264

WATCH: Perspectives on the Pandemic #15 Prof Sucharit Bhakdi warns of the possible complications and dangers of experimental gene-therapy injections.

In February, 2021, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD and a number of his colleagues warned the European Medicines Agency about the potential danger of blood clots and cerebral vein thrombosis in millions of people receiving experimental gene-based injections.

Since then, two of the four injections have been suspended or recalled in Europe and the United States for just that reason.

In this episode of Perspectives, Professor Bhakdi explains the science behind the problem, why it is not just limited to the products already suspended, and why in the long term we may be creating dangerously overactive immune systems in billions of unwitting subjects.

The Interviewee: Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.

The Interviewer: John Kirby is the director of FOUR DIED TRYING, a feature documentary and series on the major assassinations of the 1960’s and their calamitous impact on the country. To join the struggle for justice for Dr. King, Malcolm X, and John and Robert Kennedy.

Follow Journeyman Pictures on youtube or visit their website for more of their award-winning factual content.

can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media

Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated.

Our Bitcoin JTR code is: 1JR1whUa3G24wXpDyqMKpieckMGGW2u2VX

4.8 21 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
264 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
May 10, 2021 3:19 AM

FIXED AUDIO: Here is a version with the audio problem corrected, graciously uploaded by user Victor X-Ray. If you are having trouble hearing the audio properly, try this link here!

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/perspectives-on-the-pandemic-quot-blood-clots-and-beyond-quot-episode-15_EwkVdGqjrKskpQs.html

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
May 1, 2021 4:03 PM

Some of you can’t hear Professor Bhakdi in this video.

We think this is because the left and right audio channels are 180 degrees out of phase, meaning the audio will cancel itself out on some devices, resulting in almost no audio being heard.

This is an issue with the video file itself, no matter where it is uploaded.

THE SOLUTION: listen with headphones through only one ear, or try a different device. It plays audibly on our devices here, so it seems very much to depend on the individual device/setup.

Best wishes, Admin

Victor X-Ray
Victor X-Ray
May 10, 2021 12:34 AM
Greg Almon
Greg Almon
May 6, 2021 3:13 PM

This man is highly decorated

Bob
Bob
May 4, 2021 5:44 AM

Anyone know if there are any videos of Prof Sucharit Bhakdi explaining these things in Thai language? If so, would very much appreciate a link I could pass on to my wife.

Evan
Evan
May 7, 2021 4:59 PM
Reply to  Bob

Proffesor Bhakdi as an Thai/ American lives and worked in Germany. All his studies and interviews are in English or German. His German is so fluent, he retired in Germany, Kiehl. Honestly who would want to live in USA today? Specially brilliant mind like proffesor Bhakdi.

Mike Rogers
Mike Rogers
May 3, 2021 2:40 PM

Noted the comment by Admin.
Why can’t the reporter reverse the phase of one channel of the doctor’s audio and repost?
The owner of the interview can surely do this with most editing tools. His own audio is in phase.

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
May 3, 2021 3:44 PM
Reply to  Mike Rogers

I don’t know, can he can do that without reuploading the vid and losing his views etc? The audio may have been captured out of phase, due to technological/streaming reasons, and unless you’re familiar with audio and know what to listen for (aside from having the software/knowledge to fix it) there’s every chance most vloggers wouldn’t realise. Most video editing software doesn’t make this sort of tweak straightforward. My partner makes YouTube videos and it wasn’t a concept she was familiar with at all. A2

Victor X-Ray
Victor X-Ray
May 10, 2021 12:35 AM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2
Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
May 10, 2021 3:07 AM
Reply to  Victor X-Ray

Amazing, thanks! I’ll pin this link and credit your fine work. Thanks again. A2

Dick
Dick
May 3, 2021 1:58 AM

IMHO the vaccine IS the virus. They actually telling you it’s the virus. If it wasn’t so morbidly depressing it would be laughable. Lentivirus and Adeno-associated virus (AAV) have proven invaluable for introducing genetic material into mammalian cells. Lentivirus is a commonly used virus in DNA delivery, gene therapy. Lentivirus and in this case GM Lentivirus has a more common name. HIV, and it must be injected. There is no airborne delivery. Vaccinate billions. Nothing will happen for a year or two and then the death rate will start to soar….
In a way it’s perfect. Death rate climbing from multiple unrelated causes.

-CO
-CO
May 2, 2021 3:15 PM

According to the European Medicines Agency data Base on COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Drug Reactions there are now 8,430 Dead and 354,177 Injuries Through April 24,2021.

The vaccines Included are:-
Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine Moderna (CX-024414).
Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine Pfizer-Biontech
Covid-19 Vaccine Astrazenica(CHDOX1 NCOV-19
Covid-19 Vaccine Janssen (AD26. COV2.S).

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 2, 2021 9:32 AM

So we move on to another topic of less importance. I hope we have more of these.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
May 2, 2021 3:17 AM

In immunology, ‘efficiency’ (a.k.a. ‘efficacy’) and ‘effectiveness’ are two different things. Pfizer and any others trialling any vaccine or drug measure only (often can measure only) ‘efficacy’. Calculating ‘efficacy’ requires only the results obtained from the statistics generated by the relevant trial, which can be wildly different from the ‘efficiency’, which is based on the statics generated by/from the entire (sub)population of which the trial participants are only a subset. ‘Efficacy’ is often presented as ‘efficiency’ by dumbshits who do not know the difference or superiorists who (correctly) assume most of a mainstream audience won’t. It is unfortunate that Bhakdi seems not to know, eIther.

Ii is not unfortunate Big Pharma chooses not to inform the public of that distinction, or to treat most of their other often-faulty methodology, as well as the data generated by their trials, with a disgraceful lack of transparency and an excess of ethics-free, self-serving manipulation of fact; it is simply the viciously predatory, financialized, capitalistic opportunism that is par for any big-business course.

Researcher
Researcher
May 2, 2021 3:02 AM

NHS whistleblower on what’s going on behind the scenes in hospitals in the UK January 2020 – January 2021.

Blanket DNR. Falsification of Death Certificates. No flu testing. Patients injured from the PCR test.

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
May 2, 2021 2:06 PM
Reply to  Researcher

Thanks for the link. I hadn’t previously looked at this group, but I’ll probably be doing a “Freedom Alliance” write-in for the local elections.

https://freedomalliance.co.uk
Freedom Alliance is a campaigning political party that is committed to the principles of personal liberty, sovereignty, and human rights. We reject all forms of governmental restrictions and curtailments on free people. We believe the only instance in which state authorities should have the right to dictate or restrict an individual’s movements is when that individual has been found guilty of a criminal offence in a court of law.

In all other instances, we believe in the absolute right of the people to:
Leave home whenever they choose;
Make a living and operate business premises;
Freely associate, assemble, and protest;
Speak freely without censorship or penalty;
Make their own free and uncoerced medical choices.

Lost in a dark wood
Lost in a dark wood
May 1, 2021 10:56 PM

COVID Shots, DNA & Transhumanism, With Dr. Madej
by Alex Newman April 29, 2021
In this presentation with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman, Dr. Carrie Madej explains that the elites peddling the COVID shots are also pushing transhumanism… and the two are closely related. Genetic modifications and new technologies are on the verge of changing what it means to be human, and the elites are really pushing the boundaries. Don’t miss this critically important presentation by one of the most important doctors speaking out on these issues publicly.
https://thenewamerican.com/covid-shots-dna-transhumanism-with-dr-madej-2
https://rumble.com/vg9kqr-carrie-madej-presentation.html

Thiekbalj
Thiekbalj
May 2, 2021 3:44 AM

Thanks for sharing this. Great presentation

mgeo
mgeo
May 2, 2021 9:36 AM

Genetic modifications and new technologies are on the verge of changing what it means to be human
What is going on is only (a) mass experimentaion (b) a global cull. Contrary to any lofty academic propaganda, genetics – and everything else about humans – is fiendishly complex.

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 2, 2021 10:14 AM

Horrifying.

ThereisaGod
ThereisaGod
May 1, 2021 10:04 PM

Are the people who can hear this using a Mac?

nondimenticare
nondimenticare
May 2, 2021 12:22 AM
Reply to  ThereisaGod

Speaking for myself, no. I’m on the dread Microsoft Windows 10.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
May 2, 2021 5:35 AM
Reply to  nondimenticare

Speaking for myself, no. I’m on the dread Microsoft Windows 10.

Well that’s a useful nugget for someone who was asking specifically about a Mac. Now anyone who is using a Mac will have to check that it’s not one of those Macs that are ‘Powered by Microsoft Windows 10’.

Any half-assed waveform analyzer or audio processing program should be able to determine if it’s the conjectured phase-shift problem or something else like misconfigured recording- or editing-side noise reduction, etc. If your ‘device’ lets you specify mono, stereo or surround sound output signals, try switching to mono.

Unfortunately a lot of consumer level ‘device’ designers know jack-shit about audio engineering except what Charle Kunz knew about the pedals.

Victor X-Ray
Victor X-Ray
May 10, 2021 12:35 AM
Reply to  nondimenticare
Victor X-Ray
Victor X-Ray
May 10, 2021 12:35 AM
Reply to  ThereisaGod
Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
May 1, 2021 7:41 PM

Dr Bhakdi, radiation too causes clotting.

http://www.radiationdangers.com

Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
May 1, 2021 7:42 PM

Dr Mike Adams of Natural News

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
May 2, 2021 3:53 AM

Instead of chasing red herrings (however real they are in their own context) and calling them ‘contributions’, try reading some more specifically vaccine-related (and more usefully discursive) considerations by Hooman Noorchashm (who has the incidental additional advantage of not being a closet conspiracy paranoiac).

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
May 3, 2021 3:17 AM
Reply to  Robbobbobin

This seemed not to post but apparently it did. A reconstructed repost from memory that appears below (with an addendum) does not comprise intentional hectoring.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
May 2, 2021 4:25 AM

Instead of chasing red herrings (however relevant they are in their own context) and offering one or more of them up as a ‘contribution’, you may care to consider a more COVID-19 vaccine-specific (and more usefully discursive) contribution by Hooman Noorchashm, who has the incidental additional advantage of not being a closet–or, worse, an unconcious–conspiracy paranoiac.

He has also published a simplified ‘self-help’ version (with a summarizing graphic near the bottom of the page) here.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 6:30 PM

“Depopulate the planet” (through COVID-1984 genetic injection a.k.a. alleged vaccine)

As much as I’m aware of the numerous adverse effects, I’m afraid that the “depopulate the planet” allegation is too far-fetched fucking crazy.

First of all, as sad as it is that people are having adverse reactions and are even dying after being vaccinated, the danger – as widely discussed here – of the vaccine is the genetic mutation it introduces. Not the adverse reactions after the shot. Depopulating the planet this way clearly is clearly an imbecilic idea because there are tons and tons of people who have survived the shot just fine.

Second, can the genetic injection have long-term lethal effect? Or prevent reproduction? I guess. But why go to such lengths and make so much fuss if the same could be accomplished inconspicuously in another way? They could add something to existing vaccines that people routinely take. And there are any number of things a bunch of motherfuckers on a mission to depopulate the planet could do.

Occam’s razor tells me that using this genetic shit to intentionally depopulate the planet would be a mighty cumbersome way of doing it.

Also, I really can’t see how this would be accomplished logistically. For example, Pfizer’s vaccine actually comes from the German company BioNTech that has been doing genetic research for years and modified it to make it fit the CV plandemic. How exactly has it been arranged to make BioNTech concoct an intentionally lethal vaccine? The other companies, I don’t know, but I’ve read that they operate in a similar way – they don’t really do much R&D, but snoop around and acquire high-potential stuff from biotech companies, startups, etc. Again, I find it far-fetched that such large numbers of people would be in on it and would be developing shit INTENTIONALLY designed to be lethal.

Now, I’m all ears, and if somebody has anything substantiated, anything that makes sense, anything that provides evidence that the vaccines are INTENTIONALLY lethal, I’m willing to accept that.

If not, I’m gonna continue to harbor the opinion that the vaccines are possibly dangerous shit, that they’re intended to harness people to the pharma industry, but that’s it.

BTW, there is an article about reverence of authority. Everybody should be asking themselves the question whether they’re not putting just a tad too much trust in mad professor Bhakdi. Or any other mad professor or talking head.

Martha
Martha
May 1, 2021 8:57 PM
Reply to  Jacques

You didn’t actually watch the video, did you? I have an idea…you get the shots & let us know in a couple of years how you’re doing.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 10:15 PM
Reply to  Martha

You didn’t actually read what I wrote, did you? Or you did but don’t have enough brains to understand it?

Orthus
Orthus
May 1, 2021 11:27 PM
Reply to  Jacques

It seems that you just invented a load of stuff that was not in the video, and then built yourself a straw man.

