74

The Fakest Fake News: The U.S. Government’s 9/11 Conspiracy Theory A Review of ‘9/11Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation’ by David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth

Edward Curtin

If you want to fathom today’s world, absolutely nothing is more important than to understand the truth about the attacks of September 11, 2001. This is the definitive book on the subject.

For seventeen years we have been subjected to an onslaught of U.S. government and corporate media propaganda about 9/11 that has been used to support the “war on terror” that has resulted in millions of deaths around the world.  It has been used as a pretext to attack nations throughout the Middle East, South Asia, and Africa.

It has led to a great increase in Islamophobia since Muslims were accused of being responsible for the attacks. It has led to a crackdown on civil liberties in the United States, the exponential growth of a vast and costly national security apparatus, the spreading of fear and anxiety on a great scale, and a state of permanent war that is pushing the world toward a nuclear confrontation.  And much, much more.

The authors of this essential book, David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth, and all their colleagues who have contributed to this volume, have long been at the front lines trying to wake people up to the real news about 9/11.  They have battled against three U.S. presidents, a vast propaganda machine “strangely” allied with well-known leftists, and a corporate mass media intent on serving deep-state interests, all of whom have used illogic, lies, and pseudo-science to conceal the terrible truth.  Yet despite the establishment’s disinformation and deceptions, very many people have come to suspect that the official story of the September 11, 2001 attacks is not true.

With the publication of 9/11Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation, they now have a brilliant source book to use to turn their suspicions into certitudes.  And for those who have never doubted the official account (or accounts would be more accurate), reading this book should shock them into reality, because it is not based on speculation, but on carefully documented and corroborated facts, exacting logic, and the scientific method.

The book is based on the establishment in 2011 of a scientific review project comprising 23 experts with a broad spectrum of expertise, including people from the fields of chemistry, structural engineering, physics, aeronautical engineering, airline crash investigation, piloting, etc. Their job was to apply systematic and disciplined analyses to the verifiable evidence about the 9/11 attacks.  They used a model called the Delphi Method as a way to achieve best-evidence consensus.

This best-evidence consensus model is used in science and medicine, and the 9/11 Consensus Panel used it to examine the key claims of the official account(s). Each “Official Account” was reviewed and compared to “The Best Evidence” to reach conclusions. The authors explain it thus:

The examination of each claim received three rounds of review and feedback.  According to the panel’s investigative model, members submitted their votes to the two of us moderators while remaining blind to one another.  Proposed points had to receive a vote of at least 85 percent to be accepted…This model carries so much authority in medicine that medical consensus statements derived from it are often reported in the news.

They represent the highest standard of medical research and practice and may result in malpractice lawsuits if not followed.

This research process went on for many years, with the findings reported in this book.  The Consensus 9/11 Panel provides evidence against the official claims in nine categories:

  1. The Destruction of the Twin Towers
  2. The Destruction of WTC 7
  3. The Attack on the Pentagon
  4. The 9/11 Flights
  5. US Military Exercises on and before 9/11
  6. Claims about Military and Political Leaders
  7. Osama bin Laden and the Hijackers
  8. Phone Calls from the 9/11 Flights
  9. Insider Trading

Each category is introduced and then broken down into sub-sections called points, which are examined in turn.  For example, the destruction of the Twin Towers has points that include, “The Claim That No One Reported Explosions in the Twin Towers,” “The Claim That the Twin Towers Were Destroyed by Airplane Impacts, Jet Fuel, and Fire,” “The Claim That There Were Widespread Infernos in the South Tower,” etc.  Each point is introduced with background, the official account is presented, then the best evidence, followed by a conclusion. Within the nine categories there are 51 points examined, each meticulously documented through quotations, references, etc., all connected to 875 endnotes that the reader can follow.  It is scrupulously laid out and logical, and the reader can follow it sequentially or pick out an aspect that particularly interests them.

The 9/11 Consensus Panel members describe their goal and purpose as follows:

The purpose of the 9/11 Consensus Panel is to provide the world with a clear statement, based on expert independent opinion, of some of the best evidence opposing the official narrative about 9/11.

The goal of the Consensus Panel is to provide a ready source of evidence-based research to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution.

As a sociologist who teaches research methods and does much research, I find the Consensus Panel’s method exemplary and their findings accurate. They have unmasked a monstrous lie.  It is so ironic that such serious scholars, who question and research 9/11, have been portrayed as irrational and ignorant “conspiracy theorists” by people whose thinking is magical, illogical, and pseudo-scientific in the extreme.

