This report by Rick Sterling is from May 2017, but still highly relevant. In this Westerner’s view of contemporary Russia the claim that will probably be most surprising for other Western readers is that “the majority of print media” are “critical of the government”.
For over two weeks this May, a delegation of 30 Americans visited seven regions and ten cities across Russia. Organized by Sharon Tennison of Center for Citizen Initiatives, the entire group began in Moscow with several days of meetings and visits, then broke into smaller groups going to cities including Volgograd, Kazan (Tatarstan), Krasnodar (near Black Sea), Novosibirsk (Siberia), Yekaterinburg and the Crimean cities Simferopol, Yalta and Sevastopol. After these regional visits, delegates regrouped in St Petersburg to share their experiences. Following is an informal review with conclusions based on my observations in Kazan and what I heard from others.
Observations and Facts
Western sanctions have hurt sectors of Russia’s economy but encouraged agricultural production.
Exports and imports have been impacted by Western sanctions imposed in 2014. The tourist sector has been hard hit and education exchanges between Russia and the USA have been interrupted or ended. However, the sanctions have spurred investments and expansion in agricultural production. We were told that farmers are saying ‘Don’t lift the sanctions!”
Some Russian oligarchs are making major infrastructure investments.
For example, billionaire Sergei Galitsky has developed Russia’s largest retail outlet, the Magnit supermarket chain. Galitsky has invested heavily in state-of-the-art drip irrigation green houses producing massive quantities of high quality cucumbers, tomatoes and other vegetables which are distributed via the supermarkets throughout Russia.
There has been a resurgence of religion in Russia.
Russian Orthodox Churches have been revitalized and gold leaf glistens on the church domes. Muslim mosques have also been refurbished and rebuilt. A brilliant new mosque is a prominent part of the Kremlin in Kazan, Tatarstan. There are many Muslim in Russia. This research puts the number at ten million though we heard estimates much higher. We saw numerous examples of interfaith unity and cooperation, with Muslim Imams working side by side with young Russian Orthodox priests. We also heard stories of how churches had been used as prisons or food warehouses during the Stalin era.
Russia increasingly looks east.
The Russian emblem of a double-headed eagle looks both east and west; it is a Eur-Asian country. While Europe is still important politically and economically, Russia is increasingly looking to the east. Russia’s “strategic partner” is China – economically, politically and militarily. There are increasing numbers of Chinese tourists and education exchanges with Russia. In the United Nations Security Council the two countries tend to vote together. Huge investments are planned for the transportation network dubbed the “Belt and Road Initiative” connecting Asia with Europe.
Russia is a capitalist country with a strong state sector.
Government is influential or controls sectors of the economy such as public transportation, military/defense industry, resource extraction, education and health care. State owned enterprises account for nearly 40% of overall employment. They have universal health care in parallel with private education and health care facilities. Banking is a problem area with high interest rates and the failure/bankruptcy of numerous banks in the past decade. We heard complaints that foreign multinational companies can enter and control sectors of the economy, drive out Russian competitors and take the profits home.
There is some nostalgia for the former Soviet Union with its communist ideals.
We met numerous people who speak fondly of the days when nobody was super-rich or horribly poor and when they believed there was a higher goal for society. We heard this from people ranging from a successful entrepreneur to an aging Soviet era rock musician. That does not mean that these people want to return to Soviet days, but that they recognize the changes in Russia have both pluses and negatives. There is widespread disapproval of the breakup of the Soviet Union and the economic chaos of the 1990’s.
There is a range of media supporting both government and opposition parties.
There are three major TV stations controlled by and supporting the government. Along with these, there are numerous private stations criticizing the government and supporting various opposition parties. In print media, the majority of newspapers and magazines are critical of the government.
Public transportation is impressive.
The streets of Moscow are jam packed with new cars. Meanwhile, underground there is a fast, economical and efficient subway system which is the most heavily used in Europe. The Moscow metro carries 40% more passengers than the New York subway system. On major routes the trains arrive every 60 seconds. Some of the stations are over 240 feet underground with the longest escalator in Europe. Inter-city trains such as the Sapsan (Falcon) take passengers between St. Petersburg and Moscow at 200 kms per hour. Despite the speed, the train is smooth and quiet. It’s an interesting way to view rural Russia as one passes ramshackle dachas, cute villages and abandoned Soviet era factories. A major new transportation project is the bridge between Krasnodar and the Crimean peninsula. This short video portrays the design.
Putin is popular.
