WATCH: James Corbett Answers 9/11 Questions
James Corbett joins Truth Over Comfort for a 9/11 Q&A:
911 can be a touchy subject, you may be like me and not have a consolidated view, are undecided, have questions, or you may feel the likelihood of an inside job is low, nevertheless, the day remains to have many strange phenomenons and questions. The official line the Bush administration could not see an attack like this coming, is a clear lie, no matter your overall view of 911 Truth, shown by the governments documents and words themselves.
Whatever you may think, this interview should provide information you may have not been aware of, and all though we did not cover everything, it will provide a starting point to follow the links discussed. Whatever your view, there is no hiding from previous administrations working with terrorists, bin laden, Al-qaeda in previous conflicts to achieve geopolitical goals, which led to their rise and these attacks, if you believe the official story
In this interview I had James on the 4th time, this time to discuss the 911 attacks. We discuss the lies that the Bush administration could could never have imagined an attack like this, proven by the many pre 911 war Games with similar scenarios, including one specifically with Bin Laden’s face on the first page. We also discuss the many war games on the day of 911, that confused the response shown by the NORAD tapes released by Vanity Fair and whether the war games were coincidence or intentional.
On top of this, we spoke about the investigations into 911 insider trading, of investors appearing to have foreknowledge of the attacks, shown by the activity of trades with airlines and other companies in the days coming up to 911. We discussed the explosions reports in the towers, building 7, the pentagon, Pennsylvania, AQ Links and other general questions.
You can follow Truth Over Comfort on youtube or through their website, or visit CorbettReport.com for more Corbett Report content.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
I would like to use Wilhelm von Ockam’s razor to say that the simple truth is in the eyes of the people who WANT to see it. You can make a list of the various issues related to 9/11 (just to mention a few: The temperature to melt the steel, the plane that penetrated the tower, the ASTONISHING fall of the WC7 and the brilliant Mr Silverstein, the trucks ready to go to the disaster, the Jewish students selling artworks in the buildings a few days before the terrorist attack, the Israeli dancers, the thermitic reaction of the steel, the absolute ineptitude of the “attackers”, the size of the hole in the Pentagon, the absence of the bodies of the passengers and their personal belongings, the impossibility of manoeuvring a plane like the one that hit the Pentagon. …). I can go on indefinitely. In the end, you’ll be convinced that it was a terrorist attack, but that the terrorist was the US government. There is no more evidence to be found but to put these criminals in jail.
To speak about continuosly is a tactic to go deviate the attention and the people from the Truth. The reason behind the plot? The most profitable business well known by the same people as in the past. A wake-up movement is really needed. Now could be already late. Worldwide
9/1 was a military media psyop: A movie made for “TV News”. All video material was prepared well in advance. If you continue clinging to the propaganda script of a “terrorist attack”, then you’re still living INSIDE the movie, and are propping up a state sponsored media driven illusion. Google “September Clues” “The Central Role of the News Media”. https://odysee.com/SeptemberClues:d
Explosives do not melt engine blocks at ground level while leaving plastic parts intact, neither do they turn steel into dust. Where did all that material from two 110-storey towers go?
Dr. Judy Wood has photographs on her website that you cannot argue with. Unknown energy weapon, not explosives, is obvious to anyone with eyes to see.
While it would be nice to know how those buildings were collapsed, the most important thing to do is make clear, with available information (the physics, the suggestive timelines, evidence of obvious foreknowledge and the circumstantial evdence of the collusion of Israel, etc) that it would not have been organizationally likely, or physically possible, for “19 Terrorists with box cutters and a few flying lessons” to bring three skyscapers down, blow a hole in the Pentagon and somehow compel teasonous “stand down orders” from US officials.
The “how” of collapsing the towers, short of a deathbed confession, may never be known, but if it was some form of spot-charge controlled demolition, or if top secret methods were used, either possibility points to an “inside job”. Which means “America” was under attack by its “own Government” (whoever that is), however you spin it, and this is sufficient Information to spark a literal revolution if the acceptance of it goes mainstream.
Any grifter with a self-appointed title can set up a YouTube channel and (with help from the CIA) get popular spinning fanciful tales of Star Trek weapons/ UFO interventions… tying up The Conversation, for a precious couple of decades, while discrediting Skeptics by tainting us all with the Comic Book fantasies of less rigorous thinkers.
