288

Covid “Vaccines”: A Faltering Framework

Dr Sadaf Gilani

Photo by Ali Raza from PxHere.

On April 20, The Lancet published an analysis on the efficacy of the Covid injections. This analysis supports conclusions made in my earlier analysis. That being: the Covid injections are NOT “95% efficacious”.

Beyond the analysts’ tepid language couched in scientific jargon, the graphic that appears is quite startling.  As is often true, the devil lies in the details, in this case, the difference between relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction. (For elaboration on these metrics, please see my article linked above).

Relative risk reduction (RRR) and Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) for leading Covid “vaccines” (Source: The Lancet)

From the “absolute risk reduction” you can calculate the “Number Needed to Vaccinate” which signifies approximately how many people must be injected to hypothetically benefit just one person. It is a metric every person needs to understand before taking the Covid injection.

Below are the Numbers Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) metrics for Covid “vaccines”:

Number Needed to Vaccinate (NNV) = 1/Absolute Risk Reduction

For Pfizer, this number is estimated at 119. This means 119 people must be injected for it to reduce a “Covid” case in one person. Therefore, 118 of those people incurred (potential) risk with no benefit whatsoever.

Some estimates are even higher, according to The Lancet, data from the Pfizer rollout in Israel suggests an NNV of 217!

These NNV figures are likely underestimates, as there is significant obfuscation with trial data. The actual efficacy is likely even less than 1% as some of the injected groups who became ill with “Covid like symptoms” were fallaciously labelled as side effects, rather than potential breakthrough infections.

Also unaccounted for, in the lucky 0.84% of people who hypothetically benefitted from the “vaccine”, are the side effects. Efficacy metrics do not include adverse events from the injections. In other words, safety and efficacy are entirely different considerations. For example, even an efficacious intervention may not be safe if the risk of harm is high.

This “vaccine” experiment is only a few months old, yet the passive VAERS reporting system in the USA has accounted for deaths following Covid injections as already being greater than the previous 21 years of deaths from all other vaccines combined, as well as over 227,000 other non-fatal adverse events. What’s more, it is reported that the VAERS system records only approximately 1% of actual adverse events.

Many alarmed researchers and doctors around the world have called to halt this experiment, citing a growing body of unusual side effects and associated deaths. For Covid injections, it must be clear that the complete safety profile is unknown.

Furthermore, the “reduction” is not a decrease in deaths and hospitalizations, rather a reduction of symptoms. The majority of these supposedly alleviated symptoms being of a generic cold and flu variety. To quote the Lancet study:

These considerations on efficacy and effectiveness are based on studies measuring prevention of mild to moderate COVID-19 infection; they were not designed to conclude on prevention of hospitalization, severe disease, or death, or on prevention of infection and transmission potential.”

On top of that, these mild “cases” which are being “prevented” are determined by the unvalidated PCR assays.

As mentioned, the efficacy is based on reduction in symptoms, and even then possibly only for a limited period of time. Already it has been announced that boosters are necessary, perhaps annually or twice a year.

This paltry efficacy is not unusual for the vaccine regime that is justified on the basis of benefitting the overall population. However, in this case, the argument for benefitting the overall population cannot apply, as no definite evidence for a reduction in transmission has been povided.

In addition, these injections are still experimental. Phase 3 trials are ongoing and this synthetic gene “therapy” technology has never been dispensed before. Every day, new information is coming to the fore, such as this animal pharmacokinetic study which shows that the injected vectors ended up in different organs, especially ovaries and spleen. Canadian researcher, Dr. Bridle, shared his concerns on recent findings of biodistribution of lipid nano-particles and the spike proteins in injected people.

Tragically, panic-stricken masses are deluded with the propaganda that these injections are 95% efficacious. This is a useless metric based on relative risk reduction. The absolute risk reduction is around 1%. Millions are unwittingly participating in an unprecedented experiment.  The Nuremberg Code and principles of Informed Consent are violated daily. 

It is advisable to print out the above table and request one’s vaccinator to explain this metric. To properly exercise ethical and legal informed consent, every trial participant must understand the potential benefits and risks from the injections, the potential risks from Covid (based on age and health status) as well as the efficacious treatment alternatives for those who may need them.

Would you feel comfortable suited up with a parachute that worked about 1% of the time?  Would you then say that it is 95% effective because that particular parachute worked 95% better than the competition?

A product with very questionable, miniscule efficacy and many concerns regarding potential severe short and long-term side effects (including deaths), might be more accurately classified as a poison.

A poison can be described as ‘any substance which when introduced into or absorbed by a living organism, destroys life or injures health’. The adverse effects may take many forms from immediate death to subtle changes not realized until months or years later.”
Definition of “poison”, according the Royal Society of Chemistry

One can hope that as this nefarious experiment unfolds, data and rationality will trump fear, hysteria, and the etiolated minds of the masses.  May Justice prevail and these crimes against humanity be brought to account.

Sadaf Gilani MD is a Canadian entrepreneur and activist.

can you spare $1.00 a month to support independent media

Unlike the Guardian we are NOT funded by Bill & Melinda Gates, or any other NGO or government. So a few coins in our jar to help us keep going are always appreciated.

Our Bitcoin JTR code is: 1JR1whUa3G24wXpDyqMKpieckMGGW2u2VX

4.9 69 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
288 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Joel S Hirschhorn
Joel S Hirschhorn
Jun 15, 2021 9:18 PM
Rubicon
Rubicon
Jun 11, 2021 9:46 PM

The TIDE is turning. Many Western physicians have accumulated massive amounts of knowledge to determine these vaccines are dangerous and often fatal.
See Dr. McCullough’s interview as he states the chronology of events from 2019 to 2021. A Full force vaccine campaign that never should have occurred because the available meds were there and had been used for many years.
This vaccine campaign has been funded and manipulated upon millions of Westerner by none other than the Super Elite.

Andrew
Andrew
Jun 6, 2021 1:17 PM

I have read many articles like this and understand enough to know that I will never consider vaccination but even though the facts are “dumbed down” (no offence) I still find it difficult to explain to anyone else my reasons. Maybe I’m just thick but does anybody know of an article that spells it out even more plainly?

Dreamflower0987
Dreamflower0987
Jun 10, 2021 3:55 PM
Reply to  Andrew

Thedailyexpose has several articles u may like to see

Bram
Bram
Jun 10, 2021 4:29 PM
Reply to  Andrew

I liked this video to help convince others: https://odysee.com/@Truth_will_set_You_Free:0/covid19-vaccine-facts:c

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 10, 2021 4:35 PM
Reply to  Andrew

Aside from anything else, it’s simply a matter of conscience, so don’t be intimidated, be guided by your conscience.

Hyllian
Hyllian
Jun 10, 2021 5:12 PM
Reply to  Andrew

Dumbed down to Piers Morgan levels:

They are falsifying stats and figures to

A) make covid19 more dangerous than it is

B) Make the vaccine more efficient than it is

Sorry that was far too kind of me to associate such mental gymnastics to PM.

Johanne
Johanne
Jun 6, 2021 10:03 AM
Juan Nadie
Juan Nadie
Jun 4, 2021 6:38 AM

https://downloads.regulations.gov/FDA-2021-P-0521-0001/attachment_1.pdf

A group of doctors are petitioning the FDA to deny full approval for the lethal injections. Here’s the petition.

Juan Nadie
Juan Nadie
Jun 4, 2021 6:52 AM
Reply to  Juan Nadie

P.S.: You can offer a comment to the FDA about this petition here:

https://www.regulations.gov/commenton/FDA-2021-P-0521-0001

Joe Van Steenbergen
Joe Van Steenbergen
Jun 3, 2021 1:40 AM

One can hope that as this nefarious experiment unfolds, data and rationality will trump fear, hysteria, and the etiolated minds of the masses.”

Given the huge numbers of reported deaths and serious injuries to date, and assuming (rightly) the the reported numbers are way undercounting the effects, if public health and political “leaders” have not yet decided to terminate this experiment, it seems that no number of deaths or serious in juries will spur them to bring a halt to this genocide.

Paul
Paul
Jun 2, 2021 11:29 PM

So just to be clear. You guys feel it is better to stop all vaccinations as benefits are low for each recipient despite death figures in UK and Israel being now near zero and 96% of hospitilizations now have not taken vaccine? Also people do not have a crystal ball and know how they will be affected if they catch COVID.

Instead you guys feel it is better to allow COVID (let’s put aside all the COVID arguments for the purpose of this question) to again overrun health systems and accept the cost of lives that will undoubtedly incur?

Paul
Paul
Jun 3, 2021 12:38 AM
Reply to  Paul

Whoever is marking my comments down, please be polite enough to answer the question please. We are all grown ups here.

Thank you in advance.

Robert Heath
Robert Heath
Jun 4, 2021 4:31 PM
Reply to  Paul

Grown ups dont make up data to support their position. You made up the 96% of hospital patients unnvaccinated, therefore we are not all grown ups here.

Paul
Paul
Jun 4, 2021 5:28 PM
Reply to  Robert Heath

Hi Robert,
Thanks you for your reply. I apologise it is nearer to 99%..
Here is one link (of many similar ones):
https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210513/over-_99-percent-hospitalized-2021-covid-patients-unvaccinated
Regards
Paul

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 6:34 PM
Reply to  Paul

Thanks for your response.

First problem is that most appear to be hospital workers! Not exactly a reflection of the population at large. So can we draw a generalisation from these figures?

Second problem with these gross numbers, how many patients were already sick from something else as we don’t know what they really died from whether vaccinated or not.

Third problem, how were they tested? If with the PCR ‘test’, how many cycles?

So really, the 96% or 99% tells us nothing really meaningful unless we know how, who and when as there is no correlation. We need to see the actual survey before coming to conclusions. This entire nightmare has been run purely on numbers as if they’re some kind of absolute.

AS they say, there’s lies, gross lies and statistics (or something like that).

Nice try Paul, but no prize this time.

Paul
Paul
Jun 4, 2021 8:38 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

Hi Robert,

I think this and many other links to multiple locations that can easily be found at least gives an indicator to how effective vaccines are.

I understand it’s against narrative here, but to ignore multiple sources, albeit not covering every nook and cranny you quite rightly need to have higher accuracy is clutching at straws a little tbh.

I truly understand vaccination concerns, but back to my original point isn’t it a little churlish to withdraw it and their obvious benefits just in case hundreds of scientists who have OK’d these things are wrong?

Regards
Paul

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 4, 2021 9:34 PM
Reply to  Paul

Unless they’ve invented a time machine, hundreds of seers would be more useful than hundreds of scientists (then again, isn’t this how most scientists are viewed by most people nowadays? Hehe)

Stage three trials are not complete. No long term research has been done. There are already more adverse reactions to these vaccines than ALL OTHERS put together over something like the last 5 years.

Its a joke.

UK all-cause mortality for 20202 is only the 6th or 7th highest this millennium. Why do we need to be obsessing about experimental drugs manufactured for profit by pharmaceutical corporations?

