, but that obvious agenda is not to be confused with who a person is or wants to be.
A person’s being transgender is not the same as a person being transgender and wanting to compete as their trans choice.
The trans, woke, BLM, political Left movements have been corporate captured same as all social movements & institutions in the corporate captured West, then destroyed from within.
Transgender meets Heideggerian waffle-de-doo:
The blathering bollockery of it all is finally coming out:
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1707832910550560816
A reasonable perspective, such as yours, is (let’s just say) not received with open arms in this forum.
You either tow the line or you are shunned. (But, rest assured, it’s pure coincidence that that view is identical to the establishment view!)
Nothing about trans is reasonable. It’s a deeper assault than covid and climate change since it attacks the very definition of gender and sex, therefore attacks a fundamental aspect of humanity and life itself.
The trans thing began long before Woke took it over and encased it in a mantra.
The late Christine Jorgensen had “her” trans surgery beginning in 1952. There were others before her; but she was the first “celebrity” trans.
Thank you, Howard.
Well, Howard, I really do try to live and let live, and I certainly believe everyone has the right to their opinions and beliefs, but sometimes you just have to say (write) something.
I am very angered by all the very obvious divide and conquer tactics and I am quite disapointed and surprised when I read (hear) what I consider attacks on people who basically just want to live their lives.
Like those of us who choose not to be injected, or wear masks, or stand six feet apart, or clap on the porch.
We aren’t the villains. The people pushing the agenda are the villains.
I think that accusing transgender people of grooming young children is as idiotic and as vicious as accusing unvaccinated people of killing children and grandmother’s.
World Government
Trashing gender and gender roles is an old bankster agenda. It started with the suffragette movement which was opposed by women and men where ever it was being imposed. The suffragettes were warmongers during the banksters’ WW1, the first war for oil and for Israel. It is ironic that neither men or women in the colonies could vote at this time. Voting is in any case a waste of time.
This fellow in the 1930’s Weimar republic (Hirschfeld ?) started the genital mutilation of people. His clinic and his books were rightly torched by the “nazis”. After WW2 the promotion of “sex change” surgery was promoted by the bankster media in earnest, the promotion ratcheted up decade by decade. At the same time “radical feminists” intensified their attacks on gender roles. This media and Hollyweird and “entertainment” industry offensive has got us to the insane point we are at now. It is funny that feminists are now taken aback by the current excesses they helped to create.
Supporting bankster cultural offensives is naive at best and raises suspicion of collaboration. Never forget that feminists and the “LGBTQ” crowd backed convid to the hilt. Convid was, and is the banksters’ most sinister offensive against the populave.
populace.
The scam of it is feeling the need to indoctrinate CHILDREN with “trans ideology” before they’re even half old enough to know what that truly means. The scam is making a child a lifelong pharmaceutical “customer” and telling small children that there is something inherently wrong with them that must be fixed and only a god in a white coat can fix them. The scam is millions of dollars in surgeries, treatments, side effects, etc., not to mention long term injuries that no one will even dare to discuss.
I have full understanding for an adult that comes to the conclusion their true gender differs from the one they are born with. An adult making that decision is their personal choice. Creating mass confusion in small children is not the choice of the child but of a supposedly adult world that needs to tell them something is fundamentally wrong with them. And if those children wish to fit in in this new world, they’d best accept the fact that their only hope is the glorious “medical salvation” of “gender affirming care” so benevolently “offered” to them by Pharma, et al.
And I’m sorry, there IS an agenda at work here. Pharma profits being the glaring elephant in the room that should at the very least be considered. Do we really think our medical establishment and corporate pharmaceutical entities have our best interests at heart? Or those of our children?
It is a much more complex issue than merely labeling someone transphobic or whatever pejorative you wish to apply to them for questioning just how this is all being used. And there is indeed a highly misogynistic agenda in saying women are no longer needed to produce children. Would you appreciate being labeled a TERF for questioning whether this is really all just about “inclusion” instead of the good old divide and conquer bullshit? I don’t.
Yes, there is an agenda. My point and my belief is that the agenda is being carried out by the creeps that instigate everyone of these divisive agendas. The same creeps that control the banks, the governments, the corporations, etc.
