Evidence Calls Western Narrative About Syrian Chemical Attack Into Question

by William Craddick, 6 April 2017, Disobedient Media

The April 4th, 2017 incident at Khan Sheikhoun has provoked an emotional response around the world after images began to emerge showing civilian adults and children apparently suffering from the effects of chemical weapons.  US President Donald Trump has stated that the attack has totally changed his views towards the Syrian civil war, and may alter his intended strategy there.
Although Western media immediately accused Bashar al-Assad of participating in a gas attack against his own people, the evidence indicates that the intended target was not immediately in a civilian area and was in fact a location where Syrian White Helmets were on the scene with rebel groups at what observers have claimed was a storage facility for conventional and chemical munitions. Additionally, evidence indicates that rebel groups may have had prior knowledge of the attack and knew that there was a risk of chemical weapons being unleashed. The attack also came in the aftermath of a trip by Senator John McCain to meet with groups known to associate with radical jihadist factions in Syria, at a time when the United States government has been engulfed in a power struggle between different political factions who disagree strongly over what should be appropriate policy in regards to the Syrian civil war.

I. Evidence From Khan Sheikhoun Does Not Support Assertions Of Airborne Chemical Weapons Use

Evidence which has emerged in the aftermath of the attack at Khan Sheikhoun indicates that not only was the nature of the attack misreported by the media, but that certain individuals on the ground in Syria may have had foreknowledge of the attack up to several days before it happened. On April 3rd, 2017, an anti-Assad journalist tweeted that the next day he would be launching a media campaign to cover airstrikes on the Hama countryside, including the use of chemical weapons. It is not clear how the reporter was able to know that chemical weapons would be used an entire day before the attacks occurred.

Tweet from journalist one day before the attack indicating foreknowledge about chemical weapons usage

Observers further noted that on April 1st, 2017, a doctor on the ground in Khan Sheikhoun, Dr. Shajul Islam, had received several shipments of gas masks in the days running up to the chemical incident. The revelations on Twitter fueled speculation that opposition figures were aware of the chemical attack days before it actually happened, contesting the narrative that the Syrian government was responsible. Daily Mail has reported that Dr. Shajul Islam was at one point sought by the British government in connection with the abduction of two journalists in Syria, and security services have stated that Islam and his brother may have had ties to ISIS executioner “Jihadi John.”
Additionally, footage from the scene of the incident taken by the Syrian White Helmets appears to show that their operatives were not assisting victims in a manner that was consistent with established protocol on how to handle sarin saturated bodies. Images appear to show that Syrian White Helmet operatives were handling purported sarin victims with their bare hands, rather than with gloves, which is necessary to prevent the rescuer being injured by the chemical themselves. They also appear to be using simple dust masks, which are not suitable protection in the event of a sarin attack.

Image released by the Syrian White Helmets which shows rescue workers handling victims with their bare hands and inadequate gas masks, undermining claims of sarin usage

Disobedient Media has reported in January that the Syrian White Helmets are heavily supported by the United State government via USAID, are implicated in war crimes committed in Aleppo and other parts of Syria during the civil war and appear to have a large number of members who are involved with local Syrian militia groups and jihadist organizations. The White Helmets have also been caught staging rescue footage for propaganda purposes in the past.
United Arab Emirates-based Al-Masdar News has also cited Twitter users who noted that photos of the Khan Sheikhoun attack appear to show storage facilities rather than a residential area and speculated that the White Helmets may have been using the location alongside rebel groups who were storing munitions in the area. The Russian Ministry of Defense have stated that the release of any chemicals was a result of a Syrian government airstrike against rebel supply depots in the area where chemical arms were being produced.

