Please Remember Not to Vote

PS: Those who want the short response can always start at the last para. The conventions of the mind are not rigidly set rules. Be free to alight in a vote for freedom from false framed definitions that seem real by reaction but lack substance.

I don’t recognize the charge against me of ‘cognitive infiltration’ but I do recognize that infiltration, funding and subversion of any movement of being renders it a proxy force or captured opposition. Therefore I an vigilant against deceits and write in the willingness to undo them.

I also see this in the reframing of the meanings of others by which to smear and invalidate them from ‘debate’ made famous by Kathy Newman’s; “so you’re saying..so you’re saying..”so you’re saying..” when none of her reframing of what Peterson said were true of what he said but were intent and attempt to trick reaction by which to invalidate him and his critiques of false thinking running a destructive agenda. Such is the pretence of communication for the purpose of framing what can be allowed to be said.

“Everyone’s guilty so no one’s guilty” has no resonance with ‘new age’ but is what I associate with normalising guilt as the human condition rather than active conditioning – (eg: the agenda for a carbon tax economy under ‘Green’ Fascism). Systemic guilt is simply a matter of power struggle as the basis of its distribution, and so you have the bankers & co, redistributing consequence of un-faced and unowned guilted-consequence onto the population at large and of course the living environment in general.

The voting system generally works as a vote AGAINST a perceived evil rather than for a genuine alignment of heart and mind – and as a manipulation of fear. But the perception of evil is also worked as the identity management of those who love to hate the bad guys as a way to believe they are the good guys.
The politics of hate, cynicism and manipulation of guilt are all dependent upon the mindset of unowned and un-faced fear and guilt – projected upon the other as if to kill it with the denial or invalidation of the other.

Paradoxically perhaps, the owning and facing of our own denied self, emotion and thought, meets the experience of waking as freedom from its tyranny. Guilt-lessness or a true Innocence of being, is a sanctity of being that can be ‘covered over’ by engaging in personal conflict or self-attack, but never truly lost. But this is not something that can be manipulated, weaponised, claimed, possessed or marketised – excepting as fake news – because it is the nature of ‘giving to have’ instead of ‘getting to get rid of’. This is the vote for the living or the dead – but who associates giving with anything but loss – unless giving ‘in order to GET’. However, ideas are strengthened by giving and sharing them and so the ideas we give and receive are the determiners of the world we perceive and the meanings we give – and take from it.

As for me being a government agent of disinformation. I have the same sense of mulga – for how better to serve the ‘zionasti’ agenda of domination by guilting-deceit’, than to rant and rail as he does? But whether he does this for pay, as a volunteer, or a ‘useful idiot’, he is still a fellow being and not the role.

Private mythologies personify the forces and relations of invested idea in the world. It is like a ‘soap drama’ in which people identify and engage in even into sickness, war and death. But it isn’t a true appreciation of what is truly here and so I do not join with ‘evil’ agendas excepting to use them as an illumination of the ideas, definitions, beliefs and self convicting fears that underlie them.

I am an agency of governance in that as I elect to accept a true governance in place of tyranny, be that tyranny overt or covert, I live and give witness into the whole as a living vote cast. There is a way of listening within, that uncovers a peace of being in which and from which we are guided truly instead of misguided by the carrot and stick of lack and fear. There is also an integrative nature to the living that shares qualities that a quantitative manipulation cannot see or know. Truly conscious being is not a mind-capture and no matter how many are aligned in a disintegrity, it does not become true by consensus or by official edict.

Communication by invitation is different than assertions of framing deceits. The deceit must ALWAYS appeal to a sense of self-lack and division, guilt and fear. In true discernment there is no call or need to investigate every branch of an argument down to its roots to know it is without true foundation. And yet this is NOT a personal demonisation or invalidation of the fool or the fooled but the capacity to illuminate the nature of the folly to the recognition of wisdom in a true founded appreciation.

That humankind is collectively engaged and entangled in destructive folly is fuelled and locked in by the personal drive of ‘self-vindicating’ vengeance. I understand that you feel enraged, but I suggest that Law of a just outcome is not served by giving power to the grievance, any more than by giving power to the perpetration of lawless intent. But it is served by giving a true hearing to all concerned. At this time, our human laws are often subverted or corrupted to serve the power-cartels of those who take power by making powerless and so the law has to be held in the hearts of the people and lived from the ground up as a re-alignment in the desire for true – rather than the persistence of a destructive insanity.

The deceiver will suggest that the enemy of your feared outcome is your friend – but you might guess you are being gamed. However the onus or responsibility is not on those who seek to find reinforcement for their lack of substance, but on you for being un-watchful of your mind to be so phished.

The worship of evil under the reaction of an opposition to it, is the power to assert and believe anything at all – and enact it upon yourself, your sister, brother and world in a righteousness… that attempts to expunge an inner fear on an outer realm of relation.