Jacques
Jacques
May 2, 2021 6:39 AM
Reply to  Orthus

Instead of your knee-jerk reactions and trying too hard to find something wrong with what I say, read the article about the Myth of Authority, reread what I wrote, and come back.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
May 3, 2021 3:47 AM
Reply to  Jacques

These are the people who, a few years ago, warned of the mass conspiracy from oil well to jet fuel pump that was covertly assembled to inflict a universal cull of human beings across the face of the planet via Richard Branson’s coatntrails. They will be back but next time it could be to warn of the sewer-borne cull conspiracy that swims against the current up your piss and into the depths of your private life every time you take a leak. Why else would sewer workers start wearing PPE and take to urinating only in open fields beyond the reach of urban reticulation systems? Huh? Huh?

Dick
Dick
May 3, 2021 2:03 AM
Reply to  Martha

It’s GM HIV About a year at most.

Brahanseer
Brahanseer
May 1, 2021 9:32 PM
Reply to  Jacques

The vaccines are not a sensible response to the virus. It is evident they are being promoted for some other purpose. They do not prevent those vaccinated from contacting the virus or spreading it. And there is no other plausible explanation for the deliberate suppression of existing, safe treatments like Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine and vitamin D.

Depopulation won’t be done by mass execution. The link to those like Fauci who are pushing vaccinations for all they’re worth would be much too direct. They couldn’t avoid the criminal implications. Depopulation is much more likely to be attempted by mass sterilization, which could be administered covertly via a trojan horse vaccine. That would be harder to detect, particularly if it were possible to activate the sterilizing agent in a time-phased way via 5G, through a subsequent injection, or by some other means.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 10:28 PM
Reply to  Brahanseer

There is actually a very plausible explanation for suppressing cheap treatments and peddling novel vaccines – money, profits. Plus the creation of dependency on future vaccination, possibly making it mandatory.

Maxwell
Maxwell
May 2, 2021 1:55 AM
Reply to  Jacques

This is correct.

It is actually in the legal requirement of the EUA that no other treatment be available.

If such a treatment were available then no EUA. If no EUA then no rushed, “authorized and legal” mass experimental “vaccinations” and hence no massive profits.

It’s quite straightforward.

Brahanseer
Brahanseer
May 2, 2021 5:14 PM
Reply to  Jacques

I can’t see all western governments colluding with drug companies to devise a global inoculation plan for no other reason than to fatten Pharma profits. There has to be more.

Robbobbobin
Robbobbobin
May 3, 2021 4:07 AM
Reply to  Brahanseer

“There has to be more”? How about “there’s no collusion, just leading government medical advisers and established ‘experts’ concurring?”. Not enough group think in there for you? Seems to me that SARS-CoV-2 is an extremely serious variant of the original SARS coronavirus but, even if it (turns out that) it isn’t, since when does established professional concurrence in practically any less than diamond hard science not trump collusion?

mgeo
mgeo
May 2, 2021 9:45 AM
Reply to  Brahanseer

Military, subversive and eonomic imperialsim are the common means of mass execution. They all serve the capitalist agenda. Execution through jabs is just a (relatively) new approach, already pilot-tested.

ThereisaGod
ThereisaGod
May 1, 2021 10:07 PM
Reply to  Jacques

Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer’s former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory Research disagrees with you, but what would that idiot know?
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/exclusive-former-pfizer-vp-your-government-is-lying-to-you-in-a-way-that-could-lead-to-your-death

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 10:17 PM
Reply to  ThereisaGod

Check out the appeal to authority fallacy. There is an article about it published earlier today on OffG.

What would you assume that Yeadon is an idiot?

Vin
Vin
May 1, 2021 10:45 PM
Reply to  Jacques

But it’s not really about the vaccine, which may eventually kill a large chunk of the population. It’s about the passport, which will become the Digital ID for all.

antitermite
antitermite
May 1, 2021 11:42 PM
Reply to  Jacques

Thanks for this Jacques.
Seems a lot of readers here might not comprehend your points, but what you are saying echoes my own thoughts.

I think that the elites right at the top, those behind the obvious stringpullers, really want this Transhumanism experiment to succeed.
For selfish reasons, for themselves only.
But it’s too risky without trialling it on a few billion humans first.

Depopulation makes no sense.
What difference to a billionaire whether the proles are culled to Georgia Guidestone levels?
They live in Bubbles so far removed from society that none of the issues that have been making news, msm or alt, will touch them.
Climate change? Nope.
EU immigration flood? Nope.
BLM? Nopity nope – all distractions for plebs only.

The elites only worry about their own skin.
The mass “inoculations” are a prerequisite to genetic editing, once this is perfected they can essentially become “amortal”, countering degenerative change & disease.

When this technology is perfected, availability will be controlled by those with power & patents.
None of us will have access (until population really does meet the mythical half billion), but just the “0.01%”, who will then have the “0.1%”, their only real competitors, by the short hairs.

Drooze
Drooze
May 2, 2021 5:20 AM
Reply to  Jacques

“I find it far-fetched that such large numbers of people would be in on it…”
Oh Dear it’s structural!

Jacques
Jacques
May 2, 2021 6:41 AM
Reply to  Drooze

What’s fucking “structural”?

Describe how droves of people are “structurally” developing a vaccine/genetic vehicle that is INTENDED to be lethal.

flashlight joe
flashlight joe
May 2, 2021 5:51 PM
Reply to  Jacques

You’ve got a bad attitude this morning; too much on the personal attack mode. Take your meds. Chill.

Nick
Nick
May 2, 2021 6:38 AM
Reply to  Jacques

It’s not about adverse reactions right now,it’s about the next 10 years when vaccinated people encounter wild infections. If it killed everyone straight away,it would fail.

Jacques
Jacques
May 2, 2021 10:01 AM
Reply to  Nick

So, do you have any tangible evidence, anything mildly substantiated that the vaccines/genetic vehicles are INTENTIONALLY made to be lethal within the next 10 years or any other period?

I stress the INTENTIONALLY, meaning that they’re being peddled to KILL people.

I’m not saying that the alleged vaccination can’t or won’t have adverse effects, of various kinds, I’m specifically talking about the INTENT to be LETHAL.

I’m all ears.

If you don’t, it might behoove you, or anybody, to stop claiming that. Why? Because it’s unsubstantiated. Possibly total bullshit.

I mean if one objects the unsubstantiated claims about the lethality of COVID-1984, one shouldn’t make unsubstantiated about the (allegedly intended) lethality of the vaccines/genetic vehicles.

In other words, don’t apply double standards. That’s all.

Dick
Dick
May 3, 2021 2:01 AM
Reply to  Jacques

So you clearly don’t understand the concept of finite or that crucial finite reserves are rapidly dwindling including oil and rock phosphate. That 6 Billion people only exist because of oil. Wake up. Do the math. There is no other solution. Once you understand that then the fog will clear and you will understand.

Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
May 1, 2021 6:21 PM

Dr Bhakti.

As a non-scientist, I agree & understand almost

everything you’re saying but what I heard

was that the pathogen in the vaccine would react

to 5G radiation to cause immediate death.

I think you may’ve accidentally missed & overlooked

the significance of 5G rollouts to the Plandemic.

Dr Bhakti, I notice the sudden sadness in

your eyes, please don’t be disheartened.

The most important thing is that you spoke

The Truth. God bless.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 6:54 PM

God bless … what God? There is God? You’ve seen him?

As to 5G, as much as I have no doubt that excessive electromagnetic radiation is no good, the claim that the interaction between 5G and an alleged pathogen in the vaccines would cause immediate death is obvious BULLSHIT.

First of all, pathogens don’t cause IMMEDIATE death.

Second of all, shitloads of people have been vaccinated and are exposed to 5G, yet they’re not IMMEDIATELY dying.

Incidentally, regarding the “God bless” (sic), “blesser” means “hurt” or “injure” in French. Religion has injured far more people than the vaccines.

tony_0pmoc
tony_0pmoc
May 1, 2021 7:19 PM
Reply to  Jacques

The vast majority of the human race have believed in a God, throughout all of recorded human history. Logically, there is absolutely no reason why a God should ever have existed. I have an open mind on the subject.

However my wife and me a bit, whilst we were both brought up as Roman Catholics, and coincidentally resigned at the age of 15 (though we didn’t know each other then) have decorated our home with every God under the Sun, including the Sun..and I know we are both full of God, especially my wife, cos she is such a happy, shining person, and is wonderful to everyone, especially Children.

We just don’t do religion – except maybe a few Pagan Rituals occasionally, but only cos its fun. We do not take it that seriously.

If there is a God in control, then he is doing a seriously crap job..

but maybe we are like goldfish in a bowl in the little boys bedroom, and he is our god, and then the his cat (the devil) gets in, fishes us out with his paw and eats us.

Who knows, we are just a little spec in the Universe, which is very big.

Tony

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 11:33 PM
Reply to  tony_0pmoc

Tony

If there is a God there’s a fair chance he’s not there to wipe our arse. Up to us with God’s guidance for us to do the heavy lifting.

How many times in history have we suffered hardship at the hands of evil finally overcome, perhaps with bit of ‘luck ‘ which can’t be explained. I’m sure we can all think of examples.

Anyway, that’s one school of thought.

Jacques
Jacques
May 2, 2021 10:47 AM
Reply to  Loverat

There is no God out there anywhere.

It’s a concoction implanted in people’s head, an ideological construct.

Do the positive aspects religion might have had throughout history outweigh the negative aspects? In my view, absolutely not. Not only has religion been monstrously misused to keep people under control, to wage war, to scheme, you name it, but also, and more importantly, it made people inherently subject to a higher authority as opposed to confident individuals answering to nobody but themselves.

Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
May 1, 2021 7:49 PM
Reply to  Jacques

Yes, you’re right, blesser means to hurt in

French. I’ve never thought about it like that.

Religion hasn’t hurt anyone, most religion

is about the black man’s divinity.

Figure it out yourself.

The Tanzanian gvt did present its findings

to the world.

Rest of it you can keep to yourself.

Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
Rahwa Tesfai Ghermai
May 1, 2021 7:53 PM
Reply to  Jacques

If God were something to do with the black man do you see Him playing any part in this?!
Who is the Madonna of Krakow? Now, WHY IS SHE THE MADONNA OF KRAKOW?

GO FIGURE IT OUT FOR YOURSELF!

Peter Sky
Peter Sky
May 1, 2021 6:10 PM

As far as the tetunus vaxxe is concerned this may not be what is offered. There is the DTaP (Diphtheria, Tetanus, Pertussis) vaxx and Tdap which is not the same as a tetanus vaxx. Tetanus is a bacteria so it is very different from the virus vaxx which are different from the covid vaxx

comment image
https://healthfreedomidaho.org/truth-about-tetanus/

dtanti
dtanti
May 1, 2021 11:25 PM
Reply to  Peter Sky

So many misconceptions about the tetanus vaccine. Doctors give it after potential exposure, which is ridiculous, and unless you demand tetanus only you’ll end up with DTAP/TDAP. And, as the infographic explains tetanus bacteria is very, very rare.

tony_0pmoc
tony_0pmoc
May 1, 2021 4:39 PM

Whilst I am not having any issues with The sound, I do with the content, much of which seems to have been skillfully edited, to underplay, minimise and tone down what Professor Bhakdi actually said, so that it could appear on Youtube

In my view, this other interview with Professor Bhakdi on Rumble a couple of weeks ago is very much better, undiluted, and much easier to understand.

“COVID Shots to “Decimate World Population,” Warns Dr. Bhakdi”
https://thenewamerican.com/covid-shots-to-decimate-world-population-warns-dr-bhakdi/

Simon
Simon
May 1, 2021 3:49 PM

It’s odd to me that youtube hasn’t censored this. The audio problems amount to something approaching the same (mirrored at https://odysee.com/BloodClotsAndBeyond:4 and https://www.bitchute.com/video/j6vgPtETS3A2/), but it’s almost as if the censors are beginning to feel a bit worried by the number of people questioning the official narrative now (over 400,000 views on this one version alone) and are beginning to quietly backtrack, lest they spend the rest of their lives in jail for promoting this travesty.

Unrelated, there seem to be more and more cases of the vaccinated affecting the unvaccinated (https://www.bitchute.com/video/g6hEmHiFqztg/), presumably because the vaccinated are shedding the spike protein, which in itself is a lethal weapon (https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-04-sars-cov-spike-protein-lung.amp), even without the rest of the virus.

tony_0pmoc
tony_0pmoc
May 1, 2021 5:55 PM
Reply to  Simon

I am yet to be convinced that the vaccinated are having any but a psychological affect on the unvaccinated. However, I do not minimise the reality of psychological effects producing real physical changes in the human body. The most obvious example of this is the placebo effect – eg giving someone a pill that is completely benign, but the person who receives is told, and believes that the pill wil make them very much better – and it does. Similar affects can be achieved by eg Faith Healing or even Reiki.