II. Rebels Are Known To Have Possessed And Used Chemical Weapons In Syria For Some Time

While the Syrian government surrendered their chemical arms stockpiles for destruction several years ago, evidence indicates that rebel groups in Syria have ramped up their own supplies of the deadly weapons systems and have not hesitated to deploy them in combat. On June 23rd, 2014, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Syrian government had completed the removal of all chemical weapons from the country per and agreement they had reached with the United States. The handover was confirmed by the United Nations Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. While the Syrian government have surrendered their chemical weapons, rebel groups have acquired and used them in increasing numbers.
The supplies for these weapons appear to come from multiple sources. Before they were handed over to the U.S. military, rebel groups such as ISIS were able to capture stockpiles of chemical weapons from Syrian army depots. On July 9th, 2014, just weeks after the Syrian army’s handover, The Guardian reported that ISIS had captured a massive former Iraqi chemical weapons facility northwest of Baghdad, confiscating over 2,500 degraded chemical rockets filled with sarin. Research has also led to speculation that ISIS and other rebel groups may have been able to access materials for chemical weapons stored by Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. In November 2016, The New York Times acknowledged that ISIS had used chemical arms at least 52 times in Syria and Iraq.
rebels test on rabbits Screen-Shot-2017-04-06-at-12.56.50-AMDaily Mail: Rebel tests weaponized chemical agent on rabbits in Syria
ISIS is not the only rebel group to possess sarin and other kinds of chemical munitions in Syria however. Video obtained by Daily Mail shows that Syrian rebel groups in Libya have been experimenting with various kinds of chemical weapons for some years now. In 2014, the United Nations acknowledged that “abandoned” sarin gas cylinders had been located in the city of Aleppo. On April 8th, 2016, Voice of America reported that jihadist group Jaysh al-Islam used chemical weapons in attacks against Kurdish troops in Aleppo.

III. The Khan Sheikhoun Incident May Be Part Of An Ongoing Power Struggle Over U.S. Policy In Syria

The chemical attack also appears to play into the ongoing power struggle between the American political establishment and members of the new Trump administration. Political figures who are hawkish towards the Syrian government have noted with some dismay that President Trump had until this week been apparently unwilling to prosecute the United States’ stated goal of enacting regime change in Syria, citing the larger threat of ISIS and other jihadist terror groups as a priority.
The United States politicians who have taken funds from countries known to supply rebel groups with materials for the production of chemical weapons were also meeting with rebel factions who are reported to associate with jihadist groups in the run up to the attack. On February 22nd, 2017, CNN reported that McCain had made a secret trip to northern Syria the week prior. McCain’s made the trip despite the fact that since late 2015, the Western media has finally admitted that there were no longer any “moderate” rebel groups in Syria. In January 2017, Representative Tusli Gabbard returned from a visit to Syria to confirm these reports, as well as to reveal that U.S. support was effectively delivering arms to jihadist groups such as al-Nusra, al-Qaida, Ahrar al-Sham and ISIS who are operating inside Syria. McCain claimed to be meeting with forces who are preparing to combat ISIS in Eastern Syria, but The Guardian has reported that these groups are mainly comprised of mercenaries who have and will fight for jihadist groups if the price is right. Disobedient Media has also previously reported that in 2014, McCain accepted a donation of $1 million from Saudi Arabia. The CEO of Al-Masdar News, Leith Abou Fadel, recently posted images on Twitter in April 2017 showing Saudi-made chlorine agents found in East Aleppo which were being used to create chemical bombs.

Saudi-made chlorine agent captured in East Aleppo

The trip to meet with rebel groups is not McCain’s first. On May 27th, 2013, The Daily Beast ran an exclusive report revealing that Senator John McCain had made another secret trip into Syria to meet with “assembled leaders of Free Syrian Army.” McCain made the trip in spite of the fact that documents obtained by Judicial Watch which state that the United States was fully aware of the growing jihadi presence among Syrian rebel groups, and reports emerging in the American press indicating that rebels were increasingly engaging in war crimes. In August 2013, three months after McCain’s visit, civilians in the Ghouta neighborhood of Damascus were hit with a chemical attack after rockets containing sarin struck the area. Though most of the mainstream press immediately blamed the Syrian government for the tragedy, German paper Die Welt has since run a report alleging that the sarin did not come from the Syrian government, but from stockpiles held by jihadist rebel group Al-Nusra.
ZeroHedge has reported that McCain angrily slammed Secretary of State Rex Tillerson after the White House backed comments Tillerson and ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley made stating that the United States would no longer primarily focus on regime change in Syria. McCain’s desire to push regime change in Syria, his constant drive to seek confrontation with Russia, his close financial relationship to a state which is known to have supplied rebel groups with materials for crude chemical weapons and the now common knowledge that there are no “moderate” rebels remaining in Syria raises serious questions about the true nature of McCain’s secret missions he has embarked on in the country over the past few years.
The Syrian government has been making serious gains in the civil war, recapturing the city of Aleppo and pushing against rebel groups in many other parts of the country with the support of the Russian Federation. It is strategically counterintuitive to assume that Bashar al-Assad would engage in a chemical attack on Syrians just one week after figures in the American government expressed the opinion that they would be willing to allow him to remain in power. The Syrian government no longer even possesses chemical weapons, as the United Nations and U.S. Department of State have already confirmed.
The involvement of the US-supported White Helmets, who have a history of association with war crimes and extremist groups in Syria and the apparent anger from the factions in the American government who oppose President Trump’s policies in Syria suggests that the facts surrounding the Khan Sheikhoun attack are being intentionally distorted for political gain. The apparent association of Senator John McCain with groups linked to extremism in Syria just weeks before the attack and his financial ties to states which have supplied rebel groups with chemical arms only serves to create further concerns that factions of the United States government are illicitly attempting to promote confrontation and drive increased U.S. military involvement in Syria. It may be some time before the full picture about the Khan Sheikhoun tragedy becomes apparent, but is more than clear that Syrian rebel groups hope to use the incident as a means of provoking increased Western support in their fight against the Russian-backed government.