You’re buying into the fear narrative. Please try to put your figures in some perspective, rather than shouting big numbers at people. This isn’t Facebook. A2

YeahBut
YeahBut
Jun 5, 2021 11:23 AM
Reply to  Paul

The 99% Cleveland Clinic article tells us nothing about vaccine efficacy, although to the casual reader it might seem to. The vast majority of those hospitalisations could have happened in early January when hardly anybody had been fully vaccinated. Without more detail, that 99% figure could even be consistent with the vaccine not working at all.

So yes, it’s right to ignore unscientific articles like that one. They are created for propaganda purposes, so that the 99% figure can be posted in comments sections, rather than to give an accurate assessment of vaccine efficacy.

Jean
Jean
Jun 6, 2021 1:24 AM
Reply to  Paul

I looked for the original source data and / or study without success, instead finding only an announcement by the Clinic (https://newsroom.clevelandclinic.org/2021/05/12/most-covid-19-infections-and-hospitalizations-are-in-unvaccinated/) that it is being prepared for publication. When you try to convince skeptics based on data, you must reveal the data.

Tom
Tom
Jun 3, 2021 4:15 AM
Reply to  Paul

I personally don’t think we should stop all vaccinations, just this one. If the virus hasn’t been proven to exist, I won’t need to vaccinate against it.

Paul
Paul
Jun 3, 2021 8:40 AM
Reply to  Tom

Thank you for reply.

So you want to spend many months or even years isolating virus before doing anything about it’s spread across the world and taking millions of lives?

Not using a multi tasking approach to this or any other task is a little foolish don’t you think?

Regards
Paul

Sophie - Admin1
Admin
Sophie - Admin1
Jun 3, 2021 10:02 AM
Reply to  Paul

‘It’ is not taking millions of lives. The all cause death stats show people are dying in usual numbers of usual things – but misuse of the PCR and other bureaucracies are allowing some of those statistically ordinary deaths to be labeled ‘covid’ and thus scare stupid people into thinking that they need untested unproven gene therapies to ‘save’ them.

Paul
Paul
Jun 4, 2021 8:15 AM

Thanks for your reply.

But you fail to answer my original question unless you are insinuating COVID doesn’t exist OR should be ignored and let the virus continue it’s rampage through populations?

My original questions was should we NOT vaccinate and/or test until virus is isolated and let the medical profession clear up the mess whilst we wait?

Regards
Paul

Mo Om
Mo Om
Jun 4, 2021 3:40 PM
Reply to  Paul

Hey Paul,

The Covid case counts are mostly based on PCR testing which has proven to be unreliable. You can read up on that here: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html

It then follows that any death attributed to Covid has a big question mark over it since the test used to come to that conclusion is unreliable. Almost everyone knows by now that the elderly and people with co-morbidities were the most “affected” by Covid. Everyone else is just fine. Whoever died most probably died of other causes. What the PCR test says is irrelevant.

Add to that the fact that decades-old drugs that have been shown to be effective against Covid have overnight been labelled unsafe and should not be used to treat Covid. Anyone who so much as says their names is immediately censored and deplatformed. Thousands of doctors with nothing to gain from administering such cheap treatments as HCQ and Ivermectin talked about their impressive success rates and got silenced. You might remember the fraudulent “study” that got retracted from the Lancet that labelled HCQ as not only ineffective but dangerous. You have to wonder why the medical establishment and governments fought so hard against the already available cheap drugs that have been in use for decades only for them to end up pushing “vaccines” developed within 2 days (Moderna) and a few hours (Pfizer/BioNtech) with no long term safety studies, skipped animal trials and didn’t include the elderly, who are the most vulnerable, in these studies. All for a “disease” that most won’t even know they caught it unless they got PCR tested at cycles as high as 40. And, don’t even get me started on how corrupt the lying scumbags at Big Pharma are. Now, we have to blindly trust them. No way!

You don’t have to be a “crazy” conspiracy theorist to see that there is some agenda behind all this craziness.

To answer your question:

Do we need to stop all vaccinations?

Yes. We didn’t need them in the first place. These case and death numbers rely on PCR tests.

death figures in UK and Israel being now near zero and 96% of hospitilizations now have not taken vaccine

This is them pulling wool over our eyes. They reduce the PCR cycle counts for the “vaccinated” which most likely leads to a negative test while they keep cycle threshold high for the unvaccinated which leads to more positive cases in the unvaccinated population. You can read more on this deception here.

let’s put aside all the COVID arguments for the purpose of this question

We don’t to put these questions aside. We can all see Covid as the scam it really is.

Ssh
Ssh
Jun 6, 2021 11:29 PM
Reply to  Paul

The restrictions are the problem. It should be a matter of choice. If people want the vaccine, fine. But the same holds true for those who don’t, without any imposed repercussion not to… But how many would opt in if there was no “peer pressure” to do so… Which makes the matter even more questionable.

Dr. Rob
Dr. Rob
Jun 4, 2021 3:12 PM
Reply to  Paul

It seems you are incredibly misinformed and not understanding the data being presented. Covid has absolutely not taken millions of lives. Good try at towing the narrative along but you very clearly have no idea what’s going on or you are incredibly naive.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 4:53 PM
Reply to  Paul

So you want to spend many months or even years isolating virus before doing anything about it’s spread

Well unfortunately, that’s what we normally do with vaccines as the average time taken to produce a (hopefully) safe vaccine is 9-10 YEARS. These gene therapy inoculations were produced in months. Furthermore, they have NOT been okayed, they’re for “emergency use” only.

“Taking millions of lives”. Well flu takes millions of lives, TB takes millions of lives, diarrhoea takes millions of lives but I don’t see the world being locked down because of it (but lockdowns DO)!

Mark
Mark
Jun 3, 2021 8:47 AM
Reply to  Paul

It is pretty easy to create the appearance of COVID infections more or less exclusively occurring in the unvaccinated; the CDC has changed its reporting requirement for ‘new cases’ for the vaccinated only. Now a COVID case need only be reported to the CDC if it results in hospitalization or death. Rules are still the same among the unvaccinated, though – if you test positive, you’re a ‘new case’.

Paul
Paul
Jun 3, 2021 10:59 AM
Reply to  Mark

Thank you for reply.

I am glad you brought this up….

How about total deaths? In 2019 in UK there were 530k deaths. In 2020 there were 608k deaths. I acknowledge this is a crude comparison, but there has been a rise of 78k deaths in UK between these 2 years. According to https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/ Deaths as at 31/12/20 was 73k. Nothing to do with COVID then?

Regards
Paul

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 3, 2021 2:57 PM
Reply to  Paul

Please, will you link to your research regarding what caused these deaths. Do you have any papers which break these down into various categories? Collateral deaths due to delayed/curtailed healthcare, neglect, suicide, home deaths due to avoiding hospital, deaths of elderly people offloaded into care homes, deaths of ‘suspected’ covid10 (u07.2), deaths with a positive PCR test result (u07.1) no matter the actual cause of death.

We already know that about half of excess deaths in UK care homes in 2020 were NOT from covid. Meaning these people were hastened to their end by lockdown conditions.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/articles/deathsinvolvingcovid19inthecaresectorenglandandwales/deathsregisteredbetweenweekending20march2020andweekending2april2021

Thanks A2

Paul
Paul
Jun 4, 2021 8:24 AM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Hi again Sam,

Yes, here is link:
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/excessdeathsinenglandandwales2020final

Compare to 2019.

Already spoke about PCR tests above.

Regards
Paul

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 4, 2021 5:26 PM
Reply to  Paul

There is no ONS data analysis on collateral deaths here. It does not exist. That’s why.

You can see, however, that home deaths are up 33%, above overall excess deaths at 14%. People staying home because they were scared, or because they didn’t want to be a burden, many dying preventable deaths. From this you can extrapolate, what about those who waited at home till the last minute, were rushed to hospital too late and then died there, thus increasing deaths in hospitals as well?

You can also see Influenza and pneumonia are down 28% in 2020.

This is not a tabloid virus, so please stop resorting to tabloid-level epidemiology and acknowledge there are lots of complicated factors.

Just a note, perhaps if you spent more time giving considered answers and less time showboating in an infuriating and smug way, we’d actually be able to have a genuine exchange? No one enjoys playing slippery, semantic tag as much as you, it is actually really dull and a classic avoidance strategy. It only achieves a litany of barely started, barely coherent conversations all over the comments board. Pretty boring to wade through.

So, unless you’re prepared to settle down and have a measured conversation, I’ll need to start flagging your posts for potential spam and disruption.

Thanks awfully for your contributions here, you can do better.
A2

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 5:49 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Yes, but slowly, slowly, stats are emerging that attempt to measure preventable deaths, as you say, at home (I came across the number 14% extra deaths at home) or for example, youth suicides and mental illness. But it’s also clear that the govt, would not like to see these numbers tabulated. Perhaps ‘when the dust has settled’, the numbers of ‘excess’ deaths will be made available. It is, as you say, complex, so for example, how many of those ‘excess’ deaths at home would have occurred anyway? Who knows?

We saw the same approach by the govt to deaths in care homes, which in my book were actually MURDER (see Governor Cuomo in NY State’s care homes), for which the govt will never be held accountable!

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 4, 2021 9:45 PM
Reply to  Barovsky

I agree.

Forgive the following info dump. I was confused about something, which led to a research scramble.

In Paul’s link above, it appears to state that 2020 England/Wales all-cause mortality (table 12a) is 75,845 and of that, it states, 73,766 were excess deaths due to ‘covid’.

Leaving 2,079 non-covid excess.

I think this figure is ridiculously low! I am convinced it has been recently massaged. I actually kept notes on this last year, therefore I know there were over 13,000 more excess deaths than ‘covid’ deaths up until July 2020. Over 20% more.

Where did they go? What system retroactively reduced 13,000 non-covid excess deaths to just 2,079?

I was so skeptical about this, and questioning my own sanity, that I checked out my own link (above) in a reply to Paul, which shows 2020 England/Wales care home excess deaths, searching for comparison. And this now serves to demonstrate my point!

In my link it shows that during the ‘first covid wave’ only approx half excess deaths in care homes were related to covid.

The ONS page gives no actual figures, just a graphic image, so I looked around and found figures on this page (I’ll go with these until I’m corrected).

These figures confirm my recollection. It says there were 29,542 excess deaths in England/Wales care homes up until August. Of these 19,113, (64.7%) were ‘covid’ according to the Care Quality Commission.

Which leaves 10,429 non-covid excess deaths. This is more like what I remember.

This shows that significantly more non-covid excess deaths occurred in care homes ALONE, according to the ONS, than their current total all-cause excess mortality figure above (2,079).

To restate, that’s 10,429 in care homes alone, compared to 2,079 in total for England/Wales.

No, they don’t add up. Where have these non-covid deaths gone? Why have they been absorbed into the covid deaths in Paul’s link?

Interesting points on that:

The ONS use CQC data for Care Home deaths (didn’t know that). The CQC don’t use death registration data. Quoting from here:

An important difference between the two sources is that the ONS reports deaths where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate, while CQC notifications rely on the statement of the care home provider that COVID-19 was suspected or confirmed.

Could this be having any effect at massaging numbers? It’s definitely more revisable than death registration data.

-*-

There is also a new covid code now! U10.9!!!