At the end of the day, what happens within the human body, is massively affected by your brain and what you are thinking. If you are drowned with doom, gloom and death propaganda, it is likely to have a very negative effect on you. If you believe and trust the healer is going to heal you, without even actually touching you as in Reiki, which I have witnessed (and otherwise would have thought was a load of bollocks), I think there is a very good chance you will get better, rather than having the likes of Matt Hancock and Bill Gates, telling you, you are going to die soon, because you are a useless eater.

I think there is an opportunity here to turn the psychology around on these evil bastards in control.

There is a lot more of us than there is of them. We just haven’t learnt the psycholgical techniques yet…but we probably will as we fight to survive.

Tony

SteveS
SteveS
May 1, 2021 3:37 PM

no audio

Victor X-Ray
Victor X-Ray
May 10, 2021 12:37 AM
Reply to  SteveS
George Mc
George Mc
May 1, 2021 3:32 PM

This is a hoot:

https://www-bbc-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56933756.amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a6&usqp=mq331AQHKAFQArABIA%3D%3D#amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&aoh=16198791004172&referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com

“Very small numbers of people have been admitted to hospital with Covid several weeks after having one vaccine dose, a study of UK patients has found.
Most of those affected were frail and elderly and at high risk of being very unwell.”

When Evil Covid started, if you pointed out that “Most of those affected were frail and elderly and at high risk of being very unwell” you would have been strung up! Once again, the vax removes all the sins of the world!

Simon
Simon
May 1, 2021 4:04 PM
Reply to  George Mc

Major Study Finds “Abundance of Patients Admitted to Hospital With Covid Within Seven Days of Vaccination”

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/982499/S1208_CO-CIN_report_on_impact_of_vaccination_Apr_21.pdf

mgeo
mgeo
May 1, 2021 4:05 PM
Reply to  George Mc

A big lie, of course. The older people are relatively unaffected, based on what I gather from the heavily censored reports and muddied statistics. It is those below 65 or so that are getting injured/killed, especially after the 2nd. jab. This may be one reason for extending the delay before that 2nd. jab.

Getting the magic disease from a jabbed person (jabbee) is another story.

JudyJ
JudyJ
May 1, 2021 6:16 PM
Reply to  mgeo

“The older people are relatively unaffected”

Not so sure. A woman of 75 I was talking to yesterday had two or three minor strokes (she still has partial right-side paralysis) in quick succession in March/April. Her doctors told her it was probably related to an operation she underwent last November. Of course not related to her vaccinations in January/ March.

As Mike Yeadon has said, the vaccine side effects will not just target young people…it is simply that such cases are more difficult to dismiss with an alternative explanation.

I agree that delaying or covering up side effects after the second dose was always the reason for extending the time lapse between the two jabs. It was to buy time to contrive another explanation for sudden deaths, such as a deadly variant that the vaccine is ineffective against. I still expect that to materialise in due course – we have seen all the warning signs already.

EDITH
EDITH
May 1, 2021 11:58 PM
Reply to  JudyJ

yes well we have not hit the eclipses to the fixed star Algol or when Uranus hits it in a few years….. if it plays out the same as it has done before through a few hundred years of history plenty will then die of something….last time it happened was at the height of WW2….. time before there was a lot of trouble in India…sound familiar….

sarab
sarab
May 4, 2021 4:54 AM
Reply to  mgeo

Not true. They were among the first to be vaccinated (maybe those stories have been censored away?) and there were an alarming number especially in care homes.

Judith
Judith
May 1, 2021 5:07 PM
Reply to  George Mc

Good point. Now who’s the Grandma killers?

Howard
Howard
May 1, 2021 3:15 PM

If someone hasn’t already posted this link to an interview with Dr Bhakdi on The Last American Vagabond, here it is. I’m pretty sure it will cover the same topics as the interview presented above.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi Interview – COVID Vaccine Blood Clot Risk Was Known, Ignored & Buried (thelastamericanvagabond.com)

Denny KirkQ
Denny KirkQ
May 1, 2021 5:56 PM
Reply to  Howard

Howard,

thank you for sharing this video. It is the best that I have seen on this whole insanity of Covid 19 and the Jabs. Everyone should watch this. I was not aware of the book that Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi and his wife co-wrote regarding this issue. I plan on getting the book.

The more that I continue to inform myself of the Plandemic, the more confident I am becoming with others when I enter into discussions over this issue.

Most of the people that I am around, whether it be family or friends, have received the Jab. I am beginning to enter a stage whereby I have to accept the responsibility to speak the truth. I am encouraging everyone to do the same.

Be confident, loving and assertive when doing this. As time goes on and the worst does come true, more deaths, perhaps we can at least start to build some bridges of hope. Peace.

sarab
sarab
May 4, 2021 5:11 AM
Reply to  Denny KirkQ

Same. Many friends and family around me have had the shot. I won’t. And I can’t imagine that there was any way for me to arrive at a different decision. I’m uplifted feeling that there is a constellation of us around the globe. 🙂

Denny
Denny
May 1, 2021 10:13 PM
Reply to  Howard

this one from yesterday was his best one yet, a def must watch;

https://www.bitchute.com/video/l4dki1do1HAs/

Sprititual Malenutrition
Sprititual Malenutrition
May 1, 2021 2:45 PM

Manfred in “Shmergelhaim” (whatever that means)

Sprititual Malenutrition
Sprititual Malenutrition
May 1, 2021 2:15 PM

What could Goethe, Schiller, Kant or Nietzsche have done to counter such gigantic Anglo-American words of wisdom as “fuck, shit, crap or piss”? These are the practical fourletter words of eternal truth that rule the world in postmodern times! It is so much easier to express everything than to write pages of unreadable books. “Rock’n’roll” instead of symphony!

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 1:01 PM

The assault on this video by the shills is a strong indication that it is hitting the perpetrators where it hurts. The well known saying that you know that you are over the target when you are getting flack is applicable here.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 2:17 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

Calm down, dimwit. And look in the fucking mirror.

You complain about conformism, as a minimum implicitly, about the fact that the world has swallowed CV-1984, yet you exhibit exactly the same kind of conformism vis-a-vis your dogmatic standpoints.

Don’t go apeshit just because I, and others, have criticized the video. Maybe you have time to spend hours and hours of videos made by mad professors; I don’t.

And don’t you call names people who harbor opinions you don’t like to hear, motherfucker!

Nick
Nick
May 2, 2021 6:48 AM
Reply to  Jacques

Go and have your meltdown somewhere else.

Turning Moment
Turning Moment
May 1, 2021 11:04 AM

One of Europe’s most published immunologists speaks. I guess a mad system had to end in the most warped insanity imaginable.
Meanwhile, my friends and family play Russian Roulette with their lives and run roughshod over my soul.

Mara M
Mara M
May 1, 2021 10:52 AM

I can hear the interviewer but not the Dr!

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 10:26 AM

I have a post captured by the “spam check”. Very little action here today.

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 10:24 AM

We have different kinds of fake opposition on this forum as on other forums. We have the obvious shills like Bob/Orage, We have suspiciously prolific posters like Cat Collector/ Sociopsycho with his interminable stream of irrelevant U Tube music videos. We have ADL sponsored voices like Mandate (and his vast number of aliases). But today Jacques, Petra and Dick have shown themselves to be shills. Attacking a courageous voice for medical sanity and against the great genocide. Jacques seems to think the vaccines are harmless and that all we are facing is a bit of dystopia. But it should be clear by now that the dystopia is for the survivors of the big cull and also as a means of facilitating the cull. These shills stood idly by when Rosemary Frei ripped into the opposition. Jacques also denigrated the marchers that risked pig brutality.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 11:57 AM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

Oh my goodness, Peter, you have it so very wrong.

Do you believe in the virus, Peter? Are you a believer in SARS-CoV-2 and are you a believer in COVID-19? If so, can you say why?

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 12:22 PM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

I do not believe in convid 1984. However the issue of overwhelming importance is the lethal injection cull. This was the objective of the plandemic. We desperately need qualified voices warning the sheeple that the injections are deadly and why. Are you saying that the stuff is harmless ?

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 12:29 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

All right, let me play the devil’s advocate.

WHY do you conclude that the injection is lethal? Or that it’s its purpose? What evidence, what whatever do you have for that claim?

You demand evidence, genuine science, and so on with respect of the virus, and rightly so, but do you employ the same standards to what comes out of your cakehole? Hardly.

Mind you, I’m not saying that the alleged vaccine is harmless, that it won’t have dire consequences, and that it might not be lethal.

I’m simply asking for the application of the same standard as opposed to pulling opinions out of one’s favorite orifices, usually the asshole.

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 1:20 PM
Reply to  Jacques

The crooked establishment’s own dubious figures show the stuff has lethal short term effects. At least 13,000 deaths in just three regions- the US, UK and the rest of Europe. More than all vaccine deaths in four months than in the last 15 years combined. Astronomic levels of serious adverse events. The long term effects are unknown but are likely to be horrendous. Are you not aware that these substances are being promoted and produced by eugenicists that have been bemoaning the size of the human population for decades ? According to them their poisons teach the body to create spike proteins that the immune system will learn to combat. But will these proteins be properly formed ? A scientist who warned of the dangers of prions being formed has been silenced. Women are having heavy menstrual flows after being “jabbed” suggesting that warnings of sterilisation are true. Enhanced and lethal immune responses are likely. Autoimmune diseases and fatal and horrible conditions like MND/ALS are likely. We are at the start of a real life horror story and we are the victims.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 2:11 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

Blah blah blah …

I’m aware of all of that and then some. None of what you say is evidence of anything.

Now provide me with a single piece of evidence that the injections are deliberately intended to be lethal. Experimental? Unsafe? Intended to hook people on vaccines and harness their bodies to the pharma industry/state surveillance? Sure. But prima facie lethal? Why? Cui bono? How has it been logistically arranged I don’t think so.

Kalen
Kalen
May 1, 2021 3:18 PM
Reply to  Jacques

It is you who blah blah blah to stifle open rational debate by insidiously trying to revers burden of proof that vaccines are lethal, it is not skeptics but those who produced jabs and claim jabs are safe must prove that their jabs are not injurious or lethal to satisfaction of skeptics not other way around.

As long as they provide no hard data based proof of safety (no phase 2,3 trials completed, not fully FDA approved ) those jabs must by default be considered dangerous and lethal.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 4:32 PM
Reply to  Kalen

Insidiously … !

Right, that’s precisely the kind of denunciative language the likes of Facebook, Youtube, or any of the present-day censors are using to discredit anybody who says or asks anything they don’t want to hear.

Fuck insidiously and answer the simple question asked above/below. What substantiate evidence is there indicating that the vaccine is intended to be lethal.

That should be simple enough even for you.

Incidentally, I agree with just about anything regarding the nefarious nature of the vaccines. There is ample evidence for that. However, the hysterical claim that the vaccines are INTENDED to be lethal is a bit far-fetched, and since there is no evidence to that effect, I’m asking for some.

Whatever the fuck is the problem with that …?

Kalen
Kalen
May 1, 2021 5:13 PM
Reply to  Jacques

You pretend to debate and that is insidiousness as here people come for open debate not seeking to stifle it as you try to do. If you have your arguments related to jabs present them and open yourself to criticism instead insinuating other people’s ignorance to cover up yours.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 6:10 PM
Reply to  Kalen

Blah blah blah … just answer the simple question above.

Hele
Hele
May 1, 2021 5:59 PM
Reply to  Jacques

You’re right to want evidence.Until that comes to light- Lethality- is at this point- just going to have to viewed as a “bonus” for those interests wishing to depopulate the planet.
So many benefits for those in power- that out weigh risks-profit, mind and body control.

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 3:50 PM
Reply to  Jacques

The onus of evidence is on those who make and promote the experimental vaccine/therapy to reasonably prove it’s safe. Not for us to prove otherwise.

At best, the answer to this question is we don’t know. Whether through design, accident there’s a fair chance it’s unsafe.

But in any event, a ‘don’t know’ isn’t good enough for me. It shouldn’t be good enough for anyone being coerced.

My mum was called 7 times pushing it. Why would you call someone 7 times to push a questionable therapy?

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 4:36 PM
Reply to  Loverat

Well, I agree with all of that. It’s total bullshit, it’s probably very unsafe, it’s this and that.

But saying that the vaccine is INTENDED to kill people is a strong statement, and I’m asking for some reasonable substantiation.

I’m getting none.

After all, there is the possibility that the allegations that “the vaccine is intended to kill” are deliberately spread to make people paranoid, to shift the discourse, the make people focus on a non-issue, etc.

Unlike others, I keep my options and mind open.

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 11:47 PM
Reply to  Jacques

Agreed. Keep an open mind and go with the evidence. Problem I’m getting is that too many pieces are beginning to slot in with the most sinister of scenarios. A lot of circumstantial evidence I guess, and sometimes you have to make that call. After all, waiting for conclusive evidence might be too late.

