99

DISCUSS: Assange Extradition Hearing

Julian Assange’s extradition hearing is underway as of this morning, at Woolwich Crown Court. It will be his first public appearance since last May.

However fair, impartial, or even real this legal process is, there’s no question of its importance in terms of the idea of free speech. Even if you don’t buy the Assange narrative is genuine – and we get a lot of comments and tweets from people who think that way – the narrative is still that he’s on trial for simply publishing documents the US would rather he didn’t. Which is totally unacceptable.

Assange’s father reported that the WikiLeaks founder was being harassed the day before his trial began:

Early signs are that the QC’s arguing for the Assange to be “sent back” to America, have no interest in being either honest or especially subtle.

…or, indeed, that they even know exactly how Assange is meant to have broken the law:

NOTE: “Damaging US interests” is not a crime. Yet.

The media are gearing up to cover it, with a possible slight change in attitude at The Guardian (a development that bears watching), although the subject is conspicuous by its absence on the BBC Homepage.

As always, discuss below.

Following discussion among the editors, it update detailing the court proceedings thus far has been split into a separate article.

Thanks for reading...

You can help us keep doing what we do. Every little helps and is hugely appreciated.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

Categories: Assange Arrest, latest
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

99 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments