The Danger Is Real: The Deep State’s Plot to Destabilize the Nation Is Working
John & Nisha Whitehead
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out … without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.”
H.L. Mencken
If the three-ring circus that is the looming presidential election proves anything, it is that the Deep State’s plot to destabilize the nation is working.
The danger is real.
Caught up in the heavily dramatized electoral showdown between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, Americans have become oblivious to the multitude of ways in which the government is goosestepping all over our freedoms on a daily basis.
Especially alarming is the extent to which those on both sides are allowing themselves to be gaslighted by both Trump and Harris about critical issues of the day, selectively choosing to hear only what they want to hear when it casts the opposition in a negative light.
This is true whether you’re talking about immigration and border control, health care, national security, the nation’s endless wars, protections for free speech, or the militarization of the U.S. government.
For starters, there’s the free speech double standard, what my good friend Nat Hentoff used to refer to as the “free speech for me but not for thee” phenomenon in which the First Amendment’s protections only apply to those with whom we might agree.
Despite her claims to being a champion for the rule of law, which in our case is the U.S. Constitution, Harris isn’t averse to policing so-called “hate” speech. In this, Harris is not unlike those on both the Right and the Left who continue to express a distaste for unregulated, free speech online, especially when it comes to speech with which they might disagree.
Then there’s Trump, never a fan of free speech protections for his critics, who has been particularly vocal about his desire to see the military vanquish “radical left lunatics,” which he has dubbed “the enemy from within.”
If it were only about muzzling free speech activities, that would be concerning enough.
But Trump’s enthusiasm for using the military to target domestic enemies of the state should send off warning bells, especially coinciding as it does with the Department of Defense’s recent re-issuance of Directive 5240.01, which empowers the military to assist law enforcement “in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.”
This is what martial law looks like—a government of force that relies on the military to enforce its authority—and it’s exactly what America’s founders feared, which is why they opted for a republic bound by the rule of law: the U.S. Constitution.
Responding to concerns that the military would be used for domestic policing, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act in 1878, which makes it a crime for the government to use the military to carry out arrests, searches, seizure of evidence and other activities normally handled by a civilian police force.
The increasing militarization of the police, the use of sophisticated weaponry against Americans and the government’s increasing tendency to employ military personnel domestically have all but eviscerated historic prohibitions such as the Posse Comitatus Act.
Yet sometime over the course of the past 240-plus years that constitutional republic has been transformed into a military dictatorship disguised as a democracy.
Unfortunately, most Americans seem relatively untroubled by the fact that our constitutional republic is being transformed into a military dictatorship disguised as a democracy.
The seeds of chaos that have been sown in recent years are all part of the Deep State’s plans to usher in martial law.
Observe for yourself what has been happening right before our eyes.
Domestic terrorism fueled by government entrapment schemes. Civil unrest stoked to dangerous levels by polarizing political rhetoric. A growing intolerance for dissent that challenges the government’s power grabs. Police brutality tacitly encouraged by the executive branch, conveniently overlooked by the legislatures, and granted qualified immunity by the courts. A weakening economy exacerbated by government schemes that favor none but a select few. Heightened foreign tensions and blowback due to the military industrial complex’s profit-driven quest to police and occupy the globe.
This is no conspiracy theory.
There’s trouble brewing, and the government is masterminding a response using the military.
Just take a look at “Megacities: Urban Future, the Emerging Complexity,” a Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command.
The training video is only five minutes long, but it says a lot about the government’s mindset, the way its views the citizenry, and the so-called “problems” that the government must be prepared to address in the near future through the use of martial law.
Even more troubling, however, is what this military video doesn’t say about the Constitution, about the rights of the citizenry, and about the dangers of locking down the nation and using the military to address political and social problems.
The training video anticipates that all hell will break loose by 2030, but the future is here ahead of schedule.
We’re already witnessing a breakdown of society on virtually every front.
