The Exoneration of Milosevic: the ICTY's Surprise Ruling

by Andy Wilcoxson, via CounterPunch

The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague has determined that the late Serbian president Slobodan Milosevic was not responsible for war crimes committed during the 1992-95 Bosnian war.
In a stunning ruling, the trial chamber that convicted former Bosnian-Serb president Radovan Karadzic of war crimes and sentenced him to 40 years in prison, unanimously concluded that Slobodan Milosevic was not part of a “joint criminal enterprise” to victimize Muslims and Croats during the Bosnian war.
The March 24th Karadzic judgment states that “the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milosevic agreed with the common plan” to permanently remove Bosnian Muslims and Bosnian Croats from Bosnian Serb claimed territory.[1]
The Karadzic trial chamber found that “the relationship between Milosevic and the Accused had deteriorated beginning in 1992; by 1994, they no longer agreed on a course of action to be taken.  Furthermore, beginning as early as March 1992, there was apparent discord between the Accused and Milosevic in meetings with international representatives, during which Milosevic and other Serbian leaders openly criticised Bosnian Serb leaders of committing ‘crimes against humanity’ and ‘ethnic cleansing’ and the war for their own purposes.”[2]
The judges noted that Slobodan Milosevic and Radovan Karadzic both favored the preservation of Yugoslavia and that Milosevic was initially supportive, but that their views diverged over time.  The judgment states that “from 1990 and into mid-1991, the political objective of the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership was to preserve Yugoslavia and to prevent the separation or independence of BiH, which would result in a separation of Bosnian Serbs from Serbia; the Chamber notes that Slobodan Milosevic endorsed this objective and spoke against the independence of BiH.”[3]
The Chamber found that “the declaration of sovereignty by the SRBiH Assembly in the absence of the Bosnian Serb delegates on 15 October 1991, escalated the situation,”[4]but that Milosevic was not on board with the establishment of Republika Srpska in response.  The judgment says that “Slobodan Milosevic was attempting to take a more cautious approach”[5]
The judgment states that in intercepted communications with Radovan Karadzic, “Milosevic questioned whether it was wise to use ‘an illegitimate act in response to another illegitimate act’ and questioned the legality of forming a Bosnian Serb Assembly.”[6]  The judges also found that “Slobodan Milosevic expressed his reservations about how a Bosnian Serb Assembly could exclude the Muslims who were ‘for Yugoslavia’.”[7]
The judgment notes that in meetings with Serb and Bosnian Serb officials “Slobodan Milosevic stated that ‘[a]ll members of other nations and ethnicities must be protected’ and that ‘[t]he national interest of the Serbs is not discrimination’.”[8]  Also that “Milosevic further declared that crime needed to be fought decisively.”[9]
The trial chamber notes that “In private meetings, Milosevic was extremely angry at the Bosnian Serb leadership for rejecting the Vance-Owen Plan and he cursed the Accused.”[10]  They also found that “Milosevic tried to reason with the Bosnian Serbs saying that he understood their concerns, but that it was most important to end the war.”[11]
The judgment states that “Milosevic also questioned whether the world would accept that the Bosnian Serbs who represented only one third of the population of BiH would get more than 50% of the territory and he encouraged a political agreement.”[12]
At a meeting of the Supreme Defense Council the judgment says that “Milosevic told the Bosnian Serb leadership that they were not entitled to have more than half the territory in BiH, stating that: ‘there is no way that more than that could belong to us!  Because, we represent one third of the population. […]  We are not entitled to in excess of half of the territory – you must not snatch away something that belongs to someone else! […]  How can you imagine two thirds of the population being crammed into 30% of the territory, while 50% is too little for you?!  Is it humane, is it fair?!’”[13]
In other meetings with Serb and Bosnian Serb officials, the judgment notes that Milosevic “declared that the war must end and that the Bosnian Serbs’ biggest mistake was to want a complete defeat of the Bosnian Muslims.”[14] Because of the rift between Milosevic and the Bosnian-Serbs, the judges note that “the FRY reduced its support for the RS and encouraged the Bosnian Serbs to accept peace proposals.”[15]
