Canada and Its Ukrainian Nazi Collaborators: Chrystia Freeland’s Family Lie Grows Bigger and Blacker

In my view, a complete disclosure of Chomiak’s record is desirable. In light of Freeland’s record as a professional Ukrainian agitator prior to her becoming Canada’s External Affairs Minister, Chomiak’s record is extremely relevant. Trudeau should be ashamed of himself for sacking his excellent foreign minister and former liberal party leader Stephane Dion and replacing him with this spawn of fascism to aid in the dangerous demonization of Russia which puts a target on Canada.

Not being one to speculate, I found this expose of the whole Chomiak-Freeland story. It seems Chomiak’s immediate post war OSS contact was with Frank Wisner (direct or indirect, it doesn’t say.) Wisner was the major architect of MOCKINGBIRD. Freeland’s own ‘journalistic’ career has been in the Russophobic rewriting of Ukrainian history: working for ‘Ukrainian News’ (that Chomiak set up); and ‘Ukrainian Weekly’ (which has strong Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty connections.) It is not to hard to impute that both Chomiak and Freeland have been working with or for the CIA as part of Wisner’s ‘Mighty Wurlitzer.’ As someone has already said in comment, this apple did not fall too far from the tree. Right next to the trunk, in fact.

How Britain Protected Ukraine’s Waffen-SS Galitsia Division in the Wake of World War II —– http://www.globalresearch.ca/history-how-britain-protected-ukraines-waffen-ss-galitsia-division-in-the-wake-of-world-war-ii/5558113

At lower level there seem to be might conflicts of good and evil. At middle levels there is more awareness that that is a narrative device at once hateful but forcefully active. At higher levels the conflict itself is a device by which to engineer the world – and the mind that is thus conditioned.
The demonisation of Nazism – served many ends that set the psychic-emotional framing for the post war world order – which are still active and thus still taboo to revisit and openly discuss. I don’t say there is no cause to see hateful acts in the other – but if they can be made SO evil as to become required and justified hate – then the evils of other parties can be sidelined or ignored. EG: Should Churchill have been tried for firebombing Dresden – a hospital town – whose few survivors were then straffed by returning fighter planes? Should the international cartels and banks that funded and supported the Nazi regime have been included in culpability? The wholesale ‘import’ of the German eastern european intelligence network and operation paperclip acquiring top Nazi scientists along with psychological human experimentation methods – all show that the narrative for the masses is just that and not trustworthy.
Evil works behind or beneath the seeming of a world that masks in presentations of ‘good intentions’ or ‘power and protection’. It is often felt too high a price to bring to question the narrative that seems justified and justifiable in current terms – for giving any ‘ammunition or advantage’ to an enemy calls for propaganda to weaponize truth but in our case – for all the right reasons – where any of the enemies who do likewise at our expense are revealed despicable and fraudulent thereby.
I find it evident that families are a vehicle of intergenerational purpose on many levels and in many ways – and there is also evidence of the recognition of a hateful inheritance and the desire to be free of ‘passing it on’. But hate often lies hidden beneath what seems well intentioned – for it is hellish to abide in the raw – and the mind recoils or fragments and dissociates to align so as to mitigate and cover over a terrible psychic displacement. Some sense of self-righteousness is thus a ‘survival need’ and the projection of the split – of the guilt and hate AWAY, uses the other as the ‘recipient’ but with the intent to get rid of it as an intent of ‘otherness’ or separation from – and judgement over. This operates the ‘reversal’ of consciousness and the truly transcendent embrace re-wakens from a divided and ‘flipped’ consciousness to original nature – in which the other is the recipient of the effulgence or extension of such nature and recognized ‘brother’. or indeed ‘Self’.
The recognition of self in other works no less in division – for that which we accept as self is the measure and likeness of what we ‘see’. But conflicted-self interprets everything through the lens of an attempted but separate unity – and cannot and will not look within.
The idea of sins passing down the generations has Lamarckian resonance – and also correlates the idea of family themes or a shared collective ‘karmic’ expression. But when the idea is interpreted through the lens of sin (lie, guilt and fear) it becomes destructive as is Everything interpreted through such a lens darkly. The correcting of a lie is truth – not punishment and death – but the effect of a lie in the mind that believes it true is a death of awareness of connection, and of communion in truth – along with the interpretation of such dissonance as punishment or rejection and unworthiness – that then patterns as personality strategies and stories that play out every facet of the attempt to escape feared truth in asserted or coercive identities, masked in power or in victimhood. All fear-defined identity carries both. For the first ‘lie’ is the context of all else that automatically follows… until the foundation is revisited and seen as false. But to the identity in self-assertion – anything that would expose or undo its source of power is demonized and denied access. Such is the nature of the mind that lives the belief that truth MUST be unconscious for its story to live. What is not anticipated is that in the fruit of such a focus – ‘all hell breaks loose’ and the mind is trapped in – and conditioned by – its own reactions to a script it experiences as happening to it, or done to it.
Whatever we inherit are patterns or habits or themes that we experience and explore in our own unique way and within our own gift of discovery. The undoing of guilt cannot be effected by a mind reacting from or in guilt but is undone within true presence or acceptance that is the forgiveness that then discovers there was nothing to forgive – but that is not effectively true or effective to believe when the unconscious and active beliefs are anything but guiltless. Any attempt to get rid of guilt on Others or World is a false escape – in which an elitism of self-specialness generates a partial and temporal mitigation while all else is outsourced to ‘not me’ or Other.
The defences and strategies of entangled fragmentation are of such complexity as to be always ahead of the mind that thinks it understands, but the core freedom is in the recognition and refusal of deceit – regardless it appears in the forms of acceptability or respectability. For many, this recognition is itself refused until the allegiance to the basis of thought is able to be released enough to let awareness or perspective in. Hence the phrase, forgive them for they know not what they do has no reference to what they do – so much as a captured mind that believes it knows something ELSE and reacts in alignment with false imprinting.
Nothing of what I have shared here can mean anything within the framework of apportioning guilt and punishing – but it supports awakening true responsibility and correcting. Sin is the idea of uncorrectable error. It is also the belief you are alone in a hostile world. So the experience of correction that restores total Communication is not the overcoming of the past, or its denial or replacement with ‘better’ versions within the terms it sets – but the opening to presence in which a different purpose operates as unified or integrated desire. While this is your being, what you seem to have become is so estranged from your truth that it is not recognized within the paradim of your thinking – but will shift your thinking so as to become able to grow consciousness as the field or space in which self-definition and belief operate – along with their feelings, interpretations and reactions.
You may realize I am not at all talking about correcting Others – but the uncovering of an innate worth in self automatically extends to others and vice versa – the recognition and appreciation of another opens a like quality in oneself.
So what of the machinations of evil? First look to your own wholeness or peace and from there you can give true witness and know when and what and where to be or do or say – and learn from the dissonances of getting ahead or behind yourself by taking on what isn’t yours or denying what is. But under the rule of terror is no compassion – but a loss of the capacity to feel and the masking in manufactured emotionality. The Feeling of Existence is our primary being – never is this absent – but attention may be fixated in story – in narrative reality experience.