PS The site hosting Corbett’s interview looks interesting BUT: the page featuring quotes pertinent to the NeoNato Invasions of Afghan is FULL of Government press release material. It is probably an honest mistake. On the other hand, the page dedicated to citing well-known Eugencists (Sanger, GB Shaw, Huxley, et al) is a useful resource because it gives us these people unfiltered, with the courage, of their Era (1900-1930s) to say blatantly Eugenocidal things out in the open.
The page with dodgy material (most of that lame stuff is on the “Boston Bombings”):
https://www.truthovercomfort.co.uk/post/afghanistan
erratum: TREASONOUS… not “teasonous” … although: why couldn’t that be a word? (my “r” drops out on this keyboard, along with the space-bar function)
If I’m not mistaken, on 9/11 Europe grounded ALL the planes flying.
I’m sure at the time, because of the clear skies, the heat rose, and it was noted the Co2 from the trees in Europe, started rising.
Am I mis-remembering something?
Not a chemtrail in site.
Why don’t these clowns even touch on HOW the towers were destroyed? Most important question and they avoid it!
Its common knowledge now, only those living under a rock cant tell reality from their own beliefs.
They do touch on it. They talk about explosives. Also, if you listened,
he said there are lots of investigations into the buildings, so he is interested in investigating other aspects, which he is entitled to. This doesn’t make him clownish in the
slightest.
On that note, and given the suspiciously co-ordinated look of the recent allegations about the late Mohamed Al-Fayed – it must surely be time to revisit his theories about the death of Princess Diana and his son Dodi?
That was better than I expected. Partly because the interviewer kept bringing it back to the point. Worth hearing if only to remind you of the many inconsistencies you may have heard but forgotten.
My guess..? Arabs/semites were highjackers, planes maybe remote guided anyway, buildings may have extra charges to make sure, WTC7 had something to hide and was a controlled blast, someone set up the date to confuse with the wargaming.
Even if the perpetrators were kidnapped and coerced into telling the truth, most Folks would still not believe them.
Blood covered hands have written that chapter, along with all the others, and moved on to the next.
We are like their children.
We believe all the bedtime stories.
This is an extremely important exploration. Well meaning and truthful as your presentation is, I believe that to use the propaganda phrase nine eleven is to be complicit in and perpetuate the horrific lie.
What phrase would I use instead? I’d use the date, September 11th, 2001. I would not use the propaganda term ” terrorist attack” I’d call it a coordinated false flag event by agencies and the government of the United States in pursuit of war, invasion a global inquisition and the control of oil with the side consequences of ending the constitution, the bill of rights and sovereign individual citizenry.
The only truthful and non-propagandistic way to label or describe the fate of the World Trade Center buildings is to call it a carefully, planned and executed demolition with high explosives. Words matter.
On the upside, 9/11 was the beginning of the end for the Imperial USofAs. Also the beginning of the end of the Anglo-American Project Zion.
These “actors” are about to exit stage left and Humanity can hardly wait.
Bye-bye. Enjoy your eternity in Hell. You earned it!
Where is Tilly Petersen / Sylvia Shawcross when you need her?
Simple question: did a number of WTC buildings come down suddenly on 9/11 or was that also fake news?
Since when did your mind join the CIA/ SIS Matrix dear? Before, on or after 9/11?
Forget who, how or why for a second.
No, the collapsed were a product of mass-hypnosis/impossible CGI/magic mushrooms. Take your pic. There weren’t any planes either – those were holograms/more CGI/etc. In fact, there were never buildings there at all, and if you claim there were, you’re a limited hangout/psyop/disinfo agent. Everything is fake news except what I post – because you can absolutely trust my claims, evidence or not.
Of course I meant to say ‘collapses’.
Exactly. Are we really to disregard all the eye-witness accounts of people who were there in downtown Manhattan that day as being the products of CGI? Preposterous!
Couldn’t this same application for covid- YES it is,.
according to some of my friends and family and work colleagues and most of joe pubic 100000000 millions died from covid virus.
Satire alert!
Sorry off topic:
Australia’s Nobel winning scientist, Peter Doherty conceding some ground?
