8

Fire Did NOT Cause WTC7 Collapse – New Study Finds

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth partner with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of WTC 7’s collapse conducted by researchers in the university’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The UAF WTC 7 report concludes that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fire but rather by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. Download report HERE

can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media

Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated.

Our Bitcoin JTR code is: 1JR1whUa3G24wXpDyqMKpieckMGGW2u2VX

0 0 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
Oct 26, 2020 11:00 AM

Of course, it didn’t. The very idea is ludicrous.

The real question is though: why did they showcase its highly-incriminating implosion?

That’s the real question.

1. If they could bring down WTCs 3, 4, 5 and 6 without our having a clue about exactly when and how they were destroyed why did they film WTC-7’s collapse from seven vantage points?

2. Why do they show us all the journalists on the day alluding to controlled demolition? In the case of this exchange between Brian Williams, MSNBC News Anchor and David Restuccio, FDNY EMS Lieutenant, there is no doubt that they are scripted and their script gives away that they themselves are in on its demolition.

“Can you confirm it was No 7 that just went in?” [“Went in” is a term used in controlled demolition that comes from the fact that the buildings fall in on themselves.]

“Yes, sir.”

“And you guys knew this was comin’ all day.”

“We had heard reports that the building was unstable and that eventually it would either come down on its own or it would be taken down.”

And I think we can infer the same for the following journalists. Psyops are all about control of the story and they don’t just let journalists loose to say whatever comes to them, they must be in on whatever’s going on and scripted to say what is desired to fit with the operation.

Vince DeMentri, WCBS reporter
“It was almost as if it were a planned implosion. It just pancaked.”
Note his smile as he says the word “pancaked”.

Al Jones, 1010 WINS reporter
“And I turned in time to see what looked like a skyscraper implosion. It looked like it had been done by a demolition crew, the whole thing just collapsing down on itself.”

Dan Rather, CBS News Anchor
“Amazing, incredible, pick your word. For the third time today, it’s reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before, where a building was deliberately destroyed by well-placed dynamite to knock it down.”

We see these journalists in the the Free Fallin’ video made to Tom Petty’s music by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. When it first came out I loved but I watched it through innocent eyes. I thought WTC-7’s graceful showcased implosion was a smoking gun … it took awhile to realise that no! it wasn’t really a smoking gun, it was a Trojan Horse.

WTC-7’s implosion was planned to be a gift for the truthers … a gift to keep all focus on the buildings, particularly WTC-7, and away from the planes.

What a chortle the perps must be having with that video – it is so in your face that everyone is in on it but all truthers can see is “smoking gun.”
https://youtu.be/i5b719rVpds

Sure, there’s talk of the planes, it cannot be avoided because people are interested in the planes but generally the focus of the truth movement has inexorably moved away from the planes to focus as much as possible on the buildings, particularly WTC-7 cos WTC-7 wasn’t hit by a plane! It’s all so simple, all we need to worry about is proving controlled demolition, right?

PLANES VS BUILDINGS

Why do they want us away from the planes?

Fake planes automatically means faked deaths whereas:
Controlled demolitions could be of partially or fully evacuated buildings.

This is the crux! Partially or fully evacuated buildings.

We have been led to believe the buildings were only PARTIALLY evacuated … but what’s to say they weren’t FULLY evacuated? What’s to say the jumpers, the loved ones, the first responders, etc were either faked or participating in a Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise comprising all the smaller exercises and drills they told us about … plus a few more they didn’t tell us about to produce the injured, etc.

They don’t want the faked planes to be gumming up the works with their necessarily implied faked deaths. They want it all about the buildings which could go either way.

They want truthers armed with an important truth (controlled demolition) but an equally important lie (real death and injury). This will stagnate the truth as the notion that the US government cold-bloodedly and callously let all those poor people in the buildings die is simply too taboo for the general population.

Every single skerrick of evidence, including the showcasing of the highly-incriminating collapse of WTC-7, supports the hypothesis that 9/11 was, in fact, a massive exercise pushed out as a real event … like so many other terror events.

mapquest directions
mapquest directions
Apr 23, 2020 11:13 AM

I appreciate your efforts in this sharing, can you let me talk directly with you?

mapquestdirections
mapquestdirections
Apr 23, 2020 11:12 AM

I appreciate your efforts in this sharing, can you let me talk directly with you?

TFS
TFS
Sep 13, 2019 7:50 AM

I suspect newer technology could bring new views on 9/11, and even the moon landings!

MIT released as open source in 2012 and piece of software (I think for Matlab).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9ASH8IBJ2U

1. Would it detect explosives going off in WTC7 or is the image quality to poor?

2. Would it support the allegations of moon landing films being falsified or support their authenticity.

We love Geeks……

nottheonly1
nottheonly1
Sep 13, 2019 4:07 AM

For days now I have pondered about the question, why people refuse to accept the truth about 9/11. And I am not talking about the oneupmanship of amateurs trying to be extra smart like th fake guy that was interviewed in the street at the time of collapse – stating that it was structural failure. Right then, right there. Armchair engineers that come up with the most ludicrous explanations as to how two 400m tall skyscrapers turned into the finest dust imaginable. You might also remember that people saw the devil in the dust cloud?

