conflict zones, latest
Comments 8

Pepe Escobar: It’s the Russian way or the highway

RussSub
A Russian nuclear submarine in the Barents Sea.

The New Great Game in Eurasia advanced in leaps and bounds last week after Russia fired 26 cruise missiles from the Caspian Sea against 11 ISIS/ISIL/Daesh targets across Syria, destroying all of them. These naval strikes were the first known operational use of state-of-the-art SSN-30A Kalibr cruise missiles.

All it took for the Pentagon was a backward look over the shoulder at the flight path of those Kalibr missiles – capable of striking targets 1,500 km away. Talk about a crisp, clear, succinct message from Moscow to the Pentagon and NATO. Wanna mess with us, boy? With your big, bulging aircraft carriers, maybe?

Moreover, on top of the creation of what is a de facto no-fly zone over Syria and southern Turkey, the Russian Navy cruiser Moskva, carrying 64 S-300 ship-to-air missiles is now docked in Latakia.

The proverbial anonymous US sources could not but go on overdrive, spinning the Russians had four wayward missiles that landed in Iran. The Russian High Command ridiculed them; all missiles landed within eight feet of their targets.

The Pentagon didn’t even know the Kalibr could be fired from small ships — as Tomahawks require much larger ships.

The best the Pentagon could muster, apart from widespread apoplexy, was NORAD commander Adm. William Gortney telling the Atlantic Council Russian long-range aviation and long-range cruise missiles present a new “threat” for US strategic homeland defense.

The Russian cruise missile threat is a “particular challenge for NORAD and for Northern Command.” Oh, really?

Talk about a New Great Game-wide understatement. A case can be made that Russia’s military development over the past few years has put Moscow generations ahead of the US. In case of a Hot World War 3.0 – and nobody, apart from the usual Dr. Strangeloves, could possibly want that — missiles and submarines will be the key weapons, not US-style monster aircraft carriers.

The Pentagon is apoplectic because this display of Russian technology revealed the end of the American monopoly over long-range cruise missiles. Pentagon analysts were still working under the assumption their range was around 300 kilometers.

Moreover, NATO has been warned; Russia can crush them, in a flash — as I witnessed in conversations in Germany last week. Fiery rhetoric of the “you’re violating my air space!” variety also won’t cut it.

Once again, assuming the Dr. Strangelove scenario, the only possible US response if the going gets tough would be to launch nuclear ICBMs; but then Russia’s air space will be sealed by S-500 anti-missile missiles, carrying ten inceptor missiles each and unable to miss on any American ICBM. […]

Meanwhile, in Sochi, Russian President Vladimir Putin met — again — with Saudi Arabia’s Defense Minister Prince Mohammed bin Salman, as in the warrior prince who’s smashing civilians in Yemen. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Energy Minister Alexander Novak were also there.

Diplomatically, this was all about Moscow and Riyadh agreeing ISIS/ISIL/Daesh cannot be allowed to take over Syria. The devil is in the details. Much spin centered on a “political solution.” Putin once again could not be sharper; the current offensive is meant to “stabilize the legitimate authorities and create conditions for finding a political compromise.” The House of Saud got the message; it’s the Russian way or the highway. […]

Read in full Pepe Escobar’s Say hello to my cruise missiles at Asia Times


8 Comments

  1. The best analysis I read pointed out that Russia can never be friends with the US. What they can do is pressure the EU (Germany) in particular to be neutral.




    0



    0
    • Seamus Padraig says

      Exactly. Russia will never be truly safe until the US pulls out of the Eastern Hemisphere for good. That might take a while, though. And there’s no guarantee that Washington will be willing to go quietly.




      0



      0
    • I think Germany is struggling to maintain the propaganda that they have continually promulgated and I have noticed a lot of German responses to my tweets regarding misinformation about the Assad regime. It would appear that there is support both for Assad and Russia against the “aggressive” US/EU slaughter by proxy. That of course, is no indication on where our government will take us or what they will do in our name, but we should be used to that by now.




      0



      0
  2. Yes.. good! And… think about it. To operate the literally hundreds of foreign and Syrian ‘rebel’ ‘ bases in Syria would need thousands of Brit, US Israeli French etc experts in logistics, construction, military planning, training etc. Uneducated mercenaries at 200US$ a day from Sudan or Chechnya couldn’t carry out this massive sophisticated op. Nor a few ex Syrian/Iraqi army officers. Russia gave them 1 hour notice of airstrike.. to keep them all in place!.

    In any case they couldn’t withdraw them. That would need hundreds of evacuating choppers which would have given away the game.. and if they did withdraw, the whole op. would immediately collapse.

    They got nato and EU scream ‘Stop the bombing’ to assure the imbedded that at least something was being done save their necks. Many of the embedded would have already been killed or wounded, with the rest exposed.

    No negotiations to get them out like in Debaltsevo.




    0



    0
    • Had hoped that NATO’s illegal shelling of Donetsk would be exposed when they were photographed in the Cauldron – feeble minded woman that I am.




      0



      0

Please note the opinions expressed in the comments do not necessarily reflect those of the editors or of OffG as a whole