comment 1

China getting go ahead to build nuclear power plants in UK as part of ‘low carbon fuel policy.’

According to numerous outlets, including the Express, the UK Prime Minister, David Cameron is about to sign a long-debated deal with China and France to build a “prototype” nuclear reactor in Essex and to help fund the development of two new reactors on UK soil, at Hinckley in Somerset and Sizewell in Suffolk. The former will be operated by two major Chinese energy companies, and the latter by France’s EDF Energy.

These plans have ignited much controversy and opposition, not only because of the perceived dangers to the environment through accident and contamination, but also because of the huge subsidies the Government has agreed to pay EDF and its Chinese partners – which will of course be footed by UK tax payers.

The Chinese government’s rush toward greater dependence on nuclear power has also been described as “insane” by one senior Chinese scientist, because the country is allegedly not investing enough in safety controls, which is a major cause for concern post-Fukushima.

The fact these projects are described as being “at the core of the Government’s drive to replace Britain’s ageing fossil fuel plants with low-carbon alternatives” should possibly alert us to the danger of the climate change campaign being rather cynically hijacked for highly questionable and environmentally destructive ends.


SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Filed under: empire watch, latest, UK
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
China getting go ahead to build nuclear power plants in UK as part of ‘low carbon fuel policy.’ | Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News
Sep 15, 2015 11:39 AM

[…] Source: China getting go ahead to build nuclear power plants in UK as part of ‘low carbon fuel policy.’ […]