What the Press Hides From You About Venezuela A Case of News-Suppression All Across the Mainstream Media

Eric Zuesse

Alfred de Zayas, human rights lawyer & UN independent expert on international order. His report on Venezuela has been buried by the MSM


This news-report is being submitted to all US and allied news-media, and is being published by all honest ones, in order to inform you of crucial facts that the others — the dishonest ones, who hide such crucial facts — are hiding about Venezuela. These are facts that have received coverage only in one single British newspaper: the Independent, which published a summary account of them on January 26th. That newspaper’s account will be excerpted here at the end, but first will be highlights from its topic, the official report to the UN General Assembly in August of last year, which has been covered-up ever since. This is why that report’s author has now gone to the Independent, desperate to get the story out, finally, to the public.


On 3 August 2018, the UN’s General Assembly received the report from the UN’s Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order, concerning his mission to Venezuela and Ecuador. His recent travel though both countries focused on “how best to enhance the enjoyment of all human rights by the populations of both countries.”

He “noted the eradication of illiteracy, free education from primary school to university, and programmes to reduce extreme poverty, provide housing to the homeless and vulnerable, phase out privilege and discrimination, and extend medical care to everyone.”

He noted “that the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, and Ecuador, both devote around 70 per cent of their national budgets to social services.” However (and here, key paragraphs from the report are now quoted):

22. Observers have identified errors committed by the Chávez and Maduro Governments, noting that there are too many ideologues and too few technocrats in public administration, resulting in government policies that lack coherence and professional management and discourage domestic investment, already crippled by inefficiency and corruption, which extend to government officials, transnational corporations and entrepreneurs. Critics warn about the undue influence of the military on government and on the running of enterprises like Petróleos de Venezuela. The lack of regular, publicly available data on nutrition, epidemiology and inflation are said to complicate efforts to provide humanitarian support.

23. Meanwhile, the Attorney General, Tarek Saab, has launched a vigorous anticorruption campaign, investigating the links between Venezuelan enterprises and tax havens, contracting scams, and deals by public officials with Odebrecht. It is estimated that corruption in the oil industry has cost the Government US$ 4.8 billion. The Attorney General’s Office informed the Independent Expert of pending investigations for embezzlement and extortion against 79 officials of Petróleos de Venezuela, including 22 senior managers. The Office also pointed to the arrest of two high-level oil executives, accused of money-laundering in Andorra. The Ministry of Justice estimates corruption losses at some US$ 15 billion. Other stakeholders, in contrast, assert that anti-corruption programmes are selective and have not sufficiently targeted State institutions, including the military.

29. …Over the past sixty years, non-conventional economic wars have been waged against Cuba, Chile, Nicaragua, the Syrian Arab Republic and the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela in order to make their economies fail, facilitate regime change and impose a neo-liberal socioeconomic model. In order to discredit selected governments, failures in the field of human rights are maximized so as to make violent overthrow more palatable. Human rights are being “weaponized” against rivals. Yet, human rights are the heritage of every human being and should never be instrumentalized as weapons of demonization.

30. The principles of non-intervention and non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign States belong to customary international law and have been reaffirmed in General Assembly resolutions, notably [a list is supplied].

31. In its judgment of 27 June 1986 concerning Nicaragua v. United States, the International Court of Justice quoted from [UN] resolution 2625 (XXV): “no State shall organize, assist, foment, finance, incite or tolerate subversive, terrorist or armed activities directed towards the violent overthrow of the regime of another State, or interfere in civil strife in another State”.

36. The effects of sanctions imposed by Presidents Obama and Trump and unilateral measures by Canada and the European Union have directly and indirectly aggravated the shortages in medicines such as insulin and anti-retroviral drugs. To the extent that economic sanctions have caused delays in distribution and thus contributed to many deaths, sanctions contravene the human rights obligations of the countries imposing them.Moreover, sanctions can amount to crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. An investigation by that Court would be appropriate, but the geopolitical submissiveness of the Court may prevent this.

37. Modern-day economic sanctions and blockades are comparable with medieval sieges of towns with the intention of forcing them to surrender. Twenty-first century sanctions attempt to bring not just a town, but sovereign countries to their knees. A difference, perhaps, is that twenty-first century sanctions are accompanied by the manipulation of public opinion through “fake news”, aggressive public relations and a pseudo-human rights rhetoric so as to give the impression that a human rights “end” justifies the criminal means.