Yeadon said he can’t think of a benign reason why this vaccine or therapy is being rolled out in the way it is. Can you?

simon
simon
May 2, 2021 6:58 PM
Reply to  Jacques

very good trolling here. are we expecting a pharma exec to release a public statement such as “this vaccine is intended to kill you, peasanr, bwahaha”?

Kalen
Kalen
May 1, 2021 5:19 PM
Reply to  Kalen

This is about toxicity of Pfizer jabs.

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 3:43 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

So far, what concerns me is the range of different side affects with this one. Not necessarily the overall numbers until more information comes in. Headaches in particular are a worry. I think Bhakdi mentions this. I don’t think the Flu vaccine causes this number of side affects. There’s something very wrong here.

Peter Sky
Peter Sky
May 1, 2021 2:03 PM
Reply to  Jacques

it already had dire consequences long before it was even injected into anyone. a year of lockdowns, masks, terror, intubation, sedation, heavy drugging of victims etc. a fake health care system, suppression of health knowledge and destruction of healthy living going on for decades.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 2:35 PM
Reply to  Peter Sky

I was actually asking for a single piece of evidence, anything mildly substantiated by actual fact, corroborated in a non-fallacious way, whatever that the vaccines are intended to be lethal.

I’m all ears, truly. Totally willing to accept it. As long as it has at least a shred of basis in reality.

So, what evidence is there that the vaccines are intended to be lethal?

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 4:37 PM
Reply to  hotrod31

Kindly copy and paste here the passage where the text provides substantiated evidence that the vaccine is INTENDED to kill people.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 2:13 PM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

If everyone in opposition was pushing the message no virus then avoidance of the vaccine is automatic and whether it is dangerous or not becomes irrelevant. No doubt it is dangerous and has had adverse effects but it’s honestly hard to know because it’s easy to imagine they feed us false stories to get us jumping up and down. I know someone in India who only just died supposedly from COVID although he’d had the vaccine, however, I don’t know the details and now is not the right time to ask.

Maiasta
Maiasta
May 1, 2021 2:28 PM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

The person you’re probably referring to is the Tamil actor known as Vivek. He died the day after receiving the vaccine. But the vaccine in question was Covaxin, which is locally produced and is not an RNA “vaccine” (it does, however, contain aluminium and other carconigenic substances). I’m writing up a quick blog post about it. There’s been a big wave of vaccine skepticism in India over the past year, a fact that has even been acknowledged by corporate news.
[EDIT] I just re-read your comment and realised that you were referring to someone you knew [?]. Sorry about that. The rest of my comment remains relevant though. Littlle is being written about post-vaccine death rate outside of Europe & the US.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 2, 2021 9:55 AM
Reply to  Maiasta

Yes it is someone I was only very little acquainted with but certainly he was a good friend of a friend. When a little time has passed I shall ask her exactly what she knows.

I looked up Vivek and in his case I guess it doesn’t seem an unreasonable coincidence that he suffered a heart attack because heart attack can strike at any time – but perhaps you know more than what I’ve just gleaned and have reason to think it seems suspicious. In the case of my acquaintance what I’ve heard is that the cause of death is being treated as COVID and as the evidence shows it doesn’t even exist I think his case looks more suspicious but do not have enough information to have an opinion.

Despite the fact I have no trouble recognising that this pandemic is a complete psyop I do have trouble recognising they’ve unleashed a killer vaccine on us … perhaps I’m more naive than I thought.

Dick
Dick
May 5, 2021 1:08 AM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

When did I say that dickwad? The vaccine is the virus. I know it in my bones.

Dick
Dick
May 5, 2021 1:07 AM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

I’m lost. What did I say? F*&k you anyway sanctimonious prick. You have no frigging idea what is going on.

Dick
Dick
May 5, 2021 1:11 AM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

Look at my comment at May 3 1.58am. I am assuming that I was writing in English and you understand English.

Edwige
Edwige
May 1, 2021 10:21 AM

I wouldn’t normally link a Fraudian article but just occasionally they give some useful information:

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/may/01/its-just-the-beginning-covid-push-to-digital-boosts-big-tech-profits

Well, why would big tech look to suppress anti-covid information? Nope, I can’t see it. Must be the science…

The interesting thing is why did the Fraudian post this? My guess would be to stoke up resentment at the big tech firms ready to pressurise them into introducing more censorship and ultimately a major transformation of the on-line world (biometrics to log on, no more anonymous commenting). It’s also undoubtedly to encourage people to invest in digital.

Peter Sky
Peter Sky
May 1, 2021 8:22 AM

#INDIA: Villagers chase out the testing & vaccination squads. They see through the V-fraud!
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti2/status/1387822081191124994

comment image

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 12:09 PM
Reply to  Peter Sky

This is very sad. But I refer to an article I read here a few months ago.

It posed this question: (might have been a Kit Knightly article)

Is the vaccine safe?
Answer: We simply don’t know.

And the more we learn about blood clotting issues and priming it could well prove to be lethal. No controversy in saying that. Its obvious scientific fact to those but the dim-witted and distracted.

Peter Sky
Peter Sky
May 1, 2021 2:12 PM
Reply to  Loverat

you are mentally deranged if you are asking questions like is a vaccine safe. “even the concept of thinking vaccines are good for us shows you are sick”. next you’ll be asking if dropping a nuclear bomb on a city is safe.

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 3:59 PM
Reply to  Peter Sky

I think you have completely misread my post. My angle, based on the evidence is we don’t know if this vaccine is safe. Likely not. But in any event not knowing is a good enough reason not to take part in this experiment . Being hysterical is hardly going to advance the cause.

George Mc
George Mc
May 1, 2021 8:14 AM

I’ll grant I haven’t had time to fully take in this article, but it seems bizarre:

https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/apr/28/crime-against-humanity-arundhati-roy-india-covid-catastrophe

I was aware that India has been seized as the latest theatre of World War Covid and I’m guessing that the leader Modi is being stung up as an example of “incompetence”, “arrogance” and the ultimate blasphemy “anti-science” but I was quite taken aback by this astonishing ad hominem:

With his customary braying sneer, in which every taunt and barb rises to a high note mid-sentence before it falls away in a menacing echo, he stirred up the crowd.

I could think of any number of ways to sum up what seemed to me the offensive tone of e.g. Thatcher’s haughty narcissistic drone, Blair’s cringing obsequious whine etc. But that would be irrelevant, and I would rightly be denounced for character assassination. But it seems that higher considerations are present here – perhaps that dedication to the Great God Science?

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 10:07 AM
Reply to  George Mc

Has Modi stepped out of line ? He is a staunch supporter of Israel.
This could be the start of the vaccine genocide.

Patrick
Patrick
May 1, 2021 10:46 AM
Reply to  George Mc

I would be skeptical of that article about India. Arundathi Roy is a well known ‘leftist’ often was on Amy Goodman’s “Democray Now” program in America which is a kind of standard leftist operation. Other’s very prominently featured there was the like of Chomski and Naomi Klein. Beyond that I don’t know but Roy is for sure a very typical ‘leftist’

Willem
Willem
May 1, 2021 8:07 AM

I keep being amazed by my colleagues (medical experts) who are

1. Perfectly capable to have a rational debate about proteins, genetic variants, pharmaceuticals, elective procedures, death and diseases and pitfalls of clinical studies, yet
2. Act completely deranged when the topic of covid enters the arena

the issue of the cause of all of this is often discussed here. Well, if some vector stops producing an effect, once the vector disappears the cause is found. And medical experts have used (themselves) as the vector from the beginning of all of this. How could they? – This question keeps on coming back to me. I don’t have a good answer. I just cannot get my hand around the hugeness of their stupidity. It’s infinite!

The current slogan from my colleagues in the news is that ‘you do not vaccinate yourself for yourself, you do it for another’. This is because, we had yet another ‘outbreak’ of ‘vaccinated’ geriatric people in an old people’s home of which 12 of 29 people PCR-ed positive after the second jab. And this is weird ain’t it, when for instance in the Pfizer trial only 8 out of 23000 patients tested positive within 2 months after the jab.

This needs an explanation from the expert!

What does the expert say?
– Chance cannot explain this difference (12 in 29 vs 8 in 23000), the trial must be flawed? (The explanation from statistics)
– Of course they PCR positive. This is what happens if you introduce a spike protein in the body (which you cannot get rid of) to which the PCR must tests positive? (The explanation from biochemists)
– I don’t know, but whatever it is, it makes no sense (the explanation from an agnost or a man in doubt)

Answer: No, of course the expert doesn’t say all the above.
What the experts says is… well you know what the experts says, as I showed it above and it just tires me too much to repeat their nonsense about ‘vaccinating’ yourself for another’.

So what caused of all of this in the old people’s home according to the expert? Simple: It was the (yet unidentified) superspreader, the Typhoid Mary under the asymptomatic visitors who entered the old people’s home!

And this explanation they really consider as scientific (holding up a hypothesis that cannot be falsified). Equally plausible to this story is that the Martians did it, or a deus ex machina, or the Russians. Yeah, maybe a Russian asymptomatic superspreader did it. That would perfectly fit their narrative, but maybe a bit too obvious. So let’s keep with the unifentified person, as if we are speaking about the devil. That is science for you, from the mouth of the medical expert! Mind you, these same experts are about to quote the falsification principle by Popper, a philosopher they love (probably because he, just like them, ridiculed the idea that there could be such a thing as a conspiracy theory, but I digress)

And what I find cringeworthy is that they speak on behalf of medical society, which includes amongst others me.

And some of these experts who talk about this in the news know (because I told them) how I think about these ‘vaccines’ and that there is not a chance in the world that I will ever take them. Which must mean, according to what the experts say in the news that I am an egoist and not part of medical society! – How is that when colleagues with whom you work with are saying that, implicitly, about you in the lamestream news? Which is believed by 90% of my friends and relatives, who then come to me and ask me about my take on this thing? I am not capable to express my rage about this in English (or Dutch) about the way I am being slandered by my so called medical experts and leaders in the news through their incompetence, but I hope that by saying it in this way to you that you understand my rage and frustration. And why I want to get out of medical society ASAP. The nonsense that they say and repeat in the news, well, go ahead, I cannot stop them from doing it, but stop doing it under my name!

I cannot begin to fathom the basis of the stupidity of my colleagues. It is endlessly deep and probably ends in a black hole of non-thinking. As an example: The hospital announced that there will be massive cut backs in funding next year and that loss of jobs are to be expected. My colleagues are stunned, they really are, this is what they are saying to me. Yet they do understand that if you only have certain amount of money, that it can only be spend on a certain amount of topics. So if you have test streets, free vaccination for all, and close (almost) all outpatient contacts and elective procedures, where do you think that the money will go to?

They do it to themselves. The wise thing (I think) is to remain as far away from them as possible while they are doing it to themselves. That is my strategy.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 8:21 AM
Reply to  Willem

Willem, I’m curious to know your opinion. Do you think Typhoid Mary really was a superspreader or could that be a myth? Do you recognise the phenomenon of the asymptomatic infecter in general or not? I know there was at least one book written about Typhoid Mary and her rampant infecting … but then there have been a few books written about 9/11 full of crap.

Willem
Willem
May 1, 2021 8:39 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

In answer to your Questions

‘Willem, I’m curious to know your opinion. Do you think Typhoid Mary really was a superspreader or could that be a myth?’

Well, I used to. But now I have doubts. I wasn’t there at the time, and there is no data, yet is proclaimed to be true. Just like miracles.

‘Do you recognise the phenomenon of the asymptomatic infecter in general or not?’

I used to, but then I wised up and did some ‘unlearning’ about HIV and AIDS (the only ‘disease’ in which I, erroneously, thought, that it could be spread asymptomatically). There is no single proof that asymptomatic infection exists. It is Carl Sagan’s dragon in his garage.

‘I know there was at least one book written about Typhoid Mary and her rampant infecting … but then there have been a few books written about 9/11 full of crap’

I haven’t read that book, but yeah, see above

Corarden
Corarden
May 1, 2021 9:32 AM
Reply to  Willem

Hi Willem
I watched the entire Mullis interview last night before I went to sleep, and really enjoyed it. I can’t remember which commenter here posted the entire interview for us, but thanks to them, it was very entertaining and touched on many things I have talked about over the years outside medicine, of which I know nothing. What a great soul Kary was. Anyway, now I will go back through the comments to find what you wrote a couple of days ago having seen the entire interview.

