VIDEO: Stand for the truth – Former NIST employee speak out

In August of 2016, a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) began looking into the reports his agency had released years earlier on the collapse of the World Trade Center. What he found shook him to the core.

In this half-hour interview, Peter Michael Ketcham tells of his personal journey toward reluctantly concluding his employers of 14 years had deliberately suppressed the truth about the most pivotal event of the 21st century.


Filed under: 9/11, 9/11 fifteen years on, latest
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
wells fargo login
Reader

Hey there! Quick question that’s totally off topic. Do you know
how to make your site mobile friendly? My weblog looks weird when browsing from my iphone.
I’m trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to correct this issue.
If you have any suggestions, please share. Cheers!

rtj1211
Reader
rtj1211

It seems to me that the hypothesis which needs to be falsified is that the collapse of WTCs 1, 2 and 7 was due to controlled demolition. The key features of the WTC collapses were: Collapse under gravitational acceleration. Symmetrical collapse within the footprint of the building. Pulverisation of all cement from the building. Presence of nano-thermite materials in the rubble. Expulsion of large pieces of steel perpendicular to the direction of building collapse. Evidence from witnesses concerning loud noises of explosions. What are the key features of collapses known to have initiated by nano-thermite explosions? If they are pretty… Read more »

Tyler
Reader

mohandeer
Reader

I’ve yet to find a site which fully encompasses all the false evidence of the US propaganda fiction of the 9/11 lie and until I do I am doomed to half baked theory on what I believe really happened. If anyone can point me to a full analysis of what really happened, I would be extremely grateful.

anikinskywalker
Reader

I watched September 11th the New Pearl Harbour available on YT. It’s pretty detailed and provides much food for thought.

Manda
Reader
Manda

At risk of being shouted down (again and as usual when I mention her name) I suggest Dr Judy Wood as one comprehensive scientific attempt to discover what happened with the evidence available to her. She has made at least one legal challenge against NIST which has been kicked into the long grass I understand, There is a you tube video of her speaking about her evidence, method and findings titled ‘Dr. Judy Wood ~ Evidence of Breakthrough Energy on 9/11″. I invested in her book which puts her findings in a form most lay people can understand. I find… Read more »

Norman Pilon
Reader

Manda, Judy is either a crackpot or disinfo. She has been thoroughly debunked. Let her go and move on to more sensible “evidence-based” analyses. Here is something for you to read and think about: The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center Towers – by Dr. Gregory S. Jenkins, Ph.D. Physics Co-author: Matt Sullivan And then please have a dispassionate listen to this interview with Wood: https://youtu.be/_qYm1AnUKi8 The untenability of her approach to investigating the events of 9/11 is quite evident. At best, she is unhinged, and at worst she is being paid to… Read more »

Manda
Reader
Manda

I don’t believe she is a paid disinfo, crack pot she may be, I don’t have the scientific training or expertise to judge. I don’t find AE 9/11 any better to be honest and gave up on looking at 9/11 stuff years ago.
I will take the hint and not mention her again though. I saw that video a good while back.
I will wait and see if anyone ever does anything substantive with their evidence. I don’t expect I will live to see it though.

leruscino
Reader

It wasn’t supposed to be easy ?
If it was we’d have seen the perpetrators behind bars & you know that will never happen just like JFK…………..
& how many years is that?

Norman Pilon
Reader

Well, you and I may not know “who” perpetrated the crime exactly or the “how” in the details of that crime, but I think we can confidently assert that the “planes” and only “fire and gravity” brought down both Towers and WTC7. That isn’t half-baked. That’s solid. Just crawl through the evidence amassed and analysed by “AE for 9/11 Truth” and see where you cannot but end up. But of course you already know that, and for the time being, for people who were not on the inside of the “conspiracy,” that is all that can be known. So really… Read more »

Norman Pilon
Reader

“but I think we can confidently assert that the “planes” and only “fire and gravity” brought down both Towers and WTC7.”
Just to be clear, when I wrote that, what I really meant was that what we can be certain of, is that the planes and fire and gravity DID NOT bring down both Towers and WTC7, eh. I just noticed that glaring ambiguity when I came back to reply to Manda.

Manda
Reader
Manda

“There is no crime that the ruling class will not commit to attain its ends.”
I concur.
I believe the ‘ruling class’ is not a single monolith though, it has factions, sometimes competing and has control of different levers of power and enforcement, directly or indirectly, that also wax and wane.

