Essays, latest
Comments 20

The Myth of the Given

by Vladimir Golstein

Mikhail Lermontov

One of the problems of dealing with establishment, politicians, mass media and their pundits, is that they start with some phony certainties:

  • Serbs committed genocide;
  • Russians grabbed Crimea
  • Putin interfered in US election;
  • He is a killer, who runs autocratic hell.
  • Russian economy is collapsing.
  • US is the most progressive, democratic and fair country on earth.
  • It always has good intentions.
  • People who support Trump are deplorable racists.

And things of that nature. The list can obviously go on.

Paradoxically, the enemies of the hegemonic discourse, have their own certainties. Well, it is given that the world is controlled by Rothschilds, zionists, capitalists, bankers, white men, sexy women and so on.

Why? How? Well, it is given.

Well, for anyone who cared to think about matters of this world, nothing is given. Mass media does not always lie. Russians are not angels, nor are they devils. Same about Americans, Israelis or Ukrainians.

One character in Lermontov claims that the only given thing is that one day he’ll have misfortune of dying. To which another replies:

Well, I am more rich than you are in certainties. I know that one day, I had the misfortune of being born. A Hero of Our Time, Mikhail Lermontov

These are the only two given facts. The rest is not given. It is a verbal construction based on approximation or induction.

Consequently, people like Dostoevsky, would proclaim mysteries and enigmas on every corner:

Man is a mystery. I want to solve this mystery, even if I have to spend my whole life doing it. Because I want to become a man.

That’s what nineteen-year old Dostoevsky wrote, and he remained true to this goal. Because he wanted to become human. And we become so when trying to solve mysteries, not when we proclaim banalities.

Indeed, there are so many mysteries paradoxes and uncertainties: capitalism or socialism; globalism or localism; the balance of rights and duties, man’s duty to others and to mother earth. Yet, the fools continue to rush where angels fear to tread.

Because it is given.

Obama has lost all credibility when he declared casually:

Well, Russia does not make anything.

Why? Well, everyone in Washington knows it. It is given!

Honestly, Trump will never say anything even approximately that stupid and that insulting.

And that’s given. At least in my world.


20 Comments

  1. chasingthesquirrel says

    The myth of a given is not that one does not exist. The myth is that it can be anything you want it to be.




    0



    0
  2. jones says

    Perhaps what Obama meant was Russia produced nothing anyone else desired to want enough to buy. Except her enormous natural resources. To which the West waits ravenously to feed upon were it not for that pesky gatekeeper, Putin.
    The “given” that exists with all Western politicians is that mirage of “materialism” that they paint to lure voters from one party to another each election cycle. “In my presidency, you’ll all have Dyson’s, made in [insert country ]. And free this-n-that ! Support freedom !” etc…..
    As others have encouraged you to understand, nothing of any meaningful consequence has changed from the O to the T regimes. The system they both defer to is the capitalist global order. Funnily enough, Putin seeks admission into this club, as a “given”, since Russia is a global power. On his terms. That’s where the beef really is.




    0



    0
  3. From Sarte and Buddha, Dostoevsky through to Trump. Such pondering on “givens” is a waste of timè. Trump is a distractor actor for the same power block that has driven the US foreign policy for decades. I know everybody who is salient enough to be reading anything on this site knows every POTUS is a puppet and will have argued that fact at some point. What confounds me is how quickly it is forgotten from issue to issue.




    0



    0
    • candideschmyles, What you choose to give time to, is your choice. But you are not the judge of another’s choice – excepting you project your own rules onto them. So feel free to think you rule the world 😉

      Your suggestion of replies here as being in terms of Trump, is a curious conclusion. I thought that the main respondents here were looking at the notion of a ‘given’ as a false basis from which to think or act.

      The use of time is perhaps a way in to the choices as to whether to waste and be wasted in diversionary conflicts that ‘carrot and stick’ the mind to persist in, or to uncover what lies beneath – that the diversionary mind is made to keep hidden.