Willem
Willem
May 1, 2021 3:49 PM
Reply to  Corarden

Found it

https://off-guardian.org/2021/04/27/debunking-msm-lies-about-the-unite-for-freedom-protests/#comment-361552

Happy to hear you enjoyed it. It was Judith who reminded me of the interview and (I think) moneycircus who provided the link for the interview

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 9:41 AM
Reply to  Willem

Thanks, Willem.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 8:30 AM
Reply to  Willem
Willem
Willem
May 1, 2021 8:50 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Well, okay. But typhus is a bacteria which can actually be identified. So asymptomatic bacterial infection: sure. I mean there is a reason why people who go on vacation to India develop gastroenteritis.

Whether that is true for the case of typhoid Mary, don’t know, see above

Whether it is true for a viral infection that has not been isolated, i.e. an invisible virus that is spread by an invisible spreader. Well. ‘It pays to keep an open mind, but no so open that your brains fall out.’

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 9:46 AM
Reply to  Willem

Thanks. I don’t think for one moment that there is any asymptomatic spreading of the alleged COVID-19, of course. That is beyond ludicrous.

swami
swami
May 1, 2021 10:26 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

it not people where possessed once and the church knew who was possessed and the Church could also cure..
this is just the 2021 version.
asymptomatic possible possession
medical lot preform the exorcism via 3 vaccines and many testing.
you can even bump into someone who has the possession and thank god you will get tested by the holy spirit track and trace APP they will inform you someone you meet was possessed, so stay home and be sanitized with holy water testing kit cross and garlic and miracle vaccine approve by the pope himself.
social distancing 2 meters is 6.56167979 feet 666

Dayne
Dayne
May 1, 2021 1:42 PM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Totally. And that’s what makes it a lynchpin in this whole reign of terror: The healthy, functioning human is recast as a big, scary threat that must be locked up, isolated, disempowered and otherwise “contained”.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 2, 2021 2:29 AM
Reply to  Dayne

Very interesting perspective.

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 8:59 AM
Reply to  Willem

Willem

I always enjoy reading your reports. I find the human behaviour I have observed, and read about, inexplicable but fascinating.

I’ve said this before but am starting to think something very sinister is at play. Its like a cult – the mask wearing on Twitter profiles and dance routines. Its like many people have taken a zombie pill. Nothing would surprise me anymore – my views on Covid 19 etc have evolved so much, first it was simply being sceptical of lockdowns in response to a virus, to all sorts of agendas unthinkable 12 months ago.

I wonder how this behaviour can be compared to the 17th century witch hunts and medical thinking then. Mind you, I’m reminded that Samuel Pepys had a successful gall bladder operation (probably 1630s, 40s) so perhaps things weren’t so bad then.

EDITH
EDITH
May 2, 2021 12:15 AM
Reply to  Loverat

no it is just neptune weaving its magic spell on human mind….. when combined with eclipses in communication/thinking houses…… it did the same thing at the beginning of the AIDs nonsense but only with one eclipse……we have had to suffer through 2 and have one more to go…….it is really making sure this time….
nothing sinister really………just energy……… and it isn’t to our credit that so many have no understanding of same and run around like chooks with heads cut off making up stories to explain the simple……

Dors
Dors
May 1, 2021 10:02 AM
Reply to  Willem

I just cannot get my hand around the hugeness of their stupidity. It’s infinite!

You’ve probably already heard of the book “Disciplined Minds,” but just to mention in case you haven’t. And its basic message chimes with my own observations in various schools, including among way-above-averagely bright students. Schools’ hidden curriculum : training to conform to the unspoken rules. It can be perceived as having taste, refinement, and realises itself in conforming to pseudo-intellectual fashions.

to remain as far away from them as possible while they are doing it to themselves. That is my strategy.

Welcome to the club. 🙂

Dors
Dors
May 1, 2021 10:15 AM
Reply to  Dors

But the most basic answer is actually not schools: people are shaped from an earlier age.

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
May 1, 2021 11:05 AM
Reply to  Dors

Thanks for the tip

Review of Jeff Schmidt’s Disciplined Minds: A Critical Look at Salaried Professionals and the Soul-Battering System that Shapes their Lives

He cites opinion polls taken during the Vietnam war showing that support for the war was greater among those with more higher education. But what about the widespread perception that professionals have more progressive views on issues ranging from crime to capitalism? Schmidt says that professionals may have progressive views about distant social issues, but in the workplace professional attitudes prevail, and they are uncritical.

Schmidt argues that what really makes an individual a professional is not technical knowledge, but rather “ideological discipline”…

The Coming Revolution
The Coming Revolution
May 1, 2021 5:49 PM
Reply to  Moneycircus

Haven’t read the book but Schmidt couldn’t be more spot on about “The Soul-battering System That Shapes Their Lives”: although the origin of the peculiar, square-shaped graduation hat is still debatable, the connection with what a square is a symbol for comes powerfully to mind: according to Merriam-Webster, one of the meanings of the verb “to square” is “to set right”.

A square hat over one’s head would thus indicate a mind that has been set “right”, a yet another mind to engross the army that supports the current state of affairs.

Willem
Willem
May 1, 2021 1:13 PM
Reply to  Dors

‘ You’ve probably already heard of the book “Disciplined Minds’

Happy to say that I ordered it, based on your previous comment. I look forward to reading it. Thanks!

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
May 1, 2021 10:11 AM
Reply to  Willem

Willem, sounds to me as if you’re ripe for a shift over into ‘alternative’ – that is: non-allopathic – medicine. I’ve been around professional practitioners of non-allo disciplines much of my life, as well as being a doctor-yourself amateur in the field, on my own – and my dogs’ – account. It is indeed alternative to allo approaches, and for my money, it’s noticeably superior. It still makes eclectic use of proven, reliable drugs too, plus the huge range of traditional herbal and homeopathic medicines. Not snotty about mix’n’match – if it works! That’s the key proviso.

It frees you from having to toe the scientismic dogma lines currently enforced – so obviously malignly – in lamestream medicine. Corruption-capture of alternative systems by gangster-capitalist rackets like the BPharma criminals is also much more difficult, and inherently less profitable to them, too. ‘Barefoot doctors’ don’t make good cash cows for racketeers – which is why the BPh crooks and their techno-tabaquis denigrate alt-medicine with such vicious mendacity, of course.

With the mind freed thus, it becomes possible to entertain – and to test by trial and error – hypotheses which allo-orthodoxy just can’t abide, such as the current discussion about ‘viruses’ versus ‘exosomes’, for just one example (and in spite of the counter-dogmatic ‘certainty’ indulged wankily by some commenters here, this issue ISN’T settled at all yet. We really don’t know for sure whether viruses exist in fact, or not; nor do we know for sure whether ingestion of viruses/exosomes is bad, or actually an ancient, highly-useful and necessary strand of the evolutionary process – at least for those who have maintained their physical robustness by prudent life-styles. That discussion of hypotheses continues. Dogmatic certainty about it is for wanky self-deluders. The true scientific method, where dogma is always eschewed with vigour, continues to demonstrate its real value).

In the ‘alternative’ worldview, you’re also able to venture into the frequently highly-productive field of ‘energy medicine’ too. This approach – whether its theoretical basis is correct or not – allows practitioners to make use of their own and their patients’ unbending intent; which, as any student of Castaneda’s stories knows, is a potent affector of surrounding physical, material reality – including living bodies – in its own right. (See the meticulously high-quality experimental work of Dean Radin at the Institute Of Noetic Science outfit for some of the most recent examples of the long-time accumulated body of quality experimental science-work that has verified some clear ideas of this potent effect).

W, your continuing very obvious angst at the idiocy which you have to tolerate at your job, just to keep your vocation going, is very evident. Could it be the universe nudging you with the suggestion that it’s time to consider changing course, to become a more authentic healer…?

Willem
Willem
May 1, 2021 1:21 PM

‘ W, your continuing very obvious angst at the idiocy which you have to tolerate at your job, just to keep your vocation going, is very evident. Could it be the universe nudging you with the suggestion that it’s time to consider changing course, to become a more authentic healer…?’

Definitely. But first I want to unwind all the nonsense that I had to learn in the last 20 years about what ‘medicine’ is before going into a new field.

I am, however, much more willing to consider alternatives to medicine in account than I used to. Even admitting such a minor thing is considered heresy in the club that I currently work with.

Dayne
Dayne
May 1, 2021 1:53 PM

Institute Of Noetic Science… Founded in the 70s; by an austronaut who had “walked on the Moon”; explores paranormal phenomena…

Do I need to go on? All of this screams “CIA front peddles the occult.”

dr death
dr death
May 1, 2021 1:17 PM
Reply to  Willem

to wit:

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”

‘upton sinclair’

or similairly:

“Hear, hear! It’s all a question of trusts and monopolies. Doctors have a monopoly of medicine just as parsons have of God. You can’t get a parson to admit the arguments of an agnostic, because his salary depends on his not letting the agnostic refute him; and you can’t get an ordinary doctor to look kindly on psychoanalysis or autosuggestion because their success would make him superfluous.
All this is not a question of the Life Force at all; it is a question of bread and butter.”

‘C. E. M. Joad’

Dayne
Dayne
May 1, 2021 1:37 PM
Reply to  Willem

Someone on LinkedIn posted a photo of a coffee shop sign that says “Masks Required — We Don’t Care if you’re vaccinated / or if you think covid is a hoax” etc. Needless to say, it received thunderous applause and thousands of likes from the corporate types.

Good luck to the shop owner, I say. Insulting, patronizing and alienating customers during these trying times — and in the name of a Big Lie, no less — now, there’s a strategy!

EDITH
EDITH
May 2, 2021 12:12 AM
Reply to  Willem

willem they use the same argument again and again……wear a mask to protect others, social distance to protect others, stay home to protect others, and now get vax to protect others….very odd as at no point can people assume to beharming/ murdering others unless they have a gun or knife that they are about to plunge or shoot into them…and even then one may survive…. there seems to be this peculiar delusion abounding about how we can endanger others or have the right to hurt them… well until they have been Vax and die and then oh well they were old or sick or something.

at the start i wrung this admission out of a friend who told me she was wearing her mask because she feared she may kill me….. i did laugh out loud and tell her not to be so bloody stupid……she had no issued right to kill me and to take the stupid thing off….which she did very sheepishly……. still wears it elsewhere even now…..groan…..no saving some from their stupidity and obviously your colleagues are in the grip of this crazy….

not long to go now and the illusions, delusions will start to ease…….one eclipse to go….

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 8:05 AM

“we should be trying to come with strategies of resistance”

Absolutely!

The best strategy is proving to be not giving a shit. The last couple of days I passed through the city twice, and I’m happy to report that just about nobody wears the fucking respirator, that more and more bars/pubs are open (it’s prohibited), and that life is starting to look kinda normal. The occasional masked dimwit stands out like the sore fucking thumb he or she is.

Best of all, the cops don’t seem to give a damn either. They’ve clearly had enough too. A while ago, it was prohibited to travel between districts (unless you made up one of quite a large number of excuses) and it was enforced mildly to say the least. I traveled across the country regularly, and never saw any cops. A friend of mine told me that cops stationed on a road leading into Prague, who were required to stop cars (probably surveilled by fucking drone), were telling people who broke the rules something like “You know sir, you don’t have permission to go into the city, but the closest place where you can turn around is when you already get there. Do you think we’ll come after you to check that you did … (wink wink)?”

Fuck them. Read The Good Soldier Schweik. Fuck them … !

Most of all, STOP TALKING ABOUT THE VIRUS!! I mean other than telling whoever is pushing the virus to fuck off. Or to shove the vaccine up their ass.

Dick
Dick
May 1, 2021 9:12 AM
Reply to  Jacques

Don’t you want to run over those fucking masked idiots. News flash dumbos. If this was a real virus your dumb fuck mask wouldn’t help you one iota. Surgeons wear masks because of bacteria not viruses.

Thom
Thom
May 1, 2021 7:11 AM

I wouldn’t want all those chemicals injected into me for what is at worst a very minor condition for most people. I suspect the jabs are basically placebos, though.
Clearly far more people are wise to this than is being admitted – and you can probably gauge the honesty of the government in question by how many they’re claiming are taking up the vaccine. Even my local paper has shut down comments on anything covid-related so the masters are obviously scared the game is up.

Schmitz Katze
Schmitz Katze
May 1, 2021 7:00 AM

Dr Sucharit Bhakdi is a hero for sounding the alarm from the get-go. Vielen lieben Dank Herr Professor !
Prof. Bhakdi as many of his esteemed colleagues, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, to name but one, are censored in German MSM and banned from German TV.
As in all of Europe, there is complete absence of scientific debate.There is only one ongoing pandemic narrative, although there is no excess mortality. In 2020 alone Germany has closed 20 hospitals and cut more than 5000 ICU beds. The country´s health care system was never in danger of getting overwelmed.
Now even children are being misused as test subjects for mRNA gene therapy, although especially young and healthy people do not need an untested so-called vaccine, for a virus that does not affect them. It stands to reason but how are brainwashed people to know when there is no open debate on TV only vaccination propaganda from even various chairpersons of the German Ethics Committee. Not one of them is called Dr M.Engele (wordplay, meaning „little angels“ in German) in case you are wondering why New Normal Ethics will make your hair stand on end.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 6:44 AM

Although I have previously declared a war on these videos, as I don’t have time to watch this or that mad professor’s mildly incoherent rants for – surprise, surprise – I have a life to live, I’ve watched a few bits of this. Nothing new under the sun, we’ve heard all of this before.