The Tribunal’s determination that Slobodan Milosevic was not part of a joint criminal enterprise, and that on the contrary he “condemned ethnic cleansing”[16] is of tremendous significance because he got blamed for all of the bloodshed in Bosnia, and harsh economic sanctions were imposed on Serbia as a result.  Wrongfully accusing Milosevic ranks right up there with invading Iraq only to find that there weren’t any weapons of mass destruction after all.
Slobodan Milosevic was vilified by the entire western press corps and virtually every politician in every NATO country.  They called him “the Butcher of the Balkans.”  They compared him to Hitler and accused him of genocide.  They demonized him and made him out to be a bloodthirsty monster, and they used that false image to justify not only economic sanctions against Serbia, but also the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia and the Kosovo war.
Slobodan Milosevic had to spend the last five years of his life in prison defending himself and Serbia from bogus war crimes allegations over a war that they now admit he was trying to stop.  The most serious charges that Milosevic faced, including the charge of genocide, were all in relation to Bosnia.  Now, ten years after his death, they admit that he wasn’t guilty after all – oops.
The ICTY did nothing to publicize the fact that they had cleared Milosevic of involvement in the joint criminal enterprise.  They quietly buried that finding 1,303 pages into the 2,590 page Karadzic verdict knowing full well that most people would probably never bother to read it.
The presiding judge in the Radovan Karadzic trial, O-Gon Kwon of South Korea, was also one of the judges in the Slobodan Milosevic trial.  Milosevic’s exoneration by the Karadzic trial chamber may be an indication of how the Milosevic chamber would have eventually ruled, at least on the Bosnia charges, if Milosevic had lived to see the conclusion of his own trial.
It’s worth recalling that Slobodan Milosevic died under a very suspicious set of circumstances.  He died of a heart attack just two weeks after the Tribunal denied his request to undergo heart surgery in Russia.[17]  He was found dead in his cell less than 72 hours after his attorney delivered a letter to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in which he said that he feared he was being poisoned.[18]
The Tribunal’s official report on the inquiry into his death confirmed that, “Rifampicin had been found in a blood sample taken from Mr. Milosevic on 12 January 2006.”  And that “Mr. Milosevic was not told of the results until 3 March 2006 because of the difficult legal position in which Dr. Falke (the Tribunal’s chief medical officer) found himself by virtue of the Dutch legal provisions concerning medical confidentiality.”[19]
The presence of Rifamicin (a non-prescribed drug) in Milosevic’s blood would have counteracted the high blood pressure medication he was taking and increased his risk of the heart attack that ultimately did kill him.  The Tribunal’s admission that they knew about the Rifampicin for months, but didn’t tell Milosevic the results of his own blood test until just days before his death because of “Dutch legal provisions concerning medical confidentiality” is an incredibly lame and disingenuous excuse.  There is no provision of Dutch law that prohibits a doctor from telling the patient the results of his own blood test — that would be idiotic.  On the contrary, concealing such information from the patient could be seen as malpractice.
This all gives rise to well-founded suspicion that powerful geopolitical interests would rather Milosevic die before the end of his trial than see him acquitted and have their vicious lies exposed. U.S. State Department cables leaked to Wikileaks confirm that The Tribunal did discuss Milosevic’s medical condition and his medical records with U.S. Embassy personnel in The Hague without his consent.[20]  They clearly didn’t care about medical confidentiality laws when they were blabbing about his medical records to the American embassy.
It’s an unsatisfying outcome that Milosevic has been quietly vindicated for the most serious crimes that he was accused of some ten years after his death.  At a minimum financial compensation should now be paid to his widow and his children, and reparations should be paid to Serbia by the western governments who sought to punish Serbia in order to hold Milosevic “accountable” for crimes that their own Tribunal now admits he wasn’t responsible for, and was in fact trying to stop.