Depending on who you ask, Putin’s popularity seems to range between 60 and 80%. There are two reasons: First, since he became leader the economy has stabilized, corrupt oligarchs were brought into check, and the standard of living dramatically improved. Second, Putin is credited with restoring international respect for Russia and national pride for Russian citizens. Some say “During the 1990s we were a beggar nation.” Russians have a strong sense of national pride and Putin’s administration has restored that. Some people think Putin deserves a break from the intense pressure and workload. That does not mean everyone likes him or is afraid to say that. Our official Moscow guide took delight in showing us the exact spot on the bridge outside the Kremlin where she believes Putin had one of his enemies assassinated. Other Russians we spoke with mock these accusations which are widely believed in the West. As to the accusations that Putin is a “dictator”, about 75 students in Crimea openly laughed when they were asked about this Western belief.
Current Political Tension
Russians are highly skeptical of accusations about Russian “meddling” in the U.S. election.
One foreign policy expert, Vladimir Kozin, said “It’s a fairy tale that Russia influenced the U.S. election.” They contrast the unverified accusations with clear evidence of U.S. interference in past Russian elections, especially in the 1990’s when the economy was privatized and crime, unemployment and chaos overwhelmed the country. The role of the U.S. in “managing” the election of Boris Yeltsin in 1995 is widely known in Russia, as is the U.S. funding of hundreds of Non Governmental Organizations in Ukraine prior to the 2013-2014 violence and coup.
There is a strong desire to improve relations with the U.S.
We met numerous Russians who had participated in citizen exchanges with the U.S. in the 1990’s. Almost universally these Russians had fond memories of their visits and hosts in the U.S. In other places we met people who had never met an American or English speaking person before. Typically they were cautious but very pleased to hear from American citizens who also wish to improve relations and reduce tensions.
Western media reports about Crimea are hugely distorted.
CCI delegates who visited Crimea met with a broad range of citizens and elected leaders. The geography is “stunningly beautiful” with mountains dropping to beaches on the Black Sea. Not reported in the West, Crimea was part of Russia since 1783. When Crimea was administratively transferred to Ukraine in 1954, it was all part of the Soviet Union. Crimeans told the CCI delegates they were repelled by the violence and fascist elements involved in the Kiev coup. Bus convoys from Crimea were attacked with injuries and deaths following the Kiev coup.
The new coup government said Russian was no longer an official language. Crimeans quickly organized and held a referendum to secede from Ukraine and “re-unify” with Russia. With 80% of registered voters participating, 96% voted to join Russia. One Crimean stated to the CCI delegates, “We would have gone to war to separate from Ukraine.” Others noted the hypocrisy of the West which allows secession votes in Scotland and Catalonia, and which encouraged the secession of Croatia, but then rejects the overwhelming vote and choice of the Crimean people.
Sanctions against tourism are hurting the economy of Crimea yet the public is confident in its decision. The Americans who visited Crimea were overwhelmed with the warm welcome and friendliness they received. Because of the sanctions, few Americans visit Crimea and they also received substantial media coverage. In reaction, political officials in Ukraine accused the delegates of being “enemies of the Ukrainian state” and put their names on a blacklist.
Russians know and fear war.
Twenty-seven million Russians died in WW2 and that experience is seared into the Russian memory. The Nazi siege of Leningrad (now called St Petersburg) reduced the population from 3 million to 500 thousand. Walking through the cemetery of mass graves brings home the depth of suffering and resilience of Russians who somehow survived a 872 day siege on the city. Memory of the war is kept alive through commemorations with huge public participation. Citizens carry poster size photographs of their relatives who fought or died in World War 2, known as the “Immortal Regiment“. In Kazan, the march involved 120 thousand persons – 10% of the entire city population – beginning at 10 am and concluding at 9 pm. Across Russia, millions of citizens actively participate. The marches and parades marking “Victory Day” are more solemn than celebratory.
Russians see themselves being threatened.
While Western media portrays Russia as “aggressive”, most Russians perceive the reverse. They see the U.S. and NATO increasing military budgets, steadily expanding, moving up to the Russian border, withdrawing from or violating past treaties and conducting provocative military exercises. This map shows the situation.
Russians want to de-escalate international tensions.
Former President Gorbachev said to our group “Does America want Russia to just submit? This is a country that can never submit.” These words carry extra significance because it was Gorbachev who initiated the foreign policy of Perestroika which led to his own side-lining and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Gorbachev has written about Perestroika as follows:
Its main outcome was the end of the Cold War. A long and potentially deadly period in world history, when the whole humankind lived under the constant threat of a nuclear disaster, came to an end.