The bottom line here is that only a FUCKING MORON will allow him/herself injected with an experimental genetic concoction for a disease that does not exist and even if it did, it would be mostly harmless. Well, I guess it does exist – people do get cough or the flu once in a while.

As much as it’s tragic that people suffer from adverse reactions or even die (I’d hope that those who got this shite voluntarily will all receive the Darwin Award), I’d be more worried about long-term effects than adverse reactions immediately or shortly after injection. Including the fact that people are being made even more dependent on the pharma industry and put on a medical leash if these vaccines become mandatory.

Be it as it may, the point here is neither the alleged virus nor the vaccination, well I the latter is as per the above, but the transformation of the world toward totalitarianism.

Discussing the virus is beating a dead horse.

People need to discuss a new ideology, new vision for the future. Preferably not through the prism of all sorts of false dichotomies, such as the left/right, and other bullshit concepts that have proved to be a cul-de-sac, a divide-and-conquer stratagem intended to fuck people up and steer them in the wrong direction.

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
May 1, 2021 10:19 AM
Reply to  Jacques

Despite my ironic comment further up, J, I’m one of the people who gave you an upvote for this post. 🙂 The virus/exosome discussion is still worth having, though. That question definitely isn’t settled, despite all the dogmatic, anti-scientific assertions by the self-indulgent virus-slaggers here.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 10:52 AM

I appreciate your or anybody’s comments. I don’t quite understand what up/down-voting is good for. If one has something to say, let one say it. Expressing like/dislike is meaningless, totally subjective, contributing nothing to nothing.

As far as viruses, exosomes, germ, and the theories behind all of this, I’ve learned a lot in the past 12 months. Some of the stuff I’ve since read has confirmed my doubts about viruses as a cause of disease, but I’m not ready to dismiss them entirely, as some people do. I’ve assumed neutral stance.

Personally, however, I’ve become much less concerned about disease, viruses, catching something. Kinda the opposite of most people, or at least those who have fallen for the CV-1984 hype.

Be it as it may, I’m neither a virologist nor do I aspire to become one or even investigate disease to any great length. Instead, I focus on staying healthy insofar as possible, by exercising, not overindulging or not too often, and so on. Not accumulating stress and frustration.

What I really wish is that people were more future-oriented, (more) interested in looking beyond the horizon and more given to seeking alternative, better ways to live. The absolute vast majority of people who think that they do that are only caught in discussion about improving the status quo within the established paradigms. They’re running in circles in a cage, unable to see beyond its bars.

The worst part of what we’re living through is that Klaus Schwab has a vision, the technocratic vision. Those who oppose it don’t have one – there vision is either nothing or the pre-CV status quo.

dtanti
dtanti
May 1, 2021 6:26 PM
Reply to  Jacques

Jacques, I am with you. We need to stop obsessing over and participating in the BS status quo and start engaging in envisioning and creating something new, building intentional communities, and re-learning how to rely (healthily) on one another.

EDITH
EDITH
May 2, 2021 12:21 AM
Reply to  Jacques

it occurs to me that the obsessing is simply part of the same game played by the various Govts etc……. there is plenty of info out there that repeating anything makes it normal……so endless repeating about the scam helps to makes the scam normal too…… as well as being pretty boring if one has half a mind…..

Wayne Vanderploeg
Wayne Vanderploeg
May 1, 2021 5:12 PM
Reply to  Jacques

I agree that this is more of the same. However, he is accredited and less likely to be attacked by the MSM and could, possibly, trigger a wider response from other researchers with far more to lose. It is likely that this video led to the pausing of the J&J vaccine. It got the attention of the CDC. I think the CDC was waiting to see if there was a major reaction in the American population. And there was not. At least few details of the clotting mechanisms. Put this video out there ten months ago and that would have been the complete end of the vaccine drive. I need to talk with my kids again to make sure they are not coerced into vaccinating my grand kids who are between the ages of 5 and 11.

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
May 1, 2021 6:41 AM

The mental manipulation of Brits continues. The Telegraph: Overseas holidays get green light from May 17. Teacher says, school’s out! Yay!

Why is it that Britain and its former colonies are the most sheep-like and controlled? It’s not the constitutions… they’re all significantly different.

I suggest the the British ruling class do have a better set of tricks. From the time of the Reformation and the Tudor police state, including the role of Shaksper-Marlowe-Oxford, the English hymnal and the state’s control of everything published or printed (which continued formally until the late 1960s, and informally to this day) which together constituted the creation of a national myth… and in the process cultivated a public mentality that culminates in Huxley’s description of the slave loving his slavery.

It is this psychology that gets Brits to snitch on each other in vomit-inducing conformity; and for Australians, Kiwis and Canadians to junk the pioneer spirit of self-reliance in the face of adversity and to sit like a dog in a cage, snout stuck out, waiting for a pat and a snack.

Could this be why the robber barons and their tax-evading foundations gravitate to Britain, for the advice of its buttoned-up, pervert spooks and its test bed population of Pavlovian dogs?

It’s not any levers or laws, hidden or enacted that the Committee of 300 pull. Nor is a secret charter of Rothschild-Rhodes or the reassuringly snobby imprimatur of Rothschild&Rockefeller&Royalty but something at once banal and burnished…

… a system that produces the old yet effective hierarchy of compromised headboys, opportunist school monitors (prefects) hopeful of promotion, psychopathic bullies (capos) and schoolyard sheep.

This is why you end up with a Boris Johnson, parachuted in from the same old-same old; the opportunity for a jumped-up boot-licker like Matt Hancock to gain power outside his class (punch above his weight, in the British lexicon) while the MPs fall, as one, into the role of school monitors with one or two playing the archetypal school rebel with a dashing quiff.

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
May 1, 2021 8:39 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

The most senior school monitors are promoted by caste and get into the elite societies by connection or privilege. These become the powerful but barely visible cadre of mandarin bureaucrats.

MPs are the theatrical and debating societies, the denizens of school hall who tread the boards so that they know, even blindfold, how far they can go in any direction before they bump into the arch or fall off the stage.

We see them in faded photographs, stacked on trestle tables for a school photograph, high to low in a powerless illusion of privilege.

Or, if we close our eyes, we can just remember them in that valedictory review: stage right in straw boaters and blazers, hands paddling in unison, singing something written in the 1960s as a paean to a bygone age; stage left in 1940s Agitprop, fists piercing the air, appropriated from some revolutionary dressed by a banker in a staged coup that redistributed some wealth or stole something or other.

Remember the golden rule. When teacher raises her finger to her lips: hush! And when the bell rings, stop thinking and leave the room in an orderly fashion.

Learn well, my pretties, learn well. You will prove most limited — I mean, useful.

Oblio
Oblio
May 1, 2021 11:00 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

My take. The media have always ridiculed the working class whilst at the same time linking intelligence to accents. The life chances (in the UK ) with a strong english working class regional accent are virtually nil. This discrimination is bred into us from childhood, I FIND MYSELF DOING IT, it’s ingrained in all of us mainly due to the BBC etc. This is how they control us.

Wayne Vanderploeg
Wayne Vanderploeg
May 1, 2021 5:22 PM
Reply to  Moneycircus

I remember teachers planting the idea of going to college in middle school. They told us the story of how the Germans were doing it.

Only best students were chosen for the next level. The rest were relegated to trade school (as if that was the bottom of the barrel). So you better start studying!

And I bought that shit for a while.

Fuck. I should have been a brick layer!

Edwige
Edwige
May 1, 2021 8:53 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

When the generational crime syndicates deamped to Britain because of its security from external invasion they weren’t about to be undermined from within.

IMO you’re correct to date this back to the Tudors and some of their statecraft tricks. I’d add a couple of other factors: 1) Britain was the earliest culture to become dominated by print media. I remember reading social historians like Roy Porter eulogising Britain’s “coffee house culture” where what we would now call “the chattering classes” gathered in coffee houses to read and discuss the newspapers. Rather than some unique British genius, it’s now clear this was an exercise in mind control 2) The British have been manipulated into a particular attitude to revolutions. The British-based rulers manouevred rival countries, starting with France, into disastrous bloodbaths that not only destroyed them as great power rivals but gave revolution a bad name at home. Quite rightly nobody wanted to go through a ‘reign of terror’. Britian’s few attempts at revolution have been so feeble that nobody would try to repeat them (and useful stooges tell us there’s something against British identity in rising up. This is of course utterly cynical because these people have no real belief in national identities and want to destroy them).

In reality Britain has had successful revolutions – but they’ve been imposed from above and obfuscated in the historic record. William of Orange came to power in a revolution backed by a massive invasion force. The winners wrote the history and most people haven’t a clue about it. It’s a period that desperately needs more study, for example how the Bank of England came to be founded just five years later (like most British “truthers” I know more about the Federal Reserve than I do about the Banke of England).

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
May 1, 2021 10:43 AM
Reply to  Edwige

I agree about the silence about William of Orange. It is very blatantly ignored yet was the time when the institutions of modern financial power evolved. History of the City of London must needs remain niche.

As to the print media, I’d respectfully say it’s more complex. There was a “chattering class” but Elizabeth’s reign severely restricted the printing trade and the Continent got newspapers 50-years-to-a-century before England.

In 1665 came the Oxford Gazette… but that was Oxford… heavily controlled. It was not til 1702 that London got the Courant, the same year that Moscow got Vedomosti.

The fist in the other glove was censorship. Over the centuries Britain deftly avoided the appearance of state censorship, gaining a reputation for free speech to rival that of Switzerland.

Most British students are taught of Gloriana, the virgin Queen whose virtue like her intellectual rigor you didn’t fiddle with. This whitewashes her security state that rivaled any in history by the measures of psychological torture, societal penetration and brutal enforcement.

The Swiss managed an equally impressive reversal of history, swapping a long history of immolation and femicide (Switzerland’s record on witch burning rivals all comers) to become the paragon of international human rights.

This is the trick, I suspect. Once all of society has been drenched in blood, no-one brings up the subject. The People learn to go along to get along.

Sir John Harington: “Treason doth never prosper. What’s the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
May 1, 2021 10:37 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

Spot on, M! What you’re describing is the self-perpetuating English-raj-class, who really got going after the Norman invasion, and who have been the gics – the gangsters-in-charge – in England and its ghastly expanding empire, running the show in Britain ever since.

The primary instruments of their continuing domination are their long-continued global-fleecing rackets in the City of London, and their always crypto-fascist military: the cannon-fodder instrument of their centuries long spree of armed-robbery and occupation, around the world; now thankfully faltering into its end-of-empire dotage.

The reason we have an utterly-incompetent shitshow like Bozo and his jackal-crew ostensibly ‘running’ things right now is because the raj long ago perfected their skill at running a pretend democracy – actually a rabid anti-democracy beneath all the ersatz pomp – which normally gets enough suckers to believe in it enough of the time. Lying-grafter crooks like Bozo get to be toy-PMs because they have the ‘right’ plummy accent, and the ‘right’ rabid raj-school indoctrination.

May Hem
May Hem
May 1, 2021 5:14 AM

I could see and hear Dr Bhakdi clearly. He also explains clearly the implications of gene-based injections and spike proteins. Excellent.

But …… he seems to believe there actually is a covid virus. This seems strange given his knowledge and experience. What do others think?

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 6:14 AM
Reply to  May Hem

He does describe it as a “so called pandemic”.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 7:03 AM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

Big deal.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 7:03 AM
Reply to  May Hem

As I say in a comment below, May Hem, anyone who should know better who doesn’t say there’s no virus is likely controlled opposition.

If there’s no virus, then it doesn’t matter the dangers of the vaccine, there is simply no justification for it, danger or no danger. Even if the vaccine were completely benign there is no reason for it. Very straightforward … but they don’t want straightforward, they want us jumping up and down about this that and the other, getting our knickers in a twist about this that and the other when all we have to say is:

This is a psyop, there’s no “novel” virus. End of.

epousedesacrecoeur
epousedesacrecoeur
May 4, 2021 1:24 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Exactly. This is a very truthful, straightforward understanding.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 5:10 AM

People, people, people.

Why doesn’t this guy know THERE IS NO “NOVEL” VIRUS? What does he say to Samuel Eckert’s unresponded-to offer of 1.5 million euros for proof of its isolation?
https://www.samueleckert.net/isolat-truth-fund/

The dangers of the vaccine are completely irrelevant if there is no requirement for one.

They just keep us going with all the nonsense.