Of course the wider ramifications of Chrystia Freeland’s attempted cover-up: is not just for self-preservation, but also not to draw any more attention to Ukraine’s past; present (and future?) Stepan Bandera’s Government in Exile was legitimised by the US and Canada. The current ‘Government’ of the Ukraine are the descendants and inheritors of, what is essentially a radicalised Nazism. This is the major stumbling block for Ukrainian accession to the EU; and then NATO. And the US State Department of George Soros desperately want that accession. So the current burgeoning of ‘Nationalism’ will have to be rolled back.
I take a different view to Kit’s excellent recent article “Reuters (finally) realize there are Nazis in Ukraine”. I read the Josh Cohen article in question as a coded application form for the EU/NATO. Cohen also writes for Foreign Policy – the CFR/Bildeberger (online) rag. In his previous articles he identifies Volodymyr Viatrovych as the historian responsible for rewriting Ukraine’s neo-Nazi history. What I believe he is saying is “shut this guy up!”; consolidate and come to terms with your past; apologise, and move on – you are ruining our plans!!!
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/05/02/the-historian-whitewashing-ukraines-past-volodymyr-viatrovych/
TPTB want the lid back on our Nazi associations of the past (see below.) An unapologetic neo-Nazi Ukrainian ‘Puppet Regime’ are holding back on Soros’ Russia/World domination plans. And Freeland is a bit of a sideshow: but an incredibly entertaining and revealing one at that.

Does the mendacity of the plutocrats and their ilk ever end?
Is evil passed down genetically?
Anarchy (rules WITHOUT rulers) now.