By waging endless wars abroad, by bringing the instruments of war home, by transforming police into extensions of the military, by turning a free society into a suspect society, by treating American citizens like enemy combatants, by discouraging and criminalizing a free exchange of ideas, by making violence its calling card through SWAT team raids and militarized police, by fomenting division and strife among the citizenry, by acclimating the citizenry to the sights and sounds of war, and by generally making peaceful revolution all but impossible, the government has engineered an environment in which domestic violence is becoming almost inevitable.
The danger signs are screaming out a message
The government is anticipating trouble (read: civil unrest), which is code for anything that challenges the government’s authority, wealth and power.
According to the Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command, the U.S. government is grooming its armed forces to solve future domestic political and social problems.
What they’re really talking about is martial law, packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for the nation’s security.
The chilling five-minute training video, obtained by The Intercept through a FOIA request and made available online, paints an ominous picture of the future—a future the military is preparing for—bedeviled by “criminal networks,” “substandard infrastructure,” “religious and ethnic tensions,” “impoverishment, slums,” “open landfills, over-burdened sewers,” a “growing mass of unemployed,” and an urban landscape in which the prosperous economic elite must be protected from the impoverishment of the have nots.
And then comes the kicker.
Three-and-a-half minutes into the Pentagon’s dystopian vision of “a world of Robert Kaplan-esque urban hellscapes — brutal and anarchic supercities filled with gangs of youth-gone-wild, a restive underclass, criminal syndicates, and bands of malicious hackers,” the ominous voice of the narrator speaks of a need to “drain the swamps.”
Drain the swamps.
Surely, we’ve heard that phrase before?
Ah yes.
Emblazoned on t-shirts and signs, shouted at rallies, and used as a rallying cry among Trump supporters, “drain the swamp” became one of Donald Trump’s most-used campaign slogans.
Now the government has adopted its own plans for swamp-draining, only it wants to use the military to drain the swamps of futuristic urban American cities of “noncombatants and engage the remaining adversaries in high intensity conflict within.”
And who are these noncombatants, a military term that refers to civilians who are not engaged in fighting?
They are, according to the Pentagon, “adversaries.”
They are “threats.”
They are the “enemy.”
They are people who don’t support the government, people who live in fast-growing urban communities, people who may be less well-off economically than the government and corporate elite, people who engage in protests, people who are unemployed, people who engage in crime (in keeping with the government’s fast-growing, overly broad definition of what constitutes a crime).
In other words, in the eyes of the U.S. military, noncombatants are American citizens a.k.a. domestic extremists a.k.a. enemy combatants who must be identified, targeted, detained, contained and, if necessary, eliminated.
In the future imagined by the Pentagon, any walls and prisons that are built will be used to protect the societal elite—the haves—from the have-nots.
If you haven’t figured it out already, we the people are the have-nots.
Suddenly it all begins to make sense.
The events of recent years: the invasive surveillance, the extremism reports, the civil unrest, the protests, the shootings, the bombings, the military exercises and active shooter drills, the color-coded alerts and threat assessments, the fusion centers, the transformation of local police into extensions of the military, the distribution of military equipment and weapons to local police forces, the government databases containing the names of dissidents and potential troublemakers.
The government is systematically locking down the nation and shifting us into martial law.
This is how you prepare a populace to accept a police state willingly, even gratefully.
You don’t scare them by making dramatic changes. Rather, you acclimate them slowly to their prison walls.
Persuade the citizenry that their prison walls are merely intended to keep them safe and danger out. Desensitize them to violence, acclimate them to a military presence in their communities, and persuade them that there is nothing they can do to alter the seemingly hopeless trajectory of the nation.
Before long, no one will even notice the floundering economy, the blowback arising from military occupations abroad, the police shootings, the nation’s deteriorating infrastructure and all of the other mounting concerns.
It’s happening already.
The sight of police clad in body armor and gas masks, wielding semiautomatic rifles and escorting an armored vehicle through a crowded street, a scene likened to “a military patrol through a hostile city,” no longer causes alarm among the general populace.
