latest, multipolar world, NATO, Russia, USA

The Power of “Nyet”

by Dmitry Orlov, July 27, 2016

The way things are supposed to work on this planet is like this: in the United States, the power structures (public and private) decide what they want the rest of the world to do. They communicate their wishes through official and unofficial channels, expecting automatic cooperation. If cooperation is not immediately forthcoming, they apply political, financial and economic pressure. If that still doesn’t produce the intended effect, they attempt regime change through a color revolution or a military coup, or organize and finance an insurgency leading to terrorist attacks and civil war in the recalcitrant nation. If that still doesn’t work, they bomb the country back to the stone age. This is the way it worked in the 1990s and the 2000s, but as of late a new dynamic has emerged.

In the beginning it was centered on Russia, but the phenomenon has since spread around the world and is about to engulf the United States itself. It works like this: the United States decides what it wants Russia to do and communicates its wishes, expecting automatic cooperation. Russia says “Nyet.” The United States then runs through all of the above steps up to but not including the bombing campaign, from which it is deterred by Russia’s nuclear deterrent. The answer remains “Nyet.” One could perhaps imagine that some smart person within the US power structure would pipe up and say: “Based on the evidence before us, dictating our terms to Russia doesn’t work; let’s try negotiating with Russia in good faith as equals.” And then everybody else would slap their heads and say, “Wow! That’s brilliant! Why didn’t we think of that?” But instead that person would be fired that very same day because, you see, American global hegemony is nonnegotiable. And so what happens instead is that the Americans act baffled, regroup and try again, making for quite an amusing spectacle.

The whole Edward Snowden imbroglio was particularly fun to watch. The US demanded his extradition. The Russians said: “Nyet, our constitution forbids it.” And then, hilariously, some voices in the West demanded in response that Russia change its constitution! The response, requiring no translation, was “Xa-xa-xa-xa-xa!” Less funny is the impasse over Syria: the Americans have been continuously demanding that Russia go along with their plan to overthrow Bashar Assad. The unchanging Russian response has been: “Nyet, the Syrians get to decide on their leadership, not Russia, and not the US.” Each time they hear it, the Americans scratch their heads and… try again. John Kerry was just recently in Moscow, holding a marathon “negotiating session” with Putin and Lavrov. Above is a photo of Kerry talking to Putin and Lavrov in Moscow a week or so ago and their facial expressions are hard to misread. There’s Kerry, with his back to the camera, babbling away as per usual. Lavrov’s face says: “I can’t believe I have to sit here and listen to this nonsense again.” Putin’s face says: “Oh the poor idiot, he can’t bring himself to understand that we’re just going to say ‘nyet’ again.” Kerry flew home with yet another “nyet.”

What’s worse, other countries are now getting into the act. The Americans told the Brits exactly how to vote, and yet the Brits said “nyet” and voted for Brexit. The Americans told the Europeans to accept the horrendous corporate power grab that is the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), and the French said “nyet, it shall not pass.” The US organized yet another military coup in Turkey to replace Erdoǧan with somebody who won’t try to play nice with Russia, and the Turks said “nyet” to that too. And now, horror of horrors, there is Donald Trump saying “nyet” to all sorts of things—NATO, offshoring American jobs, letting in a flood of migrants, globalization, weapons for Ukrainian Nazis, free trade…

The corrosive psychological effect of “nyet” on the American hegemonic psyche cannot be underestimated. If you are supposed to think and act like a hegemon, but only the thinking part still works, then the result is cognitive dissonance. If your job is to bully nations around, and the nations can no longer be bullied, then your job becomes a joke, and you turn into a mental patient. The resulting madness has recently produced quite an interesting symptom: some number of US State Department staffers signed a letter, which was promptly leaked, calling for a bombing campaign against Syria in order to overthrow Bashar Assad. These are diplomats. Diplomacy is the art of avoiding war by talking. Diplomats who call for war are not being exactly… diplomatic. You could say that they are incompetent diplomats, but that wouldn’t go far enough (most of the competent diplomats left the service during the second Bush administration, many of them in disgust over having to lie about the rationale for the Iraq war). The truth is, they are sick, deranged non-diplomatic warmongers. Such is the power of this one simple Russian word that they have quite literally lost their minds.

But it would be unfair to single out the State Department. It is as if the entire American body politic has been infected by a putrid miasma. It permeates all things and makes life miserable. In spite of the mounting problems, most other things in the US are still somewhat manageable, but this one thing—the draining away of the ability to bully the whole world—ruins everything. It’s mid-summer, the nation is at the beach. The beach blanket is moth-eaten and threadbare, the beach umbrella has holes in it, the soft drinks in the cooler are laced with nasty chemicals and the summer reading is boring… and then there is a dead whale decomposing nearby, whose name is “Nyet.” It just ruins the whole ambiance!