39. Economic asphyxiation policies are comparable to those already practised in Chile, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Nicaragua and the Syrian Arab Republic. In January 2018, Middle East correspondent of The Financial Times and The Independent, Patrick Cockburn, wrote on the sanctions affecting Syria: There is usually a pretence that foodstuffs and medical equipment are being allowed through freely and no mention is made of the financial and other regulatory obstacles making it impossible to deliver them. An example of this is the draconian sanctions imposed on Syria by the US and EU which were meant to target President Bashar al-Assad and help remove him from power. They have wholly failed to do this, but a UN internal report leaked in 2016 shows all too convincingly the effect of the embargo in stopping the delivery of aid by international aid agencies. They cannot import the aid despite waivers because banks and commercial companies dare not risk being penalised for having anything to do with Syria. The report quotes a European doctor working in Syria as saying that “the indirect effect of sanctions … makes the import of the medical instruments and other medical supplies immensely difficult, near impossible”. In short: economic sanctions kill.

41. Bearing in mind that Venezuelan society is polarized, what is most needed is dialogue between the Government and the opposition, and it would be a noble task on the part of the Secretary-General of the United Nations to offer his good offices for such a dialogue. Yet, opposition leaders Antonio Ledezma and Julio Borges, during a trip through Europe to denounce the Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, called for further sanctions as well as a military “humanitarian intervention”.

44. Although the situation in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela has not yet reached the humanitarian crisis threshold, there is hunger, malnutrition, anxiety, anguish and emigration. What is crucial is to study the causes of the crisis, including neglected factors of sanctions, sabotage, hoarding, black market activities, induced inflation and contraband in food and medicines.

45. The “crisis” in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is an economic crisis, which cannot be compared with the humanitarian crises in Gaza, Yemen, Libya, the Syrian Arab Republic, Iraq, Haiti, Mali, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Somalia, or Myanmar, among others. It is significant that when, in 2017, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela requested medical aid from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, the plea was rejected, because it ”is still a high-income country … and as such is not eligible”.

46. It is pertinent to recall the situation in the years prior to the election of Hugo Chávez. 118 Corruption was ubiquitous and in 1993, President Carlos Pérez was removed because of embezzlement. The Chávez election in 1998 reflected despair with the corruption and neo-liberal policies of the 1980s and 1990s, and rejection of the gulf between the super-rich and the abject poor.

47. Participatory democracy in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, called “protagónica”, is anchored in the Constitution of 1999 and relies on frequent elections and referendums. During the mission, the Independent Expert exchanged views with the Electoral Commission and learned that in the 19 years since Chávez, 25 elections and referendums had been conducted, 4 of them observed by the Carter Center. The Independent Expert met with the representative of the Carter Center in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, who recalled Carter’s positive assessment of the electoral system. They also discussed the constitutional objections raised by the opposition to the referendum held on 30 July 2017, resulting in the creation of a Constitutional Assembly. Over 8 million Venezuelans voted in the referendum, which was accompanied by international observers, including from the Council of Electoral Specialists of Latin America.

48. An atmosphere of intimidation accompanied the mission, attempting to pressure the Independent Expert into a predetermined matrix. He received letters from NGOs asking him not to proceed because he was not the “relevant” rapporteur, and almost dictating what should be in the report. Weeks before his arrival, some called the mission a “fake investigation”. Social media insults bordered on “hate speech” and “incitement”. Mobbing before, during and after the mission bore a resemblance to the experience of two American journalists who visited the country in July 2017. Utilizing platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, critics questioned the Independent Expert’s integrity and accused him of bias, demonstrating a culture of intransigence and refusal to accept the duty of an independent expert to be neutral, objective, dispassionate and to apply his expertise free of external pressures.