A review is no place to go into all the details of this book, but I will give a few examples of the acumen of the Panel’s findings.

As a grandson of a Deputy Chief of the New York Fire Department (343 firefighters died on 9/11), I find it particularly despicable that the government agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), that was charged with investigating the collapse of the Towers and Building 7, would claim that no one gave evidence of explosions in the Twin Towers, when it is documented by the fastidious researcher Graeme MacQueen, a member of The 9/11 Consensus Panel, that over 100 firefighters who were at the scene reported hearing explosions in the towers.  One may follow endnote 22 to MacQueen’s research and his sources that are indisputable. There are recordings.

On a connected note, the official account claims that there were widespread infernos in the South Tower that prevented firefighters from ascending to the 78th floor.  Such a claim would support the notion that the building could have collapsed as a result of fires caused by the plane crashing into the building.  But as 9/11 Unmasked makes clear, radio tapes of firefighters ascending to the 78th floor and saying this was not so, prove that “there is incontrovertible evidence that the firefighter teams were communicating clearly with one another as they ascended WTC” and that there were no infernos to stop them, as they are recorded saying.  They professionally went about their jobs trying to save people.

Then the South Tower collapsed and so many died.  But it couldn’t have collapsed from “infernos” that didn’t exist.  Only explosives could have brought it down.

A reader can thus pick up this book, check out that section, and use common sense and elementary logic to reach the same conclusion.  And by reaching that conclusion and going no further in the book, the entire official story of 9/11 falls apart.

Or one can delve further, let’s say by dipping into the official claim that a domestic airline attack on the Pentagon was not expected. Opening to page 78, the reader can learn that “NBC’s Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski was warned of the Pentagon attack by an intelligence officer,” who specified the illogical spot where the attack would happen shortly before it did.

In Miklaszewski’s words, “And then he got very close to me, and, almost silent for a few seconds, he leaned in and said, ‘This attack was so well coordinated that if I were you, I would stay off the E Ring – where our NBC office was – the outer ring of the Pentagon for the rest of the day, because we’re next.’”

The authors say correctly, “The intelligence officer’s apparent foreknowledge was unaccountably specific.” For if a terrorist were going to fly a plane into Pentagon, the most likely spot would be to dive into the roof where many people might be killed, including top brass and Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. To make an impossibly acrobatic maneuver to fly low into an outside wall would make no sense.  And for the government to claim that this impossible maneuver was executed by the alleged hijacker Hani Hanjour, a man who according to documentation couldn’t even pilot a small plane, is absurd. But the intelligence officer knew what would happen, and the reader can learn this, and marvel.

Or the reader can start from the beginning and read straight through the book.  They will learn in detail that the official version of the attacks of 9/11 is fake news at its worst.  It is a story told for dunces.

Griffin and Woodworth and their colleagues simply and clearly in the most logical manner show that the emperor has no clothes, not even a mask.

Since knowing the truth about the attacks of September 11, 2001 is indispensable for understanding what is happening in today’s world, everyone should purchase and read Unmasking 9/11: An International Review Panel Investigation.  Keep it next to your dictionary, and when you read or hear the latest propaganda about the 9/11 attacks, take it out and consult the work of the real experts.  Their words will clarify your mind.

It is the definitive book on the defining event of the 21st century.


can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media

Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated.

Our Bitcoin JTR code is: 1JR1whUa3G24wXpDyqMKpieckMGGW2u2VX

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
74 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 30, 2018 12:08 PM

Happy Halloween 🎃 to all the spooks 👻 that assist the powers-that-be and post disinformation on the Internet to cover-up DEW destruction of the World Trace Center complex on September Eleventh Two-Thousand and One ! Greenhouse gases and nuclear radiation are good for you like leaded gas, asbestos, and nicotine! And if too many people become aware of how free energy was demonstrated on that fateful day, there will be hell 😈 to pay.

http://mark-conlon.blogspot.com/2018/10/concerned-grandpa-steve-deak-resurfaces.html

Antonym
Antonym
Oct 22, 2018 4:34 AM

My main question on 9/11 stays: qui bono? Was the CIA / FBI / ?? so sure they could bend the fall out of this in their advantage? Did they have such a control over the media / government/ ?
A rational society could have concluded that the country’s national defend was crap and fired the responsible leaders: the US looked very vulnerable from the outside.