Yet we are clearly in a new Cold War and the threat has re-emerged.
Despite three years of economic sanctions, low oil prices and an intense information war in the West, Russian society appears to be doing reasonably well. Russians across the spectrum express a strong desire to build friendship and partnership with the U.S. At the same time, it seems Russians will not be intimidated. They don’t want war and won’t initiate it, but if attacked they will defend themselves as they have in the past.
For direct-transfer bank details click here.
“Russians will not be intimidated. They don’t want war and won’t initiate it..”
Hmm, Don’t most Russians realise that’s EXACTLY what their govt has done in Crimea and Donbas ? ( those really WERE Coups) Budapest Memorandum, anyone ?
Stalingrad: Wehrmacht’s capitulation on Feb 2nd 1943, 75 years ago, saved Europe from the Empire that was holding the rest of continental Europe supine under its Nazi jackboot.
Postman calling. Brilliantly witty article by the Saker on latest Pindo threats against Russia. Sample:
I have a really hard time explaining to them that they should stop listening to this endless bombastic verbiage. Not only because the vast majority of officials making these statements are both stupid and ignorant, but because the main export of the AngloZionist Empire nowadays is hot air. We saw that recently with the grand statements about Kurdistan or, for that matter, the plans “A”, “B”, “C” and “D” about Syria: all delivered with the same final gravitas.
[vexarb’s comment: Ah, Gravitas; wasn’t that what our LibDems added to the Bush/BLiar Coalition of the Killing, when the LibDems finally relinquished their principles and piled in on the gang rape of Iraq? I remember the Guardian waxing lyrical about Gravitas. ]
Is anyone else following the intricacies of the #ReleaseTheMemo denouement? Judging alone by those who seek to block its release – it must have some incendiary substance? Allegedly, it has already caused one Clinton cabalist casualty …Did Andrew McCabe take early retirement from the FBI …or did Christopher Wray force him to resign after reading the memo?
Anyone who wants the memo released is under Russian influence …Devin Nunes (who commissioned the memo) is a “Russian Agent”; the social media ‘#ReleaseTheMemo’ campaign has been perpetrated by Russian bots and troll factories in St Petersburg. So it should be worthy of consideration that the memo seriously undermines the whole Russia-gate narrative?
What has intrigued me is the recent Guardian involvement. Apropos of nothing – on Tuesday – they exclusively published an article on a second dossier (the Shearer dossier) that ‘confirms’ the unsubstantiable claims of the Steele (‘Pissgate’) dossier. Not even Steele himself could vouch for it (even though it appears he may have had a hand in compiling it?) WTF? #FakeNews!
That the Guardian should publish fake news is not worth commenting on. But on this story, at this time? It struck me that if Clinton News Network, MSNBC or NBC produced an eleventh hour confirmational second dossier – they’d be laughed out of the asylum? So they chose the Guardian. Is this not confirmational of a transatlantic network of “Washington Consensus” useful-idiot media?
(Judging by Pelosi’s face at the SOTU – someone has got something to hide?)
[As an aside: did anyone else notice that the “Brexit Memo” was leaked to BuzzFeed – the erstwhile publishers of the Steele Dossier? Correlative or conspiratorial?]
[[As an afterthought – after George Eliason’s brilliant expose – to what extent might Pinchuk; Clinton; Poroshenko; Kaptur; the Ukrainian Caucus; (Soros; McCain; Graham); the Brown Noser; Crowdstrike; Fusion GPS; the Atlantic Council; RFERL; BBG; etc. be implicated …if at all?]]
It seems to me that it is not too implausible that there is a transnational coalition of foreign influence that is pushing a Russophobic agenda – but that this has nothing to do with Trump or the GOP. So come on Mrs Clinton – “What [Really] Happened”?
And what comes next – when your story implodes???
The Guardian is forever foaming at the mouth at the ridiculous and hard evidence free doping ban on Russian athletes. Both on the front pages, opinion pages and sports pages. The total lack of critical and objective reporting has gone out of the window at the Guardian.
Incidentally, the ‘I saw Russian tanks invade Ukraine but forgot to take any photos but a Ukrainian cowherder confirmed it,’ Shaun Walker, is leaving Russia as the Guardian correspondent and is about to publish a book about his time there. From the publisher blurb, the book is hugely praised by John Simpson and others at the BBC, Peter Pomerantsev a fervent Putin basher, and various US commentators. I wonder how objective that will be about Putin and the Ukraine coup d’etat?
PS peace and prosperity in Russia vs war and recession in EUSA:
this is why i read OG…..
