Fire Did NOT Cause WTC7 Collapse – New Study Finds
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth partner with the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF) in releasing the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of WTC 7’s collapse conducted by researchers in the university’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. The UAF WTC 7 report concludes that the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11 was caused not by fire but rather by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building. Download report HERE
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
Of course, it didn’t. The very idea is ludicrous. The real question is though: why did they showcase its highly-incriminating implosion? That’s the real question. 1. If they could bring down WTCs 3, 4, 5 and 6 without our having a clue about exactly when and how they were destroyed why did they film WTC-7’s collapse from seven vantage points? 2. Why do they show us all the journalists on the day alluding to controlled demolition? In the case of this exchange between Brian Williams, MSNBC News Anchor and David Restuccio, FDNY EMS Lieutenant, there is no doubt that they are scripted and their script gives away that they themselves are in on its demolition. “Can you confirm it was No 7 that just went in?” [“Went in” is a term used in controlled demolition that comes from the fact that the buildings fall in on themselves.] “Yes, sir.” “And you guys knew this was comin’ all day.” “We had heard reports that the building was unstable and that eventually it would either come down on its own or it would be taken down.” And I think we can infer the same for the following journalists. Psyops are all about control of the story and they don’t just let journalists loose to say whatever comes to them, they must be in on whatever’s going on and scripted to say what is desired to fit with the operation. Vince DeMentri, WCBS reporter “It was almost as if it were a planned implosion. It just pancaked.” Note his smile as he says the word “pancaked”. Al Jones, 1010 WINS reporter “And I turned in time to see what looked like a skyscraper implosion. It looked like it had been done by a demolition crew, the whole thing just collapsing down on itself.”… Read more »
I appreciate your efforts in this sharing, can you let me talk directly with you?
I appreciate your efforts in this sharing, can you let me talk directly with you?
I suspect newer technology could bring new views on 9/11, and even the moon landings!
MIT released as open source in 2012 and piece of software (I think for Matlab).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9ASH8IBJ2U
1. Would it detect explosives going off in WTC7 or is the image quality to poor?
2. Would it support the allegations of moon landing films being falsified or support their authenticity.
We love Geeks……
For days now I have pondered about the question, why people refuse to accept the truth about 9/11. And I am not talking about the oneupmanship of amateurs trying to be extra smart like th fake guy that was interviewed in the street at the time of collapse – stating that it was structural failure. Right then, right there. Armchair engineers that come up with the most ludicrous explanations as to how two 400m tall skyscrapers turned into the finest dust imaginable. You might also remember that people saw the devil in the dust cloud? Those are the folks that can’t let go of the official fairy tale. The religious people. It has everything to do with belief. Folks that believe all kinds of things in the absence of knowledge. Not that there is a lot wrong in believing that there is an invisible guy in the sky that loves us very much and therefore gives us hard times and torture and mayhem and fire and brimstone – Goerge Carlin’s perspective on religion, that I do share. But it is so much easier for a person whose entire life is based on belief, to believe the official mare. The most preposterous fiction story one could pulled out one’s nose, or in this very case from further below. So outrageously pathetic, that it is reminiscent of an early 60’s C-picture phantasy fiction. To be honest, Godzilla made a lot more sense and was much more believable that the regime’s narrative. There were enough people at the time who believed that nuclear explosions on an island could, maybe, create some genetic changes and let an iguana grow into the size of a sky scraper. Hence, since the U.S. is a country that trusts in God, it also trusts of course in God’s… Read more »
Pretty much it. All kinds of mystification going on and using the lens of religion is helpful to understand the extent of denial in the population at large.
This study indirectly confirms what any rational person can immediately see when watching a video of its collapse, for what else if not fire brought down this building in such a fashion? Building 7 came down by controlled demolition.
“The truth rarely if ever convinces its opponents. It simply outlives them.”
— Max Planck, physicist
The quantitative observations made in the following video alone (along with the response from NIST to those observations) are enough to disprove progressive collapse:
https://youtu.be/x-jWUzhtTIY