How Come Washington’s Humanitarian Concerns Always Result in Population Control
by Jean Perier, via New Eastern Outlook
Alleged humanitarian efforts have always been a rather important aspect of the state propaganda campaign carried out by the White House and its media. We’ve seen Washington using its proxy NGOs to fight against the alleged “humanitarian crimes” of the Syrian government, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba and other states that Washington has declared its enemies.
This large-scale campaign that is said to be driven by “common human values” has been supported by a number of modern American oligarchs.
Among those “humanitarian champions” one may find the founder of Microsoft and one of the richest businessmen in the world, Bill Gates. He is a figure who likes to be presented as a benevolent philanthropist of sorts. By using the so-called “Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation,” this American oligarch attempts to put on the mask of the official representative of the US political elite, carrying on the fight against poverty, food shortages and diseases in Africa and other poor regions of the world.
However, in reality these “activities” of Bill Gates and the White House are focused on the use of progress to reverse the effect of humanitarian projects, namely to reduce the population of the planet, or, in other words – to pursue eugenics.
This statement is confirmed by Gates’ remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares (emphasis added):
First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”
Thus, one of the most powerful men in the world has openly declared that he expects vaccines to reduce the world population. Mind you, that when Bill Gates speaks about vaccines, he knows what he is talking about. In January 2010 at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Gates announced that over the next decade his foundation would allocate 10 billion dollars to develop and deliver new vaccines to developing countries.
We’ve heard this position regarding the control of the world population through the “reduction of the number of third-world inhabitants” before. Australian microbiologist and Nobel Price laureate Macfarlane Burnet in 1947 urged the Australian government to develop and unleash biological weapons against “over-populated countries of Southeast Asia.” In particular, during a closed meeting in 1947 with The New Weapons and Equipment Development Committee, the microbiologist recommended the creation of a group with a mandate to create secret biological weapon components that could affect food in such a way that it would allow Canberra to control the population of Indonesia and other Asian countries.
A similar objective was pursued by a secret program codenamed Project Coast, during which US intelligence agencies started testing such viruses as Ebola and Marburg fevers on South Africa’s black population. The US Center for Disease Control was delivering those viruses from its secret laboratories to Africa in a bid to create biological and chemical weapons, which were aimed at sterilizing and even exterminating the black population of this African country, while at the same time, murdering political opponents of the apartheid.
Today, in the age of high-tech novelties, Bill Gates has pioneered the electronic direction of eugenics, offering to implant the “undesired” part of the population with an electronic chip that would deprive women of reproductive capacity for a total of 16 years.
However, this is hardly the whole truth about the “humanitarian concerns” of the White House and its “humanitarian patrons”, who, under the guise of fighting for the greater good, continue searching out ways to control the population of the planet, using both the advances of modern science and armed conflicts, like those that we’ve witnessed in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and other countries.
Jean Périer is an independent researcher and analyst and a renowned expert on the Near and Middle East, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Nothing wrong with mass eugenics that a bit of targetted proportionality wouldn’t fix. For instance, the average first world inhabitant with all attendant resource amplifiers–washing machines, central heating, automobiles, automated garage doors, and so on–equals themselves as a single basic human being plus a significant number of virtual basic human slaves. Say 20 for want of a better guess. OK, for every third world human living perforce at the resource requirements of a basic human who is targetted by first world philanthropy for an effective dose of vaccination eugenics, administer a similarly dodgy vaccination to 19 random first worlders. Fair’s fair. Sounds like an equitable plan to me. After we get the between group (i.e. eugenicizors v eugenicized) groups sorted out we could start in on some within group procedures. I mean, if we’re going to start razing confederate statues to signal our commitment to equality at last we might as well do it properly.
I haven’t yet determined how reliable this source is, but the article appears to be adequately referenced, and taken at face value, corroborates the apparent intent to surreptitiously control “third world” population growth rates by means of vaccinations masquerading as prophylactics:
A couple of excerpts:
&
<
blockquote>WHO and Philippine Health Department Excuses
When the first reports surfaced in the Philippines of tetanus toxoid vaccine being laced with hCG hormones, the WHO and the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) immediately denied that the vaccine contained hCG. Confronted with the results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence coming from “right-to-life and Catholic” sources. Four new vials of the tetanus vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke’s (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila — and all four vials tested positive for hCG!