67. The Independent Expert recommends that the General Assembly:

  • (g) Invoke article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations and refer the following questions to the International Court of Justice: Can unilateral coercive measures be compatible with international law? Can unilateral coercive measures amount to crimes against humanity when a large number of persons perish because of scarcity of food and medicines? What reparations are due to the victims of sanctions? Do sanctions and currency manipulations constitute geopolitical crimes?
  • (h) Adopt a resolution along the lines of the resolutions on the United States embargo against Cuba, declaring the sanctions against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela contrary to international law and human rights law. …

70. The Independent Expert recommends that the International Criminal Court investigate the problem of unilateral coercive measures that cause death from malnutrition, lack of medicines and medical equipment.

72. The Independent Expert recommends that, until the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court address the lethal outcomes of economic wars and sanctions regimes, the Permanent Peoples Tribunal, the Russell Tribunal and the Kuala Lumpur War Crimes Commission undertake the task so as to facilitate future judicial pronouncements.

On January 26th, Britain’s Independent headlined “Venezuela crisis: Former UN rapporteur says US sanctions are killing citizens”, and Michael Selby-Green reported that:

The first UN rapporteur to visit Venezuela for 21 years has told The Independent the US sanctions on the country are illegal and could amount to “crimes against humanity” under international law.

Former special rapporteur Alfred de Zayas, who finished his term at the UN in March, has criticized the US for engaging in “economic warfare” against Venezuela which he said is hurting the economy and killing Venezuelans.

The comments come amid worsening tensions in the country after the US and UK have backed Juan Guaido, who appointed himself “interim president” of Venezuela as hundreds of thousands marched to support him….

The US Treasury has not responded to a request for comment on Mr de Zayas’s allegations of the effects of the sanctions programme.

US sanctions prohibit dealing in currencies issued by the Venezuelan government. They also target individuals, and stop US-based companies or people from buying and selling new debt issued by PDVSA or the government.

The US has previously defended its sanctions on Venezuela, with a senior US official saying in 2018: “The fact is that the greatest sanction on Venezuelan oil and oil production is called Nicolas Maduro, and PDVSA’s inefficiencies,” referring to the state-run oil body, Petroleos de Venezuela, SA.

Mr De Zayas’s findings are based on his late-2017 mission to the country and interviews with 12 Venezuelan government minsters, opposition politicians, 35 NGOs working in the country, academics, church officials, activists, chambers of commerce and regional UN agencies.

The US imposed new sanctions against Venezuela on 9 March 2015, when President Barack Obama issued executive order 13692, declaring the country a threat to national security.

The sanctions have since intensified under Donald Trump, who has also threatened military invasion and discussed a coup….

Despite being the first UN official to visit and report from Venezuela in 21 years, Mr de Zayas said his research into the causes of the country’s economic crisis has so far largely been ignored by the UN and the media, and caused little debate within the Human Rights Council.

He believes his report has been ignored because it goes against the popular narrative that Venezuela needs regime change.

The then UN high commissioner, Zeid Raad Al Hussein, reportedly refused to meet Mr de Zayas after the visit, and the Venezuela desk of the UN Human Rights Council also declined to help with his work after his return despite being obliged to do so, Mr de Zayas claimed….

Ivan Briscoe, Latin America and Caribbean programme director for Crisis Group, an international NGO, told The Independent that Venezuela is a polarising subject. … Briscoe is critical of Mr de Zayas’s report because it highlights US economic warfare but in his view neglects to mention the impact of a difficult business environment in the country. … Briscoe acknowledged rising tensions and the likely presence of US personnel operating covertly in the country…

Eugenia Russian, president of FUNDALATIN, one of the oldest human rights NGOs in Venezuela, founded in 1978 before the Chavez and Maduro governments and with special consultative status at the UN, spoke to The Independent on the significance of the sanctions…

“In contact with the popular communities, we consider that one of the fundamental causes of the economic crisis in the country is the effect that the unilateral coercive sanctions that are applied in the economy, especially by the government of the United States,” Ms Russian said.

She said there may also be causes from internal errors, but said probably few countries in the world have suffered an “economic siege” like the one Venezuelans are living under…

In his report, Mr de Zayas expressed concern that those calling the situation a “humanitarian crisis” are trying to justify regime change and that human rights are being “weaponised” to discredit the government and make violent overthrow more “palatable”…

Venezuela has the largest oil reserves in the world and an abundance of other natural resources including gold, bauxite and coltan. But under the Maduro government they’re not easily accessible to US and transnational corporations.