Few seem to care about the government’s endless wars abroad that leave communities shattered, families devastated and our national security at greater risk of blowback.
The Deep State’s tactics are working.
We’ve allowed ourselves to be acclimated to the occasional lockdown of government buildings, Jade Helm military drills in small towns so that special operations forces can get “realistic military training” in “hostile” territory, and Live Active Shooter Drill training exercises, carried out at schools, in shopping malls, and on public transit, which can and do fool law enforcement officials, students, teachers and bystanders into thinking it’s a real crisis.
Still, you can’t say we weren’t warned about the government’s nefarious schemes to lock down the nation.
Back in 2008, an Army War College report revealed that “widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security.” The 44-page report went on to warn that potential causes for such civil unrest could include another terrorist attack, “unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters.”
In 2009, reports by the Department of Homeland Security surfaced that labelled right-wing and left-wing activists and military veterans as extremists (a.k.a. terrorists) and called on the government to subject such targeted individuals to full-fledged pre-crime surveillance. Almost a decade later, after spending billions to fight terrorism, the DHS concluded that the greater threat is not ISIS but domestic right-wing extremism.
Meanwhile, the government has been amassing an arsenal of military weapons for use domestically and equipping and training their “troops” for war. Even government agencies with largely administrative functions such as the Food and Drug Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Smithsonian have been acquiring body armor, riot helmets and shields, cannon launchers and police firearms and ammunition. In fact, there are now at least 120,000 armed federal agents carrying such weapons who possess the power to arrest.
Rounding out this profit-driven campaign to turn American citizens into enemy combatants (and America into a battlefield) is a technology sector that has been colluding with the government to create a Big Brother that is all-knowing, all-seeing and inescapable. It’s not just the drones, fusion centers, license plate readers, stingray devices and the NSA that you have to worry about. You’re also being tracked by the black boxes in your cars, your cell phone, smart devices in your home, grocery loyalty cards, social media accounts, credit cards, streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon, and e-book reader accounts.
All of this has taken place right under our noses, funded with our taxpayer dollars and carried out in broad daylight without so much as a general outcry from the citizenry.
And then you have the government’s Machiavellian schemes for unleashing all manner of dangers on an unsuspecting populace, then demanding additional powers in order to protect “we the people” from the threats.
Are you getting the picture yet?
The US government isn’t protecting us from terrorism.
The US government is creating the terror. It is, in fact, the source of the terror.
Just think about it for a minute: Cyberwarfare. Terrorism. Bio-chemical attacks. The nuclear arms race. Surveillance. The drug wars.
Almost every national security threat that the government has claimed greater powers in order to fight—all the while undermining the liberties of the American citizenry—has been manufactured in one way or another by the government.
Did I say Machiavellian? This is downright evil.
We’re not dealing with a government that exists to serve its people, protect their liberties and ensure their happiness. Rather, these are the diabolical machinations of a make-works program carried out on an epic scale whose only purpose is to keep the powers-that-be permanently (and profitably) employed.
Mind you, by “government,” I’m not referring to the highly partisan, two-party bureaucracy of the Republicans and Democrats.
I’m referring to “government” with a capital “G,” the entrenched Deep State that is unaffected by elections, unaltered by populist movements, and has set itself beyond the reach of the law.
I’m referring to the corporatized, militarized, entrenched bureaucracy that is fully operational and staffed by unelected officials who are, in essence, running the country and calling the shots in Washington DC, no matter who sits in the White House.
Be warned: in the future envisioned by the government, we will not be viewed as Republicans or Democrats. Rather, “we the people” will be enemies of the state.
For years, the government has been warning against the dangers of domestic terrorism, erecting surveillance systems to monitor its own citizens, creating classification systems to label any viewpoints that challenge the status quo as extremist, and training law enforcement agencies to equate anyone possessing anti-government views as a domestic terrorist.
What the government failed to explain was that the domestic terrorists would be of the government’s own making, and that “we the people” would become enemy #1.
As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People and in its fictional counterpart The Erik Blair Diaries, we’re already enemies of the state.