If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Categories: empire watch, latest, Syria
Notify of

oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Apr 9, 2017 11:12 PM

“The involvement of the US-supported White Helmets, who have a history of association with war crimes and extremist groups in Syria and the apparent anger from the factions in the American government who oppose President Trump’s policies in Syria suggests that the facts surrounding the Khan Sheikhoun attack are being intentionally distorted for political gain.” Journos, it seems, are having a hard time settling on a narrative about the US attack on Syria. Which is it?: Trump’s making a move. Or those distorting the facts surrounding the Khan Sheikhoun attack are making a move? My position is that the deep state is getting its way here and Trump is simply helping it to, per the unwritten agreement, namely the agreement (firmed up when Trump engaged in no push back against the neocons’ engineering of Michael Flynn’s departure) Trump will get to be king and the deep state will get to… Read more »

Apr 9, 2017 5:28 PM

Reblogged this on The Free.

Apr 9, 2017 4:26 PM

The “White Helmets” are certainly earning their keep. McCain’s love of the ISIS terrorists is well known and it seems that wherever he goes he brings death and destruction.

Apr 9, 2017 4:59 PM
Reply to  Ram

Maybe McCain should be renamed Senator Death?
After all, a substantial amount of his funding comes from the death industry – does it not?

Apr 9, 2017 2:23 PM

Outtakes from WH Productions
Keffiyeh man lives through bombing and sarin attack, but is upset over his lost keffiyehcomment image
Bit actor working up through the rankscomment image
A many of many talentscomment image

Apr 10, 2017 12:34 AM
Reply to  Yonatan

I hope the Shite Helmets Productions people pay him well and provide decent working conditions for him. If they don’t, he’s likely to start a protest for higher pay and proper occupational health and safety regulations against them and we all know how such protests turn out eventually …

Apr 9, 2017 12:37 PM

Inter alia, the evidence from this weeks seemingly coordinated and pre-meditated acts of war and terror point to the fact that an (imaginary) Deep State is the true ruling power in America – that “[We] the People” have no democratic say at all – voting is merely pacification; that Trump has waded into the swamp – and is not waving, but drowning; the opt in/opt out conventions of International Law have been opted out of permanently; that the instruments of world ‘peace’ – particularly the UN – are in fact instruments of war and regime change; in international affairs America is the arch villain, the main culprit and sponsor of terrorism – in policing itself and its proxies it is the judge, jury and executioner. As the old saying goes: bombing for peace is like f_cking for virginity. In this post-truth, post-fact world – the evidence confirms the fact that… Read more »

Apr 9, 2017 12:53 PM
Reply to  BigB

Sorry, typo – Edlib Media Centre = EMC, not ECM.

Apr 9, 2017 12:04 PM

Welcome to the reality games, the reality of apprentice Trump – mired in incompetence and ignorance as far as foreign policy is concerned. There will be more to come no doubt.