OHZ
OHZ
Oct 21, 2018 4:50 PM

Sad display in the comments here. I assume this is carefully planned to be off putting. I think it’d be better to let the books stand on their own and cut off the comments section. It’s nothing more than a vector for nonsense. Not one bit of good info has been left by the anonymous visitors here (be they honest researchers, interested people, trolls, or GCHQ officers – who knows?). Unlike the interesting article, near every bit of these comments serves to make the research community look like cranks and nitwits. Talk of space beams and mininukes, goofballs typing in… Read more »

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 21, 2018 9:02 PM
Reply to  OHZ

I agree with you wholeheartedly. The powers-that be do not want you to read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? They would rather have sock puppet clowns populate comments to dissuade honest people in search of the truth with talk of space beams, thermite and nukes. Nowhere in Dr. Wood’s book does she suggest space beams. Credible compassionate people like me who have read her book know this to be true. NOTE FROM ADMIN: Judy Wood suggested the hypothetical “beams” came from “space” on Jim Fetzer’s radio show, Novmber 11 2006. We have reminded the Mr Potter of this on five… Read more »

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 22, 2018 1:44 AM
Reply to  Editor

So what is your point other than assisting the powers-that-be with covering up the classified technology that dustified the WTC in mid-air never hitting the ground? Dr. Wood saying may be, might be, or could be on a program with Fetzer the clown is not forensic scientific evidence. That’s akin to it may, might, or could rain. It doesn’t mean it WILL rain. AGAIN I repeat to deaf ears that NOWHERE in Dr. Wood’s book does she make unfounded claims of “space beams”. There is a possibility that it will rain tomorrow. Then again, it might not rain. Those who… Read more »

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 22, 2018 10:26 AM
Reply to  Editor

So rather than acknowledge forensic evidence, you have made the conscious decision to resort to condescension directed against myself, Dr. Judy Wood, and Andrew Johnson instead of the position they are maintaining. Ignoring the truth, doesn’t change the truth. You may kill the messenger, but you can’t kill the message. (It’s your sandbox, so the offensive emoticons that trouble you and your alter ego so much are not used in this particular post. However, I do use them in other Internet psyop playgrounds.) “Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practice to deceive” Early on, Dr. Steven… Read more »

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 22, 2018 11:00 AM
Reply to  Thomas Potter

9/11 Wake Up This is your alarm! © 2012 Music, Lyrics, & Vocals by Charlie Pound https://youtu.be/IskN48CVLEI Verse 1: Where did the towers go? Away with the breeze that blows. And how much steel did they find? Could it be shipped in time? I don’t know I haven’t seen the receipt, but it doesn’t make sense to me! All those cars in a line, door handles and engines gone. I’d tell you if I could, but you need to ask Judy Wood. Before you accuse someone, you better make damn sure you know what was done! Chorus: Wake up! this… Read more »

manfromatlan
manfromatlan
Oct 17, 2018 3:20 PM

While it does appear that Wikipedia has blocked a page devoted to Dr, Judy Wood https://www.facebook.com/drjudywood/posts/this-is-a-screenshot-of-the-wikipedia-page-i-created-to-help-raise-public-awaren/926261794105114/ a perusal of the discussion pages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editor_assistance/Requests/Archive_5#Tagged_for_deletion turns up this gem

I have a vague recollection of an article by this very name being submitted and quickly deleted as advertising two or three months ago, so this may not be the first go-round.

p0000t
p0000t
Oct 17, 2018 10:43 AM

I don’t care. This has become a non productive hobby for nerds.I am quite ready to think that EITHER explanation is possible for the attack on the World Trade Centre: 1. retaliation by non Western victims, or 2. the US Government’s ‘Control By Terror’ state’. The US has created the terrorism in the world by its intrinsic policy of domination since its origin as a coloniser of Native American Lands and onward to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Anyone who wants the truth and the end of this international holocaust is to declare the United States a threat at every moment of… Read more »

MLS
MLS
Oct 17, 2018 11:51 AM
Reply to  p0000t

I always love it when someone pops up to say “9/11? Nah mate, just for nerds innit” Of course it is. What’s the diff if the government did it or not, right? Who cares if they set up the biggest false flag in recorded history, murdered 3,000 of their own citizens and then blamed it on al Qaeda as an excuse to murder millions more? The important thing is…I dunno…something else. Some generic idea about opposing imperialism maybe, something vague and unthreatening. Move on. Don’t think about 9/11. It’s old news. It doesn’t matter. IT DOESN’T MATTER.