I do not believe that the destructive agenda is being pushed by most/majority of transgender people.
Then perhaps some Trans gender people, who’ve made their decisions as adults, should start objecting to the hyper sexualization of small children. I tend to agree with some in the LGB community that it’s time to disavow some of the radical Trans agenda. Many do not agree with it but are now indeed perceived to. And that puts a nice target on the guy community for hate, the hate generated by fear for their own kids. Read Hannah arendt on the creation of a special privileged group and totalitarianism. Not a pretty picture and again, all about divide and conquer as well as creation of scapegoats.
It’s time to disavow all of the “radical” Trans agenda. It was a parastical cuckoo term which absorbed the LGB and negated it. And the agents of this move were groomed to stridently denounce any attempt to remove the “T” term because they, or their handlers, knew full well that the “T” was the centre of the scam.
Oh good Lord, the hypersexualization of young children?
Like Barbie Dolls? What does everyone remember most about a Barbie Doll? I’m going to bet the folks at Mattel were by and large heterosexual.
No one does hypersexualization of everyone, young and old, better than heterosexuals.
You are right. There is a target on a back. That’s the whole point. They just keeping picking backs to put those targets on.
Whether you choose to be unvaccinated, or you choose to decide your sexuality.
You become a target. Of someone.
It’s narcissism.
Healthy minds don’t want the whole world to know anything about their their sexuality.
What is a transgender person?
Isn’t it nice how all those ‘really entrenched forces’ freely allow Naomi Klein to agitate against them on their own media platforms! I mean, it’s a miracle she hasn’t been censored by now, isn’t it? 😉
Wonder if Klein considers vaccines as a cause of autism a conspiracy theory?
Thank you for including enough of Ms. Klein’s epistle to make it clear what she’s doing. Namely, throwing a few common sense items (like the “problem” being entrenched – which it certainly is) with many speculative items (like her all too obvious take-down of Naomi Wolf) into the same pot and expecting the resulting stew to look somehow edible.
In Doppelganger, Naomi Klein scapegoats Naomi Wolf for the sins of Klein’s father
Talk about living in denial!
“In order to stand with us, Ms. Klein would have to repudiate her father’s career, acknowledge her own possible role in her child’s disability (for believing in the trustworthiness of felonious corporations), and work alongside her former adversaries to overthrow the Fascist Pharma State (as Dr. Wolf is doing) — while raising a special needs child. And it’s all too much. So her personality split and she projected upon Dr. Wolf all of the hurt, rage, and pain that she was likely feeling towards herself, her father, and the system that betrayed her.
THAT’S the shadow that needs to be integrated. It’s not that Dr. Wolf is a fascist, it’s that Ms. Klein, the world’s foremost expert on disaster capitalism inadvertently slid into Pharma fascism herself and does not know how to extricate herself from the fact that she was tricked by the most vile aspect of global monopoly capitalism. Ms. Klein spent her life battling the dragon of capitalism and then it found her weak spot — the trusted advice of her pediatrician — and now her world is upside down.”
Last night, after I noticed I wasn’t getting any results back from a query in my browser search engine (I think they have some kind of lease-like relationship with both ‘big-G’ and ‘big-B.’ [No free advertising here, eh?]), I decided to try “dogpile” search engine.
Remember, this was strictly an experiment, from the start, using a leading “privacy” browser.
What I tried to look up were Russian battlefield videos, so I entered
–
watch russians destroy u
–
However, before I entered anything more than you see in that line
–
watch russians destroy u
–
The auto-fill, drop-down menu provided an extensive list OF EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE, such as
–
watch ukraine destroy russia
video shows ukraine destroy
ukrainian forces destroy russian
ukrainian troops destroy
russian destroyed in ukraine
ukraine forces destroy russian
russia destroyed by ukraine
ukrainians destroying russian targets
–
The only way I was able to defeat the inversion was to use an online translator then copy, paste and enter the same question in a variety of ther languages.
This barely improved the results.
How do I know?
I checked by copying the summarizing foreign language text into the translator, and reading the English translation.