Check it out in Paul’s ONS link, the Ons is counting U10.9 nowadays!

Were you aware? I wasn’t!

This code includes deaths which have been ‘temporarily associated with Covid-19’ and is titled ‘Multisystem inflammatory syndrome associated with COVID-19.’

This includes deaths from:

  • Cytokine storm
  • Kawasaki-like syndrome
  • Paediatric Inflammatory Multisystem Syndrome (PIMS)
  • Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C)

(although it doesn’t include actual Kawasaki syndrome, apparently!)

Man, do I feel behind the times. Is this code being used to a) block-colour old deaths as covid, and b) disguise potential vaccine side effects?

Forgive any spelling/punctuation/formatting issues.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 10:20 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Yes, very good! Since the very beginning of this nightmare, numbers, stats, tables, et al, have been used to confuse/frighten the public, and very often these numbers are not even stats, it turns out that they’re actually PREDICTIONS based on crappy software ‘models’!

What is most depressing is the role universities have played in the deception (I’ve never liked universities anyway, tho I went to art school so does that count?)

In another but related arena of universities as weapons of war, see Alan McCloud’s:

The Notorious London Spy School Churning Out Many of the World’s Top Journalists
The fact that the very department that trains high state officials and agents of secretive three letter agencies is also the place that produces many of the journalists we rely on to stand up to those officials and keep them in check is seriously problematic.
KIng’s College London! Spook School.

jules
jules
Jun 5, 2021 3:50 AM
Reply to  Paul

Try looking up number of burials and cremations for local councils in the uk over the last 5 years, there are various discussions around the numbers on various forums from freedom of information requests along with images of the response letters with the stats – in a nutshell 2020 had fews total deaths for the councils presenting info (burials + cremations) than highest years over the past 5 – think 2015 was normally highest. Conclusion: death rates are unchanged for 2020 – analysis: likely death cause reattribution to covid – summary: what pandemic?
Research this, the number aren’t difficult to find. As a starting point try googling “council burials freedom of information leeds”…(and its not just Leeds lol)

Paul
Paul
Jun 6, 2021 12:04 PM
Reply to  jules

Hi Jules,

Thanks for your reply.

Interesting way to try to expose the government.

However, see below link:

Cremations 20% in 2020 compared to 2019.

Look forward to your response

Regards
Paul

Sophie - Admin1
Admin
Sophie - Admin1
Jun 6, 2021 12:13 PM
Reply to  Paul

You do realize an increase in cremations is meaningless unless there is a concomitant increase in deaths?

And even then you have no data about covid deaths until you have a way of diagnosing covid reliably. Current numbers are based 98% on PCR tests at 40Ct which means virtually every positive will have been false. Even if we have true positives it’s no indicator of active disease, merely that a person may have some fragments of viral rna in their body.

Deal with the actual facts and data and stop spitting out distractions and meaningless side issues.

Robert Heath
Robert Heath
Jun 4, 2021 4:03 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Also inflated specifically by the reintroduction of the Liverpool care pathway, rebranded, but still euthanasia, declaring a patient a covid case (inferred if they had been in contact eg in a hospital) put on nil by mouth, along with midazolin to speed up death

john
john
Jun 7, 2021 11:39 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

‘Paul’ needs banning. From reading the contributions it is clearly a shill contributor, probably paid, repeatedly making nonsensical points using obviously flawed sources to tie you all up and get you chasing around in circles. The objective is to wear down your resolve and make you give up. I’ve seen this time and time again. On a site like twitter I would ask people to disengage but on here I am asking admin to terminate the user.

George Mc
George Mc
Jun 3, 2021 10:53 AM
Reply to  Paul

Oh there’s plenty of people who have crystal balls and just KNOW that COVID will “again” (?) overrun health systems and that we sceptics will have to accept the cost of lives that will “undoubtedly” (?!) occur!

Alan Watts
Alan Watts
Jun 3, 2021 6:52 PM
Reply to  Paul

“you guys”

Alan Watts
Alan Watts
Jun 3, 2021 6:58 PM
Reply to  Paul

Paul,
At best, you are a dickhead with views that don’t really gel with the usual audience here. which would lead me to ask the question, so, WHY ARE YOU HERE?
Btw, that’s ok, but somewhat akin to entering into a deep sea diving contest when you can’t swim.

At worst, you are a brigade 77 troll. And on that basis. YOU ARE OUT

PS x464d5774gtyu

Paul
Paul
Jun 4, 2021 8:28 AM
Reply to  Alan Watts

Hi Alan,

It sounds like you dislike articulated discussion?

My questions/comments are valid, so why shouldn’t I ask?

I look forward to your answer to my question…. assuming you have one?

Regards
Paul

tami
tami
Jun 6, 2021 1:00 AM
Reply to  Paul

Actually Paul, not sure why anyone is arguing with you. I think your a perfect candidate for the vaccines. Go with all your like minded friends. Bon voyage!

Robert Heath
Robert Heath
Jun 4, 2021 4:22 PM
Reply to  Alan Watts

Using a buzz phrase such as “rampage through the population” as if that was an established fact suggests a paid propagandist. Whether 77th brigade or a pharmer lackey, no way to tell.

Paul
Paul
Jun 6, 2021 10:06 AM
Reply to  Robert Heath

Apologies. Rampage is probably a little strong a word.

Regardless 3million+ have died!

Thanks
Paul

Sophie - Admin1
Admin
Sophie - Admin1
Jun 6, 2021 10:44 AM
Reply to  Paul

Are you under the impression people simply did not die before 2020?

Paul
Paul
Jun 6, 2021 10:57 AM

Hi Sophie,

Lol. No. But 3 million have died with COVID which was my point. And if left unvaccinated will continue right?

Certainly 3 million haven’t drowned as per Chris comment below. I have tried responding to him, but my reply keeps getting deleted! (I have screenshot to prove if you would like?).

Regards
Paul

Sophie - Admin1
Admin
Sophie - Admin1
Jun 6, 2021 12:19 PM
Reply to  Paul

Don’t be silly. There is no indication any of them died of COVID and nothing to show these untested gene manipulations would prevent it even if they did. Real vaccination, as opposed to this weird untested protocol, does not and never has required everyone to be vaccinated. And for a bug so mild it’s indistinguishable from colds and flu, why on earth would it be necessary.

Not to be rude, but why are you bothering pushing silly lines of argument you must know to be fraudulent? This is your life going past. Why not at least spend it honestly if not productively?

Just a thought.

Paul
Paul
Jun 6, 2021 12:24 PM

Sophie,

Thanks again for your reply.

We are going around in circles…. I have laid out enough data to show 95%+ of hospitalizations are of people NOT vaccinated.

And I have asked via thread above that in UK alone what has caused the increase of 73k of deaths between 2019 and 2020 if it is not COVID?

Why are these silly lines of argument? I know they do not fit your narrative, but all the same………

Regards
Paul

Sophie - Admin1
Admin
Sophie - Admin1
Jun 6, 2021 12:52 PM
Reply to  Paul

They are silly, Paul, because they avoid all meaningful data in favor of junk and smoke.

UK had more deaths than 2020 on several preceding years. What caused them? Many different things is the answer, and same applies to 2020. The numbers vary year by year. 2020 was higher than some, lower than others and quite unremarkable.

So far the evidence for a real pandemic remains zero.

Over to you if you really think lobbing easily dismissed nonsense at people is how you want to spend your Sunday.

Bram
Bram
Jun 10, 2021 4:25 PM
Reply to  Paul

Those deaths also need context with an ever-increasing population that is aging. Luckily, the ONS does this for us: Age-standardised mortality per 100,000 was 1043 in 2020, which was indeed higher than 2019 but lower than every year prior to 2009 (going back 1940). https://www.bmj.com/content/bmj/373/bmj.n896.full.pdf

Granted, there is a slightly remarkable uptick, so then the question is, as pointed out by Sophie and others here, what caused them? For the first time in modern history a large part of regular health care services was shut down, and panic was induced by governments and media that are supposed to inform the public without (too much) bias. It also becomes difficult to argue that Covid actually was the most important determinant in excess mortality in the UK given that so many countries, regardless of their approach to Covid in terms of measures, experienced little or no excess mortality while letting the virus “rip” (Japan being the best example).

But back to my first point about mortality in context, how do those figures justify introducing an experimental vaccine? Why does everyone need to be vaccinated? If you’re worried about the health care system just vaccinate everyone over 60, and you’ve basically eliminated the “problem” (I personally am against this because I think it’s still too risky and is unnecessary)

Paul
Paul
Jun 10, 2021 5:51 PM
Reply to  Bram

Hi,

All your answers are here:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/excessdeathsinenglandandwales2020final

Unless you are suggesting a mass death certificate and/or ONS fraud?

Regards
Paul

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 10, 2021 6:11 PM
Reply to  Paul

You are not addressing his post. You are not having a good faith exchange. You are cynically spamming decontextualised links and touting non sequiturs. A trolling tactic that is not tolerated here. Good Day. A2

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 10, 2021 6:12 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Thank you Admin2!

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 10, 2021 6:34 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Do you think these guys are nothing more than people with too much time on their hands or something more ‘indisidious’?

Chris
Chris
Jun 4, 2021 12:59 PM
Reply to  Paul

Why would you want to vaccinate against something with a death rate LESS THAN that of drowing? I feel they should fully test the vaccine (full clinical trials) before it is claimed safe, effective and then unleashed on society.

It’s unfortunate that common sense and logic have been replaced by panic and hysteria.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 10, 2021 6:45 PM
Reply to  Chris

It’s us doing the panicking, not the people administering the ‘vaccine’! We’ve deliberately panicked by a sophisticated psychological warfare campaign, fueled by (deliberately) wild predictions of death. Yes, people are dying just as every winter people die of respiratory diseases, but they don’t lock us down every winter do they?

Robert Heath
Robert Heath
Jun 4, 2021 4:27 PM
Reply to  Paul

96% of hospital patients unvaccinated is just an outright lie, so you have nothing to back that figure up, whereas there is plenty of VAERS and MHRA data that shows the harm being done by the gene therapy called a vaccine, why I bother to answer beats me, as making up statistics shows you clearly have no interest in rational debate

Paul
Paul
Jun 4, 2021 5:13 PM
Reply to  Robert Heath

Hi Robert,

Thanks you for your reply. I apologise it is nearer to 99%..

Here is one link (of many similar ones):
https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/covid-19-vaccine/news/20210513/over-_99-percent-hospitalized-2021-covid-patients-unvaccinated

Regards
Paul

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 4, 2021 6:31 PM
Reply to  Paul

This isn’t peer reviewed or anything. I can’t even find a link to the actual study, merely press releases on the Cleveland Clinic site. All reads like pharma propaganda to me right now. Help me out if you find the actual paper, please! A2

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 6:42 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

Sam, even if it was ‘peer reviewed’ it’s clear that such animals can no longer be relied upon, such is the corruption of science eg, ‘peer reviewed’ the study in the Lancet, which had to be withdrawn as was fake, yet the damage was done, like Neil Ferguson’s projection of 500,000 dead, the number that kicked this nightmare off in the UK!