US oil companies had large investments in Venezuela in the early 20th century but were locked out after Venezuelans voted to nationalise the industry in 1973.

Other than readers of that single newspaper, where has the public been able to find these facts? If the public can have these facts hidden from them, then how much trust should the public reasonably have in the government, and in the news-media?

Important Notes

Zeid Raad Al Hussein, who “reportedly refused to meet Mr de Zayas after the visit,” is Prince Zeid Raad Al Hussein, a Jordanian Prince. Jordan is a vassal-state in the US empire. But Prince Hussein is a Jordanian diplomat who served as United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2014 to 2018 — hardly an unbiased or independent person in such a supposedly nonpartisan role.

Here is the garbage that a reader comes to, who is trying to find online Mr. de Zayas’s report on this matter. As intended, the document remains effectively hidden to the present day. Perhaps the UN needs to be replaced and located in Venezuela, Iran, or some other country that’s targeted for take-over by the people who effectively own the United States Government and control the UN’s bureaucracy. The hiding of this document was done not only by the press but by the UN itself.

On January 23rd, Germany’s Die Zeit headlined “Christoph Flügge: ‘I am deeply disturbed’: The UN International Criminal Court Judge Christoph Flügge Accuses Western Nations of Threatening the Independence of the Judges”. Flügge especially cited US President Trump’s agent, John Bolton. That same day, the Democratic Party and Labour Party organ, Britain’s Guardian, bannered “International criminal court: UN court judge quits The Hague citing political interference”.

This news-report said that, “A senior judge has resigned from one of the UN’s international courts in The Hague citing ‘shocking’ political interference from the White House and Turkey.” The judge especially criticised Bolton:

The American security adviser held his speech at a time when The Hague was planning preliminary investigations into American soldiers who had been accused of torturing people in Afghanistan. The American threats against international judges clearly show the new political climate. It is shocking. I had never heard such a threat.” Flügge said that the judges on the court had been “stunned” that “the US would roll out such heavy artillery.”

Flügge told the Guardian: “It is consistent with the new American line: ‘We are No 1 and we stand above the law’.”

On February 6th, a former UK Ambassador to Syria vented at an alt-news site, 21st Century Wire (since he couldn’t get any of the major-media sites to publish it), “A Guide to Decoding the Doublespeak on Syria”, and he brazenly exposed there the Doublespeak-Newspeak that the US Government and press (what he called America’s “frothing neocons and their liberal interventionist fellow travellers”) apply in order to report the ‘news’ about Syria.

So: how can the public, in a country such as the US, democratically control the Government, if the government and its press are lying to them, like that, all the time, and so routinely?


If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of

oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Feb 12, 2019 1:20 AM

“’In 1970,’ writes historian Howard Zinn, ‘an ITT director, John McCone, who had also been head of the CIA, told Kissinger and Helms that ITT was willing to give $1 million to help the U.S. government in its plans to overthrow the ALLENDE government.’
Democratically elected leader, Salvadore Allende, nationalized foreign-owned interests, like Chile’s lucrative copper mines and telephone system – International Telephone & Telegraph (ITT) who offered the CIA $1 million to overthrow Allende — which the CIA allegedly refused — but paid $350,000 to his political opponents.
“’The stage was set for a clash of two experiments,’ says Blum. Allende’s SOCIALISM was pitted against what was later called a ‘prototype or laboratory experiment to test the techniques of HEAVY FINANCIAL INVESTMENT in an effort to DISCREDIT and BRING DOWN a government.’
This clash would reach its climax on SEPTEMBER 11, 1973. (911?) This socialist experiment ended in violence on that day and Allende himself was said to have ”committed suicide . . . with a machine gun”.
Of course, the U.S. claimed no COMPLICITY in or even KNOWLEDGE of the coup at the time. However, when the State Department declassified 5000 documents in 1999, a different story was told.
“For example, a CIA document from the day before the coup stated bluntly, ‘The coup attempt will begin September 11.’ Ten days later, the Agency announced, ‘severe repression is planned.’
With thousands of opponents of the new regime gathered in soccer stadiums….
A Sept. 28 State Department document detailed a request from Chile’s new defense minister for Washington to send an expert advisor on detention centers.
“Allende was dead. In his place, the people of Chile now faced brutal repression and human rights violations, book burnings, dogs trained to sexually molest females, a powerful secret police, and more than 3000 executions. Tens of thousands more were tortured and/or disappeared.