From outright denial the stories now shifted to the allegedly “insignificant” quantity of the hCG present; the volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies.
But new tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of women vaccinated with the tetauns toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, twenty-six tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only “insignificant” quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring anti-hCG antibodies? The WHO and the DOH had no answers.
New arguments surfaced: hCG’s apparent presence in the vaccine was due to “false positives” resulting from the particular substances mixed in the vaccine or in the chemicals testing for hCG. And even if hCG was really there, its presence derived from the manufacturing process.
But the finding of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of vaccinated women obviated the need to get bogged down in such debates. It was no longer necessary to argue about what may or may not have been the cause of the hCG presence, when one now had the effect of the hCG. There is no known way for the vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been artificially introduced into their bodies!
Indeed, something appears to be amiss.
I’ll have to research this issue a bit more thoroughly, however, to satisfy myself that the ‘accusation’ is actually well grounded — but not that it would surprise me in any way if it so turned out, given the panoply of crimes and horrors of which people have proven themselves capable.
Thanks Norman, this is very interesting news. Why indeed are tetanus vaccination programs in Third World countries targeting women aged 14 – 49 years (the years during which women are usually menstruating) rather than men who are more likely to sustain wounds while doing outdoor work and coming into contact with soil containing animal-derived fertiliser which harbours the tetanus bacilli?
Another thing too is that the countries mentioned in the sources you found and in the source I found are countries where traditional Christian religious denominations (Roman Catholicism and traditional Protestant denominations) have been the main religions. We probably need more sources of information about similar vaccination programs from non-Christian countries to be sure that there is indeed credible evidence for eugenics programs masquerading as vaccination programs.
Incidentally for years parts of Nigeria and Pakistan harbour endemic polio for the reason that Muslim communities in those areas suspect polio vaccination programs being carried out are really sterility programs in disguise.
“Incidentally for years parts of Nigeria and Pakistan harbour endemic polio for the reason that Muslim communities in those areas suspect polio vaccination programs being carried out are really sterility programs in disguise.”
Entirely agree, to the degree that vaccination programs actually work to immunize people against disease, which, by the way, it isn’t even a certainty that they do.
According to researchers like Dr. Chris Busby and Professor Richard Strohman, the eradication of infectious disease, even that of polio in the geographical West and other regions, has had less to do with the ‘molecular approach’ than with providing people with adequate nutrition, shelter and effective sanitation.
On the matter of vaccination proper, and not the possible intersection between eugenics and medicine, Dr. Busby has some interesting things to say in a short 15 minute video that can be found on YouTube and titled: “Systemic uninformed consent to MASS VACCINATION. Pr Dr Chris Busby”
The gist of his talk is that there are real risks associated with accepting any vaccine, and that these risks should be weighed in terms of their probability of occurrence and likely severity against those of the disease(s) against which the vaccine is supposed to protect.
In his opinion, under modern living conditions, in countries where serious infectious diseases have been eradicated, it is far riskier to subject oneself and one’s children, especially infants, to vaccinations than to take one’s chances — given that the probability of contracting any of the targeted diseases is next to nonexistent. But most people, not having access to hard epidemiological data, are simply unaware of this and dutifully — and in some instances, injuriously — accept whatever immunization cocktails and schedules are suggested to or even imposed on them. Busby reminds everyone that it is an enshrined human right that parents can refuse to subject either themselves or their children to any form of vaccination, no matter how mandatory it may appear that they must acquiesce, as when schools refuse admissions on the basis of forgone immunizations.
Here’s the Busby video (and if this link fails, just search YouTube with the title I provided above):
.
‘However, in reality these “activities” of Bill Gates and the White House are focused on the use of progress to reverse the effect of humanitarian projects, namely to reduce the population of the planet, or, in other words – to pursue eugenics.’
I’m sorry but this is so badly worded that it isn’t clear what exactly you are saying,
The article as it appears here at Off-Guardian may be an English-language translation of whatever language the original article was written in.