It’s time to wake up and stop being deceived by Deep State propaganda.
Originally published via The Rutherford Institute
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
There is only ONE deep state. It is called MAGA (Make America GARBAGE Again 😆😆😆)…it is governed by a stupid old orange broke narcissist funded by fascist billionaires and hostile Asian powers!!!
Having a bad day?
Agree. It is China’s fault and their paid secret societies in this country who did it.
They did it while we were asleep. We Americans were vulnerable, smiling and innocents. Thinking good about everybody. But some wanted it different: https://l-files.livejournal.net/homepage_rs/11812527/2904833
More seriously, the mindset of the US military machine has been extremely easy to read and predict, for decades. The logical conclusion is that it will turn against US citizens and finally against itself, once it is no longer able to do the same abroad. The way of murder is a one-way street.
In Adolph Trump’s defence, he is probably referring to the trans woke ideological cancer.
“Then there’s Trump, never a fan of free speech protections for his critics”
Trumps critics are psychopathic liars. The clip you linked has to be seen in context. As it is, I agree with him. I wish the world was as clear as you paint it. Unfortunately, it is much more twisted, darker, sicker and nauseating. Save 1 bullet.
“And then comes the kicker.
Three-and-a-half minutes into the Pentagon’s dystopian vision of “a world of Robert Kaplan-esque urban hellscapes — brutal and anarchic supercities filled with gangs of youth-gone-wild, a restive underclass, criminal syndicates, and bands of malicious hackers,” the ominous voice of the narrator speaks of a need to “drain the swamps.”
Anarchism = Natural Law
https://nevermore.media/2022/02/26/anarchism-natural-law/
The New Anarchy: Truth, Nature, Beauty and Withness
https://winteroak.org.uk/2023/04/30/the-new-anarchy-truth-nature-beauty-and-withness/
The End of Their World is the Beginning of Ours!
https://nevermore.media/2022/04/01/the-inevitable-triumph-of-anarchy/
Coming of Age in Troubled Times: An Interview with Stephen Jenkinson
https://abeautifulresistance.org/site/2021/4/18/coming-of-age-in-troubled-times-an-interview-with-stephen-jenkinson
Returning the Gift
https://grateful.org/resource/returning-the-gift/
The best thing for the world is to break up the United States, just like they broke up the Soviet Union. Who knows exactly how it would pan out, but something like:
The world would celebrate this happening along with controlled nuclear disarmament – you could easily make two or three of these new confederations like Kazakhstan, free of legacy nukes.
Ah, Rhys. If only the US had originated the Global one-world dictatorship. Then we could say goodbye to it w the passing of the US. Too bad that it started in Venice, but for at least 3 centuries has had its headquarters in Britain.
Actually, it little benefits us to blame entire countries when the evil responsibility lies w approximately 5,000 individual human beings– almost all from “the West.” Well, them and those they bribe & employ.
I think you are right. It’s the shadow banks
How about we establish a Republic and Suprise everybody.
The manner in which healthcare profiteers tolerate and foster conditions by which the marketplace of human illness expands, so too does the economy of militarism and war cultivate its own markets for exploitation.
The Insane Terrorist Empire undermines demographic stability (through sex confusion and destitution), wages (through immigration etc.), public safety (through violent immigrants) and even farming (under climate BS). It evades deadly or fraudulent medical treatment, narcotics, police violence, private firearms, crumbling infrastructure and an infestation of untouchable aliens. It facilitates ICT hacking, global disorder (through its military that exploits impoverished recruits) and loopholes for “donors”. Are its people innocent? Ask OBL. Everything comes home to roost.
I wonder if all this stuff about violent immigrants in’t exagerated anyway? ( Although the plot in Scar face does make you wonder!!!)
If anything, under-exaggerated.
You forgot zombies, child castration and potholes.
Its all there. I was trying not to be verbose.
THE PFIZER PAPERS
Remember the covid documents that Pfizer wanted Court permission to delay releasing for 20 years? The Court made them release them– about 450k of them. The lawyer who helped compel it was Aaron Siri, a major good guy.