The fix is in, all ’round, one way or another, everything is under surveillance and censorship, as is always the case during war, and this is a war on the imagination, A TOTAL WAR ON IMAGINATION, against individual autonomy, free speech, free inquiry, free association, free thought, the control of information against individual liberty and national sovereignty.
We are in a state of domestic occupation.
The same bias is everywhere. Type “media attacks Trump” on google and watch an unending list of articles exactly opposite of your search.
True, you’re right about that, it was getting on my nerves, and so I was hoping — stupidly, knowing better — somehow to find a loophole. Instead, I found, maybe, a pinhole, if.
Cheers!
You can easily disable autofill on firefox, it’s a known security/privacy issue on all browsers btw. (loads of articles about it if you search).
Also beware of google translate, I translated a Turkish substack article talking about Ukraine that had quoted the famous Newland phonecall, which spat out “The EU is really nice” lol
For Russian war propaganda try https://southfront.press/ the original site was deleted from the international Domain Name Servers in an attempt to close them down (with zero outcry from the .alt media) so it’s probably a good source from the Russian perspective. RT is still on Odysee too.
There’s loads of russian war porn channels on Telegram, I don’t use telegarm but sometimes you can see the channels in a browser, tho it seems this functionality is less and less available thesedays, here’s one channel that will lead to posts from other channels https://t.me/Slavyangrad/
Excellent details and links, thank you ImpObs. Here’s an supposedly independent translator I recently found.
https://www.deepl.com/translator-mobile
You might try looking up a supposedly independent translator called DeepL
I linked it in a comment but it was pending then deleted, I think because I put in the link to it, not sure. Anyhow, trying again, hoping for a better result.
Cheers!
P.S. “Thanks for the details amd links…” also got deleted with the lost pending comment.
Cheers!
And thanks again.
This may help. last night I was watching ReDacted and got to these.
Russia-Germany Conflict Looms As Moscow’s Drone Blows Up Leopard Tank With German Troops | Watch – YouTube
Thank You, Ariel, I’m having a watch right now!
“Welcome into our Big Show today”. War is a show, quite telling.
Shock & Awe, for the kids,
Flocks & Gore for the ‘adults’.
Crocks & Wars to control minds,
Until reality bites, like body parts…
Of wounded children
& screaming adults.
It is NOW. But we need to keep in mind what we are actually watching unless it’s a computer game. If it isn’t, it’s unfortunate people being mangled.
Try this ( originally Canadian) browser: http://www.presearch.com
Jacinda jumped and Dan ducked out.
It must be Justin’s turn next Todd.
RATS deserting sinking ships.
Or should that be Shithouses?
She is working at the UN. Just changed ship…
Ardern?- close, but I think actually at the Kennedy Harvard school – where she has multiple fellowships/appointments starting this fall. Of course, there was the famous visit to Blackrock HQ in NYC in 2021 (I think). She will become an extremely wealthy woman.
” Jacinda jumped ……..RATS deserting sinking ships”. Sounds like good news..but what is the evidence that the rats’ ships are sinking? Tell me where you see our freedoms coming back in the ‘ free West’?
Arrogant, paranoid pricks.
Do they really believe they can just cancel curiosity, rout all rumours and stifle suspicions?
It won’t work, except on the fully hypnotised, mesmerised and stupefied.
Time to start printing T shirts, bumper stickers and street posters:
‘OFF GUARDIAN, WHERE FACTS ARE SACRED’
off guardian where your words are vaporized or pending forever ever ever
Or, y’know, for five minutes or so.
i must beee a liar then
I like your time keeping better than mine. I got pended several days ago and the comment had yet to appear last I checked.
If that was only five minutes, then I’d like to come sit beside you and watch time move so slowly.
At that rate, I could remain 79 for another 5 years.
I called it ‘Pending Purgatory’ Gordon. It’s left me alone lately. Be patient.
I might just print that on a t-shirt.
Off-G, in my opinion, isn’t a news site, so shouldn’t be subject to these restrictions. Similarly for many ‘alt-right’ sites. If (big if) this can be recognised, then the MSM will be the big losers under this Act. So not all bad after all!
Off-G is cant be a news site with so many top intelligent geo strategist intellectuals gathered in the comment section, who cares for mankind and want peace for freedom.!