Shortly after the coup, U.S. economic and military aid once again began to flow into Chile.”

50 years later they are still using the same script!!!
If it ain’t broke why fix it?

Feb 12, 2019 9:38 AM
Reply to  Maggie

Hi Maggie – there doesn’t seem to be much activity on this page so I just wanted to say thanks for your contributions – very informative!

Feb 14, 2019 3:15 PM
Reply to  Maggie

The US Regime is like Nazi Germany on steroids.
Indeed, any crimes committed by Nazi Germany (if only because of their limited duration) pale into insignificance compared to those of the Ziocon monsters who have rampaged across the planet for decades, slaughtering, butchering, starving and immiserating hundreds of millions.
Entire countries have been destroyed.
These are crimes without parallel committed on a gargantuan scale.
In just one (comparatively very trivial) example,500,000 children under 5 died in Iraq because of US economic strangulation from 1991-2003.
The same fate is currently planned for Venezuela and Iran. “If they want their people to eat, they have to do as they are told.”
This is all being directed by the same subhuman criminal Zionist filth, Abrams, Bolton, Pompeo, Mnuchin, who have a proven track record of similar crimes over a protracted period.
40% of humanity is currently subject to US/ Ziocon economic strangulation.
They are now seeking to engineer further wars against Russia and China whose likely outcome will be the extinction of humanity.
Though ordinary Americans may in some ways themselves be victims of this criminal cabal, nothing will change until they fully appreciate the enormity of the countless crimes that have been committed in their name, and the extent of the human suffering involved. Until they themselves have watched their children starve in front of them and die for lack of basic medicines. That is what it will take, and it will be very richly deserved. Like Germans starving and freezing in the rubble of their ruined cities in 1945. That is what needs to happen. Until it does, and the Zionist cabal responsible is held fully accountable for these abominations, the pattern will continue to repeat itself until the whole world is destroyed.

“We are here to further the cause of war with Iran.” Netanyahu in Warsaw.

Feb 11, 2019 10:51 PM

The information is out there, we just need to know where to look, or follow the path others have followed to the truth.

”7 December 2013 municipal elections in Venezuela produced a robust,convincing victory for chavismo: The National Electoral Authority (CNE) announced that with 97.52% of the votes processed, PSUV (el Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela) candidates won 210 mayoralties (76% of the total) whilst candidates of the right wing (MUD coalition) were victorious in 53 (15.82%). A total of about 76 mayoralties have to yet be adjudicated by the national electoral authority (CNE.)
The PSUV and allied candidates got 49.24% of the popular vote, whilst the right wing candidates, got 42.72%. Thus, the PSUV had an electoral victory by a healthy margin of 7 %. The electoral turnout was 59.82%. This is high, since in Venezuela municipal elections tend to have low electoral turnouts.
Key sections of the Mesa de Unidad Democrática (MUD) and their ALLIES IN THE US, used the untimely death (assassination) of President Hugo Chavez earlier this year as a window of opportunity to destabilise and oust the Bolivarian government. And thought this opportunity increased when Nicolas Maduro won by a slender 1.5%.
On the run-up to April they waged a massive and intense but groundless campaign to discredit the CNE (National Electoral Council.)
Believing the moment was ripe, they unleashed a wave of violence prompted by their leader Henrique Capriles, who on April 15, ON NATIONAL TV called upon his supporters to come out into the streets to protest at the ‘electoral fraud’ and invited them ‘to vent your anger’. The resulting violence led to the death of 11 people, and two children.

The accusation of fraud was the charge used by Capriles in refusing to recognise the Maduro government. This position of non-recognition is supported by only one government in the world: the UNITED STATES. Still today, Capriles and the MUD refuse to recognise the Maduro government and accept the election result of April 2013. U.S. deep state agencies continue to date to use $millions of taxpayers money to fund the activities of Venezuela’s right wing.
The municipal elections of December 7: MUD leader, Henrique Capriles, along with sections of the World Media, spread the fallacy that this election represented a plebiscite on President Nicolas Maduro – and Henrique Capriles even called on Maduro to resign if the PSUV lost the popular vote!
The MUD’s ‘plebiscite deception’ was part of their destabilisation campaign against the legitimate, democratically elected, Bolivarian government.