Well, Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly have produced a book from that material– aided by 3250 scientists and doctor volunteers. Read about this extraordinary project:
https://rescue.substack.com/p/extra-the-pfizer-papers-pfizers-crimes
The book is called The Pfizer Papers
I don’t think that the term’ deep state’ is very helpful
The Deep State does sound a little tame.
Would you consider calling it the SS, for Secret State? That doesn’t sound evil enough either. It needs to have a short name that sends a chill down your spine. Any ideas?
The Keepers.
I’m ready for another name too. What’s your choice?
Organized Crime.
just the state…or the faceless state maybe
Thom Crewz is probably right. Organized crime by the state
Regarding the quote:
Accusation of a conspiracy of serious fraud against the Cabinet Office of His Majesty’s Government, Treasury, the Crown, and others as yet un-named.
This accusation covers the CESTUI QUE VIE ACT, the Registration Process, and the use of ALL CAPS/Titled NAMES.
I understand that the Cabinet Office of whichever political party has been and is in power is involved in a fraud conspiracy against the British People and is protected by Oaths of Office and Secrecy.
I will lay out the points below that must be answered with full disclosure in Plain-Simple-English and rebutted where possible. Or this accusation stands.
Cestui Que Vie Act 1666
1666 CHAPTER 11 18 and 19 Cha 2
An Act for Redresse of Inconveniencies by want of Proofe of the Deceases of Persons
beyond the Seas or absenting themselves, upon whose Lives Estates doe depend.
X1Recital that Cestui que vies have gone beyond Sea, and that Reversioners cannot find
out whether they are alive or dead.
1- Please provide full disclosure concerning this Act.
2- Explain in full the Birth Registration process and is the above Act used to create a legal person (corporate fiction), and are the birth certificates bundled into Mutual Bonds and are they traded on financial markets.
3- Is the Cestui Que Vie Act used to declare all children born, lost at sea presumed dead whereby the Crown becomes trustee of their estate?
4- Regarding pt3 Does this mean that the people not understanding this Act move forward in life requiring to abide by all Government rules, pay taxes, and cannot own anything of value? (We can be the keeper of things but never the true owner).
5- Regarding pt4 Does this mean we are all slaves to the Crown?
6- Can the Police charge a living man or woman with any offence without an injured party?
7- Can the Court notify a living man or woman to come to court where there is no injured party?
8- Do the Police and the Court use legalese trickery by using a fictitious legal person’s name, hoping that the living man or woman who believes they have been charged and notified will come to court and accept they are dead and that because they are dead, they require representation? This takes the responsibility for the action from the Crown as trustee onto the person charged, whereby the living man or woman must accept and pay the penalty.
9- When a living man or woman buys and pays in full for a thing of value with money earned by their endeavors i.e., A home, land, business, car, and those things are registered, and the man and woman’s name capitalised. Do they solely own those things that have been bought and paid for, and what interest does the Crown have in the transaction?
10- Concerning our I.D., documents (Passport, Driving License, etc.). If the above points cannot be rebutted with full disclosure this must mean our I.D., documents belong to a corporate fiction and do not belong to our living selves.
11- If the above points cannot be rebutted and are not answered with full disclosure, this must mean the British people have no contract with their Government, Justice system, Security Services, Local and National Government Departments, The Treasury, Banks, and the Crown. It means that if fraud has been committed without giving people full disclosure, those individuals, in their personal capacity acting for the above corporate entities, have acted with criminal intent. This means all of the above have no authority or jurisdiction over the people.
12- What is the Government doing about the over 35 trillion pounds invested suspiciously in British Overseas Territories?
My ID as a German citizen officially does not belong to me but to the State that has issued it. I have to pay for their efforts to do so.