It really would be educational for America to be looted as Russia was, a puppet President selling American industry to oligarchs for a song, 60 millions and more dying prematurely, gang warfare and murders driving digital industry wars. Oh and Exxon Mobil being sold to the Russians. Definitely that….
Long before all that happened, wailing wussies would be calling for nuclear war as Americans know nothing of suffering, take no responsibility for their societal failings, have never been invaded by foreigners and have never had their infrastructure bombed.
They know nothing of sacrificing 10% of their population in an existential war and now they murder with drones, they never will. Unless it is imposed upon them by others…..
So next time you hear Trump, one of the other sockpuppet idiots on Capitol Hill, any number of greasy lobbyists or bankers call Russia ‘aggressive’, threaten a drone strike on them and their family. Tell them it is part of ‘understanding Russian sacrifice since 1939’……very educational for bankers to see how the other side suffers from US murdering….
And consider making it a capital crime for any investor to ever utter a word of support for any future US murdering, election rigging and foreign interference. Defence means defence of the US seaboards and land borders with Canada and Mexico. It does not mean coups in Ukraine, puppets in Afghanistan, bases in 180 countries overseas, NGOs stuffed full of CIA plants etc.
If Russia were American in its values, Alaska would have seceded and have a Russian puppet instlled after coup. Americans in Juneau declaring loyalty to Washington would be terrorists declared war upon, with voluble support from Beijing. America dealing with Latin American drug mules in Florida would be seized upon by Russia as unprovoked attacks on minorities, worthy of calling the US President imperialist.
Following trade sanctions on the US by the EU and Russia, the US would be vilified for building increased trade with a free South America in general and Brazil in particular, whose government would not be the result of a Kremlin funded coup.
Russia would be fomenting war continuously between Haiti and the Dominican republic, installing air bases and imposing sanctions on one side. America would be threatened for having pretensions at regional influence in the Caribbean.
Russia would draw up a seven pronged attack to destroy the oil producing regions of Mexico, Canada, Texas, the Gulf, Venezuela, Colombia and Brazil. Depleted uranium would ensure foetal abnormalities for generations and any leader not a puppet to the Kremlin would be fitted up for chemical weapons crimes. No evidence capable of cross examination would emerge, but corrupt judges would pass sentence on pro Washington leaders without conscience.
Vladimir Putin would organise for the Winter Palace in St Petersburg to be blown up in high tourist season, eviscerating three thousand tourists and curators. Kazakhstan separatists would be blamed, despite voluminous evidence it was paid for by Iran and China. A full scale war with Almaty, Operation Cock and Whore, supported under pressure by Damascus, Tehran and Minsk, will capture geostrategic territory for the heir of Peter the Great, imposing human trafficking, misery and civil war for thirty years. The Russian military suppliers will threaten the Duma with extinction if they do not vote through overpriced unnecessary ordinance purchases on the nod. And Almaty will become the Bangkok for aging Russian sexists whose wives have kicked them out…..
Any drunken football fan singing IF VLADI IS A XXXX, CLAP YOUR HANDS! would be sent to a detention camp on Sakhalin for ten years without trial as a suspected bomber in St Petersburg, despite graduates of Moscows professional demolition training course caught whispering plot by the bugging brigade walking free on the streets of Sochi.
What a good thing Russians are more grown up……
Excellent article,because of the manner in which it was done. Very informational…..one gets a true view of people that want to be accepted, just NOT as a vassal, but on equal terms as friends.
Excellent article by a brave little group of righteous Yanks and Yankesses who dared to visit Russia, the very lair of the Bogeyman, in a time of peace and prosperity. My daughter spent a happy fortnight break enjoying the relaxed gaiety of Moscow in summer; took her family on a brief stopover to Moscow a few months ago, and they loved it. Came back and reported the same news as above, to incredulous Londoners: the Russians drive modern cars! But is this news? Only to the backwoodsmen of the MSM.
Re the quote about the terrible Yeltsin years: “During the 1990s we were a beggar nation.” I first realized how bad things had become, under “restructuring” by the Anglo-Zio-Capitalist carpetbaggers, when I heard that the new Turkish word for prostitute was “a Natasha”. Only later did the fall in life expectancy and increase in death rate come out as cold statistics. Thank God, Vovo has changed all that. The nearest thing to FDR and Attlee in our rotten century.
My then girlfriend, working on archeological digs in Jordan in 1993, heard something similar when locals spotted the modish red star on the fashionably black cap I had loaned her. Desperate people do desperate things.