Nafeez Ahmed: Trump’s State Department spent over $1m in Iran to exploit unrest

by Nafeez Ahmed at InsurgeIntelligence

c


At the end of 2017, a dozen cities across Iran, including the capital Tehran, were rocked by spontaneous protests which continued into the New Year. The protests drew attention to the country’s deteriorating economic conditions, along with the regime’s abysmal human rights record.
They also paved the way for President Donald Trump’s announcement on January 12th that this would be a “last chance” for waiving US nuclear sanctions under the Iran nuclear deal for a further 60 days, after which the US would withdraw if its “disastrous flaws” cannot be fixed.
A range of recent official documents, from Congressional research to US foreign aid funding reports, throw new light on the Trump administration’s approach. The documents reveal the US government’s continued interest in triggering major political change in Iran to pull the country into the orbit of American interests. This includes the possibility of exploiting political unrest and other crises — including a worsening water crisis — to turn popular opinion against the regime.
Iran’s unrest has mostly been driven by a convergence of domestic ecological, energy and economic crises. The State Department has sought to exploit these crises to undermine the legitimacy of the regime, by funding opposition groups as well as anti-regime broadcasting to the tune of tens of millions of dollars a year.
One State Department funding document, for instance, refers to a project to use Iran’s growing water crisis to drum up public anger against regime “mismanagement”. To date, US government records show that the Trump administration has spent over $1 million, at least, since 2016, on financing anti-regime activism within Iran.
The policy is not new, though. Altogether, since 2006, successive US administrations have invested tens of millions of dollars a year on ‘democracy promotion’ efforts in Iran, serving as cover for longstanding ‘regime change’ aspirations.
Much of the media programming funded by the State Department has focused on glorifying the reign of the Shah of Iran, the brutal US-UK backed dictator who was deposed by the 1979 revolution. The propaganda appears to have worked, with many participants in the latest protests calling for the Shah’s exiled son, Reza Pahlavi, to return to power in Iran.

see full article HERE


newest oldest most voted
Notify of
uncle tungsten
Reader
uncle tungsten

Thank you Big B, i loved your vehemence. I reckon Bibi got the US president he so richly deserved. Well so far that is. The Iranian mosquito effort might have been more effective had Bibi and MBS not left it to Nikki and the Donald to fully fund and organise.

Den Lille Abe
Reader
Den Lille Abe

So Trumps team spent a million… We have not and never will have a clue on what was spent behind the scenes on this. That the US want to take down Iran should be beyond doubt to anyone still breathing. But it will take more than that to do it, Iranians resilience, and for us Westerners, strange mix of politics and religion, which we don’t understand, seems to be very well anchored. Grievances can always be found, but if they are not deep running, they cant be exploited.

vexarb
Reader

Only a measly $Million? No wonder they failed. Obama and Biden allotted Victoria Nudelman-Cohen a cookie budget of $5Billion to destabilize the Ukraina — and they succeded brilliantly. Another sign of Trump’s business incompetence. “If you pay peanuts you get monkeys”.
Back in the Shah’s days of course a $Million was a lot of money.

Big B
Reader
Big B

LMFAO! Trump and Nikki Haley stand in solidarity with Iranian working class protesters against Khameini and Rouhani – the oppressive Iranian bourgeois theocracy! WTF: is Washington is overtly Marxist-communist now? Do they not recall that the CIA installed both the Monarchy (the Shah) and the Theocracy (Khomeini) as an anti-communist bulwark in Iran? Apparently not? I’m not suggesting for one second that there was a Marxist revolution in Iran. There was not; not even close. Despite the grandstanding and astroturfing from the West: neither was it a regime change movement. I wanted to highlight the political illiteracy and hypocrisy of… Read more »

Big B
Reader
Big B

Link to UN report on meeting, and Haley’s “solidarity” quote.