Whist eugenics is a reasonable accusation against the activities of many : the legacy of Sanger still exists, eugenics isn’t the only objective. Given the Gates Foundation horrendous reputation in India, refer Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Pediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital in Delhi, profiting from those without a voice appears the choice profession of Mr Gates.
Decades of IMF Structural Adjustment Policies brought only increased starvation and poverty – the Washington Consensus delivered some relief – to Washington – welcome to the new age of ‘philanthrocapitalism’ – the new means of delivering food security to Wall St – whilst the worlds poorest pay.
Whilst it would be neo-Malthusian to accuse Bill and Melinda of proposing to cull the world’s “undesired” (a la Kissinger’s MSSM 200) – before we swing the other way and accuse them of actual benevolence – read the Global Justice Now report into their foundation.
http://truepublica.org.uk/global/gates-foundation-spearheading-neoliberal-plunder-african-agriculture/
(Link to the report is embedded in Colin Toddhunter’s excellent cover article)
As Kissinger also said “control food and you control the people.” Theirs is not an altruistic mission.
White man is still waging war against the indigenous people across the planet. The Nazis were for eugenics, but we’re told that’s bad, but when a multi-billionaire and creator of the worst OS on the planet is for it, then it’s “Good, Double Good?”
P,S. Green Party nominee Jill Stein to file for recount in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin
http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/green_party_nominee_jill_stein.html#
‘Miraculously,’ enough money arrived in one day for the recounts, but only in the three states Clinton lost. No recounts in those she ‘won.’
Wonder who’s behind Stein? She surely isn’t worried that votes were stole from her?
Maybe the 1% cast the 1% of the vote Stein got!
And then there is this, buried deep in PNAC’s notorious “Rebuilding America’s Defenses”:
‘And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool. ‘
Reblogged this on EU: Ramshackle Empire.
Just curious: is there any proof thet the population growth is a consequence of people’s low (formal) education? Or of low life standards and (in general) population’s poverty are the *source”?
(Look at the picture of Melinda & Bill in the bottom linked article. Would the African people get better, if the baby from the picture was never born?!)
I believe Bill meant that he could reduce the ultimate population number reached by 15% i.e. instead of reaching 9 billion, we would hit approx 7.7 billion. Therefore, not “culling” but growing the population more sustainably.
I love this site and consider it important, but we need to be careful to not fall into the same trap which has ensnared MSM, selective and mis-interpretation of information to suit our message.
I agree. The author refers to “vaccines” in an ominous way. Maybe he (?) is right but nothing in the piece helps me determine this. The most promising hyperlink – “develop and delivernew vaccines to …” – comes half way down, and is to a Telegraph article. That’s not much use in itself, scientifically speaking, but may hold links to credible sources. Trouble is, the link is broken, leaving me neither believing nor disbelieving – just dissatisfied.
You may be interested to know (if you don’t already) that in late 2014 the Roman Catholic Church in Kenya charged that the World Health Organisation and UNICEF supplied tetanus vaccine containing anti-fertility or sterility agents to the Kenyan Ministry of Health in its 2-year vaccination project aimed at Kenyan girls and women between the ages of 14 and 49 years. The Kenyan government launched an inquiry into the Church’s claim.
I will show what I found at one website LifeSiteNews but you should Google “Kenya”, “tetanus”, “vaccine” and “sterility” if you want more information and to get some sense of the controversy surrounding this particular issue.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/kenyan-gvmt-launches-probe-into-claim-un-is-using-vaccines-for-mass-sterili
Kenyan gvmt launches probe into claim UN is using vaccines for ‘mass sterilization’
The health committee of Kenya’s National Assembly has ordered an independent inquiry into the Catholic Church’s claims that a national anti-tetanus vaccination campaign is covering for a sterilization scheme aimed at suppressing the country’s population.
The news comes as health ministry officials have called for professional discipline against Dr. Stephen Karanja, head of Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association, who raised the alarm about the vaccine.
At the same time, a teacher’s union has called for a boycott of the vaccination campaign until Catholic claims are disproven.
The Health Ministry, which is conducting the five-injection, two-year vaccination project on female Kenyans aged 14-49, and the vaccine’s supplier, the World Health Organization, deny the claims of the Church, which has called all along for an independent inquiry.