There is no virus. There is no virus. There is no virus. There is no virus.

When there is no virus all else is irrelevant.

Make the assumption that anyone who should know better who doesn’t say there is no virus is probably controlled opposition – well they are definitely controlled opposition but whether they’re “innocent” controlled opposition or paid controlled opposition is another matter.

Prof Sucharit Bhakdi’s parents are diplomats and he’s won a number of prestigious awards – does that increase or decrease your confidence in his genuineness in relation to this psyop?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucharit_Bhakdi

It’s good to understand the basic strategy for an Emperor’s New Clothes psyop – distraction. We have masses and masses and masses of distraction keeping us away from the fundamental truth that there is no novel virus. It’s distraction, distraction, distraction, distraction.

Captain Birdheart
Captain Birdheart
May 1, 2021 6:12 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Thanks Petra,

What level of distraction are you ? Level 3 or 4, or 21 ..?

Like I said a while back, we need a key on who believes what.

Some of your ‘choices’ are spot on, others..na

There is truth. I don’t pretend to know it, though.

Not that there isn’t a fight, there is.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
May 1, 2021 6:52 AM

There is a virus. There’s not a virus. It’s a bioweapon. It’s not a bioweapon. Professor X is controlled opposition. Professor Y is genuine opposition.
I actually agree with quite a lot of what Petra says, and yes, this is definitely one massive pysops.
But my concern is a lot of us are getting caught up in the minutiae of whether there is or isn’t.
Perhaps, in my opinion, we should be trying to come with strategies of resistance instead, as well as physically and mentally preparing for what’s coming; and I include here an almost certain cyber pandemic and induced economic collapse (so as to usher in a digital currency) and even more so, connect and link up with other like minded people.
That’s just what I think anyway…

Captain Birdheart
Captain Birdheart
May 1, 2021 7:21 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Agreed, Gezzah
Actually shaved my moustache off, after two years, in solidarity ! (been up all night)
Good to know people like you are ‘on-side’ !

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
May 1, 2021 7:35 AM

What these pyscho bastards intend is just horrific, and sorry, we can’t afford to be squabbling over details anymore, because we’ve been doing this for over a year now.
We already KNOW what they’re planning, and we all need to unite as much as possible. That’s my say on this.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 7:57 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

I’m afraid I strenuously disagree, Gezzah. There’s no minutiae if there’s no virus is there? The minutiae only occur if there is a virus.

No virus – end of
Virus – all kinds of concerns about measures to be taken or not taken

In a psyop clarity is important. It’s always the Emperor’s New Clothes and only what is wanted for real is done for real, it’s so very, very simple but people seem to want to make it more complicated than it really is. In this psyop they didn’t want a virus and it wouldn’t have worked for their narrative in any case.

No virus
All the rest is propaganda … there’s the propaganda promulgated 24/7 in the media and there’s the propaganda directed to the disbelievers of the media story by the controlled opposition. And controlled opposition is not all that difficult to determine generally speaking.

Controlled opposition is anyone not saying there’s no virus – they could be genuine opposition but simply not get it or paid opposition who do get it.

When we know there’s no virus then resistance against that simple lie is more powerful … and they do everything in their power to weaken resistance. The resistance message is “freedom” – that’s a message crafted by controlled opposition because no need to fight for freedom if there’s no virus in the first place.

Captain Birdheart
Captain Birdheart
May 1, 2021 8:25 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Again,many people here get the no virus but your standing on other key issues, screams controlled op.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
May 1, 2021 8:31 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Petra… I’ll say right up front: this covid bullshit is a Scamdemic. It’s a huge pysops against humanity. Yes. Agree with you on that.
I’m almost in agreement with you regards the “virus” as well. My position is there’s no virus if they can’t show its been isolated and purified as per Koch’s Postulates. In essence I’m saying WHERE is this ‘virus’?
However… that’s Not the point of what I was saying. I was trying to say if we keep squabbling over details instead of focusing on the intended plans of the 0.01% we will get nowhere.
My point was we need to unify against What Is Coming – a technofascist 1984 nightmare that those Behind the scamdemic want to impose on us.
I strongly disagree with your opinion that if there’s no virus in the first place, there’s no need to fight for freedom.
What about the vaccine passports? What about their plans for a Central Bank digital currency? What about contact tracing? What about biometric ID? What about 5G and the Internet of Things?
With respect P, I’m trying to look at the Big Picture and what these bastards want to do to humanity, and not just focus on whether there’s a virus or not.

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
May 1, 2021 11:22 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Well G, part of the constant disputes here is Petra’s delusional certainty that she knows which propositions are absolutely certainly unquestionably true, and which absolutely certainly unquestionably aren’t. Sure sign of a rabid delusional: A scientismist rather than a scientist.

The real – actually-scientific – fact about viruses is that their whole existence is in discussion, along with the whole Pasteurian germ theory of illness, with the exosome idea coming up to challenge them. And – quite clearly for anyone determined to stay on their trolley – that dispute simply hasn’t been settled yet. Real, evidence-driven science is never ‘settled’. It’s always a permanently-open discussion. Basic scientific method.

Also, the fairly well-established-by-now fact that a covid virus hasn’t been purified and put through the Koch tests, in itself doesn’t prove that NO viruses exist. It may even be that the covid virus exists; or perhaps it really is a useful message-and-sample-bearing exosome after all, spreading vital natural immune-stimulating information widely to the herd…

As to practical strategising to off the globalists’ malign agenda around the scamdemic, I’d say that resistance is already in the simmering-steadily stage, and is already generating some effective counter-action, which is making the scammers wobble a bit, and wonder whether they’d better stop trying to push this particular covid iteration of their criminal scams, for the time being, in case they provoke a pitchforks-and-lampposts insurrection. Resistance is coming along nicely. Why do you think so many medics – and lay-people – are refusing the poison-stabs right now? And that will grow, as the death count from the stabs continues to grow, and to be un-hideable?

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 11:32 AM

Let’s get one thing clear, I make no claims about viruses in general, all I say is that there is no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 and that is an incontrovertible fact.

If there’s a single skerrick of evidence of SARS-CoV-2 please let me know what it is.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
May 1, 2021 11:52 AM

Appreciate your reply R, and yes, I’m trying to keep an open mind, and, er, ‘stay on my trolley’ as it were, but as I said above, I’m much more concerned about the Big Picture – where this agenda is heading, and the deadly consequences of that.
Look at Israel and the Green Pass or the Excelsior Pass in New York as just two examples.
As much as I hate too, I’m going to have to really bite my tongue when selling the mag, or I’ll get sacked. No more income. Today, a woman came up to buy mag wearing a facemask. I made the comment “it would be nice to see your face” in a polite manner.
She said she was a microbiologist and there was a slim chance the virus was ‘still about’. She then mentioned about India. I let rip, told her over 27000 people die in India everyday, mentioned the awful air pollution there, and also said the virus had never been purified using Kochs Postulates.
She claimed it had been sequenced and I was wrong. Anyway, I got quite angry (Irish blood) and insisted it hadn’t been scientifically proven to exist.
She goes “we’re ending this conversation now” and as she walked off I called out ‘enjoy your fascism’.
Sigh.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 12:05 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Oh dear, Gezzah. I understand how you feel. I’m having quite a hostile conversation with a friend at the moment. She’s Jewish although totally not interested in her heritage or religion nevertheless I just think her attitude is just like that of the good Germans who stood by as so many of her fellow Jews were gassed in ovens.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 11:44 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Gezzah, What I try to do is get clear on psyop MO because when you get clear on psyop MO there is no squabbling, it’s all so clear.

From Day One, before the science said so, I knew there would be no virus because that wouldn’t be psyop MO. They didn’t want a virus, they didn’t need a virus and a virus wouldn’t have worked for their narrative in any case. In psyops it’s all faked unless wanted for real. Golden rule No. 1. All faked unless wanted for real.

The MO for big psyops is to have two distinct streams of propaganda, one targeted to the believers and one targeted to the disbelievers (by controlled opposition), plus multiple smaller streams to distract and confuse, eg, Judy Mikovits and her Wuhan lab drivel. The main propaganda stream targeted to the disbelievers is “Well, yes, there is a virus but … masks ineffective / lockdown counterproductive / vaccine dangerous etc.

The MO is to control the opposition message to have it fight at the secondary level of untruth not the primary level. If there’s no virus then no need for vaccine no need for vaccine passport etc OK? What we need to do is EXPOSE the lie of the virus and then automatically no vaccine passport, OK? No need to fight for freedom, we just fight for the truth and freedom comes automatically. If someone’s in jail for a crime they’re innocent of you don’t fight against their conditions you fight for their innocence then their freedom comes automatically.

I don’t know what the problem is. I just say the same thing over and over and over and over again and yet I cannot make myself clear.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
May 1, 2021 12:13 PM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Petra… I’m not having a go at you. Forget about the virus – they don’t need a “virus” anymore because look at what they’re doing: the Green Pass in Israel, the Excelsior Pass in New York, the World Economic Forum Common Pass, Qantas announcing no jab, no international flights, digital travel cards to be introduced in Australia in August, Jacinda Ardern announced the other day all frontline workers must be vaccinated or they will be ‘moved on’, almost certainly if you’re not jabbed you will be locked out of restaurants, pubs, cinemas, etc.
That’s what I’m trying to say. The massive threat to our freedom whether the virus even exists or not. Yes, it’s a scamdemic. A fraud. I’m saying to you to look at the big picture.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 2:06 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Whether the virus exists or not …

But if the virus doesn’t exist then a priori there is no need for any of what they’re implementing whereas if it did exist there’s room for argument. Sure, even if it did exist the vaccine would still be completely unnecessary but the point is when there’s no virus … and there isn’t then vaccine is automatically out of the question, there’s simply no discussion about it and if all those in opposition to what’s happening were all clear on no virus, it would simplify things wouldn’t it? But they’re not all clear on it … and the person in the video is not helping make it clear is he?

You walk down the street calling for freedom but freedom from what exactly?

You walk down the street and say “there’s no virus” then it’s very clear – even if people think you’re nuts, the message is still very clear – and it’s THE TRUTH!

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 6:15 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Your own support of the moon hoax(es) is a little suspicious, Petra.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 6:43 AM
Reply to  Peter Abraham

Why? About the only two things I think are real that others challenge are the moon landings and man-made climate change – and there are certainly other commenters on this site in agreement with me on those two things. On everything else including the Challenger disaster I’m mostly in agreement with others … except where I go beyond. It’s not as if I “support” NASA. I know they lied about Challenger, but the evidence shows astronauts went to the moon. It’s just that simple. What doesn’t constitute evidence against: “If we’d gone we would have gone again,” “Couldn’t have got through the Van Allen belts,” “The Russians were more advanced”. There is no EVIDENCE against having gone to the moon, just assertions and logical fallacies including argument from incredulity and argumentum ad speculum. People think that they can claim that the moon landings were faked without any clear explanation of the fakery. No! That is not evidence, the claim of “could be faked” or “were faked” without clear explanation of the fakery cannot be used as argument.
http://occamsrazormoonlandings.weebly.com/

Captain Birdheart
Captain Birdheart
May 1, 2021 7:54 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

Where is the evidence, it’s there, there on the chair. Sadly, you are the psyop yourself now, you sat there.

Edwige
Edwige
May 1, 2021 9:52 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

“without any clear explanation of the fakery.”

For goodness sake, there is a ton of “explanation of the fakery”. I’m not even clear what that means. Do you mean the nitty-gritty of how it was done? Not every detail of 9/11 can be completely explained beyond all doubt – but you wouldn’t say that means it was 19 hijackers with box-cutters.

Some of the logistics:
1) The external shots in space were obviously models shot using stop-motion photography. Look at where the lander docks with the orbiter after supposedly coming back from the moon’s surface for the most obvious example.
2) The film supposedly on the moon’s sirface was most probably on a sound stage. There are multiple anomalies in the footage and two films (‘Diamonds are Forever’ and ‘Capricorn One’) revealed the method. The slow motions of the astronauts were achieved simply be slowing the film down 50%. Why would one move slowly in less gravity? The weight of the spacesuits is considerably less than the gravitional drag (so-called) on Earth. Why does no astronaut perform a feat impossible on Earth (like jumping ten feet in the air)? Again, this should be possible in the moon’s stated gravity. Did they use balloons and/or wires as well? Probably – but one can’t say either way for certain. Some footage may also have been shot in remote Earthly locations but given how they reused backgrounds with different foregrounds sound stages seem more likely. I don’t believe Kubrick personally shot the film (it would be rather better!) but I suspect he acted as consultant – there’s a photo of him with a NASA honcho and he was gifted a very expensive lense by NASA for ‘Barry Lyndon’.
3) What about the launch and splash-down? Most probably they put the lunar lander into low-Earth orbit. Nobody denies that this is possible. Who, if anyone, was on board doesn’t really matter. The object that splashed down and the three men stepped out of could have been pushed out of a plane, they simply use the method they admit to use in testing (like “space walks” being conducted in their underwater tank).
4) The legacy of what they left on the moon. This is one of the biggest tells for me. The photographs of the Apollo landing sites are ridiculous. They can photograph stars light years away but can’t take a decent photo of the Apollo sites? They also supposedly left reflectors – however signals from Earth had been bounced off the Lunar surface since the early 1960s so these prove nothing.
5) Ground control – most of those involved probably thought they were sending people to the moon. It was classic compartmentalisation. They stared at data on a computer – they had no idea where that data was coming from. NASA said that their simulated missions were so good nobody could tell the difference with a ‘real’ one (the drill going live technique we’ve come to recognise).