Norman Pilon
Reader

Of course, yes, it’s not a monolith. What makes it the ruling class is its objectively disproportionate ability to write on the whole the rules and regulation which govern the social, political and economic life of the society in which we live. And who would “they” be? They are the super-rich, those who deploy monopoly capital, who can buy the politicians or either, being themselves actively engaged, sit in the highest offices in “our” governing institutional bureaucracies, whether private or public (i.e., the giant corporations of whatever stripes and anything to do with a branch of government, be it scientific,… Read more »

Manda
Reader
Manda

I raise my hand to being a pedant in this case but it has enabled you to flesh the picture out. I agree and add wealth as well as money. Owning assets, be they property or shares etc. are major generators of Rentier income. Gradually more and more public assets and services are going into private hands, out of any democratic control and adding to the income and wealth inequality and increased ability to control and exploit us all. Of course gaining de facto control of whole countries via government and and or departments is the biggest prize of all.… Read more »

Frank Russell
Reader
Frank Russell

What did you say?

summitflyer
Reader
summitflyer

You can start here: http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/home.html
What I have found is that ,if one builds an archive of all the information related to it , coming from the internet ,if you go back to it a few years later it is gone,Can you say Censored ? or scrubbed.
Try this one it is very recent and a video by Cristopher Bollyn is they have not taken it out already.

aaronmicalowe
Reader
aaronmicalowe

Have you tried AE911.truth.org? I haven’t gone there yet but it’s posted at the end of the video.

Aaron Lowe
Reader

You just have to be the one that collects all the evidence (yes I know there’s thousands of documents, videos etc). Everyone is expecting everyone else to do it, which is why it never happens.

bill
Reader
bill

No explanation of 9/11 which omits serious study of the seismic evidence nor the evidence of the very definite nuclear signature can be remotely satisfying… all the evidence has to be explained and not cherrypicked as part woolly reasoning that if fire /collision didnt do it then conventional explosives must have….

aaronmicalowe
Reader
aaronmicalowe

Nuclear signature?

MLS
Reader
MLS

There was no nuclear signature

BigB
Reader
BigB

Watched this the other night – Quote of the Week “the NIST report was a Rube Goldberg machine” – Peter Ketcham. Watching this again – no one has been, can do, or will ever be able to convince me I am watching a fire collapse. The way that the information/disinformation overload cycle is progressing – sometimes instinct is all I need – but kudos to AE911 Truth for providing the science to back it up. With this and Prof. Hulsey’s WTC 7 Evaluation project, the idea that WTC 7 (at least) was a fire collapse appears as it is –… Read more »

Matt
Reader
Matt

I question the official narrative but this story doesn’t help, its an appeal to a false authority. The guy is just some guy. He didn’t work on the 9/11 investigation (or any other investigation), and has no background in structural engineering or physics.

Aaron Lowe
Reader

The question is, why aren’t you questioning the message? Why are you questioning the messenger?
If you’re dying of thirst in the desert and you see a baby baboon, dripping wet, aren’t you going to follow it to see where it got the water?

leruscino
Reader

This “Guy” has a Masters in Mathematics & was specialist for NIST for mathematical modelling on the collapse of structures – FACT so why the silly comment ?
Personally I am a qualified & certified engineer & this guy discusses well known valid points of deep shame that we have lived with the lie of 9/11 for far too many years unable to get the truth out so I salute anyone of Peter Ketcham’s calibre doing just that – suggest you research & find a moral compass?

flaxgirl
Reader

Perhaps your rationale is also a logical fallacy – the sort of inverse of “appeal to a false authority”. It’s not as if what PMK is saying is highly technical. Is there anything you think doesn’t make sense in what he says? You don’t need to be a scientist to recognise that WTC-7 fell by controlled demolition – even the scientists tell you that. That’s why it is probably the most in-your-face case of the Emperor’s New Clothes the world has ever known. I’ve realised, to my delight, that I’ve completely snookered the upholders of the Official Conspiracy Theory. I… Read more »

aaronmicalowe
Reader
aaronmicalowe

You’re expecting those that worked on the 9/11 investigation to tell the truth!!!???

paulcarline
Reader

Congratulations for posting this. And of course thanks to AE911Truth for persisting against all odds in pushing for the truth about what happened on 9/11, the event that allowed the USA and its allies (especially the UK) to go on a rampage under the mendacious banner of the “War on Terror”: in reality a War OF Terror, not only against invented enemies (Osama bin Laden, Hussein, Gaddafi, Assad) but against the general public everywhere.