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 17, 2018 12:07 PM
Reply to  p0000t

p0000t hit the nail on the head. George Bush’s grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany. How Bush’s grandfather helped Hitler’s rise to power https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar The epic story of how the Bushes took over America https://www.businessinsider.com/how-the-bush-family-rose-to-power-2015-3 George H. W. Bush’s career in politics began in 1963 when he was elected chairman of the Harris County, Texas Republican Party.[the year Democrat John F. Kennedy was eliminated from the political scene and later his brother Robert] https://www.biography.com/people/george-hw-bush-38066 George W. Bush was President during… Read more »

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 17, 2018 12:55 PM
Reply to  Editor

This is your sandbox. If you make the independent choice to cover-up the evidence of 9/11 and aid the powers-that-be, that’s on your conscience. My sense of right and wrong are elevated and I’m at peace with my being.

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 17, 2018 1:09 PM
Reply to  Editor

No, that’s your pointless game of kicking sand in the face of those who have read Dr. Wood’s book. . Read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? and do not rely on secondhand information [hearsay].
comment image

manfromatlan
manfromatlan
Oct 17, 2018 3:28 PM
Reply to  Editor

Agree with Admin. Exhortations to “read the book” or “see the video” and ‘do the research to prove my assertions’ leave me cold. If you can’t defend Dr. Wood’s hypotheses with data here, I’m not going to follow you down a rabbit hole elsewhere 🙂

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 17, 2018 3:55 PM
Reply to  Editor

Refuting the uninformed is a pointless waste of energy. People do not need you to tell them how and what to think. They can read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? themselves and do not have to depend on the uninformed opinions of others, unless your goal is to cover-up the evidence. I find it humorous when those who use argumentum ad hominem strategies often accuse others of the same without merit. Magic of the Heart Look from your heart and you will see the truth. Feel with your heart and you will know which way to go. Speak from your… Read more »

manfromatlan
manfromatlan
Oct 18, 2018 12:51 AM
Reply to  Thomas Potter

Yet here you are, telling people to “read the book” 🙂

Thomas Potter
Thomas Potter
Oct 18, 2018 1:14 PM
Reply to  manfromatlan

Yes, you finally understand that ignorance is a choice! Read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? and do not depend on the uninformed opinion of others. After “THE END,” [1984] Orwell includes another chapter, an appendix, called “The Principles of Newspeak.” Since it has the trappings of a tedious scholarly treatise, readers often skip the appendix. But it changes our whole understanding of the novel. Written from some unspecified point in the future, it suggests that Big Brother was eventually defeated. The victory is attributed not to individual rebels or to The Brotherhood, an anonymous resistance group, but rather to language… Read more »

manfromatlan
manfromatlan
Oct 17, 2018 3:01 PM
Reply to  p0000t

I agree with your conclusions 🙂

Enver Masud
Enver Masud
Sep 28, 2018 3:37 PM

FREE: 9/11 UNVEILED, 2nd ed —
http://www.twf.org/Library/911Unveiled.pdf
~ 125,000 sold/downloaded

Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
Sep 17, 2018 9:57 AM

What a shame, that once again the truth is obfuscated by yet another pair of gatekeepers who have allegedly written this book, and deliberately come to the wrong conclusions as to what brought the towers down on 911. The reviewer should have prepared himself better before putting his endorsement to this book, and if he had read ” Where Did The Towers Go?” by Dr. Judy Wood, he would have spotted the glaring mistakes in this tome, and thrown this book into the bin where it belongs. Two immediate facts destroy the veracity of the book, the first being that… Read more »

Admin
Admin
Sep 17, 2018 10:44 AM

Are you Andrew Johnson perchance? If Wood wants her hypothesis taken seriously she knows what she needs to do. Until a peer-reviewed paper is produced on the subject of how DEWs could have taken down the WTCs it remains, of necessity, pure speculation. No point lamenting the lack of scientific credibility attached to her ideas if she refuses to follow the scientific methodology and submit her ideas to peer review in the accepted form. While on the subject can you tell us how we get to talk to Wood in person, or why this Johnson character (you?) acts like her… Read more »