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 4, 2021 4:46 PM
Reply to  Paul

Paul, source please for your 96% figure. As to your argument that, “people do not have a crystal ball and know how they will be affected if they catch COVID”, well of course they don’t! What a ridculous statement. But what we can say is that around 99% of people who contract the bug do survive. Furthermore, even most of the vulnerable do survive (I think the figure for over 80s is 90%+/-), if they get treatment in time.

hotrod31
hotrod31
Jun 6, 2021 2:33 PM
Reply to  Paul

I suspect that grown ups feel that it is quite ludicrous to inject 99.3% percent of any population who are fit-and-well and in fine form. Moreover, the research appears to suggest that of the 0.7???% who are affected by this ‘new’ virus – the recovery rate, if treated correctly, have an above 93-95%+-‘survival’ rate. Additionally … most grown ups tend to wonder about a virus which has totally blown the flu and colds away, in 2020.
Some grown ups even wonder what the hell is meant by … false positive?

Dreamflower0987
Dreamflower0987
Jun 10, 2021 3:58 PM
Reply to  Paul

Early treatment is key not coercing the public with experimental injections.

Paul
Paul
Jun 10, 2021 5:17 PM

Very true. But at the same time people want their freedom too much in countries such as ours (UK). Of course not helped by websites such as this!

M St Clair
M St Clair
Jun 15, 2021 1:56 AM
Reply to  Paul

Risk stratification is key. No one should take the risk of the injections who is healthy, fit, pregnant, a child, a teen, or any young adult unless they are chronically ill, especially with diabetes, obesity or immunocompromise. The LNP have been found in multiple body tissues with particularly high concentrations in the ovaries, spleen, adrenals, liver, and bone marrow post vaccination. Most vaccines (protein subunit and inactivated) use MHC-2 to express the antigen, causing T helper cells to make memory cells, and B cells to make antibodies. But in this mRNA vaccine, the encoded spike is expressed on the MHC-1 and CD-8 (cytotoxic T cells) are generated as well. Due to the wide tissue tropism of these LNPs, this process is going to “mark for destruction” the tissues that take up these LNPs. In the future with booster shots of these products, critical tissues will be damaged and damage will be cumulative with each successive booster. This very thing I am explaining is the cause for many PhD biologists, and physicians and other healthcare workers having reticence to take these gene-based vaccines. No thank you. I treat people EARLY with ivermectin and fluvoxamine and NOT ONE of any of these Covid positive people, even ones in their 80s have had to be hospitalized, none have dropped their saturations, and none have developed Covid pneumonia nor Long Covid. To continue to champion these injections, is like driving sheep to slaughter. Only the very vulnerable should be injected. And ALL Covid victims should be treated starting on DAY ONE of symptomology!

nab
nab
Jun 2, 2021 7:53 PM

I was sympathetic to those who were being fooled. Now I see that they will remain fooled even when presented with the above information.

All I can hope now is that the shot rapidly and permanently removes the unthinkingly compliant from our numbers. It is a silver-lining as I can cope.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 2, 2021 7:31 PM

Re-run: NO ‘Covid-19’ DEATHS for the past 28 DAYS! Now they’re reduced to using an increase in ‘CASES’ as an excuse to abandon the 21 June partial release from Concentration Camp UK and how many of these ‘new’ cases are the result of inoculated reinfections, the so-called breakthroughs? And whose counting?

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 2, 2021 7:17 PM

I note that in Europe, ‘Adverse events’ already total far MORE than the numbers used here!

EudraVigilence – European database of suspected adverse drug reaction reports

COVID19 Vaccine Adverse Drug Reactions

12,184 DEAD

1,196,190 Injuries Through May 22, 2021

European Medicines Agency

https://www.globalresearch.ca/how-severe-are-the-side-effects-of-the-pseudo-anticovid-vaccines/5746511

paul
paul
Jun 2, 2021 4:55 PM

A friend is attending his sons graduation. They want a -ve test to allow entry. Any ideas on how to avoid this?

Simon
Simon
Jun 2, 2021 5:41 PM
Reply to  paul

They could write to the Dean and ask if a Hazmat Suit would be an acceptable alternative.

They could get a fake certificate.

Or they could explain to the son how there are more important things than ceremonies and recruit the son into the resistance and suggest he doesn’t enable the enablers by getting involved.

Or they could stay outside and do the photos beforehand and/or afterwards, perhaps recruiting a normie accomplice to shoot some video footage on the inside when Son gets himself “promoted”.

Richard
Richard
Jun 2, 2021 3:57 PM

https://youtu.be/295r46gmVl0
These parasites need a shot alright.

Edwige
Edwige
Jun 2, 2021 1:34 PM

Useful resource:

https://winteroak.org.uk/2021/06/01/the-acorn-66/#2

(Obviously not an endorsement of everything they write – but they are aware of Alison McDowell and Off-G which is a good start).

my parents said know
my parents said know
Jun 3, 2021 2:27 AM
Reply to  Edwige

Re: winteroak: I’m thinking love without bravery is like click-bait kittens.
Bravery is what we need- and we will find we have it despite ourselves.
Love we cannot help. We have it. They don’t. We can only hope it is a home team advantage.

Peter Abraham
Peter Abraham
Jun 2, 2021 1:16 PM

The “vaccine” seems quite effective from a population reduction point of view.

Charlie
Charlie
Jun 2, 2021 1:01 PM

I can’t believe the vax is experimental. That’s not the way they roll. It’s effects are known and that is why the roll-out has to be rapid, so they can get as many people as possible before we start to see what it really is, because when it does become apparent how dangerous it is, the first round of voluntary vaxxing will have to stop. This is where the accidentally released bioweapon narrative becomes so important, they will be able to tell the story like this; there was a bioweapon that got out and the super clever pharma companies did they best to fight it with a new vax, but they didn’t realize how dangerous the spike protein was. Now most of the world is very vulnerable to wild infection so the remaining unvaxxed people must get their doses of these new “safe-and-effective” vaccines and this time we’re not asking and we HAVE to track and trace and concentrate the unvaxxed in camps. And yes, there is a chip in the new vax, but otherwise all the kids that had the shots will die. Do you want to kill the kids you dirty anti-vaxxer? If the unvaxxed are a minority at that stage then they’re in real trouble because all the vaxxed zombies will back the imposition of biosecurity technocratic tyranny to save their silly sterilised skins. That’s my working theory, hope the resistance build quick enough to stop it.

Charlie
Charlie
Jun 2, 2021 1:30 PM
Reply to  Charlie

Worst of all, it will actually be true that in order to save the vaxxed we’ll have to join them in sterility. By that time I expect they’ll be ready to roll out vat-grown children, oh brave new world!

Wayne Vanderploeg
Wayne Vanderploeg
Jun 2, 2021 9:13 PM
Reply to  Charlie

Vat-grown. That’s an attention getter. I could just hear the tour guide now. “Over here we are hydroponically growing the generation of children and over here are the protein food vats. The lettuce and tomatoes are up growing in the vats up this way……….. Over here are the spare organs we are growing for emergencies. But those are babies in the vats, the tourist states.” The tour guide explains that it is easier to grow babies than individual organs. ……………………………………….

Irresponsible and proud
Irresponsible and proud
Jun 2, 2021 2:12 PM
Reply to  Charlie

At this point in time, they are conducting tge largest medical human experiment, to truly see if they can replace our natural immunity and turn us and future generations into perpetual clients. Eventually, in a dystopic scenario of which we see only the beginni, they would like to inject us beginning all sorts of “diseases”, even those we weren’t initially considering diseases at all. They want to modofy human cells to make us last longer at work, to be more resilient when they send us to war, to feel aversion towards anger and maybe even deep thought, a real life clockwork orange, but the behavioural trianing is applied in the propaganda to accept the actual cell-altering substances. Check Operation Warpspeed, by the u.s. Pentagon. None of that “population reduction” mumbo jumbo, although it is true that the current system if capitalism can be maintained undisturbed within a certain amount of people, otherwise wr might demand greater distribution of goods and we would also be harder to control. That’s why they are introducing eugenics (AGAIN) through the backdoor.

Chevrus
Chevrus
Jun 2, 2021 3:23 PM

Yes, I think this is the proverbial tip of the iceberg….

QuantumSingularity
QuantumSingularity
Jun 3, 2021 12:14 AM

I find it interesting and somewhat perplexing that you believe the idea of the vaxxx as population reduction is ‘mumbo jumbo,’ and yet it is a MUCH more reasonable assessment of the facts than ANYTHING you spouted. Almost laughable really.

Let me ask, have you read any of the previous spike protein based animal treatment studies? I have read every single one I could get my eyes on, and there is a disturbing trend with them all, or at least with the studies that investigated beyond the antibody response after injection. The trend was antibody dependent enhancement, as in, when the disease the injection was supposed to protect against was reintroduced to the subjects, the animals became increasingly ill and eventually died. A more astute assessment is the fucking injection killed the fucking patients. This is why the FDA never allowed these studies to move to human trials.

Now, since Covid-19 has never been proven to exist, and the genetic make-up that is supposed to be the virus was developed from base pairs that are common in hundreds of other genetic sequences in the gene database, including the human genome, one has to wonder what exactly they produced with the computer model? What particular spike protein are they forcing the body to make? Are these spike proteins even disease specific, or are they relevant to a wide range of similar sickness? I researched the shit out of these things, and I can tell you that I never figured out if they even know if the spike proteins are disease specific. They sure act like they are, but there is no definitive proof that the spike protein made is not just a generic autoimmune response to trigger the antibody development and white blood cell functions. What I would really like to know is if the animals in the studies that developed ADE (all of them) had a different disease introduced, rather than the one that was specific to the study, would they have still died? I think they would have died no matter what disease was introduced. Granted, all of these assumptions are based on modern viral theory, which may or may not be sound theory. It may just be that you are fucking with the immune system in ways that you shouldn’t and everything goes haywire. It is certain that in the studies the fucking treatment killed the fucking patients.

Now, have you read any specifics on the various groups of people who run the world? Bilderberg, Davos, Rockefeller Foundation, WEF, etc? They are all the same people really. Every meeting has a main area of discussion regarding population control focusing on various methods for population reduction. Different population numbers are cited for the various groups, 500M to 1B is generally agreed upon (by them, not me) as the number of humans the earth can support long term. It’s obvious that the various methods for birth control do not work, with the population in excess of 7B currently. So what to do? A mass die off.

Well then why not the virus? Because if you release a deadly pathogen with little to no treatment options, you just might be a victim as well. They can’t be having any of that, after all, they are the ones who are meant to survive this undoubtedly. So, what other options are there for controlled demolition of the population that you can attempt to make appear natural? Fake a pandemic and a deadly virus, and use the vaxxx as the agent of death. Which is exactly what is happening.

Your premise fails to realize that they do not need to run a global health experiment, they steal enough children to run all the genetic experiments they would ever need. They also do not need money, since they control the money and will just print more if necessary. The massive wealth transfer is an added bonus for them, but really just serves to obfuscate the real intentions of the entire plan. See, if they can keep the focus of the masses on all the nefarious things they are indeed doing, but still are not the main plan, they can divide the opposition into differences of opinion. We need to see the plan for what it is so we can come together as one group to oppose their plan for the great die-off.

