WATCH: The “Multipolar World Order” IS the New World Order!
Do you think the BRICS nations are going to save us from the New World Order? Then you might be suffering from multipolaritis. Today on The Corbett Report, Professor Dr. James Corbett serves up a hefty dose of the reality-based medicine that will cure you of this terrible affliction.
Download options, an audio-only version and fully-sourced transcript are available HERE.
Thanks for reading...
You can help us keep doing what we do. Every little helps and is hugely appreciated.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Killed to Order: China’s Organ Harvesting Industry and the True Nature of America’s Biggest Adversary – March 17, 2026
How much damage has Israel sustained?
What’s going on with fertilisers getting through the Strait?
What were the stumbling blocks to a ceasefire?
Reasonable questions to which there are no answers in which anyone can have much confidence.
For example, is one Iranian condition that the USA removes all military bases from the region? Some accounts say it is. The Iranians must know that would mean the de facto collapse of the petrodollar…. and without the petrodollar the USA cannot service its debt. Part of the petrodollar deal is US bases protect the corrupt Gulf regimes (from their own populations mainly) and in return those regimes trade their oil in dollars. The endgame looks like tankers will be allowed through the Strait if they pay a toll… in yuan. It’s how the 1956 Suez Crisis ended (i.e. a toll through the canal) which led to announcements the era of Western European empires was over. It’s another playbook being rerun.The only question mark here concerns the timing – is this for next month, next year or next decade? The middle option seems most likely although pre-mid-terms is always an option if there’s any danger Trump won’t lose heavily enough already.
Obviously, this is not to put all the blame for the failure to secure a ceasefire on the Iranians. The Americans must know the Iranians cannot agree to some of their terms. It’s why they were there. Part of the exercise appears to have been the deliberate humiliation of Vance (richly deserved, Peter Thiel creation he is, but still…. ).
P.S, Orban’s defeat looks like another chess-piece being moved into place. That European technate becomes ever more complete. VDL made zero effort to hide her glee.
What a Brilliant Move – blockading the Strait to unblock Iran’s blockade !!
I’ve noticed a big push on the old war front preparation front. A new generation of military figures waffling on about installing a sufficiently patriotic approach and beefing up on the batting down the hatches rhetoric. In short the old wartime economy bullshit the rulers have always wanked over. And it’s the one unifying factor underlying all the media memes from viruses to climate catastrophe to enemies within and without and various international shenanigans.
I also note a return of verification routines when trying to access OffG so I’m assuming there are stepped up cyber attacks.
We are getting more attacks yes. Big one yesterday.
Okay, I’ll bite… again.
This is the same old rehashed, reheated narrative, perhaps to explain away Western hegemonic demise in the face of Eurasian rise – and like the article on OffGuardian/Geopolitics & Empire referenced in the video, ‘Multipolarity As World Government 3.0 & Its Pied Pipers’ – it presents flimsy evidence as strong ‘gotcha!’ moments. Examples:
A Goldman Sachs economist coined the acronym ‘BRIC’ so this is apparently equivalent to BRICS being created and controlled by related conspirators – an insulting leap of logic.
And:
AIIB/BRICS projects and cooperation with SWIFT/IMF/World Bank mean they are all controlled and part of one long plan together – ignoring that all exist in a global economic system in which it’s in their best interests to have coordination, standards, expertise sharing and mutually beneficial arrangements – whilst still being able to have interests and aims that are directly opposed to the US-led hegemony.
And:
The fact that rivals meet at forums and use the same core banking standards (via the Bank of International Settlements, BIS). Unbelievably, this is often used as a ‘smoking gun’ proof for a secret alliance, but it completely ignores how the global system actually works. If China or Russia (or anyone) want to trade with anyone else, they need to use the standards set by the BIS – and a global ecosystem has been built that works both for and against the dominant power within it. If, for example, China’s ability to bank in the system were removed, its economy would collapse. China is the manufacturing powerhouse of the world; its collapse would bring down the global economic ecosystem – the protection is mutually assured economic destruction. It benefits all parties to be able to use the same system. This isn’t the same as being on the same side.