[1] ICTY, Karadzic Judgment, 24 March 2016, Para. 3460
[2] Ibid., Footnote 11027
[3] Ibid., Para. 3276
[4] Ibid., Para. 2709
[5] Ibid., Para. 2710
[6] Ibid., Para. 2685
[7] Ibid., Para. 2687
[8] Ibid., Para. 3288
[9] Ibid., Para. 3284
[10] Ibid., Para. 3289
[11] Ibid., Para. 3295
[12] Ibid., Para. 3290
[13] Ibid., Para. 3297
[14] Ibid., Para. 3293
[15] Ibid., Para. 3292
[16] Ibid., Para. 3280
[17] ICTY Case No. IT-02-54 Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milosevic, Decision on Assigned Counsel Request for Provisional Release, February 23, 2006
[18] Text of Slobodan Milosevic’s Letter to the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
 http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/sm030806.htm >
[19] Judge Kevin Parker (Vice-President of the ICTY), Report to the President of the ICTY: Death of Slobodan Milosevic, May 2006; ¶ 31, 76
[20] U.S. State Dept. Cable #03THEHAGUE2835_a, “ICTY: An Inside Look Into Milosevic’s Health and Support Network”


If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Categories: latest, NATO, Yugoslavia
Notify of

oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Oct 4, 2017 2:16 AM

With regard to the evidence presented in this case in relation to Slobodan Milošević and his membership in the JCE, the Chamber recalls that he shared and endorsed the political objective of the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership to preserve Yugoslavia and to prevent the separation or independence of BiH and co-operated closely with the Accused during this time. The Chamber also recalls that Milošević provided assistance in the form of personnel, provisions, and arms to the Bosnian Serbs during the conflict.11026 However, based on the evidence before the Chamber regarding the diverging interests that emerged between the Bosnian Serb and Serbian leaderships during the conflict and in particular, Milošević’s repeated criticism and disapproval of the policies and decisions made by the Accused and the Bosnian Serb leadership,11027 the Chamber is not satisfied that there was sufficient evidence presented in this case to find that Slobodan Milošević agreed with… Read more »

Oct 4, 2017 2:08 AM

But the WMD in Iraq Saddam threathened to kill UN inspectors in 1998 over were found, just mostly in Syria when Saddam’s fellow Arab Socialist Ba’ath mass murderer Assad started to use them against his people like Saddame had.

Eurasia News Online
Eurasia News Online
Aug 10, 2016 4:41 AM

Reblogged this on Eurasia News Online.

Aug 9, 2016 12:07 PM

Thank you for posting this article!

Aug 9, 2016 12:46 AM

Reblogged this on Worldtruth and commented:
Another revealing article on the disgusting NATO and US regime of false imprisonment and illegal war which saw far too many dead as a consequence.

Aug 8, 2016 9:31 PM

Masterful, potent, persuasive, and thorough. A 5* account of the situation.
And now the real trials must begin. Tens of thousands of innocent people were murdered in the bombardments.
Jamie Shea. Mad Allbright. Bill Clinton, Jack Straw, Tony Blair, Colin Powell, Javier Solana, Clare Shit, David Blunkett, David Milliband, Lord Mandelson.
Javier Solana must come in for special punishment – as the NATO General Secretary who ordered the bombings. He must be tracked down and brought to justice. Imprisoned for the rest of his life.
But the greatest criminals here are the Clintons, and no punishment – including capital punishment, under US Law – can be too severe for Bill Clinton – warmonger and mass murderer.

Aug 8, 2016 9:31 PM

The rifampicin story of the author as compared with the Dutch medical press is not compatibel. The following link is in Dutch, published in the Dutch medical journal, ‘Medisch Contact’. See: https://www.medischcontact.nl/nieuws/laatste-nieuws/artikel/miloevi263-had-rifampicine-in-zijn-bloed.htm In that article it is stated that it is likely that Milosevic poisoned himself with rifampicin (to keep his blood pressure raised) in the hope that he would receive treatment for unexplained high bloodpressure in Russia. The same article states that Milosevic had requested to the tribunal to be treated for unexplained high bloodpressure in Russia at least before January 2005 (Milosevic died at March 11 2006). According to medisch contact, toxicologist Touw analyzed Milosovevic blood in January 2006 at the request of the tribunal, as Milosevic blood pressure remained for unknown reasons high. The result from Touw’s study was that Milosevic either did not take his medication or was being poisoned (maybe accidentally) with other drugs that… Read more »

Aug 9, 2016 9:55 AM
Reply to  Willem

Too transparent. Please try harder.

Gwyn Williams Sr.
Gwyn Williams Sr.
Aug 24, 2016 5:21 PM
Reply to  Willem

But was the rifampicin not meant to lower his blood pressure and cuase a heart attack ?