The Covid-spreading farts of death

Yes indeed. Another perspective is that of the ‘freeze’ reflex. This becomes ‘passive’ and in a sense paralysed.
Fear can contract to react as fight or flight – and all the psychic-emotional deceits and disguises of both. Freeze has more of a ‘Stockholm syndome’ in which the captured is effectively tooled by the ‘overwhelming force’ as the maker of the new ‘reality’ in which it then adapts, having no sense of escape and no longer even thinks of escaping – for questioning its reality ‘re-opens’ much greater fear. And so the ‘Fall’ to a state of limitation and control, hard set in rules that are mapped in as unquestionable.
This is how we make a world apart.
Fear of the devil is of its being revealed AS US – and unworthy of life or love.
The shifting forms have never changed the underlying archetypes. Trapped in overwhelming pain and hate IS hell, and any dissociative state offers a masking over and mitigation of such self-hate.

What is not obvious is that any fear – reacted from as true becomes invested with our reality, and once invested in, operates as a captured or defended attention.
The thing that sets this up is the wish reality be different than it is.
The mind is a capacity to live out experience ‘as if’.
Truth can then seem to be lost, violated, abandoned, rejected and betrayed.
But truth never has been ‘as if’.
Truth is, ‘as is’.
Pursuing a private mind or imaginative ‘take’ on reality is not a sin, but when we give priority to this over our true relationship we can judge ourself guilty instead of releasing it to accept what is – as it is. This ‘private agenda’ is founded on a sense of sin, guilt and fear, operating a mind of deceit that enacts enslavement AS IF to be free!

So I say ‘such buttons’ clearly ‘work’ on the Many – but through more complex rationalisations or masking of complex overlay in which we have some ‘correspondence of identification’ or we wouldn’t be here.

Putting the agency for violation OUTSIDE as the primary focus takes attention and awareness from ‘trouble at home’. Our ‘world’ is literally ‘speaking to us’ of our OWN ‘correspondence of identification’ IF we are open to questioning what we are reactively set in as our ‘reality – despite or disregarding the voice for fear – whether that seems to be a virus, a tyrannous and blind ‘Them’ or a mad mind that cannot think its way out of its own making.

The tyrannous and blind ‘will’ is not a true willing, but a forced mind of the idea of ‘self-will’. In some the fear is deeply covered over by a sense of self-gratification supported by lockstepped masking in virtue or necessity.

That the fear is unconscious, does not make it any less active as a conflicted foundation that as a default, overrides living and present recognition of relationship – to a defensive sense of self-control under threat. But the first ‘casualty’ of conflicted Self or Reality is truth. Not IN truth, but the mind’s capacity to recognise, share in and be true.

The idea of lockstep as strength or unity is always an inherently locked against something. It is SET in conflict and needs conflict, enemy and threat to seem to have power over and against.

Adam Curtis pointed out that the power of dreams gave way to the power of nightmares. Note that there is nothing truly positive, alive or inspiring in the ‘UN/globalist NWO agenda’. It is set as if a positive against fear’s threats and enemies, real or otherwise’ so as to mask in virtue. Virtues are the primary qualities of truth lived and extended. Locking down into a fearful mask of pretence is as deep and dense a hell as we are willing to persist in getting identity from.

The underlying fear of death and disease is from being locked down and limited in the ‘body’ as our self. In this we use the body to serve a loveless agenda – when of itself it is a many-levelled instrument of communication – through which the living qualities of existence ‘know themselves’ of a kind.
Loss of coherency signifies a call to release conflicts to true alignment or centring. But under Humpty Dumpty, All the king’s horses and all the king’s men arise as ‘moral necessity’.

Your ‘buttons’ are within your own realm of responsibility. Releasing the wish to control others (to support our ‘reality’, allows awareness of our own unconscious mindset to rise as a choice, rather than persist as default reaction. But in a way we only choose NOT to give identity and support to the fear; life moves of itself to align in freedom from what we now recognise we do NOT want.

While we SAY we do not want this reality but persist in its underlying fears, beliefs and narrative definitions, we are saying differently to what we are doing – or acting out a mask over what has been set and walled out as no-go areas of thought, speech or dialogue.

War on Self or Reality – (apart from being an impossible situation) – is a temporary, depleting and limiting action and result. It runs out of time and space. Crisis will bring us to make choice, but the managing of crisis as a systemic suppression of the ability to know and make choice is choosing to give up feeling awareness of life to the wish not to know.

You’re a ray of sunshine in a dark winter, fact checker.

Simplified, there are roughly two theories.

The one theory sees something which it calls a virus as an alien external invader, which unknown by the organism can wreck havock if the organism does not find ways to neutralize it soon enough. Hence vaccination, introduction of a weak form of the virus in order to prepare the body for the invader.

The second theory departs from the idea that only a compromised organism, already being in a state of susceptibility (which might not yet be expressed significantly) can be subject to the destructive effect of some type of organism-alien substance. Both physical and psychological conditions are considered to be the cause.

The latter theory has trust in the wisdom, so to speak, of nature, and assumes a certain power of the mind. The former is a distrusting outside enemy theory, where nature is hostile, and the mind has no power, it is a purely physical cause and effect. At best there is some negligible effect of the mind involved, though it is taken with a grain of salt.

Mind the characteristics of these two views, they tell you a lot.

Treating people for malnutrition and stress (from exploitation), and addressing pervasive exploitation and dangers (even food and medicine) is not in line with the supreme religion of the “free market”. However, rescuing this free market at public cost from time to time is reasonable.