      No need to wait for anyone else to get it, to open into the true of what is here.




      0



      0
  4. Harry Stotle says

    What is the take-home message in the OP?

    Is ‘given’ meant to signifiy the fact that too many people simply lack political curiosity so take various stories at face value?

    I mean it goes without saying various narratives are manipulated in various ways to serve the interests of opposing factions – this came to mind after reading the article




    0



    0
  5. Joerg says

    This article raises a very valuable point. Very good!
    I may add, that this question of “given” had been discussed before and was there discussed – somewhat more focussed – under the following keywords:
    1) “The collective denial of the obvious“. On a page that discussed the JFK murder case I found this excellent definition to that: “This “unspeakable,” this hypnotic “collective denial of the obvious,” is sustained by a mass-media whose repeated message is that the truth about such significant events is beyond our grasp, that we will have to drink the waters of uncertainty forever. As for those who don’t, they are relegated to the status of conspiracy nuts“.

    2) “A collective unconscious
    To that see: https://books.google.at/books?id=GKWvX0baI_cC&pg=PA43&lpg=PA43&dq=%E2%80%9Cunspeakable%E2%80%9D+collective&source=bl&ots=gHoMr5J6Of&sig=ohhqbhBORhOd_qZijkaEBZGQ4iQ&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi7gZr26czXAhVM1BoKHYf_AZI4ChDoAQgjMAM#v=onepage&q=%E2%80%9Cunspeakable%E2%80%9D%20collective&f=false




    0



    0
  6. George says

    Along with the “given” manoeuvre there is the “either/or” manoeuvre which compliments it and which you mentioned i.e. if you don’t subscribe to the first set of givens (Serbs committed genocide, Russians grabbed Crimea etc.) then you MUST subscribe to the second (the world is controlled by Rothschilds, zionists, etc.). There is no other option.




    0



    0
  7. Fair dinkum says

    The only thing ‘given’ is Life.
    The only thing worth giving is Love.




    0



    0
  8. The piece generally is a bit muddled but the forceful Obama vs. Trump conclusion is out of place and downright bizarre. Why is a Russian passionately defending Trump by arguing “He would never use such mean words as Obama!”

    If we’re talking about, say, Dostoyevsky’s legacy, yes, his words matter. But two American presidents of the early 21st century? Their words mean absolutely NOTHING. Who cares what they SAY…it’s what they do that counts. And as we have seen neither Obama or Trump have the courage to risk going against the establishment.

    The whole media Trump circus is a diversion, pay no attention to it. As a Russian you ought to be very concerned about the future of your country, which has been marked by the Empire for assimilation (or destruction) regardless of which huckster sits in the Oval Office. Embarrassing supplications to an uncouth and venal capitalist showman/POTUS will not change that.

    Vladimir Putin and his supporters need to realize that he will NEVER be invited into the Western club as leader of a free and sovereign Russia. The United States wants Eurasia under its control. For that to happen they need to control Russia and are actively working on that goal as we speak. It’s a Yeltsin they want, not a Putin.

    Look at it this way: America will never “regain” a sense of reason and fairness because it never had one in the first place. Ask Gaddafi about American fairness. Ask Gorbachev about American promises. Don’t forget the Iran nuclear deal! And did you hear about Jerusalem?

    Devious, ruthless and ready to have a chortle at your expense should you find yourself in a desert culvert being sodomized, beaten and shot to death by real life Mad Max bandits. THAT is the Empire at work. Stay strong and stop it with the embarrassing submissive displays to Donald Trump.




    0



    0
  9. James Graham says

    To give is a verb. Existential facts, universals or nouns are not verbs (although “exists” denotes a noun and a verb…they do exist). So, when I give you this information the given has to do with what I did…not what the information is in terms of facts, universals or nouns. THEY can’t be verbs or given but that doesn’t stop me doing what I Just did. People often make that mistake. Valid, sufficient or adequate knowledge means you have to make allowances for the agent that produced it, what they did…and their freedom. All words are in order, given or taken….except the word freedom. That said, things take on a very different complexion in the legal context. What do you say to the Sheriff who gives you a sentence of 10 years in jail for a crime you say you did not commit? It’s a myth?




