by Terje M
London, December 5,1864
Yesterday, an obviously emotional British foreign minister declared that a coalition of concerned world powers have decided to intervene in the American Civil War. The intervention is a dramatic new development in this war, which has lasted almost four years. It was the regime’s considerable progress in the siege of Richmond, Virginia, that made the international coalition decide to act.
‘The coalition of the willing’, created by prime minister Lord Palmerston, intends to establish a no-gunboat-zone along the seaboard and on the major rivers of the ‘Confederation’. These plans have long been on the drawing board, but the final decision was not made until now due to its unpopularity in British public opinion.
In addition, the regime in Washington received assistance from Russia, the only great power that showed any support for it. Tsar Alexander II of Russia sent a fleet last year to New York Harbor to show his solidarity with his fellow leader. It was obviously also intended as a warning to his geopolitical rival, Queen Victoria.
The leader, president Lincoln, has on several occasions declared that he only fights to keep himself in power (‘preserve the Union’). The rebels’ declared aim is «the fight for liberty, democracy, states’ rights and their right to keep their own ‘peculiar institutions’.» The country has long been divided along ethnic and political lines.
There have been proposals to divide the country along these ethno-political divides into a ‘Confederacy’ and a ‘rump Union’, but a string of victories for the regime have left these proposals hanging in the air.
The regime that Lincoln represents is notorious for its genocide against the native inhabitants of the country. Human rights organisations have long demanded that its leaders be put to trial for these crimes against humanity. The rebels are also afraid that they «will be treated like red Indians» if the regime wins the war.
Russian state media claims that the British intervention does not have humanitarian goals. They point to the fact that many countries in this ‘Coalition of the Willing’ have a dubious human rights record. «Just look at the sultan of Turkey or the emperor of Mexico, who is obviously a French puppet. In addition, is the British policy to a large degree formed by the influential cotton-lobby and geopolitical considerations. To claim that the country who not even ten years ago attacked China to force it to accept the sordid opium trade is motivated by humanitarian concerns is ridiculous.»
Lord Palmerston refuted these claims in an emotional appeal to the world opinion. In a speech in the House of Commons, the prime minister, known for his use of robust measures, known as gunboat diplomacy, when required, declared: «The British Empire is known for protecting the interest of the human race and its concern for fair fights. The sun never sets on the British Empire. Lincoln should be aware that the sun will also not set on the crimes of his odious regime, which must go. This use of force against his own population does not belong amongst civilised nations.»
Lincoln was elected in an election many neutral observers describes as rigged. An official in the British foreign office, on condition of anonymity, said: «One-sixth of the population are literally slaves. No free and fair elections can be held under these circumstances. The election of Lincoln is therefore illegitimate, and it is preferable if the international press always refer to it as such.»
Ships from the coalition have long patrolled the coasts around the United States. Their official mission is to stop supplies to the ‘extreme rebels’, such as Nathan Bedford Forrest or Champ Ferguson and his gang. The Lincoln-regime has long protested against these patrols, which it claims only aid in this smuggling of weapons to the rebels but has quietly accepted them, even though the British gunboats have attacked regime-positions several times.
A rebel spokesman denied
the extremists had any influence
amongst the opposition fighters.
‘Now give us weapons.’
The most serious incident happened a couple of months ago, when British and French gunboats hammered Union positions around New Orleans. Almost one hundred regime soldiers died in the attack, and the rebels were able to capture the fortifications afterwards. An investigative committee from the British House of Commons came to the conclusion that: «The federal troops did not signal clearly enough that they were not extreme rebels. They did send out a longboat to parlay with the British commander, but he was in the lavatory during the critical 30 minutes the attack occurred, and was therefore unable to stop it. The Union should have timed their request a bit better.» The committee also suggested the Union owed Great Britain a formal apology for this error.
The rebels in Richmond have begged for a gunboat-free zone for a long time, as a part of a humanitarian intervention. There might be some problems enforcing it, since the city is inland.
The world press prints heartbreaking stories of civilian suffering in the besieged city if Richmond.
A string of letters from 7-year old Beulah in French newspapers has especially touched many people’s hearts. «J’ai peur. La Communauté Internationale doit arrêter l’agression
du tyran Lincoln et son ami Alexandre de Russie.» «Sauvez-moi de régime de Lincoln.». Letters to the editor (not published) have claimed her French and her handwriting are too good for a 7-year old, and that words like «Première Guerre mondiale» and «un holocauste» are too futuristic for her to know. Some have even claimed she is not in besieged Richmond at all, but safe in neutral Canada. But how cynical must one be to doubt the words of a child? And in addition, her mother has assured French papers that every word is true.