In this worth noting at this point, that the Right’s campaign of destabilisation began well before the 14 April 2013 Presidential Election and continues today… Intensifying in recent months. It has involved discrediting the armed forces with the declared intention to sow internal divisions, sabotage of electricity plants, massive speculation on US dollars in the black market, deliberate creation of shortages of basic commodities such as milk, edible oil and toilette paper, the hoarding of electro domestics, and incredible retail commerce overcharging (usually by 100% and 200%, but which on some items could reach 1000% or 2000%, and with one trader overcharging as much as 12000%!)
Such destabilisation efforts are all part of a well orchestrated campaign aimed at creating conditions such as those that led to the overthrow of Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973. Right wing propaganda kept making ominous predictions that during October and November Venezuela would face ‘total collapse’.

This is worth keeping in mind when noting that whilst having suffered another electoral defeat, the MUD has scored reasonably well in some urban centres, where the worst manifestations of the economic war have been felt.

However, whilst Opposition strategists counted on discontent resulting from the difficulties arising out of economic SABOTAGE and ongoing DESTABILISATION, President Maduro took speedy and effective measures to counter the economic war. He tightened the market on hard currency, thus substantially reducing black market speculation, and imposed limits on the outrageous overpricing being practiced by traders.

The President’s countermeasures proved rather popular and also deflated the opposition. In response to his measures, on 23 November the MUD organised a poorly attended ‘monster march’ in only a few cities in Venezuela to oppose Maduro’s measures which included a law putting a very reasonable ceiling of 30% profit on non-food retail items and a substantial reduction of the price of rents to commercial establishments.

Thanks to the leadership of President Maduro and his Government’s effective measures, Venezuela had its 19th election in 14 years taking place peacefully, with civic consciousness, by a calm and relaxed population, who, despite opposition efforts to discredit it, clearly trust the Electoral Authority. Indeed, this was yet another impeccably conducted electoral process, characterised, as every previous election since 1999, for its total transparency.
In this sense, thanks to Bolivarian politics, Venezuela’s democracy, permanently under threat from sections of the right wing in cahoots with key US (CIA) agencies, has had another boost,

Finally, in terms of the nonsense about the December 2013 election being a plebiscite on what the opposition claimed was an unpopular Government… The democratic verdict of the Venezuelan people’s behaviour tells us exactly the opposite.
After the death of Hugo Chavez, they elected a Chavista president, somebody recommended to them by Hugo Chavez himself, just before he went to Havana for his last cancer treatment. They have also given chavismo a majority in the National Assembly (99 against 64), a majority of governors (20 out of total of 23), a majority of local legislatures (22 out of 23), and now a majority of mayoralties.

Venezuelan democracy is alive, vibrant and now stronger. At the victory rally President Maduro asserted that the economic war unleashed against Venezuela could not defeat the Bolivarian process. Maduro also called for a process of national dialogue with all the elected mayors, regardless of political allegiance. About the electoral victory, he said: “the people of Venezuela has told the word that the Bolivarian Revolution is as strong as ever.”

Will Venezuela’s right and their supporters and sponsors in the US ever respect the will of the people????


Feb 11, 2019 1:03 PM

Am I deluded in thinking the ‘old’ Guardian would have published this info? The current Guardian definitely wouldn’t – they support neoliberals and neocons alike these days.

Oslo - Norway
Oslo - Norway
Feb 12, 2019 6:29 PM
Reply to  Jay-Q

Elliott Abrams: The War Criminal Running US Policy in Venezuela (video only 6 min.)

Feb 10, 2019 1:36 PM

An excellent article which sums up the timeline of crime, mass murder, lies and hypocrisy.

As for the the media, this will have you in stitches – click onto Jimmy Dore: Apologies if posted on here before. I came across it somewhere yesterday. Hilarious but also highlights the ignorance and lack of humanity we are dealing with.


Feb 11, 2019 3:16 PM
Reply to  Loverat

Jimmy Dore is an absolute genius.. I have been following him for over a year now, and he always hits the nail square on its head. Did you see his vids on the smearing of Jeremy Corbyn?