You keep accusing others of logical fallacies – but admit that NASA lied on other occasions while claiming they didn’t lie here. How you can’t see the logical flaw here escapes me. It isn’t as if there aren’t reasonable grounds to suspect NASA given the Freemasons, Nazis and Occultists involved in its formation and the deaths of whistleblowers like Thomas Baron.

You keep dismissing the Van Allen Belts. Why? What evidence is there that living creatures can go through them not from NASA? There is only one mission that sent living creatures through them – when the Russians sent worms and a tortoise! What was Operation Fishbowl about if it wasn’t about trying to blast a hole in the Van Allen Belts? An excessive focus on the Van Allen Belts ignores other dangers like solar radiation and micro-meteorites – both of which are totally unpredictable according to their own science.

You keep saying they lie about there being a virus. They would lie about our own bodies, what we can have the strongest direct personal experience of, and wouldn’t lie about space – somewhere we can never go and where our experience is entirely mediated through space agencies?

One place I would agree with you is that some who call part of the moon landings a hoax have been shills. These are the ones who try to steer those prone to conspiratorial thinking on to the “secret bases on the moon” argument which then re-inforces their beloved UFO agenda. They want ultimately to foster an alternative Creation narrative of panspermia. They’ve also sent out a few to make the hoax argument very badly because there’s nothing like hearing an argument made badly to discredit it.

Finally, I’d argue that the moon landing hoax was ultimately designed to prop up their whole failing cosmology. There are so many bizarre and implausible things about the moon it cannot be what the official cosmology says, both in nature and location. Everyone likes to quote ‘1984’ but nobody much quotes this passage from O’Brien: ” “Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that?”. I don’t know what the moon really is – but I doubt very much it’s something humanity can land on.

Corarden
Corarden
May 1, 2021 11:36 AM
Reply to  Edwige

How can you dispute the moon landings Edwige? They clearly landed on it in what looks like an inverted Mini Cooper with some tin foil wrapped around it, with some long tent poles, with four tea trays welded precisely to the bottom.

I’ve seen the photographs. I am particularly amazed at the invisible man tilting the camera tripod upwards to treat us to the footage of the top part of the Mini Cooper flying up in the air, as a small firework going off, and no plume, and soaring into the sky on what looked like a piece of wire to take the brave astronauts (freemasons) under military orders to forever shut their mouths back to the orbiter. They did this six times with no loss of life. Six half million mile return journeys, through the vacuum of space, along with the incredibly complex operations of landing, conducting experiments, leaving and a rendez-vous with the orbiter in between. This is truly amazing. Especially considering, that despite the vastly superior technology, decades later, the loss of two Space Shuttles and their crews, on a relatively short hop into orbit, Just incredible stuff.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 12:11 PM
Reply to  Edwige

Not every detail of 9/11 can be completely explained beyond all doubt – but you wouldn’t say that means it was 19 hijackers with box-cutters.

It’s not necessarily a matter of explaining every detail but if you want to say the moon landings were faked you have to say where the fakery is – obviously.

The external shots in space were obviously models shot using stop-motion photography. Look at where the lander docks with the orbiter after supposedly coming back from the moon’s surface for the most obvious example.

How so?

You keep accusing others of logical fallacies – but admit that NASA lied on other occasions while claiming they didn’t lie here. How you can’t see the logical flaw here escapes me.

No logical fallacy, Edwige. Because they lied in one situation doesn’t mean they lied in another. Perfectly good logic.

Jesper
Jesper
May 1, 2021 9:01 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

You seem very distracted by the fact that there is no virus. But there are these new vaccines and they are causing real harm as all vaccines has always done. Nothing wrong pointing out they are poison even if you’re a misguided scientist.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 11:53 AM
Reply to  Jesper

It is emphatically NOT distraction.

Loads of people pointing out problems but always “recognising” the virus is half-truth, OK, Jesper. It’s half-truth.

Half-truths make great lies.

Controlled opposition is all about half-truths or quarter-truths or eighth-truths or sixteenth-truths.

It is incredibly undermining to truth when a sea of part-truth dominates the narrative. A sea of part-truth completely squashes the truth, it strangles it.

Does this make sense, Jesper?

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
May 1, 2021 10:41 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

There, there, Petra! Go and have a lie down now, dear. Have you taken your medicine yet…?

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
May 1, 2021 5:07 AM

“The idea that science overpowers religious belief and faith…

when your science has no data collection, isn’t using controls and doesn’t go through the scientific method. When you are not challenging your own theories with healthy skepticism but instead are censoring scientists and suppressing data – and then you tell everyone they should believe in the product, whether it’s been through a safety study or not – you have become a religion: the religion of scientism, which has no facts to its name and refuses to do the proper studies.

One thing is for sure: one religion doesn’t get to override another.”
— Del Bigtree on The Highwire

Evidence the vaccine safety system is failing.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zJLGwYoxpfQe/

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 4:41 AM

This interview was heavily edited. The cull was implied but not explicitly stated as a likely objective of the scam and the lethal injections. The figures for deaths is greatly understated. We should also be studying the possibility of prions and sterilisation.

Hele
Hele
May 1, 2021 4:34 AM

Why does the EMA not provide and explanation ?

May Hem
May Hem
May 1, 2021 4:26 AM

At least one parliamentarian in Australia is attempting to do something positive for a change …..

“Independent Member for Hughes, Craig Kelly plans to introduce a Bill in the Australian Federal Parliament to crack down on the market power of the foreign controlled social-media giants and their unilateral censorship of political speech.
Overnight the Florida Senate in the USA passed such a Bill and this gives the Australian Parliament a template to adopt here.”

I hope he succeeds with this.

May Hem
May Hem
May 1, 2021 5:09 AM
Reply to  May Hem

Apologies for off topic comment folks.

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 4:04 AM

This is well worth watching. Several scientists, doctors him included have warned about the danger of pathogenic priming, as mentioned above. When exposed again to wild virus in next FLU season, immune system has potential to go haywire. (as did when tested on animals in previous SARS trials, but not tested on animals this time) The link to blood clotting interesting. I think this is the one he warns the more top-up vaccinations you take the greater the risk. Its utterly astonishing that any program like this could go ahead for any reason to protect public health. At best it’s reckless, at worst, well you decide.

Captain Birdheart
Captain Birdheart
May 1, 2021 4:01 AM

The extent of the lies would put nearly all people in hospital (!), or suicide. Needs to be a slow reveal..

Hele
Hele
May 1, 2021 3:34 AM

CDC is going to test Vaccinated at 28 PCR cycles and Non Vaccinated at 43+/-.
What a rigged game they are playing with our lives.

Wayne Vanderploeg
Wayne Vanderploeg
May 1, 2021 4:57 PM
Reply to  Hele

Do you have a link to this? I would love to jam this one down a few throats……..

Thom 9
Thom 9
May 1, 2021 2:50 AM

Watch the video on Bitchute instead here:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/9JWuWSvEeGSR/

Captain Birdheart
Captain Birdheart
May 1, 2021 2:34 AM

Yeah, hanging around for the updates ! And hanging around for the Sunrise, 1st of May, cold mind !
Guess you guys are celebrating too !

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
May 1, 2021 2:21 AM

If you’re having problems hearing Professor Bhakdi please continue to report them below. In UK on my macbook and phone I can hear his audio fine, although it sounds out of stereo phase possibly, in any rate it sounds a little bit odd.

Try an alternative browser and, if no success there, try using a VPN to play it outside your country. If you’re continuing to have lots of issues we’ll try to imbed from a different platform.

Thanks for your feedback. A2

Saint Jimmy
Saint Jimmy
May 1, 2021 2:38 AM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

I’ve got audio. No problems hearing him.

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
May 1, 2021 6:08 AM
Reply to  Saint Jimmy

Same here.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 6:47 AM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

The problem with mad professor Bhakdi is not the audibility of what he says but the fact that he should fucking write it down and refrain from wasting people’s time!

It would take only a few minutes to get what he’s saying, as opposed to wasting 45 minutes on another video.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
May 1, 2021 7:08 AM
Reply to  Jacques

I’d never waste that amount of time on someone who doesn’t recognise no virus, they’ve surely got to be controlled opposition. Perhaps I’m too quick to judge and too lazy but all those experts they wheeled out initially voicing concern about whatever but who didn’t say no virus I couldn’t really be bothered with … which is wrong because they can still give very good information … but I’ve so had it up to here with controlled opposition, you cannot get away from the bastards.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 7:35 AM
Reply to  Petra Liverani

I stopped worrying about the “virus” sometime late last spring when it became patently obvious that the statistics were being doctored and that there was clearly something entirely different going on.

As much as I like this website as a vehicle for discussion, where interesting references and opinions are provided, I’m afraid that the articles keep people in a limbo – whether intentionally or not – where they for the umpteenth time “discuss” the same thing over and over and fucking over, concluding that the world is fucked up, shit what are we gonna do, they’re after us!

Very little of what is published or stated in the comments steps out of the realm of the CV-1984 hogwash and the few usual-suspect auxiliary topics.

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I might think that this is intentional, intended to keep people bitching but never looking beyond the horizon or even the tip of their nose.

There are some funny things going on on this forum. I noticed yesterday that the admin admonished contributor “Researcher” for posting under a different nick. Now, Researcher is a very militant contributor who makes bold claims. Okay, why not. But the other nick she was writing under was written in a completely different language, different style. Weird. Researcher is probably a spook. Anyway, who cares. Life doesn’t revolve around Researcher or mad professor Bhakdi …

Ooink
Ooink
May 1, 2021 7:51 AM
Reply to  Jacques

Yep. Time to step away from the online world.

Loverat
Loverat
May 1, 2021 8:40 AM
Reply to  Jacques

I don’t know. I see the point you are making about the coverage, but I have learned alot here over the last year. I think most readers have and there are some really interesting perspectives and good scientists. In a way I think Off G has had to keep plugging away as the Covid thinking has evolved so much as events have unfolded. I think this site has done itself a huge favour with its coverage, the reader comments now are often 15 – 20 times the number from 18 months ago. I do regret that we aren’t talking about Syria, Yemen as much but I guess that’s been the thing this last year, so much life changing stuff going on.

Jacques
Jacques
May 1, 2021 9:03 AM
Reply to  Loverat

Yes, I’ve learned a lot too. Some of the articles are very good, some of the analyses were excellent, others serve as a vehicle for debate. Quite a number of contributors are interesting people, make valid points, provide references to interesting sources.

It’s time to move on. You could be reiterating that CV-1984 is a crock of shit forever, and nothing would change. In fact, this is how it was under the Second World totalitarian regimes – people were forever complaining how things sucked and how whatever this and that asshole was doing was preposterous. The assholes, of course, couldn’t care less.

The last year has clearly exposed immense corruption throughout the world. That’s a given fact, the world as we had been perceiving it – or fooling ourselves to – is an empty shell. Just about all of our institutions are fucked up, rotten to the core.

That’s the important outcome of what’s happening. It’s time to discuss whether an attempt should be made to reform it, how, or whether the time has come for humankind to follow a different course of development. Klaus the Anal Schwab and Billy the Shitty Software Peddler want technocratic dystopia; perhaps we want something different, natural freedom, voluntary contributionism, whatever.

People have to be positive and discussing the alleged virus ain’t gonna do that.

Charlie
Charlie
May 1, 2021 12:28 PM
Reply to  Jacques

I’ve learned a great deal here, from articles and comments alike. I discovered the great CJ Hopkins here. His article on the worst Hitler ever was a REAL shot in the arm. But I too feel the need for the next move. Part of that will be prepping perhaps – securing your home for a winter without heating or water, building in a little resilience -but I’m doing that and I still feel something’s missing. Perhaps it’s the need to join, I do feel we’ve become very unused to working together. Speaking for myself I need to find my crew, not just me the wife and kids but the 10 to 15 other trusted friends between the ages of 15 and 50 who’ll turn up when I need them. Some people still have that I guess, and I envy them. Perhaps I need to join a church.

Dick
Dick
May 1, 2021 9:07 AM
Reply to  Loverat

Did you really need someone to tell you covid was horseshit. 500 times?