‘But we are out there seeking the truth about COVID-19.” Doherty, with magnanimity, admitted that the study of COVID-19 was a constantly evolving one, and initially poorly understood. No longer could it be seen as merely a respiratory virus but a coagulating one. Corrections would have to be made over time.’
More here:
https://dissidentvoice.org/2024/09/peter-doherty-public-science-communicator/
From the end of your Link (at question time):
“The Dean [of Monash University] shifts and twitches nervously, hoping that no question will court controversy. Monash Education is, after all, logo and brand.”
Monash is brand and their Distinguished Guest’s answer is bland. But wrapped inside the bland words is a ticking bombshell of fact:
“No longer could it [the Covid-19 virus] be seen as merely a respiratory virus but a coagulating one. Corrections would have to be made over time.’”
The Dean of Monash can sleep easily, and so can his successors. But, after a couple of generations have come and gone, Monash medical students will take it as Gospel that the blood-coagulation factor in the Covid-19 virus was its GMO Spike Protein patented by U$ Pharma company Moderna in 2016 specifically to attack human blood cells. And the RNA which codes for this same Moderna GMO Spike Protein is the main active component of the RNA Vaxx, popularly known as the “clot shot”.
People who know call Covid-19 Vaxx the Clot Shot”: firstly because it clots human blood; secondly, because only a clot would accept to be injected with a GMO RNA substance that is currently killing 12Million people a year worldwide.
The Distinguished Speaker earned his fee, and did not upset the Distinguished Audience at the University. But he did not lie; in fact, he smuggled into those august proceedings, in one cryptic word at the end — “coagulating” — a sacred fact about the coagulating factor in Covid-19’s GMO Spike Protein.
Paving the way for more profits.
Well spotted Nick.
Coagulating and a catalyst for inflammatory diseases as well.
Billions of pills for millions of people.
Coagulating? or Amyloidogenic?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amyloid
https://t.wtyl.live/c/prion.research.investigation.project/videos?s=1
Coagulating. Because the Covid-19 has a GMO Spike protein RNA that coagulates human blood cells. It was patented by Moderna in 2016. The same Covid-19 GMO Spike Protein RNA is used in Moderna’s RNA Vaxx and in every other Con-19 RNA Vaxx. That is why the Con-19 RNA Vaxx is called the clot shot: because that GMO Spike Protein fram the Vaxx causes many healthy young people to die suddenly because their blood coagulates (clots).
“No longer could it be seen as merely a respiratory virus but a coagulating one.”
Another geat way to make a Wackzen injury appear to be a CoooVid symptom.
erratum: “GREAT not “geat””… dodgy drop-outs-infested keyboard PLUS Nano-Timer edit window
I apologize for repeating messages from previous boards. I only repeat this message to see if anyone (who did not see previous boards) has an answer.
Anyone know whatever happened to investigator Christopher Bollyn the 911 investigator who published books about it?
He used to post every day until about 2020, then practically nothing ever since.
I don’t know, but Kevin Barrett mentions that he has been in communication with Bollyn recently and relayed that he is well, but kind of ‘retired’. He did a lot promoting his theory, but the bulk of the 911Truth movement rejected it or ignored his work, preferring to center their focus on a less defined conceptual model. The generally accepted line became ‘elements within the US deep state plotted the 911 events’, or words to that effect.
Barrett brings it up in this discussion:
https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_wyatt-peterson-on-israel-did-9-11-with-call-in-from-laurent-guyenot/
From your Link to “Israel Did 911”, the section about “Lucky” Larry Silverstein:
“Silverstein’s connections, his close ties with Bibi Netanyahu. He’s on the phone with Netanyahu every single weekend, according to Haaretz. And he privatized the World Trade Center with the help of the network you just named. That’s all pretty unmistakable evidence, isn’t it?
“Wyatt Peterson: Yeah, it is. And the PBS America Rebuilds broadcast (featuring Silverstein’s “pull it” confession) was one year to the day. I think it came out on September 11th, 2002. And the chutzpah to admit openly that “we had them pull it and we stood back and watched the building come down.” That wasn’t a slip of the tongue. He didn’t misspeak. He’s telling you, he’s putting it out there. This goes into the Michael Hoffman thesis on revelation of the method. He’s putting it right out there. And when we fail to act on that information, it has this…this paralyzing effect.”
Thanks. I find it all so odd. I remember seeing Bollyn with Richard Gage and others who remain active today.