Apr 9, 2017 11:34 AM

Well, you would not be reading this in today’s feature article on page 20 in London’s Sunday Times by Dominic Lawson. His contentions: Moscow is no longer even a credible liar, merely putting out any old rubbish. The Guardian had a journalist who saw what happened in the chemical weapons attack with his own eyes (I do hope they were covered up or he may now be in hospital). Assad took Tillerson’s ‘you can stay on’ as a signal to torture his internal enemies with chemical weapons. Assad did not hand over all his chemical weapons to the UN despite Putin’s orders. Assad believes Russia is now tied to him so will lie endlessly for him. A few points of order: 1. Rupert Murdoch owns the Sunday Times. Rupert Murdoch has oil interests in the Golan Heights. 2. Dominic Lawson, a former editor of the Daily Telegraph (and hence servant… Read more »

Apr 9, 2017 12:11 PM
Reply to  rtj1211

It’s simple. There needs to be an investigation by independent authorities. Making claims of any kind without evidence is no more than propaganda.

Apr 9, 2017 11:14 PM
Reply to  rtj1211

Son of Nigel, brother of Nigella! Where was Lawson on the WMD in Iraq? Where was he on the Ghouta attack? Has he acknowledged he was wrong on either of these? Why believe those whom you know have consistently lied in the past and not apologized for misleading you?

Apr 9, 2017 9:02 AM

Total Campaign Contributions Received by John McCain: $11,079,955 Nov 29, 2010 – Nov 28, 2016.
See http://maplight.org/us-congress/legislator/592-john-mccain.
Contributions from political parties and from other candidates are not included in the “Top 10” lists.
See http://maplight.org/us-congress/contributions?s=1&office_party=all&election=all&politician=592&business_sector=Ideology%2FSingle-Issue&business_industry=Pro-Israel&start=11%2F29%2F2010&end=11%2F28%2F2016 for details of all the pro-Israel contributions he received.
(It covers more than two whole pages).
It is obvious who is pulling his strings – and why!

Apr 9, 2017 7:58 AM

There was no Gas Attack at all even a “Moderate” Rebel stockpile hit until an investigation says so! We have a known Head-Chopper AKA White Helmet with a stethoscope around his neck posing as a Doctor? The guys is known & has no medical training. US is shit scared of an investigation & there can only be one reason ! NO GAS ….. Equally the US’s FAILED missile response was planned weeks before the Faked gas attack to coincide with an ISIS offensive! The entire story stinks from every angle. Assuming there was no gas incident & leaving this to one side. On examination the Syrian airport is virtually undamaged which is clear for all to see lending great credence to the Russian claim that only 23 out of 59 Cruise Missiles hit the target which in turn means that the US attack was as fake as the Chemical Attack.… Read more »

Apr 9, 2017 2:28 PM
Reply to  leruscino

Trump is possibly being used as a Useful Idiot.
There has been a major ISIS attack against the main Jordan-Syrian crossing point. US forces including tanks and armor were sent in to Syria to supposedly rescue a group of rebels (type unknown, probably ‘carefully vetted head-chopping rebels’) surrounded by ISIS. US forces rescuing US-proxy group A from US-proxy group B doesn’t add up. One possibility is that the surrounded ‘rebels’ were accompanied by US SF or intelligence assets. Another is that this is a pretext for sending more US troops in to fight ISIS (yeah right, 6 years late as usual).

Apr 9, 2017 6:45 AM

The Observer today repeated the lie that Assad has used chemical weapons before. They simply think if they repeat a lie often enough, it will somehow become the truth or at least perceived by their audience that is it true.

Apr 9, 2017 2:37 PM
Reply to  JJA

Even Hitchens at the Daily Mail thinks the story stinks, so Daily Mail readers are being exposed evidence opposing the party line.
They say that history doesn’t repeat but it rhymes. In 2003, Tony Blair was looking for an excuse to join his Bush buddy in the pre-meditated war of aggression against Iraq. One Matthew Rycroft wrote a secret memo stating that facts and intelligence were being fixed around the policy. In 2017, as UK Ambassador to the UN, he does his part in mycrofting the fake sarin attack in Syria.

Apr 9, 2017 4:42 AM

I have heard that gas weapons are never carried and dropped by airplanes but are only used in surface-to-surface missiles (a.k.a. ground-to-ground missiles), in case a plane crashes or is shot down before it reaches the target area.