    0



    0
  10. People come to some conclusions about certain individuals or entities based on evidence of their prior actions. If they misread the evidence then they will come to the wrong conclusions!




    0



    0
    • And we interpret every thing through the filter of our mind. So then we ‘hate ourself’ in others. Or idolize others while they serve our agenda. I feel that the wrong conclusion is a ‘given’ or inevitable outcome when the wrong predicate or starting point is acted from as if a given or de facto true.
      So while we may find all kinds of judgements and meanings and feelings coming up – they may be a more rich source of feedback to our own otherwise unconscious mind-mapping.
      Staying open in the willingness for true may stand in an integrity – but doesn’t need to hate or attack another to seem to have any.




      0



      0
  11. Big B says

    The myth of the given: is that there is nothing that is given …and therefore nothing to be taken away. The lived experience is not reducible or definable in relation to its so-called ‘birth’: or its so-called ‘death’. In the Buddhist tradition: that which is subject to birth – is also subject to sickness, old age, and decay (death). This is the ultimate commonality of the human condition – which Freud termed “common unhappiness”; or Sartre may have termed “existential angst” – which Buddhists refer to as dukkha. It’s not really a translatable or definable term: to say that all life is suffering is to deny that there is much joy to be had, and much to celebrate. Suffice to say: that because dukkha is caused, and subject to conditions – there is a possible cessation; and a path to that cessation …nothing is ‘given’ …not even the two irreducible facts of birth and death.




    0



    0
    • Giving and receiving are one. But getting and getting rid of – is the self-illusion. Because there is nothing outside You and the wish to get it is the willingness to lose Everything for a ‘world’ in which you lose power by seeking it.

      So indeed no thing is given, for you are no ‘thing’ and so everything is given to all. This makes no sense in the frame of thinking – but in Theistic terms is the idea that in your (timeless) Creation, is nothing withheld you. Withholding is an action in relation to our brother, our world and our Source-Nature. What we give is our abundance, but abundance of lack is the misery of the getter or hungry ghost.

      Mind that can weave deceit is also mind that can serve awakening – but the two are mutually exclusive. What we give one we take from the other and trying to make them one makes for the insanity in which true and false can no longer be reliably discerned without awakened grace of your always and already given nature – which stands Obvious beneath the frantic noise of diversionary co-fusions of true under false pretences.

      So to operate FROM a false framed narrative set of ideas is to be subject to their rule or meaning. But to observe a false framing idea is freedom of original will and nature as one. Perhaps more accurate to say the subjection isnt, and the freedom of being to be all that it is, Is!

      How can such an investment in what is not true, so usurp and reverse the true?
      Anyhow you want.
      But only while the investment is lived FROM as if a true receiving, given acceptance, and reinforced by shared currency of meanings.

      Mind (the mind you accept) can create mythology – but this is not itself creative, and always contains an evil.
      To use the term ‘myth’ for false is a modern sign of the deeper deceit called rationalism.
      Myth is story, of core archetypes that embody meanings for a fragmented personality structure. Narrative identity – is in time as the unfolding of time, as a result of focussing in an identity reflection – and persisting in its development as an overlay of needs and abilities through which to experience what you have ‘come here’ to be the experience of – or you would be giving focus elsewhere!

      The spell of the human conditionING is of such a defence that the personality mind cannot pass – for it was made to effect and deny the breakdown of Communication. Resisting ‘evil’ is the way of self-protection and the nature of the protection racket – to which sacrifice is made, so as to evade the pain of conflict-overwhelm revisited and relived. That we (many reading here) can see this in our world (politics of power under deceit) is the step to recognising it is the lens through which we see what seems a ‘given world’ or indeed human condition.

      ‘It takes one to know one’. Instead of using law this to feed guilt and blame – be curious to know the truth!