Those are the folks that can’t let go of the official fairy tale. The religious people. It has everything to do with belief. Folks that believe all kinds of things in the absence of knowledge. Not that there is a lot wrong in believing that there is an invisible guy in the sky that loves us very much and therefore gives us hard times and torture and mayhem and fire and brimstone – Goerge Carlin’s perspective on religion, that I do share.

But it is so much easier for a person whose entire life is based on belief, to believe the official mare. The most preposterous fiction story one could pulled out one’s nose, or in this very case from further below. So outrageously pathetic, that it is reminiscent of an early 60’s C-picture phantasy fiction. To be honest, Godzilla made a lot more sense and was much more believable that the regime’s narrative. There were enough people at the time who believed that nuclear explosions on an island could, maybe, create some genetic changes and let an iguana grow into the size of a sky scraper.

Hence, since the U.S. is a country that trusts in God, it also trusts of course in God’s chosen leaders. At the time thosw were the honorable Messieurs Cheney and Bush, together with the also flawless Rumsfeld and a large number of cherished truth tellers like Rudi Guiliani and Bobby Müller. An ‘administration’ of intellectual rocket scientists and trustworthy patriots. The creme de la creme of society’s finest – in the service of the American tax payers.

Those fine people would not lie to any American. Although they would also not swear on the Bible about what they knew, but that’s understandable, becasue they did not want to upset the American people with stuff that would only confuse the population. So, they kept it simple. Nineteen hateworthy non-christians on a spree to take away freedom and democracy from the land of the free and home of the brave, were piloting commercial airliners that anybody could fly if the necessity would arise – we know that for sure since the movie ‘Airplane’, where they were showing us how it’s done – and aimed them through the obstacle parcour called Manhattan into Lord Silverstein’s Two Towers. The fires burned hot as in hell, where the Devil is constantly pouring jet fuel into the fires to prevent them from freezing over and because of that intense heat, that was as hot as the glow from the Bikini the towers turned to the finest dust. The kind of dust 3M has no respirator for.

No wonder the American people would believe this tale. In times like the one on 9/11, the leaders would not lie to them. Nobody would lie on a day like that. The cable news were at ground zero even before the main event to get the best shots. There was even one from the reputated BBC that could foretell the future. She saw number 7 collapsing while it was still standing. But not much longer. Number 7 must have heard her talking and collapsed into its own footsprint out of shame. It was a bad building. Not even hit by anything. Just a few randomly set fires that burned as hot as the aforementioned Devil’s pits and voilá – freefall. There is even a song for that moment: “I’m free – free falling…” And the outrage of the people that had stored their most important papers about organized crime and the missing Pentagon trillions! All gone! What a shame! Those poor sobs. Now they couldn’t even get after the real bad guys anymore.

Oh well. A few prayers and a lot of bumperstickers stating that “God’s in Control” and “Support our Troops” helped the grieving population to deal with this tragic event. But now was not the time for mourning. Hell no!It was time to go shopping and kick asses – over ‘there’, because something like that sould never ever happen again. And in order to make that certain, the war of terror was born and enhanced interrogation that would have make the Spanish Inquisition envious was needed to bring those to justice that were behind this day of infamy. Never forget. Ever. It’s the eleventh commandment now: “Thou shall never forget…what pathetic and ludicrous story you were dished out by those who planned and perpetrated the murder of over 3000 people with a generous collateral damage of thousands more to die of repiratory diseases, cancer and lots of unspecified illnesses.

It is religion that has caused the American popualtion to live in denial for 18 years about who planned and perpetrated this crime against humanity who created thousandfold death and destruction in countries that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. Zero. To the present day the U.$. regime is bombing with impunityfolks in distant nations, because it can. Because those who own it, want it that way. Because war is a racket and an endless war of terror is the best racket of them all.

To hell with religion if it deludes the masses from accepting the truth and believe the mass murderers. May the 48% that are no longer, or never were falling for this utter bullshit story about what happened that morning of September 11th, 2001 be firm in their demand for justice. Especially justice for the many first responders that were sacrificed with impunity and glee by the fascists behind this crime.

Rob
Rob
Sep 16, 2019 9:17 PM
Reply to  nottheonly1

Pretty much it. All kinds of mystification going on and using the lens of religion is helpful to understand the extent of denial in the population at large.

Steve
Steve
Sep 11, 2019 7:51 PM

This study indirectly confirms what any rational person can immediately see when watching a video of its collapse, for what else if not fire brought down this building in such a fashion? Building 7 came down by controlled demolition.

“The truth rarely if ever convinces its opponents. It simply outlives them.”

— Max Planck, physicist

Winchuff
Winchuff
Sep 11, 2019 6:31 PM

The quantitative observations made in the following video alone (along with the response from NIST to those observations) are enough to disprove progressive collapse:
https://youtu.be/x-jWUzhtTIY