Dayne
Dayne
Jun 2, 2021 5:29 PM
Reply to  Charlie

And they cleverly insinuate, via pop culture, that yes, the covid narrative is fake, but the alien invasion / planetary collision (take your pick) etc. narratives are real. Hence the jab is “saving” us from unspeakable cataclysms down the road. (Right; like they ever cared about the unwashed masses.)

Yossi
Yossi
Jun 2, 2021 12:21 PM

Why is Ivermectin not available in UK? This is worth watching:

Arcabuz
Arcabuz
Jun 2, 2021 11:35 AM

This is how I see it, broadly speaking and leaving behind multiple edges that would give to write a whole treatise. There was a lie, they lied to us. And the lie is so serious that they have decided to move on. Some knew it was a lie from the beginning and want to go to the end. Others found out a bit later but were already involved and can’t stop until they get to the end. Very sad.

TFS
TFS
Jun 2, 2021 10:53 AM

Seems to me the issue around ‘Absolute vs Relative’ risk needs to be outlined as a matter of course for Peer Reviewed Studies, in the explanation in giving ‘Informed Consent’ AND included/referenced within various International Laws.

I look forward to the likes Dr Malcolm Kendrick being asked to give evidence before a Public Inquiry on this very subject in relation to the vaccines

Chevrus
Chevrus
Jun 2, 2021 3:28 PM
Reply to  TFS

test….

Inorbitt
Inorbitt
Jun 2, 2021 10:01 AM

What do people here think I should do when asked by colleagues at work if I have taken the vaccine?
1. Lie
2. Avoid the question- strategy I want to employ but advice on how please
3. Not an option as I’m not willing to tell the truth at work, only to my friends and relatives

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 2, 2021 2:23 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

Tricky one, I know exactly the quandary you’re in. It’s all very well saying ‘lie’ but you need sufficient motivation to lie, which must be prompted by the circumstances, and it can easily become more sole destroying and destructive maintaining that lie than simply ‘fessing up.

Creating a vaccinated persona, conning the system, needs high-enough stakes to maintain the lie without feeling cowardly. I’ve not heard of too many spies developing loose tongues because they felt they were living a lie. The stakes were high, they didn’t want to get shot, so they kept shtum. But how often will you feel like a spy as you hide from your workmates? Beware of those innocuous, banal little moments when a workmate pops the vaccine question, when lying can feel like an indignity.

So, work on perfecting your workplace ‘persona’ and play that part, and know that you’re doing the only thing you can do.

Or, alternatively, simply tell them you didn’t get the jab! Your truth is worth a million times their cowardice, and you might be a beacon of light to someone who wants to wake up. It won’t be as bad as you think.

Avoid option 2. Never avoid the question ad infinitum. It’s not sustainable. This cult requires affirmative answers to the right questions. When you’re eventually questioned more and more directly, withholding will have forewarned your enemies as they encircle you. Very weak position.

Personally, I think I’d have to tell the truth and be damned, but I fully respect your position is your own, and potentially very different from mine! A2

Jim McDonagh
Jim McDonagh
Jun 2, 2021 8:19 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

It is one thing to be truthful when you have no skin in the game , but quite another when your personal freedom is at risk . As the new normal is rolled out even mildly admitting you have not had your jab will become a criminal act. Already you can be summarily fired from your job for refusing the jab across the planet.

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Jun 2, 2021 8:51 PM
Reply to  Jim McDonagh

The battle isn’t lost, let’s not give into despair prematurely, please. I suggest, if you’re right, then we’d all have sufficient motivation to lie, with untroubled consciences. Therefore, as I said above, lie your head off XD

Jim McDonagh
Jim McDonagh
Jun 2, 2021 9:25 PM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

You misunderstand my post ? I don’t despair . I just see no reason for “inorbitts” crisis of conscious. Class warfare will persist in many forms until hierarchies are abandoned, which seems unlikely as transhumanism is being installed at the top of globalized civilizations pyramid . With the Internet as one of its primary tools . Read Chomsky on the illusion of kinship and equality fostered by the Internet perhaps?

Kalen
Kalen
Jun 3, 2021 12:13 PM
Reply to  Jim McDonagh

We are subjected to psychological warfare with covidians as tools, useful idiots. Stay true to reality facing coercion, extortion and intimidation at work which is totalitarian place anyways.

COVID does not exists so deal with reality. And hence as the question “have you been jabbed?” Is not informational (medical information is private and should not be even solicited ) but a doublespeak seeking no knowledge of your Jab status but aims solely for personal attack, retort with a mild doublespeak of your own by telling the truth like saying “ I had coronavirus (not COVID) and now I am protected.”

it is true. If you had cold few years ago you likely have coronavirus antibodies and in fact according to published studies in 2020 you have cross immunity because of close affinity between common cold alphacoronaviruses and betacoronaviruses.

Tell the truth your way. Lies take huge mental and emotional toll only adding to anguish.

Derek Williams
Derek Williams
Jun 3, 2021 4:38 PM
Reply to  Jim McDonagh

We all have some “ skin in the game “ ( both literally and figuratively) Jim.
So if you feel “ it’s different when your personal freedom is at risk” I think you have some big decisions ahead.
Strength and good wishes.

Philippe
Philippe
Jun 3, 2021 7:36 AM
Reply to  Sam - Admin2

In this vein, my son-in-law is being coerced to take the jab at work. He doesn’t want to but feels he has little choice.

Apart from the obvious problems with the jab (we all know what they are), my daughter wants to have children in the future and is now very worried. Obviously.

I remember reading somewhere a few months ago that if the man has the jab, he can transmit the [spiked protein – although I don’t think they called it that at the time] to the woman, with all the attendant issues re placenta formation, spontaneous abortion (assuming pregnancy even gets going) etc.

Problem is, I can’t remember where I read it. I’m going to keep looking (I’ve read a lot of articles over the timeframe in question!), but do you recall anything like this appearing in one of your articles?

If he is going to think about going through with having the jab, I believe he should know all the ramifications. Many thanks.

Howard
Howard
Jun 2, 2021 3:17 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

“Of course I’ve been vaccinated!” That’s what you say. I’ve been vaccinated – some 70 plus years ago when I was a kid (at that time only three vaccines were required).

For most people in “First World” countries, it’s 100% true to say “I’ve been vaccinated.” Hopefully, if you state it firmly enough, others will just assume you mean the COVID “vaccine.”

Jim McDonagh
Jim McDonagh
Jun 2, 2021 8:25 PM
Reply to  Howard

I was given dozens of vaccinating before 1980 , most were involuntary i hate needles ! However i haven’t had any since Reagan and Thatcher turned medical treatment /vaccination into a for profit industry circa 1980.

Ort
Ort
Jun 2, 2021 9:44 PM
Reply to  Howard

I considered “Sure, I’m as ‘fully vaccinated’ as I’ll ever be!” based on the same logic. But I admit that it’s a bit too close to obvious sarcasm.

Petra Liverani
Petra Liverani
Jun 2, 2021 3:27 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

You could say:
“I’ve tested positive for common sense which grants me immunity from the virus.” 🙂

Chevrus
Chevrus
Jun 2, 2021 3:29 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

I have ANTIBODIES! Great answer!
Furthermore, I want my bodies immune system to operate as it normally would so that I can become immune to this terrible disease. I do not want my body to be altered so it produces full length S1 spike proteins which have been deomnstrated in peer reviewed scientific studies to cause damage to multiple sustems in the human body.

Barovsky
Barovsky
Jun 2, 2021 7:25 PM
Reply to  Chevrus

Re antibodies:

I had to get a blood test for my underactive Thyroid a couple of weeks ago and my GP who is a decent and honest person (though crippled by being an employee of Corporate NHS), asked me if I wanted to get an ANTIBODY TEST at the same time! This is spite of the fact that when I inquired on the NHS Covid-19 Website, I was told only NHS employess and care workers were entitled to an AB test! Has anybody else had this experience?

Lee
Lee
Jun 2, 2021 4:39 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

Tell them you feel the answer is personal – which it is. Similar to asking what religion or sexuality.

paul
paul
Jun 2, 2021 5:05 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

Ask them if they have HIV. Then wait for the call from personnel

Hector
Hector
Jun 3, 2021 8:33 AM
Reply to  paul

lol

draeger
draeger
Jun 2, 2021 6:02 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

I respond with:

“I have herd immunity and I’m part of the control group!”

which leaves them with a dumbfounded look and usually change the subject.

Ffrank
Ffrank
Jun 2, 2021 6:38 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

Many people apparently have an infection so mild that they can barely tell they were ill. If you’ve had an illness with any of the Covid-like symptoms you might choose to assume that you’ve already had the disease.
If you already had Covid you now have natural immunity (for life, if you choose to believe the recent article in ‘Nature’ mag). Once you have natural immunity there should be no need to take a potentially dangerous experimental gene therapy that duplicates the exposure you already had.

ZenPriest
ZenPriest
Jun 2, 2021 7:09 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

There’s no one answer fits all. I won’t lie, it’s not part of my constitution. I can deal with a few normies being aghast at my non compliance. What does it have to do with work really? Nothing.
But if you seek to avoid any kind of judgement and confrontation and are comfortable lying, then by all means lie.

Martha
Martha
Jun 2, 2021 11:57 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt

I usually answer: No, I’m going to take my chances with vitamin D and zinc. It worked out well for me last year. My 84 yr old mother had it and survived and when I visited, I either didn’t catch it or I have antibodies. Besides, over 4000 people have died of the shots in the last 5 months, so I’ll just wait a while and maybe they’ll be banned like DDT or Thalidomide as being a hugely bad idea. That usually shuts people up. Say you’ll wait 6 months or a yr to see how the original guinea pigs make out.

Arcabuz
Arcabuz
Jun 3, 2021 11:42 AM
Reply to  Inorbitt

I’m going to lie to everyone, work, parents, siblings, friends, etc. I think we have enough strength to overcome it. But why lie? At the moment it is obvious.

TFS
TFS
Jun 3, 2021 2:08 PM
Reply to  Inorbitt
  1. Tell them that’s confidential information between you and your doctor AND If they want to dicsuss it, would they kindly bring in the full medical history for themselves, and their immediate loved ones, also including the fully medical history of those who have been vaccinated within the workplace.
  2. Explain to them what peer pressure/bullying is and the term ‘medical coersion’, detailing what various International Laws feel on the subject of ‘medical coersion’.
Edwige
Edwige
Jun 2, 2021 9:59 AM

The Eugenics Society in their current guise (for the time being – they’re planning another re-boot):

https://www.galtoninstitute.org.uk/

The weasel words about their past aren’t exactly difficult to see through. For example, they’re against “coercive eugenics” so if people can be rendered so punch-drunk they can be manipulated into agreeing with it that’s fine and dandy by them. It’s entirely congruent with the notion the self-professed elite have some concept of free will and we have to agree to have these things done to us (like nobody forces anyone to have a smart phone or TV). “Let the right one in”….

The list of institutions that have been willing to host their conferences makes interesting reading (Amnesty International?….).