I have been busy researching for a week now and watching Putin, and have arrived at the conclusion that he is indeed the wisest leader this world has ever had.

I was especially impressed with this one, although it is just over two hours long.. but told me everything I needed to know.

Moscow Exile
Moscow Exile
Feb 10, 2019 7:26 AM

“That same day, the Democratic Party and Labour Party organ, Britain’s Guardian, bannered “International criminal court: UN court judge quits The Hague citing political interference””

Is he writing about the Grauniad?

I quit reading the Guardian several years ago, having read it man and boy shortly after it had ceased to be “The Manchester Guardian”. I never ever considered it to be a “Labour Party organ”.

falcemartello 1
falcemartello 1
Feb 10, 2019 12:41 AM

Pax -americana has used economic sanctions for over a century . Whenever and wherever possible. Let us recall Allende’s Chile paraphrasing Nixon and Kissinger “We shall make Chile’s economy scream”.
Least shall we forget Albright’s famous words when asked on live TV “Was the sanctions against Iraq worth the deaths of 500 thousand children” The sanctions of the time directly effected the well being of normal individuals in Hussein’s Iraq. Yes was her reply.
The US has been in violation of chapter seven articles 50 and 51 which came about from the Nuremberg trials. US aggression and overt destabilisation of sovereign states that the plutocratic and oligarchical class of our western liberal countries mainly USA have instigated in the last 40 years is palpable. Yugoslavia was NATO countries dry run let alone the Gulf war one that Bush Sr manufactured.
Why manufactured well to this day no one has ever refuted Iraq’s then foreign minister Tariq Aziz (who was a Coptic Christian). Aziz spoke to Cheney (who was in the Bush Sr admin as secretary of defence )
if Iraq was to take over Kuwait would the US have any objections? The response we have no opinions on the matter. They baited Iraq to occupy Kuwait. Iraq at the time was literally land locked with an inadequate port facility in Basra. Iraqs argument was based on economic necessity and cultural religious reasons. Here we see the introduction of the Wolfawitz doctrine and Reagan’s policy of detente get swept under the rug. Prior to the manufactured Gulf crisis Iraq had underwent the worst economic sanctions against a sovereign nation second only to North Korea.
Hence Zuess’s article alluding to fiduciary and verifiable facts being under reported or outright burried from public discourse is not new. Simple facts like under Hussein’s Iraq there was more female political social and intellectual representation than all NATO countries. The simple fact that the UN report states that 70 percent of Venezuela’s budget is allocated to public services is more than telling. To see every NATO affiliated country come on board to back the recent coup attempt by pax-amaericana is telling ,with the excepion of Italy all NATO countries are demanding “Its time for Maduro to go” .
Well this meme started with Obobmer the POTUS who out bombed all POTUS b4 him. Qhadaffi time to go Assad must go and now Maduro must go. How exceptional of our political class in the west have become all in the name of freedom ,democracy and the pursuit of happiness.
Hence fellow readers buckle up stock up on your popcorn because Wolfawitz is back with his three muskateers BOLTON<POMPEO and newly resurrected ABRHAMS known convicted crim from the infamous Iran -Contra affairs. Nicaragua,Bolivia and Iran beware for democracy alla Wofawitz is coming to town near you via the next manufactured terrible humanitarian crisis brought to you by MIC ,Wall Street ,London and Paris.

Feb 9, 2019 11:36 PM

40% of humanity is currently subject to US economic warfare and economic strangulation.
This has cost Cuba alone over $1 trillion.
500,000 children under 5 were killed in Iraq from 1991-2003 by US economic strangulation.
A music teacher in Baghdad was unable to import sheet music from the UK as this broke sanctions.
This will not change until Americans are made to realise what has been done in their name.
Until they have to watch their children starve in front of them or die for lack of basic medicine.
Nothing on earth would be so richly deserved.
They would finally understand what they have inflicted on so many hundreds of millions for so long.
That is what it will take for the Exceptional and Indispensable People to finally clean up their act.
Like Germans starving and freezing in the rubble of their ruined cities in 1945.
There are signs this day may be a lot closer than anyone realises.
We must all hope and pray that this is the case.