andrewjohnson911
andrewjohnson911
Sep 17, 2018 3:07 PM
Reply to  Admin

Anthony Williams posted a comment on here. The response from “Admin” mentioned my name. I can confirm that Anthony Williams is not me. I can also confirm that Dr Judy Wood submitted her research in a Court Case in 2007. This is much more serious than peer review, as it means one could go to prison for using false information. (I also submitted an affidavit for the case). If you are interested in finding the truth, this information is easily available – as are my contact details via http://www.checktheevidence.com/. In short, the towers did not burn up, nor did they… Read more »

manfromatlan
manfromatlan
Oct 17, 2018 2:49 PM

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Judy_Wood#Legal_actions On 25 April 2007 Wood was Plaintiff/Relator in a qui tam[note 3] petition to The United States District Court, Southern District of New York. In the nature of the Qui tam process, she was acting on behalf of the United States of America. She named a list of 23 respondents headed by Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA) and Science Applications International Corp.(SAIC)[9]. The petition claimed that the respondents acted fraudulently in giving advice to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) during their investigation of the destruction of the World Trade Center towers. The Statement of Case included… Read more »

phahrenheit451
phahrenheit451
Sep 18, 2018 11:13 AM

http://www1.ae911truth.org/faqs/646-faq-8-what-is-nanothermite-could-it-have-been-used-to-demolish-the-wtc-skyscrapers.html Thermite produces a blinding white light. The towers did not light up like sparklers on the Fourth of July! 😁 If they found chocolate chip cookie 🍪 crumbs in the dust would that be the cause of destruction? 😁 Let me introduce you to Dr. J. Douglas Beason https://web.archive.org/web/20180823222442/https://www.af.mil/DesktopModules/ArticleCS/Print.aspx?PortalId=1&ModuleId=858&Article=108539 New weapons and how they may change war subject of talk Thursday at Museum Light-wave energy in the same spectrum of energy found in home appliances may soon be used in a new generation of weapons. On Thursday, the Laboratory’s Associate Director for Threat Reduction, Douglas Beason, will talk about… Read more »

Admin
Admin
Sep 22, 2018 8:24 PM
Reply to  phahrenheit451

@phahrenheit451 – we have already pointed out to you that Judy Wood DID claim the theorised beam came from ‘space’ back in Nov 2006 on James Fetzer’s radio show. Your allegation this is a misrepresentation by Dr Jones is a falsehood and you know it, yet you still repeat it.

Please do not allege this lie on here again.

phahrenheit451
phahrenheit451
Sep 22, 2018 11:40 PM
Reply to  Admin

Dr. Wood does not present a theory. She presents evidence that leads to ONE conclusion. A discussion with agent Fetzer 🤡 is just hearsay 🗣️ and is not admissable in court. However, ignoring all the overwhelming, conclusive, and indisputable evidence that Dr. Wood presents 📖 while focusing on “spacebeams” is a form of a cover-up. The only people this benefits are those that committed the crimes of 9/11. Just the mention of “spacebeams” reveals who those people are.

Admin
Admin
Sep 22, 2018 11:48 PM
Reply to  phahrenheit451

Stop this nonsense. Wood was the first to mention ‘beams’ from ‘space.’ Your claims that she didn’t do so are a lie. You’re free to repeat that lie elsewhere but if you do it here it will be removed.

phahrenheit451
phahrenheit451
Sep 23, 2018 12:21 AM
Reply to  Admin

Those who control the energy ⚡ control the people. 👥 But those who control their perception 💻 control everything. Douglas Beason would be proud of you❗Keep up the good work. The powers-that-be are counting on you.😀

Norman Pilon
Norman Pilon
Sep 23, 2018 3:23 AM
Reply to  Editor

Is this the Judy Wood’s we are talking about?

andrewjohnson911
andrewjohnson911
Sep 23, 2018 1:15 PM
Reply to  Norman Pilon

The overwhelming implausibility of Norman Pilon – who has no clue that this interview has an ambush interview and, not only that, Dr Gregory S Jenkins agrees that most of the building turned to dust (or didn’t you hear that part?)

Back story – which people like you won’t include or reference – because, you are, most likely, as dishonest as Greg Jenkins.