      0



      0
  12. Existence is the Only given.

    You can call existence life and say life is the only given. How you define and relate to life and existence is your current experience of perspective. You can define it in the framing of an idea of non-existence or death – but you cannot make a fact of death as your own existence – excepting by identifying in image and form and thus protecting and defending and grieving over loss of what you never really had because you never are the image or form of existence but are the field-awareness in which and of which imaged forms, relationships and resonances arise.

    If something is ‘too big to fail’ in your invested narrative definition, you will be unwilling to re-negotiate its status or true worth to you – and in that sense will be possessed by that which you would clench upon as your own possession. A false sense of self-protection operates at expense of true and eventually results in intolerable pain and a willingness to release ‘bad’ or poor investments to align in true relevence and resonance. That is to a truly felt recognition of – and within – existence or life.

    Becoming aware that the framing of the narrative – any narrative – is operating a defence of self-imaged identity, is the opportunity to revisit the current definition and release what no longer serves – or which is now recognized as not aligned in who you are accepting true of you. For example the wish to hurt may be in your mind, but the willingness to accept that as true of you may be absent – especially in the recognition that you hurt yourself.

    Noticing our own thoughts – at the level of the template definitions that are indeed accepted as ‘given, is key to acceptance or disregard. In modern terms this is the difference between conscious choice and programmed reaction, or sovereign will and being phished and hacked by identity theft.

    The narrative identity is invoked as a persona over unresolved and un-faced and therefore unowned conflicts. Any attempt to force the breaking of illusions will only strengthen them. But the active willingness to release our own – by self-responsibility for thought-acceptance (acting from thought as if true), is a field of resonance in the capacity to choose – rather than in the framing of illusory choices that all result in the same outcome.

    Freedom is not at the level of body – but can be experienced through the physical expression of who we are.
    In so far as death is accepted as a ‘given’, is exactly insofar as the life of the body is accepted as your exclusive reality. To the narrative sense of its own existence in division and struggle, the inevitable loss of the seeming possession of a life in such terms is a matter of time. This is that same as recognizing that a wish or illusion cannot ‘home’ you or truly identify you forever or rather exclusively and always. There is a greater context that the falsely limiting sense of ‘given’ or de facto realty, masks out.

    Those who become conscious as to the nature of deceit use insight as a weapon instead of accepting a bridge to reintegrate to their true being, and so they choose to further densify their sense of exclusion and isolation within the invested self image, with the idea of more power as a result of manipulative intent. They thus forfeit awareness of true sovereign will for the dictate of a set of definitions drawn from death as power over life. Within the framing of death, such power aligns with clinging to and inflating or feeding the false sense of life with the death or denial of life in others, world and of course, their true self-awareness.

    Everyone teaches both themselves and others by example – all the time and in all that we think and do. Being conscious as to what we choose to learn – and thus teach or demonstrate, is being awake in our felt existence.
    The defended sense of self-image or concept is only running what seems to be conscious, as the scanning for threat and strategic advantage. It is the ‘psycho pathy’ of only seeming to join, while always holding back the demand or defence of separateness as ‘safety or freedom’ from true relation.

    The reversal of self in image becomes a world so full of tares that the truth can seem absent, weak or unreal – while the false seems both real and attractive.

    So what about considering that you are not as you think, and that the world it not as it seems? Would this pause enough to listen or look within and know? Covering over what we hate or fear exposure in, gives power to fear by acting as if what it says is true. But denied or unfaced fear is division, and a liar on a time lease.




    0



    0
  13. ‘Honestly, Trump will never say anything even approximately that stupid and that insulting.’

    really? i thought he already had. even so, dont give up on trump. he has shown every indication of being as stupid as obama. i believe in him.




    0



    0
    • “Johnson at once felt himself rouzed; and answered, “Sir, there is no settling the point of precedency between a louse and a flea …”




      0



      0

Please note the opinions expressed in the comments do not necessarily reflect those of the editors or of OffG as a whole