I’m going off on a tangent here but what do you think of the passports issued by the Reichsburger organisation? I think they look quite nice!! I’m not a fan of the Reichsburger movement but I do like the passports they issue!! ( Basically to me the passports mean ” No WEF here, no NATO here””
Doyou read/ wartch any of the material online posted by Enrst Woff and that other economist ( Rugemeyer? ) I think they’re very good.
The person or estate being the all capitals name created by the birth certificate, which is not you, and it is not yours, it is property of another. You, have a person, but you, are not one. The person is like a token to use such as the boat or the shoe for a game of monopoly. However most of man, and womankind, did then go out and be the token. The all capitals name on the birth certificate is simply the name of the event of you, being born; which is a historical fact. The birth certificate and or certified copy of an entry is a death certificate as it forms an estate; a legal fiction person which is in all capitals letters like a tombstone for the dead. A birth certificate and or certified copy of an entry on the lands of the united kingdom does have the words “crown copyright” and “warning: a certificate is not evidence of identity” at the bottom. Therefore the birth certificate and or person and or estate is property of mister or missus crown.
I, do not own anything, an owner is a title which is a diminishment of the status of a man, or woman, and comes with duties and obligations. So does “keeper” or any other ficticitous title. What I, have is property, that which is proper to I, that which I, can claim exclusive to all others in a society, and that which I, have the right to set the law for. Property such as your body, your sons and daughters, your house, your car, your money, the possessions you have, the money in a bank account; the account is not yours but the property: in this instance the money; is. Property is the highest right, and the foundation of every right. It is the only right those of man, and womankind, have as all others flow from that.
Problem is, the money you says is yours can be taken from your bank account. Your property can be repossessed. Leaving you with nothing.
Therefore having property is no guarantee that the crown wont step in and take the lot. As we are the security on the countries debt and the crown by way of making our country bankrupt can call in all security as and when it decides to do so.
Our way out is to declare fraud in that what we have written has been done without disclosure.
The bankers (crown) through deception and the licence to print money from fresh air and charge interest now owns everything.
and infact isn’t that exactly what happened to the Greek Cypriots? The introduction of the Euro, I think can be seenas a big scam . It had laready worked so well with the sub prime; You KNOW people aren’t going to be able to repay mortgages/ that Greece can’t repay the national debt so you repossess.. the banks get everything.
https://freemandelusion.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/a-rebellion-of-furious-paper-pseudolaw-as-a-revolutionary-legal-system.pdf
EXTRACT FROM ABSTRACT:
Pseudolaw is a collection of legal-sounding but false rules that purport to be
law. Though pseudolaw is now encountered by courts and government
actors in many countries world-wide, pseudolaw is remarkably constant,
nation-to-nation.
This observation is explained by the crystallization circa 1999-2000 of a
matrix of pseudolaw concepts interwoven with a conspiratorial anti-
government narrative. This Pseudolaw Memeplex was incubated in the US
Sovereign Citizen community. The Memeplex then spread internationally and
into additional anti-government communities. That expansion either
complemented or replaced other pre-existing pseudolaw systems.
The Sovereign Citizen Pseudolaw Memeplex has six core concepts:
1) everything is a contract,
2) silence means agreement,
3) legal action requires an injured party,
4) government authority is defective or limited,
5) the “Strawman” duality, and
6) monetary and banking conspiracy theories………………………………………
I admit I have not read the article but this is not an argument for not criticising it. What I am against in the article is the tone and all the thumbs down over the Government.
I mean, what would you put instead of Government? Somethings has to be there yes?? You cant just leave an empty space where there is Government!
Thats why I am always doing what the Government tells me. I love my Government. Love it or leave it as we use to say in my young hippie days where we smoked the herbs.
And thats why I am against and ciritcise this article. Perception folks. Go wild inside the darkness. Perception! https://vk.com/video-213201358_456247537?t=8m10s&ref_domain=yastatic.net
Eric & Odi, Don’t be absurd. The choice is not between no govt and an evil one.
Until and unless some verifiably effective mechanism can be devised to absolutely avert the latter, which is always the outcome if not the case from inception, it probably is the choice.