Evil is another facet of guilt and sin – that is protected from exposure and undoing, by assigning to special hates of attack, and further protected by joining in special ‘loves’ of conditional bubble identities of relationship by which to mask over, hide and deny the ugliness of special hate.
Nothing is ever truly brought to light by blame. Nothing is ever truly healed by shame and nothing is ever truly corrected by pain. But of course we have to grow light within what is currently running in order to see from a willingness FOR light – instead of a fear of exposure to guilt, pain and loss in such a light.

I vote for an alternative to a mind-control – under penalty of such disincentives, by accepting and joining a true movement of love – by bringing willingness for love’s awareness, instead of blind emotionally driven reaction. Unified purpose is no split mind – but unity is of free will and not of struggle to coerce, dominate and rule the mind (that then rules you).

The arguments against ‘debate or dialogue’ are always assertions of invalidating judgement.
So all one has to do to ‘defend against’ the unwanted or inconvenient truth is assert and accuse sin in another – as the first claim in giving the ‘word’ or setting the narrative.

Dear Neil, why ‘must’ comments be framed by the assertion of the article – as if that is the only way of thinking or seeing the idea of ‘vote, choice or voice’.
A false framed choice is NO choice but presents AS IF making a difference while ensuring nothing really changes.

I have repeatedly indicated in many comments that we live and vote FROM a premise that is our true freedom once uncovered AS a recognition OF freedom. But ‘this kingdom’ is not IN the world of invested power struggle, being a sovereign will.

The phishing of identity theft is the false flag of reaction – perhaps in seeking a self inflation – to be made ‘great’ again, but more often against evils that must be checked or denied.

With regard to the apparent dilemma of such a world I refer to Jesus’ differentiation of God and Caesar. I know ‘God’ is not lingua franca in such an enlightened age (sic) but to give what is due unto God and all that is true is to disinvest according and assigning it to Caesar – in ‘Rome’ or in the reactions of a like kind in our own heart.

Engaging with a lie and the father of it is not witnessing to truth so much as trying to bring truth into the ‘war’. Rather than bringing the ‘war’ to true account.

Why you do what you do is the purpose or desire that is given permission and joined with, and strengthened by ‘teaching and learning’ it. To vote first for a true awareness is only possible in the recognition of a mind of deceit. So withdrawing from the FRAME of a false thinking is the opening of receptivity to the movement of the true within you. This is is opposite to everything we have learned – in the world – of the intent to determine truth or make true what we think we want – or fear not to align in.

Freedom is not in ruling the forms that actions and outcomes take, but in recognising and aligning true, for the freedom to be you is the basis of all else. ‘Steal a kingdom and they call you king’ applies to the mind-capture even more than a coup d’etat.

Waking up to deceit is not at first completely dis – illusioned because the mind is the ingenuity by which to persist in a ‘new’ version of the same old lie.

By all means do or do not vote in any moment of thought word and deed that is yours to be, but do not accord yourself ‘power’ or ‘powerlessness’ thereby or you will believe it and suffer it as real.

I invite aligning in what speaks and moves you truly – to your willingness and desire for truth. Identity set against a corrupt and corrupting system of thought is still framed in terms of an evil. A true identification is not an attempt to self-validate the self-lacking, but a shared sense of true worth.

In a guilty world there seems nothing worthy EXCEPT to fight against the greater evil. But guilt is a personal conviction that drives the attempt to put it out on someone else.

Please notice you are always joining with truth or with illusion as the self from which you give, live and act in your relationships. I do not have to specify the choice you will make when you are awake to the true nature of what you are choosing between. No one chooses meaninglessness that is revealed AS meaningless – and yes we can and do give our perception of the world all the meaning it has for us.

Those who see the futility already see it, and those who yet cling to hope such a conflict can have a ‘victory’ persist in it. You do not need to ‘tell’ everyone what they already know or refuse yet to accept – and yet of course you can share and strengthen a witness for freedom from false framed futility – without giving power to the deceit.

The extension of any loving act is never wasted. But if it has strings attached, conditions to be met or hidden agenda in mind, then it is not love but coercion. Can those whose presentation is a deceit of their own convictions be extended love for who they ARE – and not reinforcement for what they are not and can never be?

Love is the capacity to recognize what is Real in any and every circumstance. I have learned or acquired the conditioning to a very different self and world. But I no longer invest it with R Reality.

In the UK an MP is also a representative to their constituents and some are clearly more active in taking up the cause of those who seek their help than others. Some issues may stand out as worthy of adding my voice to – irrespective of the Big Picture. Particularly where there is a willingness to ‘speak truth to power’.

The unfolding ‘script’ of the World Drama is firstly the perspective from which to see it. The mind-in-reaction, framed in guilt and fear, sees nothing true. The manipulation of the mind is a choice. Learn to notice when we align in such a choice or are about to – and vote for freedom by giving as we would in truth receive.