It’s OK – that article is only 11 years old.http://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2007/07/31/debunkingenergy/

phahrenheit451
phahrenheit451
Sep 23, 2018 5:13 PM
Reply to  Norman Pilon

Why insert doubt where no doubt exists? Because the evidence Dr. Wood presents is so damning to the powers that be. This is another form of a cover-up. Try a more effective type of cover-up. I’m getting borded with the all the worn-out ones that have been used for many years. Be creative and try something new❗ 🤡

Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
Sep 23, 2018 7:32 PM
Reply to  Editor

You say that the evidence for explosives has been presented “scientifically ” and peer reviewed . This comment is arrogant and misleading. What does “scientific ” mean exactly ? Does it for example, mean ignoring facts ? Such as half a million tonnes of steel hitting the deck with hardly a seismic signal ? and the building fabric and contents turning to disassociated molecular dust and floating away into the clear blue sky ? Peer review by whom ? Actors pretending to know about how to turn buildings and steel into particles not much bigger than nano sized and then… Read more »

phahrenheit451
phahrenheit451
Sep 23, 2018 7:24 PM
Reply to  Editor

The super-duper nanothermite 💥 cover-up is old and boring. 💤 Try a new cover-up theory. Why not claim Kryptonite dustified the WTC into particles smaller than red blood cells by gray lizard aliens 👽❓❓❓🤡

Anthony Williams
Anthony Williams
Sep 24, 2018 9:30 AM
Reply to  Editor

The invitation that you offer, to write a paper about “space beams” bringing down buildings, is a distraction from the fact that the reviewer of this book has shamefully endorsed a work of fiction claiming that it is an erudite piece of research. The categories chosen for the research are telling in their inadequate selection, with subject matter such as ” Osama Bin Laden” , “phone calls on 911 Flights ” ” Insider Trading” being examples of obfuscation and distraction. The subject that might have caused all the so called “experts” to ponder for a long time, would have been… Read more »

hsaive
hsaive
Sep 22, 2018 8:07 PM

Judy Wood is an agent

andrewjohnson911
andrewjohnson911
Sep 23, 2018 1:16 PM
Reply to  hsaive

Harold Saive is an agent. It must be true – because I said so… right? Look at the 9/11 evidence for heaven’s sake! What’s wrong with people? http://www.drjudywood.com/wp/

Admin
Admin
Sep 23, 2018 4:04 PM

While we would not suggest Wood is ‘an agent’, and we don’t consider such ad hom helpful, it’s only fair to point out that in the past you have made similar allegations/implications about others, and used inaccurate or misleading evidence to do so.

You can’t rationally complain of receiving treatment you’ve already dished out.

Laurence James Howell
Laurence James Howell
Sep 13, 2018 4:55 PM

Dear Sir, 911 was the catalysing event to foment war against the Muslims. "If your not with us you are with the terrorists", and with these words Bush the Simple consigned millions to death and misery. Why? because General Albert Pike, the senior Freemason in the US had written in his book Morals and Dogma 1882, that the third world war would be arranged so that unlike WW l and WW ll which ware wars of ideology the third, last and most destructive would be a clash of civilisations Islam v Christianity. The destruction of the seven countries, slated for… Read more »

nwwoods
nwwoods
Sep 13, 2018 3:27 AM

I have always been curious as to why all the local security cam footage from gas stations etc. around the Pentagon immediately seized by the FBI has remained sequestered for 17 years as though it were a national security secret that would put lives at risk if publicized. To date only one example footage has been released in which the nature of the “aircraft” is entirely indiscernible.

Adam Fitzgerald
Adam Fitzgerald
Nov 15, 2018 7:37 AM
Reply to  nwwoods

If you only knew what you were talking about, but you dont.

Yr Hen Gof
Yr Hen Gof
Sep 12, 2018 2:56 PM

Interestingly described on Amazon.com (US) as ‘Out of Print’, available here in GB.

Alan M
Alan M
Sep 12, 2018 6:43 PM
Reply to  Yr Hen Gof

Where from?! – ‘Normally ships withing 1-2 months’ from Amazon UK…available second hand (allegedly) from someone in Poland ‘only two copies left’!! WTF is going on??

Butties
Butties
Sep 20, 2018 9:18 PM
Reply to  Editor

Yo Admin, do not forget to remind us all when this happens. Thanks in advance!

Admin
Admin
Sep 22, 2018 8:15 PM
Reply to  Butties

We are monitoring the situation. Amazon is now listing availability on October 6. We have no explanation currently for the delay. Amazon apparently has the book in stock but its order page is not reflecting this.

The book is available for purchase now directly from the publisher. We’ll provide a link to that in an update of the article.