And:
They all use the same global governance language(!) Apparently, this means they are all in it together and are all controlled, as opposed to the simpler explanation: they’re operating in the same global system, so they use the same official language to sound legitimate, keep institutions onside, and sell their own agendas. It doesn’t show that multipolarity is just US hegemony in disguise – it shows that powerful people everywhere dress power up in whatever moral/managerial wording works while they pursue more power.
And:
COVID proves the narrative because powerful independent interests would definitely never go along with gaining more power and wealth (adopting similar controls and policies) unless they all agreed to it beforehand…right? In reality, powerful leaders don’t need a secret pact to know that a crisis is a perfect excuse to expand control. Russia and China didn’t have to follow the COVID protocols to serve a secret Global King; they all sang the same tune during the pandemic because it helped them tighten their grip at home and further their own agendas – that doesn’t stop them from pointing missiles at their enemies when the masks come off.
The narrative goes on and on stacking this type of ‘evidence’ as if it’s indicative of a long-planned, all-in-it-together agreement. Apparently, the world’s most powerful rivals are actually best friends playing a multi-decade game of pretend just to keep the public distracted. The script is supposedly perfect: they crash their own economies, sink their own ships, and demonise each other for years – all for a share of a pie that only one of them can ultimately lead. It’s a cartoonish vision where the New World Order is a surprise party waiting to happen.
Corbett and others – clearly not stupid or naive people by any stretch of the imagination – appear completely unable or unwilling to see and assess the better evidenced and realistic perspective on two things that exist right now and what they represent:
1. The West Mob – A Transnational Capitalist Class (TCC) Order – A US-centred and led hegemonic power, structured around finance/banking/corporate/asset manager/political institution interests, that has built and entrenched the dollar-based global economic system. This Order represents a borderless, corporate-led technocracy using the US military as its enforcer.
2. The Eurasian Mob – A Sovereignty-first National-Capital Order – China, Russia (and select partners) that operate capitalist systems (state + big business + security elites) and want strategic independence from US-led finance/tech power. They are building parallel institutions and trade/payment routes where feasible, specifically so they can escape the TCC’s control in this regard.
Both are well-researched and deeply evidenced, with observable political and strategic actions that divert from each other and suggest strong rivalry. The first is a world run by Private Wealth that uses the US government to protect its global investments. The second is a world run by State Power that wants to break the Western monopoly, and where the government can (and does) overrule capital when regime/security priorities demand it.
The ‘all-in-it-together’ theory effectively claims that Putin and Xi – men who sit atop massive, ancient, proud civilisations – are essentially middle managers for Goldman Sachs or similar. I ask myself (and you should too) which of these opposing narratives has a stronger evidence base, maintains logical structure and is therefore likely to be true.
I’m convinced that Corbett’s – and others – narrative is the actual ruse. In their narrative, any evidence of conflict becomes ‘staged’ and any evidence of cooperation becomes ‘proof.’ This makes the narrative unfalsifiable. In reality little of it makes much sense, little of it is well-evidenced and even less is well-reasoned. It’s a perfect meme, which explains why it’s so easily accepted and spread.
There isn’t one New World Order being planned; there are two main plans for a New World Order, with competing trajectories that have real, deep tension: One requires the end of national sovereignty (The West Mob); the other requires the end of the US dollar’s global monopoly (The Eurasian Mob).
None of this means I believe multipolarity will save us from domination. If one side ultimately prevails, we will likely still end up with an effective global monopoly of power that will do what history has always shown it does: dominate, control, and exploit human resources to the maximum possible degree. I just don’t buy the claim that today’s rival powers are secretly coordinated by a single monolithic command.
And if you’re on board with this conclusion – it’s time to start asking why the other narrative is being pushed so hard.
Tom-ah-to, tom-aye-to.
There are power centres that sometimes work together, sometimes not. They are not completely in synch. They may latch on to one issue e.g. covid because it profits them all individually. And that circumstance means they can also pull various strands together and mutually reinforce each other.
Furthermore “(i)if one side ultimately prevails, we will likely still end up with an effective global monopoly of power that will do what history has always shown it does: dominate, control, and exploit human resources to the maximum possible degree”. Which sounds like a monolith to me. Or effectively so.
Does it really make any difference to the average punter who pulls the strings?
Greedy self serving Turds in suits come in all creeds, colours and religions.
All we can do is get on with our lives as best we can.