The media chattering heads and the establishment politicos are at this point painfully aware of this problem, and their predictable reaction is to blame it on what they perceive as its ultimate source: Russia, conveniently personified by Putin. “If you aren’t voting for Clinton, you are voting for Putin” is one recently minted political trope. Another is that Trump is Putin’s agent. Any public figure that declines to take a pro-establishment stance is automatically labeled “Putin’s useful idiot.” Taken at face value, such claims are preposterous. But there is a deeper explanation for them: what ties them all together is the power of “nyet.” A vote for Sanders is a “nyet” vote: the Democratic establishment produced a candidate and told people to vote for her, and most of the young people said “nyet.” Same thing with Trump: the Republican establishment trotted out its Seven Dwarfs and told people to vote for any one of them, and yet most of the disenfranchised working-class white people said “nyet” and voted for Snow White the outsider.

It is a hopeful sign that people throughout the Washington-dominated world are discovering the power of “nyet.” The establishment may still look spiffy on the outside, but under the shiny new paint there hides a rotten hull, with water coming in though every open seam. A sufficiently resounding “nyet” will probably be enough to cause it to founder, suddenly making room for some very necessary changes. When that happens, please remember to thank Russia… or, if you insist, Putin.

Dmitry Orlov was born in Leningrad and immigrated to the United States in the 1970’s. He is the author of Reinventing Collapse, Hold Your Applause! and Absolutely Positive, and publishes weekly at the phenomenally popular blog ClubOrlov.


  1. The simplest way to quit being quite so ready to
    accept hackers should be to migrate towards the latest computer, with robust
    new technology copied by regular patches and fixes.
    As the device works about the digital network of Wi –
    Fi signals, no quality of image is lost in converting the signals for the analogue form.
    Safeguarding your residence is really crucial, specifically in our
    day and age.

    This surveillance camera system features a dual camera design having a color and also a black and white lens each.

    You look for any number of options and ways to produce
    your experience better and interesting.

  2. I’ve only one thing to say, Da to Nyet! Of course it will get your account suspended at the Guardian after being labelled as a Putinbot. But Da to Nyet anyway tavarish!

  3. Alan says

    After Nyet sometimes comes the Russian phrase “YA ne khochu” – meaning “I don’t like”. Could be a useful addition.

    • reinertorheit says

      Another phrase that frequently follows nyet is poshel ty

      Which could also be a useful addition.

    • Ikallicrates says

      “Ya ne khochu” translates as “I don’t want to”. “Ya ne lyublu” translates as “I don’t like”.

  4. reinertorheit says

    some smart person within the US power structure

    Yes, that’s where the whole idea hits the buffers, doesn’t it?

  5. Brian Harry, Australia says

    The American hierarchy, are looking more and more like a group of monkeys that have taken over the Zoo, and, it’s only going to get worse when either Trump or Hillary get to be President
    Vladimir Putin does not look like someone who will ‘blink first’. Australia’s previous Prime Minister Tony Abbott publicly promised to ‘Shirt front’ him(don’t laugh, this is serious) when they met. Putin, cold bloodedly looked him straight in the eyes, and didn’t blink, and Abbott just looked as stupid as he actually is/was.
    Putin has already warned the world that Russia still has a nuclear weapon stockpile, and if anyone in the American administration thinks he’s too afraid to use them, America is making a huge mistake.

    • Kathleen Lowrey says

      just watched the clip of that (which I had not heard about). I am actually fighting against my own elaborate tinfoil headgear these days, but the wording is so weird — as he works up this absurd confrontationalism (really? you, a world leader, are going to personally physically attack another world leader?) he speaks in the second person before correcting himself. The way the whole campaign against Russia / Putin feels stage-managed was a little vivid there.

    • reinertorheit says


      blockquote> Australia’s previous Prime Minister Tony Abbott publicly promised to ‘Shirt front’ him



      One reason Barry Humphries no longer performs his spoof ‘Australian Cultural Attache’ character Sir Les Patterson is that it proved impossible to differentiate the grotesque drunken Philistine Patterson from an actual diplomat. Sir Les was beyond parody. At one of Humphries’s performance in Queensland, Security staff forcibly removed ‘Sir Les’ from the microphone mid-performance – believing a local had somehow sneaked backstage to harangue the audience in a booze-induced stupour.

      Yet Sir Les lives on. He is now using the name ‘Paul Myler’, and is working as the Australian Ambassador here in Moscow. The goonish Myler even gave a presentation for graduates of the Diplomatic and Linguistics University MGIMO (officially part of the Russian Foreign Ministry) in which he tried to explain and defend the ‘shirtfronting’ remark.

      • Brian Harry, Australia says

        “LIKE”……..If every country had “Cultural Attache’s like ‘Sir Leslie Colin Patterson’, at least we’d all ‘die laughing’ when the planet disappears in a nuclear holocaust.

  6. Beth D says

    Fantastic post, thank you. Never forget that we were all once toddlers in our ’em’ terrible twos ’em’, when our favorite word was ’em’ nyet ’em’. We realized the power of ’em’ no ’em’ and drove our parents to distraction.

    • Beth D says

      Apologies–I followed the suggested form for italics and for some reason, probably because I left too many spaces, it didn’t work. Have a fun read :))

Comments are closed.