Howard
Howard
Jun 2, 2021 3:25 PM
Reply to  Edwige

The “inconvenient truth” about smart phones is that, as most people have them, the system makes it virtually impossible not to have one.

If they mandate vaccines – which I believe they will despite the growing “hesitancy” – they will also require a concomitant “App” which will have to be scanned anywhere a person goes.

It’s like this: the PTB are either dead serious about the final enslavement of humanity or they’re not. If they’re not, then this whole COVID thing is a “tempest in a teapot.” If they are, then smart phones will be their primary means of effecting their goal.

Pilgrim Shadow
Pilgrim Shadow
Jun 2, 2021 9:07 PM
Reply to  Howard

Eventually, some of the features of the smartphone will be incorporated into a “smart-mark”.

Ooink
Ooink
Jun 2, 2021 9:50 AM

There’s no adults out there in “leadership” positions. It’s just a wasteland of nitwits, incompetents and childlike irrational hysterics.

Steamin, psycho
Steamin, psycho
Jun 2, 2021 10:34 AM
Reply to  Ooink

So true . It is as though all politicians, religious leaders, anyone with any clout has been neutered. Vacuous celebs and influencers that’s all we have to follow now.

Ooink
Ooink
Jun 2, 2021 12:00 PM

The system itself is a mirage anyway…just a fiction with no authority outside of “do what we say because we said so that’s why or you get the big stick”. What kinds of people run a “system” like that? I think we all know the answer to that. The con is that the system is run by competent people who are sincere and care about “people” and are just trying to do the best for us all. And butter never ever melts in their mouths because they hide, like the cowards they truly are, behind the oldest lines in the book: public safety, your welfare, the greater good and a thousand other fall backs that successfully con the big dumb majority. Most people in the West have not experienced governments gone wild. They’ve enjoyed a slow boil of TV chefs, TV dancing, TV bedroom makeovers, TV news, TV sport. etc But we are all, right now, literally having the system explained to us in real time…by the system itself. It is literally showing us how it works. And most people don’t see it. At all. Amazing.

Lee
Lee
Jun 5, 2021 7:24 AM

Feminized …

Alan Watts
Alan Watts
Jun 2, 2021 9:32 AM

World’s largest meat supplier hit by cyber-attack

Oh really?

They can use this “cyber attack” nonsense with impunity. No evidence obtained or provided. No possible public scutinity.

It’s those damn rooskies I tell ya!
Can’t trust em.

Kate
Kate
Jun 2, 2021 9:00 AM

This is likely to get through some thick skulls, since it’s nice and easy to understand.

Would you feel comfortable suited up with a parachute that worked about
1% of the time?  Would you then say that it is 95% effective because
that particular parachute worked 95% better than the competition?

TFS
TFS
Jun 2, 2021 7:57 AM

Dr Malcolm Kendrick gives another example of ‘Relative vs Absolute’ Risk, in his ‘Doctoring Data’ presentation.

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
Jun 2, 2021 10:24 AM
Reply to  TFS

Thanks for the link.. it’s a great talk. The risk reduction discussion is at 27 minutes.

Juan Nadie
Juan Nadie
Jun 2, 2021 6:13 AM
DaveMass
DaveMass
Jun 2, 2021 6:06 AM

I’m afraid the sheep will realise too late, as do real animals at the door to the slaughterhouse…

Juan Nadie
Juan Nadie
Jun 2, 2021 5:58 AM

Excellent article, especially the closing remarks about poison.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 4:50 AM

Announced a short time ago… the lockdown in Melbourne has been extended for another week, until Friday 11th. But on top of that, QR codes will become mandatory in ALL shops and venues from midnight tomorrow night, including supermarkets.
Yes, supermarkets.
So, no scanning a QR code at a supermarket or a food store, no food.
Fascism reigns in Melbourne. And most people here will support this. They may as well put the noose around their neck themselves.
I was hoping (naively) that they would leave the supermarkets alone. I will not compromise on my bottom lines.
Absolute bastards.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-02/covid-19-lockdown-extension-victoria-regional-restrictions/100183838

Edith
Edith
Jun 2, 2021 5:52 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Do a car park order on line if you can….one way around it all for the moment….it is what I intend to do if they enforce it ever here…
the whole thing is getting out of hand yet again…for the life of me I cannot see why they just don’t let it run at this point….I am not hearing of 1000 dying and it seem many are involved in the contact groups of people….so what the hell…more bullshit…

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 6:03 AM
Reply to  Edith

I wasn’t expecting they’d include supermarkets as well Edith… but we are talking about complete psychopaths here.
Have enough food at home for a while, but will go out again tomorrow (before these codes become mandatory) and stock up on extra food.
You’re right, online shopping is the only way around this for now. Just looked at Coles online then. QR codes are to condition people for vaccine passports.

Juan Nadie
Juan Nadie
Jun 2, 2021 6:00 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

What happened to all the fighting men in Australia? Serious question. Are there no rebels left?

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 6:10 AM
Reply to  Juan Nadie

There’s a small number left Juan, but given the last 40 years of ‘programming’ and ‘metrosexualising’ the vast majority of men in Australia are simpering neutered eunuchs that if you said Boo to them would actually jump in the air in fright.
And groupthink in Australia is rampant. People with independent thoughts outside the square are viewed very suspiciously.

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 7:42 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

That’s what I have been saying about Australian men most of my life, haven’t met too many worth the paper they are printed on.

dr death
dr death
Jun 2, 2021 11:37 AM

I never trusted jason donovan nor dame edna (though I’m sure he’s very modern nowadays and doing story hours in some primary school somewhere).. mick dundee had much more appeal than those american ‘cowboys’ hehe all dressed in ‘black leather…

over here we have such luminaries as ‘sir jimmy saville’ and other such enobled diddler filth and horse faced miscreant royals who party it up with them.. and ridiculous whining BBC ‘women’ with lantern jaws.. and lots of pudgy anemic looking, ahem, ‘males’ who wear very tight trousers thus sterilising what little virility they have left… not that any of ’em have any use for it..

It’s quite obvious the revolution starts with that face looking back from the mirror… and the content of it’s skull..

I hope you are devilishly handsome and an have incredible mind like myself..

the imbeciles respond to vague superficiality like that..

Ooink
Ooink
Jun 2, 2021 6:31 AM
Reply to  Juan Nadie

The whole country voted for homosexual marriage. The place is as cucked and neutralized as you could possibly imagine. Insipid fools who mistake planned degeneracy and perversion for progress and liberality.

Chevrus
Chevrus
Jun 2, 2021 3:33 PM
Reply to  Ooink

It only took one false flag casualty event to take firearms away…go figure.

Anticitizen one
Anticitizen one
Jun 2, 2021 11:52 PM
Reply to  Chevrus

You’re right. That’s another deep and dark rabbit hole.

Howard
Howard
Jun 2, 2021 3:35 PM
Reply to  Ooink

It’s my understanding that the primary push for homosexual marriage was to get around insurance rules which do not allow coverage for a partner no matter how long the relationship.

I don’t even know if “common law” marriage between a man and a woman allows for coverage.

LoL
LoL
Jun 3, 2021 1:50 AM
Reply to  Ooink

“The whole country voted for homosexual marriage.”
No one should have the right to ‘vote’ on anyone else sexual preferences. It is none of anyone’s business but the people involved – just to be clear, I am talking about consenting adults here.
Besides, what has homosexuality got to do with Victorian men being spineless?
It is true, I do see more and more younger (20s, 30s, 40s) men having no backbones, though I think that’s got more to do with their education (including family, society expectations) sterilising them of their spirits rather than anything else.
Let’s not fall into the traps being laid by the parasite class of us hating, dividing amongst ourselves.

Ooink
Ooink
Jun 3, 2021 3:59 AM
Reply to  LoL

I don’t give a flying fuck if someone is homosexual and all the hysterics who downvoted my comment because they got triggered need to understand that homosexuality is being USED by the system to fuck with you. Back before we all became so progressive and inclusive and free…people like me paid homosexuals zero attention. Never gave a damn what you did in the privacy of your own home. Zero interest. Because it’s IRRELEVANT. But now the system is training people to revere the homosexual…to promote an issue that means nothing. That’s what I object to.

LoL
LoL
Jun 3, 2021 6:19 AM
Reply to  Ooink

Ooink, I am objecting to the same things that you mentioned here. I am heterosexual and really this issue is none of my business, but, I felt the need to respond, as a human being.
Anyway, let’s call a truce since it seems we’re both speaking from the same place; of being human that is and not heter, homo or whatever is fashionable nowadays.

JohnEss
JohnEss
Jun 2, 2021 1:50 PM
Reply to  Juan Nadie

That’s a great question.

I have been asking the very same for more than a year (as Gezzah will recall)

Whereas Australians used to crave individuality, they now crave the very opposite. As Gezzah says, there are swathes of the community without a spontaneous thought amongst them.

As my old Queensland mates say, “they wouldn’t have a whole brain between them.”

So much for a nation who has Ned Kelly as its national hero…

JS

JohnEss
JohnEss
Jun 2, 2021 1:51 PM
Reply to  JohnEss

Ouch! I meant “which has” not “who has”

My apologies.

JS

DaveMass
DaveMass
Jun 2, 2021 6:01 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

So if I don’t have my phone, I can’t shop?!

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 6:12 AM
Reply to  DaveMass

Then you’ll have to sign in on a piece of paper Dave.

Oscar
Oscar
Jun 2, 2021 6:16 AM
Reply to  DaveMass

what if I have an old phone – you know the sort – one that doesn’t use installable apps

Pilgrim Shadow
Pilgrim Shadow
Jun 2, 2021 9:12 PM
Reply to  Oscar

You’ll have to purchase a new phone that uses installable, no opt-out, apps.

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 7:42 AM
Reply to  DaveMass

Pretend, they are supposed to be mandatory in SA but I have never complied and never will.

JohnEss
JohnEss
Jun 2, 2021 1:53 PM

No. Me neither in WA.

Fuck ‘em!

Hele
Hele
Jun 2, 2021 7:32 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

OMG-is this really allowed.Any pushback or court injunction, class action?

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 7:55 AM
Reply to  Hele

Yes… its really allowed. And it’s happening from Thursday night. And no, except for the covid sceptics here, there will be no pushback at all. The vast majority will happily go along with it. Completely oblivious to where this is heading.

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 7:41 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Yeah, Sutton, Bowtell and all the other nutters like Norman Swan must be charged after this lunacy, it’s taking 8,000 ”tests” to find a ”case” of nothing, no one has to get sick in Victoria and it was all about using up the Twiggy Forrest imports before June 1. But never mind Spurious in SA has told footy goers to duck if the ball comes in their direction, these CHO’s are all our of their lazy ignorant facist little minds.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 8:00 AM

‘Fascist little minds’… a lot of those here Marilyn. I can’t believe people can’t see where this is heading. When work starts up again, they will insist on the QR code being scanned as well.
I knew this year would be tougher than last year, but… supermarkets😠

dr death
dr death
Jun 2, 2021 11:57 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

cloned QR codes.. it’s a thing.. also just ignore is a good idea… the hollow men want you in a tizzy and panic…

let us face facts the logistics of this operation are actually beyond the capabilities of these miserable mediocrities, the shitty vaporware and their porcine gimps, the whole wobbly edifice is built on compliance …..

we are after all dealing with imbeciles..

