Finland: tough choices to make after the Brexit

by Editeur

After the UK vote in favor of the Brexit,  panic seems to emerge on the Finnish economic playing field: according to YLE, on the first day of trading on the Helsinki Stock Exchange since Thursday’s vote, shares sank about six percent after the opening bell, at  its lowest level in five years. Outokumpu,  Metsä Board, Wärtsilä, Cargotec and Konescranes, Sampo, Nordea and Nokia dropped still more. And the  Finnish Parliament announced it will reconvene in a special session on Friday to consider the repercussions of the British vote.
In reality, from an economic point of view, Finland has little to lose as demonstrated by Standard and Poors’ Financial Services has published a Brexit sensitivity index for countries. Finland, compared to other EU countries, has very little exports to UK (1,6% of GNP), a very low financial risk, very low foreign direct investments in GNP, and very low migrations to and from UK compared to its population. And an extremely small number of  British tourists. For this reasons, it is very far from being a member of the Brexit danger club, according to Bloomberg (the danger club includes Malta, Cyprus, Ireland, Lithuania, Poland and Latvia.
However, Finland has to face political risks. The first is internal, with people led by Timo Soini and his party: they are already asking for a referendum, but in the present situation there is no majority to leave the EU. But there is also an external one, as Finland may have to make quite rapidly a choice, between following the founding members of the EU (Germany, France, Italy, Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg) , who have met on Friday and are pushing for more integration and a more federal EU, and the others,  for the moment led by Poland, who were generally UK allies in the EU to block more integration and more social regulations. The problems for this group of rebels is that they are mainly the ones on the receiving end of the EU budget, and leaving the EU would mean abandoning this money coming mainly from the founding members, so there is practically no chance that they stay rebels very long.
The question for Finland, but also for Sweden and Denmark, a traditional British ally, is to know if they are ready to follow the founding members, or if they would prefer to follow the UK and leave the EU. As they don’t have the UK’s economic strengths, leaving the EU is quite risky for their economy and their finances. If the population does not want to follow the founding members’ will to go towards an integrated EU, they could push them to go for what is called enhanced cooperation: for the moment, it is a procedure where a minimum of 9 EU countries are allowed to establish advanced integration or cooperation in an area within EU structures but without the other EU countries being involved. This allows them to move at different speeds and towards different goals than those outside the enhanced cooperation areas. But it is not sure that this would be accepted by France and Germany.
Tough choice…


If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Filed under: EU, latest
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jun 29, 2016 12:20 PM

Finland’s problem is resisting pressure to join NATO. They have a common border with Russia, a border that has changed back and forth over the years. The Finns also know that the so-called Russian aggression is nonsense and all NATO western MSM hype. The EU is subservient to NATO and it is hard for an EU member not to join.
LIttle advantage for Finland in being in the EU and no advantage in joining NATO.

Jun 28, 2016 9:22 AM

If Finland were to leave the EU, there is another option: restore the special trading relationship it used to have with the Soviet Union, but this time with the USSR’s successor state Russia.
In fact after 1945, with Finland on the losing side in World War II, the country was required to pay reparations to the Soviets, initially in the form of machinery, trains and ships. Thus was born the foundation for Finland’s modern economy. (Before the 1940s, the Finnish economy had been mostly agrarian.) Finland tailored its economy to match the 5-Year Plans developed by the Soviets.
Indeed Finland had to join the EU in 1995 as by then the Russian economy was tanking under neoliberal economic “reforms” introduced under Boris Yeltsin’s presidency and the Finnish economy was sinking along with it.
Problem solved?

Jun 28, 2016 12:12 AM

All my comments censored. WHY?

Jun 28, 2016 10:49 AM
Reply to  ThomasT

ThomasT, how many hyperlinks did you include in your comment? They may delay your post from appearing.

Jun 28, 2016 11:58 AM
Reply to  ThomasT

I’ve checked through our comments, both in the pending and in the spam folder. There are only two comments from you. This one and one other, neither of which have been censored (obviously). We don’t EVER censor comments for opinion, only for spam. If you’d posted a comment that was being held for moderation it would be here in our pending queue. Even if it had been accidentally relegated to spam, we’d be able to find it.
It looks as if you have simply not posted, or for some reason your posts have not gone through.
Sorry. But there’s nothing to be done about it now.

Jun 27, 2016 10:59 PM

Reblogged this on TheFlippinTruth.