"9/11 fifteen years on": invitation for submissions

OffG is hoping to field a series of articles in the run-up to the 15th anniversary of the 9/11 tragedy, looking at the questions and controversies that still persist.
We’re after a wide spectrum of perspectives and opinion from the mainstream to the so-called “conspiratorial”. Scientific papers, personal commentary and political analysis are all welcome. It can be your own personal work or recommendations of other material.
Send to us at submissions@off-guardian.org before Sep 10 2016.
Looking forward to hearing from you.


Filed under: latest, OffG
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Admin
Reader
Admin

we’re closing comments on this as it is just an info post & will be deleted in due course, so not a good place for discussion . But there’ll be plenty of opportunity to air your views on 9/11 soon.

mohandeer
Reader

Reblogged this on Worldtruth.

Chris Plumley
Reader

Excruciatingly incompetent or criminally complicit. Must be one or the other. Every day exposes further realisation that the latter is the most likely scenario.

Manda
Reader
Manda

I recommend Dr Judy Wood’s book ‘Where did the towers go’. No theory of who or why, just evidence pointing to what happened (and couldn’t have happened) presented.

Catte
Reader
Catte

Doesn’t she (or maybe it’s just her followers) claim the towers were brought down by a space beam?

Manda
Reader
Manda

Remember, those attacked the most severely are the most feared. All I can suggest is you research yourself and make up your own mind if you are interested. I have come to the conclusion Chomsky and Zinn were right to say looking into 9/11 is a (my interpretation) waste of time, energy and resources.

Manda
Reader
Manda

Ha, ha! That’s what her detractors claim. Only mention in the whole book of ‘space beams’ is re detractors comments. It’s essential you go to source these days to form your own opinion, getting it second hand from anywhere is bound to lead to uninformed opinion.

Norman Pilon
Reader

Judy Woods propounds utter nonsense as does her sidekick James Fetzer. The two are likely ‘infiltrators’ or ‘disinfo-agents’ whose purpose was/is to discredit all serious attempts to get to the bottom of 9/11 by having their hairebrained pseudo-scientific nonsense publicly associated with more scientifically grounded efforts to conduct a proper forensic investigation of the crime. Some debunking of Wood’s nonsense can be found here: http://911debunkers.blogspot.ca/2011/05/architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth_9853.html And a bit of the original controversy between the lunatic fringe that Fetzer and Wood represent and the saner original core of scientifically literate skeptics of 9/11 can be found here: http://stj911.org/faq.html A favorite source… Read more »

bill
Reader
bill

In fact as a real US patriot Prof Fetzer has spent much of his life seeking to explain and understand the assassinations of the Kennedy brothers which so shook his own confidence in the political integrity of his own country where he has acquired a highly respected reputation and along with dozens of books and articles has brought together many of the worlds leading experts to help illuminate a host of the difficulties of both cases, and is in no way a supporter at all of Dr Woods, their fall-out being a legend on Amazon.reviews attracting over 5000 comments, whilst… Read more »