Palmerston said: «We are only here to help the moderate rebels fight the extremist groups. But of course, the Lincoln-regime is part of the problem, not the solution. Lincoln must go as a part of a peaceful solution, and the moderate rebels should be part of a government that can decide the future of the country. The rebels’ main demands, their right to decide their own affairs in the cotton industry, should be granted as part of a peace treaty.»
Some critics have raised concerns about the country’s minorities if the extremist rebels should win. Especially the black population would be exposed to reprisals and assaults. A press spokesman for the French emperor Napoleon III, part of the coalition, declared: «The extremists have been known to commit atrocities against this group earlier, and some of them have declared that if they win, ‘they will silence any uppity n***s for good’. It is therefore important to support the moderate elements in the rebellion. The leader of the moderates, Jefferson Davis, should have a say in the fate of these states. If we don’t help the children in besieged Richmond, then extremists like Nathan Bedford Forrest might push the moderates aside. No one will be winners in such a situation.»
For direct-transfer bank details click here.
Vicious powerful dogs eating each other, with innocents caught between, as always, then and now. Strange, Isn’t it?, how those howling, snarling agents of chaos and destruction, still know how to work together to oppress all the innocents beyond their class borders. The dogs never seem to get to the point where they ‘completely’ devour each other, sadly.
Both extremely funny and extremely educational.
So is it being claimed that the KKK were the fore-runners of the White Helmets? Presumably because while the white-shrouded KKK were white supremacists, the White Helmets are Wahhabist supremacists? Is that the link?
I too – initially – was somewhat uncertain about the article but it is funny and profound, reminding us of history.
Yes, a brilliant piece. I particularly liked the bit about a ‘no-gunboat-zone’! Hilarious! Nearly spilt my coffee over the computer laughing! More seriously, In a war and particularly a civil war civilians get killed. Was Sherman’s artillery bombardment of Atlanta and different to the Syrian-Russian-Iranian bombardment of east Aleppo? Like the man said ”War is Hell”. And while we are on the subject of bombing civilians, this policy was carried out deliberately in WW2 by both the RAF and USAAF. Sir Arthur (bomber) Harris chief of RAF Bomber Command, actually invented the concept of ‘area bombing’ when RAF Lancasters set Hamburg and Dresden ablaze, killing 42,000 civilians in Hamburg and 22,000 in Dresden. Not to be outdone the American air force chief, Curtis Le May, sent his fleet of B52’s and B17s to set fire to Tokyo killing upwards of 100,000 civilians. Similarly, the bombing of Kobani, Ramadi, Fallujah and Mosul by the US air force in Syria, and resulting inevitably in civilian deaths, hasn’t raised an eyebrow from the liberal media and faux-left. Another example of blatant double-standards.
What exactly was Assad supposed to do when his country was invaded by Wahhabist fanatics funded and armed by the American/Turkish/Saudi/Qatari governments and intent on establishing their caliphate right up to the Mediterranean coast? Quitely resign presumably, and leave his country to the tender mercies of the head-choppers, and triggering another wave of refugees to Europe.
Worst of all we have the pathetic sight of the self-publicist, Peter Tatchell, the very embodiment of identity politics, interrupting Jeremy Corbyn at a Labour party meeting, calling for sanctions against the wicked Russians.
Apparently, resistance against the jihadist scourge is now to be considered a war crime. We should rather invite them in, offer them coffee and sympathy, and accommodation, those poor misunderstood souls.
Most excellent, dude! What a righteous adventure. I was really there! Or am there. Or am halfway between worlds. I certainly feel disoriented. Good night!
If the American civil war was “on” today(and who’s to say their wont be another one ‘one day’). The Newspaper editors would be saying, “sounds good, we’ll go with it”. Our readers aren’t familiar with these big words like,
“Ethno-political divide”, “Geopolitical considerations”, “Regime”, “Extremists”, “Moderates” etc. They’ll be completely confused as to what’s going on……And we’ll get away with it…….Good work Terje M.
Brilliant, for a moment I thought I was in a time-slip reading the Guardian…Excellent parody!
Excellent, Vaska, only I have no idea who Nathan Bedford Forrest might be.
A Confederate cavalry general during the war, he was the main “founding father” of the Klu Kux Klan after the war.
I almost choked when I saw the headline pop up in my feed. Visions of Armageddon flashed in my head. Is the unhinged laughter worth the unhinging?