911truthNow 1 (@911_TruthNow)
911truthNow 1 (@911_TruthNow)
Sep 12, 2018 10:07 AM

Should we forget 9/11 BBC prematurely announcing Collapse WTC7 After Explosions? Truth Movement Forgot!

Hugh O'Neill
Hugh O'Neill
Sep 12, 2018 2:33 AM

Firstly, I cannot thank Offguardian enough for blitzing this most patently False Flag crime of the century. Edward Curtin has done a superb review of this wonderful book. I admit, I have not had time to read all the articles and comments yet but I would offer this thought (my apologies if other have already). It appears that the whole 9/11 scenario was carefully scripted: the 1998 “academic paper” entitled “Catastrophic Terrorism” written by Zelikow, Carter & Deutz positively lusts after another Pearl Harbor event which kills thousands and permits wars of choice and the removal of domestic liberties (apologies… Read more »

Gary Corseri
Gary Corseri
Sep 11, 2018 9:52 PM

As I began to read thru this article by always-impressive Edward Curtin, what first struck me and impelled me to read further was this: “The authors of this essential book, David Ray Griffin and Elizabeth Woodworth, and all their colleagues who have contributed to this volume, have long been at the front lines trying to wake people up to the real news about 9/11. They have battled against three U.S. presidents, a vast propaganda machine “strangely” allied with well-known leftists, and a corporate mass media intent on serving deep-state interests, all of whom have used illogic, lies, and pseudo-science to… Read more »

Bernardo1871
Bernardo1871
Sep 11, 2018 11:36 AM
Sean O Braonain
Sean O Braonain
Sep 11, 2018 10:54 AM

Some of the best work unmasking the official 9/11 conspiracy theory is to be found at Ryan Dawson’s site http://www.ancreport.com/ryan-dawson/ He focuses his attention on a thorough analysis of the redacted police interviews of various Mossad connected individuals arrested in NY after the event and later (of course) safely repatriated to Israel, where some even felt free to brag on live TV about their foreknowledge of the attack. Some of these were caught in possession of explosives on the day, some had been seen gleefully waiting with their video cameras in a suitable vantage point minutes before the first tower… Read more »

flaxgirl
flaxgirl
Sep 11, 2018 9:27 AM

Yes, they’ve done a great job, however, the claim that 3,000 died and 6,000 were injured on 9/11 were injured needs investigation.

elenits
elenits
Sep 25, 2018 9:45 PM
Reply to  flaxgirl

Flax girl – Can you say something more about this?

vexarb
vexarb
Sep 11, 2018 7:27 AM

Curtin`s review gets my vote. As for Oddis, he can first “virulently” oppose as in his review of two years ago, or come round to thinking it’s time to sit on the fence as in his present review, and so on by gradual progression for as long as he likes. Meanwhile, reality grinds on.

“The truth rarely, if ever, convinces its opponents; it simply outlives them”. — “Mad” Max Planck, physicist.

rilme
rilme
Sep 11, 2018 6:32 AM

That’s a good review. You should dump the first two.

binra
binra
Sep 10, 2018 10:34 PM

“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals itself as a jarring dissonance.”
~ Alan Bullock, in Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives

The ability to pull so many strings in both planning and executing the event and its controlled narrative is a proclamation of power. Broad spectrum dominance from the inside out.

paulcarline
paulcarline
Sep 10, 2018 9:15 PM

Haven’t read this yet – but I do hope they demolished the idea of any hijacked planes hitting any buildings. ‘No planes’ is not theory, but demonstrable fact.

Stephen Sivonda
Stephen Sivonda
Sep 11, 2018 5:35 AM
Reply to  paulcarline

Paulcarline, I’ve been over the years skeptical of the whole original story. Over time , reading the many articles and youtube videos…it has garnered my opinion that it was a pack of lies. About 5 years back I joined the AE911truth.org group.. Just recently I saw a post about the picture of a jet engine lying on the sidewalk outside the building before it came down I recognized that picture as the same one I originally saw about 5 years ago. Back then I recognized it as NOT belonging to the model of the plane that purportedly crashed into the… Read more »

bill
bill
Sep 11, 2018 12:04 PM

Certainly excellent testimony of what is yet another glaring hole in the official narrative, a 747 P and W engine represented as belonging to a 767 (and certainly not from Flight 11, a GE CF6) …..

911truthNow 1 (@911_TruthNow)
911truthNow 1 (@911_TruthNow)
Sep 12, 2018 10:09 AM

Check out my NIST Drone photos