What your essentially asking is: What is the point of being on this forum? Or any forum like it. If discussing the facts or fictions of narratives presented to us about geopolitical power, the players and direction of travel is pointless – because it doesn’t make any difference who pulls the strings – then why take part in discussion about it at all? Just accept what you’re told without consideration or concern and carry on. Might that not be exactly what power would want though? – apathy, despondency and nobody talking about it because it doesn’t really matter anyway.
Would it have been more or less beneficial if many more people were wondering and discussing openly if there wasn’t some kind of subterfuge at play during the ‘pandemic’? – a mass awareness and focus on a dark strategy with outcomes that will impact generations beyond. Might it be useful, focus minds, encourage resilience, and build resistance to oppressive governance if many more people discussed and critically examined the narrative presented to us in this article?
I have a suspicion, not without merit, that power doesn’t really want us looking, questioning and discussing it at all – and for those who persist, power provides an excess of carefully woven narratives to blind them from truth.
My point is: We can and should get on with our lives as best we can, and at the same time question, discuss and probe the major narratives about how and by whom our lives are governed – especially when it feels like we shouldn’t bother at all, that the specifics don’t make any difference, because maybe that is how we are being made to feel.
John Brennan: Ex-CIA director calls for ousting Trump: ‘25th amendment was written with him in mind’
The woke are in alignment with Brennan: their NWO?
The controlled media (so called mainstream) seems to be turning against Trump. On CNN a retired Brigadier General called him a terrible commander in chief; NYT has carried a few articles critical of him.
US News & World Report is carrying a major article, listing the military leaders who’ve spoken out against him & their comments.
https://www.usnews.com/news/national-news/articles/2024-10-23/the-high-profile-military-leaders-who-have-come-out-against-donald-trump
Impeachment of a President has to begin in his cabinet. JD Vance as VP wd be the logical one to start, since he cannot be dismissed. Since the military men are highly respected by the citizenry, this might embolden his lackluster cabinet, but I doubt it.
Also the Military Industrial Complex (MIC) is about to get a huge windfall under Trump.
The real money’s on Rubio.
He has fiend$ in high places.
I used the wrong word; application of the 25th amendment re incapacity is NOT impeachment.
Multipolarity works well for the poison pedlars:
https://brownstone.org/articles/what-if-the-fda-were-eliminated/
Catte’s Black:
https://catteb.substack.com/p/how-to-create-pod-people-and-inherit
Where you been hiding Catte?
The obscenely rich rule, the rest are their playthings and cannon fodder.
The obscenely rich come in all creeds, colours and religions.
The obscenely rich are psychopathic control freaks.
The obscenely rich are the enemies of peace.
The obscenely rich will bring the world undone.
Unless _ _ _ _
Uh oh, a downvote from one of the obscenely rich.
Oh well, I’ll take that as a compliment.
Reported is that President Trump has ordered The Blockade of the Dire Strait of
Hormuz.** It’s not known if he intends to follow Iran’s lead by also imposing a
Pass Through Fee on the ships that have already paid the Iranians, or is imposing
The Blockade (TM) to Destroy The World Economy – (To hurry in The NWO ?)…
As He doesnt give a shit about US soldier’s lives dont expect him to give a shit
about The Global Economy…
“No More Mister Nice Guy !” …
** Expect in about a week Off-g’s Kit raising questions about whether there is A
Blockade (TM) – or Not ?
It’s just The Barons ganging up on King John of England – to cut him down a
peg or two…
It;s just a Holding Pattern ’til one of the Barons feels he’s strong enough to take
on the other Baron’s to become the New Hegemon…
They are Frenenies, and They’re All In It Together !
And the Rest Of Us still have to Slave To Live !!
And “The Band Played ‘Waltzing Matilda” while The Dish Ran Away With The Spoon…
Maybe hold a debate on this topic with say Brian Berletic and Corbett.
Would be interesting to see how Corbett’s geopolitical chops hold up in a well-informed debate.
BTW a time-honored technique of propaganda is to present a topic/interview/information etc. and then telling people how they should think about that information/interview- “…a hefty dose of the reality-based medicine that will cure you of this terrible affliction.”
So, where do you stand mate? Do you think BRICS is the dingo’s knob?
The ‘dingo’ wears a suit and wants all the babies.