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 12:10 PM
Reply to  dr death

Unfortunately Dr, with the huge amount of blind compliance here in Melbourne, the edifice, at least in this part of the world, is not so wobbly at all, however I do take note of your positivity, thanks…

Seansaighdeor
Seansaighdeor
Jun 2, 2021 8:00 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

At the march on Saturday I was ‘given’ a QR phone scam that ‘checks’ you in at any establishment. I haven’t tried it but the lady who gave me it said she uses it all the time. Perhaps this is a way forward there? I’m sure like here no one will bother checking.

Alan Watts
Alan Watts
Jun 2, 2021 9:28 AM
Reply to  Seansaighdeor

This

DomoebaMalingera
DomoebaMalingera
Jun 2, 2021 10:32 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

I expect you will have to rob these stores after closing, i just hope you can find a good crew to help!

LoL
LoL
Jun 2, 2021 10:58 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Yes, just heard the extended lockdown!
1 person with COVID in hospital and yet all elective surgery is postpone & 7mil people in lockdown !?!? etc…..

I do see some positive signs though; I’ve been walking on the beach in Mornington Peninsula, 2 days this week and there were quite a lot of people and I’d say 70% weren’t wearing masks, which is a huge change from the previous lockdowns. I was quite surprised as I didn’t expect it (and yes, I drove 70kms to get to this town, totally out of the 5kms allowable, I am sure there are others who do the same, what of it, worst is I’ll get a fine which I will write in to dispute the charge).

I live in the inner city and there are more masks on for sure, but still, I’ve walked passed more mask-less this week too, and we mask-less people tend to make more eye contact and smile, more than previously.

As for the QR code, my phone doesn’t pick up the code (too old/I don’t know why) so I just pretend to aim it at the code and walk pass. Though usually I shop online or look for shops that don’t have QR code (will see what happens tomorrow onwards with this new rule).

Besides, there might be some rumble now that the federal government is not going to pay for people to stay at home, perhaps starvation (close to it anyway) might get people off their backside and onto the street.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 2, 2021 11:23 AM
Reply to  LoL

Greetings from the western suburbs LoL. I just read that the mandatory QR codes came into effect immediately, as in today… not midnight tomorrow night. Sigh. Only option is to shop online now.
Maybe some small family owned food stores may be a bit more relaxed about having everyone scan it?
I also expect they’ll keep the mandatory QR codes in place after this lockdown ends, just like they kept mandatory facemasks on public transport since last year. Absolute bastards.
It’s to condition people for the vaccine passports, obviously.
I also noticed on public transport, especially out in the suburbs, down in the Bayside area for example, a sizable number of people not wearing facemasks, especially on the buses.
How long this goes on for, who knows?
Glad you got down to the Mornington Peninsula… lovely down there.
Have a good evening Lol👍

LoL
LoL
Jun 3, 2021 6:28 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

So Gezza, I was at a local grocery store today and yes they do have the code at the entrance but I noticed not many people sign in.
There was only one middle aged guy, not hipster looking, mask-less. He looked a bit bewildered, and I had a giggle ’cause I think that must be how I look too. It’s a bit of pressure being surrounded by a sea of masked faces. I looked at him hard, trying to look supportive but we didn’t engage, next time, promise myself I’ll go up and talk to that person/people.

I think the big supermarkets would have guards standing by to keep an eye on you for the QR code.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 3, 2021 6:54 AM
Reply to  LoL

Hah! You obviously have ESP or a Crystal Ball? I only just walked in then. On a tip off, I went to a supermarket in the next suburb on the bus, walked round it, grabbed some food, went to the check out, paid with cash. The whole time maskless, then walked out. Not one person said a single word. And even more, no guard, no check in, no scanning a code.
I did note the QR code by the entrance of the mall, but I just ignored it. Then went to an Indian food shop, got some ready made curries, then went to a tobacco shop which, thank god, was open! (I know😏) Again no scanning a code or anything.
Then home now… not one person on either bus was maskless and only spotted one other unmasked person in that suburb. I was going to set up a Coles online account and shop online, but I may hold off on that now.
I’ve meant to do that as well LoL – as least acknowledge another unmasked person and even say thanks or give them a big smile…

Hector
Hector
Jun 3, 2021 10:02 AM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

In England you can still buy your food without going in one of the big supermarket chains (T*sc*, ASDA, Strainsburys and Morrisons). The two German discounters don’t have pot bellied knob-jockeys manning the door so I go in them to get bog rolls, bleach, lemonade and cheap beer and wine. The rest I get from greengrocers and butchers. Make my own bread.

Gezzah Potts
Gezzah Potts
Jun 3, 2021 10:24 AM
Reply to  Hector

The supermarket I went to this afternoon was an Aldi. I usually don’t shop there but had heard on FB of their ‘look the other way’ policy about wearing masks, and like I said, there was no one at the entrance, and no one asked me to scan a code.
The other major supermarkets here usually have security guards or staff stationed at the entrance.
Making your own bread would be great, except I only have a benchtop stove and a microwave oven. I can imagine the smell in your kitchen!
Lots of ‘news’ about the Fauci revelations, and it’s even prompted an alternative blogger to actually say something about covid for the first time in 14 months. And they bloody live here in Melbourne which has been ground zero for really harsh measures.

Jean
Jean
Jun 2, 2021 12:14 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

In other words, let people starve to death to save lives!

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 12:48 PM
Reply to  Jean

Yes well millions of kids are starving to death while the rich nations snivel and cower

Chevrus
Chevrus
Jun 2, 2021 3:32 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

Thats some pretty messed up shit

Richard
Richard
Jun 2, 2021 5:14 PM
Reply to  Gezzah Potts

I send my 8 year old son in to the shops while I wait at the front.
He loves the responsibility and doesn’t have to wear a mask and pays with cash. Oh, and he doesn’t have a phone.

John
John
Jun 2, 2021 4:18 AM

OMG VIctoria has recorded 6 new cases of the common cold, sorry coronavirus. Quick lock down the whole state. We might run out of fucking tissues!!! Geezuz H Kreist who are these morons!

Ooink
Ooink
Jun 2, 2021 9:55 AM
Reply to  John

I posted this above somewhere…but it sums up Australia…there’s no adults out there in “leadership” positions. It’s just a wasteland of nitwits, incompetents and childlike irrational hysterics. The objective is chaos, confusion and stampeding. Most of them know what’s going on. So my comment isn’t totally accurate…unless we take them at face value…or at their word…which we shouldn’t. But human beings are trusting so why not take them at their word? These people are supposed to work for the people. You’re damned if you do, you’re damned if you don’t. etc etc etc. The solution is a 3rd way. Or a 56th way. Not being stuck in the manufactured dichotomy. etc etc etc

I’m so tired of it all now. I’m running on fumes keeping up with any of it. And this, along with a couple of youtube channels and bitchute are the only places I hear anything. I’m so very over it all I don’t think I can even keep that up.

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 12:49 PM
Reply to  Ooink

Have you all noticed they are vaxxed within an inch of their lives as Gen X kids

Ooink
Ooink
Jun 2, 2021 2:56 PM

I don’t know that many people. I don’t even know if my best friends have been injected.

Hector
Hector
Jun 3, 2021 10:05 AM
Reply to  Ooink

I’m so tired of it all now. I’m running on fumes keeping up with any of it.

I feel the same Ooink so you’re not the only one if that helps.

George M
George M
Jun 4, 2021 4:53 PM
Reply to  Ooink

No, human being are not ‘trusting’. They don’t trust me or any individual pointing out the contradictions and gaping holes in the covid official storyline. So rather than trust they choose who to follow.

Hele
Hele
Jun 2, 2021 4:06 AM
Simon Dutton
Simon Dutton
Jun 2, 2021 8:38 AM
Reply to  Hele

Great link. The site keeps getting better and better. Statement on home page:

Statements in this site are substantiated with facts that will stand in a court of law. Informed Consent requires a flow of clear, accurate, unfiltered information. Click on the hyperlinked sections to direct you to primary sources such as CDC, WHO, FDA documents.

Anyone trying to take down this site will be named as codefendant in Nuremberg 2.0 for being an accomplice to crimes against humanity. That includes social media. Lawyers are standing by.

Updated June 1, 2021 – 9:05 pm PDT

Joopy
Joopy
Jun 2, 2021 3:34 AM

What’s even worse is the fact that these psychopaths are now pushing the this poison into kids, giving the EUA for 12-15 year-olds in the US and are currently experimenting on infants as young as 6 months old. We can’t let those responsible or complicit get away with these crimes. We need mass protests like they just had in London but in every city around the world and every weekend until they stop the injections and scrap every last restriction. And that’s just for starters.

Jean
Jean
Jun 2, 2021 12:09 PM
Reply to  Joopy

In the province of Quebec, Canada they just announced that it will be possible to go back to school without masks, but only if at least 75% of the kids got their 2 doses.
Not mandatory but…

ToyAussie
ToyAussie
Jun 2, 2021 3:03 PM
Reply to  Jean

Same bullshit in BC. They’ve literally stated freedom returns with proportional vaccination uptake.

Jean
Jean
Jun 2, 2021 5:55 PM
Reply to  ToyAussie

They’re shameless, really.

Roslyn
Roslyn
Jun 2, 2021 6:52 PM
Reply to  ToyAussie

I haven’t heard anything about that being linked to vaccination status…BC has full re-opening tied with 70% of adults over 18 with one dose. Horrid enough but if they try the same thing as QC and parents stay apathetic, I am out of here. Already lost all faith in the media and getting close to losing it with the legal profession too.

Ort
Ort
Jun 2, 2021 9:38 PM
Reply to  Joopy

Another delightful wrinkle in this emergent Slaughter of the Innocents is the creepy and creeping policy of administering COVID “vaccines” to minors without parental consent.

I know from commenters here that this is happening in Canada. In the US, there was at least a ripple of controversy– at least in the vaccine-skeptic community– when Washington DC approved a bill abolishing compulsory parental consent for minors seeking vaccinations; IIRC, this foul exercise of local demagoguery was set in motion before the Megadeath Virus of Doom scamdemic commenced.

But now it seems to be happening routinely, as a sort of bureaucratic fait accompli— no public discussion (surprise, surprise), just blithe informational announcements that parental permission is no longer required. Insidious and iniquitous!

Kalen
Kalen
Jun 2, 2021 3:27 AM

In contrast to drugs clinical trials including cancer drugs trials comparing injected group relatively to placebo group in vaccination trials is deeply methodologically flawed resulting in nothing short of scientific fraud.

Moreover, in case of Covid jab trial usage of discredited PCR test positive as sole determinant of trial members’ infection status results in nearly 100% error in situation of low prevalence of infection among trial hordes, outrageously high CT test positive thresholds used or due to its inherent nonspecificity regarding most common respiratory infections.

But most of all it is explicitly prohibited to be used as SC2 infection diagnostic tool by FDA under PCR EUA conditional approval letters to manufacturers of testing kits. Using PCR to diagnose infection in trials or not is medically invalid and in fact illegal.