Feb 11, 2019 5:06 PM
Reply to  mark

I do agree with most of your post, but have to say that the Deep State in the USA could not care a fig if the American man and woman die, as long as they produce enough cannon fodder to maintain their armies.
It is a cattle business to them, and quite honestly I feel sorry for the average American, who is plodding along through life stuffing his face with 20oz steaks and big, big macs whilst sitting there with his beer in the other hand watching the latest game on TV. It has been proved that they are THE most uneducated people on the planet.
The only thing they do have going for them are their athletes….who are mainly black… descended from slaves,… specially bred for their strength, intelligence and power.. They really could have the last laugh if only they knew that they had been intentionally targeted by the State Drug Sponsors to keep them enslaved to the drugs and subservient…. It really isn’t their fault that they have been lied too over and over and over.
You only have to watch their elections to see just how dumb and brainwashed the red necks are.

Feb 14, 2019 3:23 PM
Reply to  Maggie

You are right, Maggie. When I lived in America, I watched television “news” and it was so bad I had to turn it off, because after 5 minutes my brain literally started to seize up.

Feb 9, 2019 11:31 PM

Good article.

Fair dinkum
Fair dinkum
Feb 9, 2019 11:05 PM
Feb 9, 2019 9:57 PM

Two stories today put the Lima Group, which is pushing for regime change in Venezuela, into perspective; one member is Guatemala, one of the most notorious places on earth for human rights violations:

“…While all eyes are fixed on the political and economic crisis in Venezuela, a slow-motion coup is unfolding largely unnoticed in Guatemala. President Jimmy Morales, members of Congress, certain business people and powerful military officers are taking swift, dramatic steps to consolidate power before the presidential elections in June. Morales is not eligible for re-election and so once his successor takes power he will lose his immunity from possible prosecution for corruption.
For years Guatemala has been a source of inspiration to the international human rights community – an example of how dedicated human rights activists can build justice even upon the ruins of war and mass atrocities. The past ten years have seen a former dictator found guilty of genocide; high-ranking military officials sentenced to lengthy prison terms for their roles in mass atrocities; and indigenous women winning cases against members of the military who sexually enslaved them and robbed them of their land….”
reported by Open Democracy

Then there is Colombia whose record is even worse than Guatemala’s or Honduras’s. This is from MintPress News

“….The suffering of the Wayuú, who have reported the deaths of at least 14,000 children due to the lack of clean water, has gone unreported by the same outlets that routinely raise concern about lack of essential goods in Venezuela. The Wayuú, who comprise around 20 percentof Colombia’s entire indigenous population and 48 percent of the Guajira region’s total inhabitants, are now on the brink of dying out completely seven years after the Ranchería river – their community’s only freshwater source – was diverted by the government-constructed Cercado dam in order to service the water needs of the Cerrejón coal mine.
“An estimated 37,000 Wayuú now suffer from severe malnutrition, as they can no longer grow crops or raise livestock without a freshwater source. Each person in the community now lives off of less than 0.7 liters (24 oz.) of water a day while the Cerrejón mine guzzles more than 2.7 million liters of water in a 24-hour period – most of which is used to improve mine “visibility” by minimizing dust pollution. Despite the clear impact of the dam and mine on the humanitarian crisis facing the Wayuú, the Colombian government and supportive Western media have blamed “climate change” and weather patterns like El Niño for the situation.
“The most likely reason for the erasure of the slow genocide of the Wayuú from Western media is the fact that the Cerrejón mine is a largely a U.S.-backed operation, as the mine was originally founded by ExxonMobil and is now owned by a consortium of largely Western mining companies such as Anglo American and BHP Billiton. These same mining companies often work with right-wing paramilitary groups — who are also closely connected to the Colombian government — and who repeatedly threaten the lives of Wayuú who speak up about their people’s suffering, including their chief legal advocate, Javier Rojas Uriana….”
These are the sort of governments backing Chrystia Freeland and Justin Trudeau in their campaign to put an end to social reform in Venezuela. These are the creatures rolling around the gutter into which Canada’s government has dragged us.

Feb 9, 2019 11:40 PM
Reply to  bevin

Heartbreaking. Thank you.

Jerry Alatalo
Jerry Alatalo
Feb 9, 2019 9:35 PM

Nailed it…

Feb 9, 2019 9:18 PM

This is how it’s done. Pretty simple actually