What do you think the solution is? I think representative democracy doesn’t have to be a disaster. There was a time when MPs in the UK did seem to reprsent their consituents ,focus on local issues and they were independent. Then something happened..maybe it started with Kinnock or Thatcher. Mps started turning into clones. If they said anything that wasn’t endorsed by the party, they were kicked out of the party. They stopped representing their constituencies..but I think they really did used to.There really wee debates in parliament ( in the UK I think).
I am not sure that the USA has ever been a real demcoracy .It seems to me it has ben controlled ‘ from the get go ‘ (to use the US phrase) by big money. Admittedly I am basing some of what I think on John STEIBNBECK’S novel the Grapes of Wrath!!
The world is in the hands of evil acc to John
The world is in the hands of evil acc to John 5:19.
But we have seen serious people in politics trying to set some values into the game. Some things have been better despite our depressive modern mode.
Remember the military dictator states in South America in the 1960’es.
I went there in 2004 and saw UN’s 10 human rights paper officially put on the wall everywhere in military police education camps. Impressing.
South America acted because we criticised them!
Apology to Penelope, but my response was a absurd response to the absurd.
Guess what? It’s not possible for society to function without government.
Of course it is. Almost all it already does.
Regardless of that, the state is an irrational, immoral and uncontrollable construct, having rights none of its constituents have, or can confer upon it, and being an instrument of coercive force at its core, and obviously and demonstrably, over a very long period, in the employ of the ownership class whose interests it protects and furthers, all of which has got us here to this post fake pandemic world on the verge of global war.
A lot of people see that clearly, and want nothing further to do with supporting it.
Bright minds can convene to determine another way to get the roads built that is compatible with freedom and natural law, because mandatory association with the perpetually warmaking, confiscating, polluting and impoverishing beast is verifiably not.
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/podcast/podcast-larken-rose-etienne-de-la-boetie-voluntaryism-on-the-rocks-your-blueprint-to-liberty
A discussion about society without mandatory central gov’t.
There are 8 billion human souls, or varying backgrounds, abilities sensibilities… government will out.
OF, not or.
Until it won’t. Its defects are clear and permanent, and there are no remedies for it within the system meant to maintain it, so, many now look beyond the paradigm, likely for the first time in history in such a ratio.
The United States’ gov’t is insupportably and catastrophically corrupt at this point, and I would guess Britain is no less so, though less loud on the world stage.
It’s Rome under Caligula or Nero. It can’t be maintained, and the genie of what many have now seen and discovered can’t be put back in the bottle. It can’t be unseen, and support and the consent of the governed will and should be withdrawn.
Mine has been.
Government is a human constant, because the mass of humanity requires it. I agree with the idea that the government is best that governs least, but you’re still going to get government.
It has been, but unless you’re OK with the tack we’re on, they’ll need to become voluntary versions because they never do govern least and this is the result, and we’re about to have a worldwide one with no refuge from.
Things sometimes evolve, and this ‘constant’ is the most harmful thing in human society and all of history, so the idea of it needs to.
“They never do govern least,” but they always do govern. They always will.
but a free press can help keep power in check. That has gone. Don’t they say that Clinton changed some legislation in the USA which meant that shadow banks could come into being. They are more powerful than many states. Small is beautiful
The internet is the free press now, places like this, and yes, it’s a check that info can be so available and easily shared.
The Deep State’s Plot to Destabilize all Nations Is Faltering;
1984 sryle Globalism is fighting a losing battle. The whole world under one command of a few ‘untermenschen’ is unnatural as humans love local tribes on local issues, apart from 100% impractical.
You may be right. I share your opinion.
The problem is they’ve invested everything in their plan and they ain’t giving up without a fight.
we’ll get there but what will the cost be ?
May I suggest this, discovered recently, as a possible way of resolving our present state of vulnerability and weakness in the face of the threat to humanity:
https://icedrive.net/s/8A7z58gxD8RTkWfuSN8S513PFNT2
The idea of putting up a good fight I find appealing.
I think they see themselves as uebermenschen