Robert Pukose, the government MP who is vice-chairman of the National Assembly’s health committee, explained, “We are at loss about who to believe since both sides have tabled conflicting results. That is why we need new tests conducted jointly for us to give final and conclusive results,” according to the Nairobi Standard.
The inquiry will consist of submitting vaccine samples to a committee of Catholic, government, and independent medical experts. What they will be looking for are traces of HCG, a female hormone produced during pregnancy, which if injected along with traces of tetanus, will produce antibodies. And just as these antibodies will react to a real tetanus infection, so will they react to a pregnancy, causing a miscarriage.
The Health Ministry submitted its test results on the tetanus vaccine to the committee last week, showing no trace of HCG.
This week the Catholic bishops’ doctors presented their own test results, all of which showed traces of HCG. Karanja told the committee, “The hormone, Beta HCG, is neither a byproduct of, nor a component required for, the manufacture of the tetanus vaccine. It being part of the vaccine is nothing short of a scheme to forcefully render our women incapable of bearing children.”
The Health Ministry’s Immunization Technical Group, Dr. Collins Tabu, challenged the validity of the Catholic doctors’ test results, asking, “Were the samples sent to the labs indeed vaccines? Were they sent in their primary containers and what was the condition of storage? What types of tests were run on them?”
Unless the tests were done at either of two specialized government labs, they could not be valid, he added.
But the Kenyan Catholic doctors have told LifeSiteNews via email that the government won’t let anyone get samples of the vaccine for tests—the ones used had to be obtained surreptitiously by devout Catholics. All along the doctors wanted to conduct tests jointly with the government but could not get co-operation.
Dr. Karanja also told the committee the tests were simple and could be conducted at any lab. Dr. Pukose further undermined Tabu’s argument, noting that both the Health Ministry and the Catholics had submitted results from the Lancet Kenya lab—with contradictory findings.
Meanwhile Akello Misori, secretary general of the Kenya Union of Post Primary Education (Kuppet), advised women to avoid the tetanus shots, stating that Kenya needed many children to provide jobs for teachers. “A generation will come when we will not have children to teach. We will, therefore, end up with no jobs,” he said.
One big reason for the Church’s concern is that the vaccines are provided by the World Health Organization and UNICEF, two United Nations organizations with a documented involvement in developing a sterilization vaccine using the HCG hormone as an antigen.
Karanja’s colleague Dr. Wahome Ngare told LifeSiteNews, “WHO conducted massive vaccinations campaigns using the tetanus vaccine laced with HCG in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and Philippines in 1994.” The opposition of the Catholic Church stopped those drives.
“What is downright immoral and evil,” said Ngare, “is that the tetanus laced with HCG was given as a fertility-regulating vaccine without disclosing its contraceptive effect to the girls and the mothers. As far as they were concerned, they had gone for an innocent injection to prevent neonatal tetanus.”
LifeSiteNews asked WHO’s Kenyan representative, Dr. Custodia Mandlhate, if she denies claims the same kind of campaign is going on in Kenya. She replied, “ I am sure you will agree with me that this is an unnecessary controversy like many others related other vaccine preventable diseases, and which consequences has been the delays in eradication and elimination of these diseases in the countries of the African Region.” The fight against polio, especially, she told LifeSiteNews, had been impaired by “unnecessary pro-life arguments.”
The National Assembly’s Dr. Pukose issued a stern warning after announcing the joint investigation, saying, “Those found to have been misleading Kenyans, whether it is the experts advising the Catholic Church or the Ministry of Health, will be held individually accountable. Playing with the safety and health of Kenyans is a criminal matter.”
Thanks for this.
“Trouble is, the link is broken, leaving me neither believing nor disbelieving – just dissatisfied.”
Writing non-fiction without adequate research resourcefulness is inherently dissatisfying. For all. Maybe there’s a mooc you can do. Meanwhile, try this easy-peasy correction:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/financetopics/davos/7106626/Bill-Gates-makes-10-billion-vaccine-pledge.html
Took me less than a minute and my real name is not even Eliot Higgins.
Suppose your reading is correct, isn’t the more important question how is vaccination and health care going to stop people reproducing?
Yes
Reblogged this on Susanna Panevin.