Europe, latest, media watch, UK
Comments 2

Why Jeremy Corbyn is terrifying the London elite

by Craig Murray

Jeremy-Corbyn-11_3328948k

For a decade, I have argued that democracy in the UK is dysfunctional because an entrenched party system offers no real choice. The major parties offer political programmes which are virtually indistinguishable. As I put it in lectures, if the range of possible political programmes were placed on a linear scale from 1 to 100, the Labour and Conservative parties offer you the choice between 81 and 84.

This exclusion of political possibility is reinforced by a corporate media structure, led by the BBC, in which ideas outside the narrow band of establishment consensus are ridiculed and denigrated. Therefore even political ideas which have the consistent support of the majority of the population, such as nationalisation of railways and other natural monopolies including utilities, simply cannot get an airing. Of all the broadcast coverage of the Iraq War, less than 3% gave time to anti-war voices, despite a majority opinion against the war.

This phenomenon explains why a large majority of both Conservative and Labour MPs are members of the Friends of Israel when public opinion consistently sympathises more with Palestine. It also explains the quite extraordinary media onslaught against Scottish independence.

I pointed out that Nicola Sturgeon’s appearance in the TV leadership debates was the first major airing of an anti-Trident argument on broadcast media in England for a decade. Actually hearing anti-austerity arguments led to a huge surge in support for the SNP in England as well as Scotland.

Now Jeremy Corbyn, having obtained a platform where on occasion he has been able to have his views broadcast direct without media mediation, is experiencing a massive surge of support. Ed Miliband’s lasting achievement is that he managed to put the ordinary people who marched against the Iraq War in charge of the Labour Party, not the careerist Blairite committee manipulators. The result is stunning.

The sheer panic gripping the London elite now is hilarious to behold. Those on the favoured side of Britain’s enormous wealth gap are terrified by the idea that there may be a genuine electoral challenge to neo-liberalism, embodied in one of the main party structures. This is especially terrifying to those who became wealthy by hijacking the representation of the working class to the neo-liberal cause. The fundamental anti-democracy of the Blairites is plainly exposed, and the panic-driven hysterical hate-fest campaign against Corbyn by the Guardian would be unbelievable, if we hadn’t just seen exactly the same campaign by the same paper against the rejection of neo-liberalism in Scotland.

I think I am entitled to say I told you so. Many people appear shocked to have discovered the Guardian is so anti-left wing. I have been explaining this in detail for years. It is good to feel vindicated, and even better that the people I have repeatedly shared platforms with, like Jeremy and Mhairi, are suddenly able to have the genuinely popular case they make listened to. Do I feel a little left behind, personally? Probably, but I would claim to have contributed a little to the mood, and particularly my article on the manufactured myth that the left is unelectable has been extremely widely shared – by hundreds of thousands – in the social media storm that is propelling the Corbyn campaign.

There has been very little comment on the impact a Corbyn victory would have on the SNP. Indeed, despite being unbendingly unionist, the Scottish media have been unable to avoid representing by omission the fact that the Labour leadership contest is taking place almost entirely in another country with another political culture. But there is no doubt that a Corbyn-led Labour Party would be more attractive in Scotland than the Tory lite version, although the paucity of Labour’s Scottish leadership would be a constant factor. Much would depend on the wider question of how the careerists who make up most Labour MPs and MSPs would react to a Corbyn victory.

At Westminster, I can see no reason at all why Liz Kendall, Chuka Umunna and their like cannot simply cross the floor and become Tories. Cameron is astute enough to find junior ministerial positions for them and the Tory ranks would be elated enough to swallow it. But most of the careerists will look at their new constituency members and suddenly discover left wing principles. It will be less bloody than people expect.

In Scotland, a Corbyn victory will bring some swing back to Labour from the SNP, but most of the old Labour demographic have now set their hearts on independence. Should Corbyn actually look set to win a UK general election in 2020, that would very possibly dent the enthusiasm for independence at the margins. It would in no sense reduce my own desire for independence, but even I would feel it less urgent. A Corbyn led UK would not cause the same feeling of moral revulsion. All of which is a good argument for having the next referendum early.

Should Corbyn not win the Labour leadership, the effect will be opposite. The SNP will be boosted by the death of the last hope that the Labour Party might actually mean something again, rather than be a vehicle for soulless careerists spouting management-manual jargon. If Corbyn loses, the Labour Party in Scotland really might as well wind up. The cause of independence will be furthered.

So what do I want to happen? I want Jeremy to win, of course, deeply and sincerely. I am an internationalist and not a Machiavellian. I want the chance of a just society and an ethical foreign policy for England and Wales. Like me, Jeremy wants to see Ireland eventually united. I have never discussed Scottish independence with him, but I am quite sure his opposition is not of the Britnat imperialist variety.

You can be sure that the security services are heavily targeted on the Corbyn campaign. Allow me one last “I told you so”. I came in for much ridicule when I stated, from certain knowledge, that MI5 were targeted on Scottish Nationalists (I had actually been shown the tasking). This comes into the category of obvious truths which the media and political consensus seeks to deny. The ridicule even came from some within the SNP – which, like any other organisation deemed a threat to the UK, is itself penetrated by the security services. Well, now that truth has become mainstream too. I do not anticipate any apologies.

2 Comments

  1. Kaivey says

    I joined Labour because of Corbin. I recently took early retirement from work due to chronic stress causing ill health. I’ve got a small pension but I find that I’m taxed on it. How can poor people on very low wages pay taxes when their rents and mortgages are so high? The rich off shore their taxes and got the capital gains tax lowered which they said this would improve investment but they just squirreled it away out of sight. The nicely spoken honourable gentlemen in the City will take care of that for them. I’m so fu*cking angry that I might have time to get more politically active now to take this scum out.

  2. Kaivey says

    I used to enjoy writing in CIF until I got pre moderated where after that most of my posts never got through. Right wingers were posting like mad on CIF, and they seemed to be having a field day, with no opposition, but know I know why, they were all being pre moderated like me. I had bought the paper most of my adult life, had adored it, but now I was considered to be too radical for a paper that I always thought was radical.

    Now I hardly ever read the Guardian and go elsewhere for my news. In fact, I found out about OffGuardian from RINF. Now when I go back to the Guardian I find it so limp and boring. It’s full of liberal stuff about gay rights which might make people think that it is still a left wing paper, but it doesn’t have much serious leftist politics at all. Strangely though, it do an excellent documentary about James Steele, ‘The Mystery Man in Iraq, which was awesome, and very critical of US foreign policy. George Monbiot and Seumas Milne are still good, but they never openly criticise Israel. Its as if the Guardian has been infiltrated with right wing intelligence assets and there was a power play but the left lost.

    I put this video below out on the Guardian once, which the Guardian removed in a jiffy. If people were given the truth they would be far more radical. The west is controlled by an enormous amount of propaganda. If only people could get some of the truth and then they might get to realise how wicked the west can actually be. And about how WW1 and WW2 were more about big business, making serious money, and protecting the aristocracy from democracy, than fighting evil, where the lines between the good guys and the bad guys were blurred.

    An Israeli Soldier’s Story – Eran Efrati

Please note the opinions expressed in the comments do not necessarily reflect those of the editors or of OffG as a whole