So how big Pharma came up with fraudulent relative effectiveness numbers submitted to FDA and media.

Imagine running trial of cancer therapy drug where healthy cancer-free people are given the same drug as cancer patients and then counted as proof of drug effectiveness against cancer they never had.

This is absurd but that kind of measure was used or rather abused by big Pharma for calculating for example 94% relative effectiveness of COVID jabs. [ out of 40,000 trial participants three positives in jab group and 100 positives in placebo group; 100-3/100+3 =0.94];]

It is a whitewash using such small numbers as only absolute measure of vaccine effectiveness has any meaning attached to it because of low prevalence of virus circulation (very low risk of infection) among population which naturally is reflected in random trials.

Here is NBC addressing the problem:

When the risks of an event are small, odds ratios (relative risk gauge) can be misleading about absolute risk. A more meaningful measure of efficacy would be the number to vaccinate to prevent one hospitalization or one death…

An estimate of the number to treat from the Moderna trial to prevent a single “case” would be fifteen thousand vaccinations to prevent ninety “cases” or 167 vaccinations per “case” prevented which does not sound nearly as good as 94.5 % effective. “

Mass Vaccines differ from drug therapies because they are administered to healthy people, mostly people who will never be exposed to virus or bacteria, (in large part due to vaccine and natural induced herd immunity) and hence since only small fraction of trial hordes can be exposed and infected during trial, we cannot compare effectiveness of vaccines in preventing infection relatively to control (placebo) group as we do not know how many were actually exposed to pathogen in both groups and in how many cases other kinds than specific vaccine induced antibody immune system response actually prevented infections if it did.

As prevalence of exposure in population to pathogen (a risk of pathogen infection) is small and unknown only absolute effectiveness could be meaningful and relevant in mass vaccination programs, a measure that may crudely judge worthiness of vaccines only in specific epidemiological context (high lethality of pathogen), and of course after all adverse effects are individually investigated with near zero tolerance. In mass vaccine deployment calculating risks and benefits should not involve comparing combined vaccine adverse effect rate with pathogen Infection rates including IHR, IFR but with normal hospitalization and death rates of healthy people of different demographics . Findings of direct causes of deaths from jabs (clotting due to spike S toxicity ) hence must result in immediate end of entire vaccination campaign as it was done in the past

This is my point all along, vaccines are band aids, if at all, effective only in certain application to certain contained and localized groups with high prevalence of pathogen and only in limited specific periods of time and only as last resort until effective treatment or medical and non medical preventive measures are developed and applied.
Global vaccination programs are scientifically baseless, useless and dangerous by themselves among many other reasons due to their global scale alone

Edith
Edith
Jun 2, 2021 5:56 AM
Reply to  Kalen

There is always the assumption that everyone is going to catch whatever….which is total fantasy…I am betting even in Black Death plagues no everyone got ill…not everyone gets cancer, heart disease etc etc …yet this lot act like they will.

Oscar
Oscar
Jun 2, 2021 6:19 AM
Reply to  Edith

many people still have intact immune system that can handle whatever they catch

Willem
Willem
Jun 2, 2021 7:00 AM
Reply to  Oscar

‘ Imagine running trial of cancer therapy drug where healthy cancer-free people are given the same drug as cancer patients and then counted as proof of drug effectiveness against cancer they never had.’

Is what they did in ‘HIV patients’ back in the days in the 1980s with AZT.

Except that they didn’t really run a placebo controlled trial as ‘hiv patients demanded the drug as they were dying’ so companies had to give it to them out of compassion.

Outrageous

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 7:45 AM
Reply to  Willem

Gardasil is one I don’t get, they have no way of knowing if any of the children jabbed would ever have got cervical cancer in the first place yet they claim they reduced it.

Joopy
Joopy
Jun 2, 2021 7:31 PM

Because the Pharmafia has captured all the institutions that should normally expose the fraudulence of their trials and protect the public from their dangerous and deadly products so they can do and claim whatever they want with reckless abandon and the only accountability they face, in the worst case scenario, is a small fine paid years or decades later after maiming and murdering hundreds or thousands of people and after making $billions off their suffering and deaths. No one ever goes to jail and no new checks are put in place and they go on and do the same thing over and over again, racking up felony after felony amounting to $billions paid out in just the last couple of decades. That familiar formula applies to all the major industries in the US and most other western countries. Congress, the regulators, the media, academia, the medical profession, etc, are all completely corrupted by corporate money and none of them actually represent or serve the interests of the people and no one is looking out for us or our children. We need take responsibility for our own bodies, minds, lives, and futures and that means we have to burn the whole fucking thing down and start anew, before they kill off billions and enslave the rest of us in the techno-fascist, trans-humanist digital dystopia that will be implemented when they “6uild 6ack 6etter” from the ruins of the controlled collapse of the global economy and every aspect of society as we once knew it.

Edwige
Edwige
Jun 2, 2021 8:32 AM
Reply to  Edith

Was the Black Death real is something I’ve been pondering.

On the one hand, it had an apparently unmistakable symptom, unlike Covid with its flu/pneumonia/whatever symptoms (at least in the bubonic version – the other two versions are more ambiguous). On the other hand, even mainstream science and history admit their transmission narrative is in crisis because of the lack of huge piles of rat skeletons and the last UK outbreak being in 1666 is, to say the least, a bit of a coincidence.

Edith
Edith
Jun 2, 2021 10:36 AM
Reply to  Edwige

Interesting….possibly more lies and exaggeration

Ort
Ort
Jun 2, 2021 9:28 PM
Reply to  Edwige

If you read the expert debunkers here more closely, you’d realize immediately that the absence of skeletons reveals that those rats were all crisis actors.

Moreover, the infamous Pied Piper of Hamelin was one of their most successful recruiters!

Jean
Jean
Jun 2, 2021 2:57 AM

Dr Gilani article is scary enough, but in his country, which happens to be mine too, it might get ugly, because now the govt authorities are recommending mixing and matching Astra-Zeneca (viral vector) with Pfizer and Moderna (mRNA).

IMHO, this is playing with fire.

Obviously, Canada is playing politics (to boost immunization statistics) with public safety. For me, this is a tipping point. Thank God, I refuse the shots, but if I had my 1st jab with AZ like most of my friends and members of my family when they pushed us to get that product before it’s expiration date (which it is now passed but they say they’ll keep it for another month), I would rush to get my 2nd jab with AZ too before the stock is gone and there’s only mRNA left.

Mixing the 2 products is in my mind absolutely crazy. But the propaganda is so strong here that people are now convinced that Pfizer is the best and they WANT to get it for their 2nd dose.

The Canadian and provincial govts are totally careless and if there are consequences, they should be held criminally accountable for them.

So you must check closely the guinea pigs of Canada in the coming weeks.

Link: https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/canada-mixing-covid-19-vaccines-astrazeneca-pfizer-moderna-naci-1.6048152

(don’t know why, but each time I see Dr Tam, she reminds me of a hologram of sci-fi movie)

Jean
Jean
Jun 2, 2021 3:06 AM
Reply to  Jean

Talking about Dr Tam, which is the chief public health officer of Canada BTW, she tweeted this the very same day of the announcement about mixing vaccines:

“Today the Public Health Agency of Canada launched a Vaccine Injury Support Program that will support people in Canada who have experienced a serious and permanent injury after receiving a Health Canada authorized vaccine.”

Hele
Hele
Jun 2, 2021 4:07 AM
Reply to  Jean

Dr Tam-demic.

DomoebaMalingera
DomoebaMalingera
Jun 2, 2021 10:39 AM
Reply to  Hele

Dr Dam-demic

Pilgrim Shadow
Pilgrim Shadow
Jun 2, 2021 9:21 PM

Dr. Demonic. Soulless looking creature.

wardropper
wardropper
Jun 2, 2021 4:01 AM
Reply to  Jean

You’re so right about the idea of mixing the two products being crazy, especially since nobody seems prepared to tell us what is actually in either of them.

It’s like trying to cure acne by mixing attenuated snake venom and bee stings.

Witch doctors do that sort of thing better.

Hele
Hele
Jun 2, 2021 4:08 AM
Reply to  Jean

truly negligent and frightening-the safety of the mix and match vaccines.

Jeff Tati Jhonson
Jeff Tati Jhonson
Jun 2, 2021 2:27 AM

Excellent article Dr.Gilani

BRAVO

Maxwell
Maxwell
Jun 2, 2021 2:26 AM

This is gross/criminal negligence by our governments and government agencies on an unprecedented and extraordinary scale. Governments serve solely as an arm of corporate power. Children are merely sacrificial lambs of capital and biotech experimentation.

If you’re defending COVID-19 “vaccines” your whole argument is built on trusting psychopaths.

The four major companies who are making these covid vaccines are/have either:

1. Never brought a vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).

2. Are serial felons (Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).

3, Are both (Johnson & Johnson).

You do not “need” any product created by companies that are known to be liars and have paid billions in criminal fines. You do not need any product made by companies that profit off of perpetual disease. Human beings are not biologically dependent on pharmaceutical products.

Getting jabbed with with an experimental poison concoction, is the OPPOSITE of “getting back to normal”. It is, in fact, the beginning of living in an insane medical tyranny.

Anyone who still thinks any of this is motivated by a concern for our health or has anything much to do with science is beyond hope.

Anyone out there who thinks medicine, science, public health, politics, human rights, wealth, power justice and corruption are NOT now insidiously intertwined, is not seeing reality.

John
John
Jun 2, 2021 4:20 AM
Reply to  Maxwell

Turned to Ayurveda years ago. Haven’t looked back and touch wood have never been sick since. Not even a cold.

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 7:50 AM
Reply to  John

I am immunosuppressed for Crohn’s disease, I can’t even catch a cold

Marilyn Shepherd
Marilyn Shepherd
Jun 2, 2021 7:49 AM
Reply to  Maxwell

My neighbour is part of a class action against J & J for vaginal mesh used to poison her body, she’s in shocking pain all the time, J & J keep appealing, then we have the baby powder which they just lost again, these big pharma mob are criminals.

Now it took me over a year but finally discovered that rotten Roche recommended the fake tests at 40 ct, so literally nothing happeed here ever. But this is what they call a pandemic catastrophe in Australia https://covidlive.com.au/australian A trillion dollar waste over tests at 40 ct, 3.6 billion just on fake tests.

Edwige
Edwige
Jun 2, 2021 8:39 AM
Reply to  Maxwell

“You do not need any product made by companies that profit off of perpetual disease.”

In the words of Goldman Sachs, is curing your patients really a viable business model?

Anyone who hasn’t yet discovered the crimes of a particular Big Pharma company, just search their name with “corporate rap sheet” and you’ll find a long list. Each ruling against them is to them just a line in the annual accounts, none of the senior executives end up behind bars.

Charlie
Charlie
Jun 2, 2021 4:12 PM
Reply to  Maxwell

I wonder if these companies aren’t being used as the vehicles to roll out the poison and are in fact expendable pawns. When we realize the harm done they can be sacrificed as part of the developing narrative of accidentally escaped bioweapon, followed by botched experimental response followed by mandatory vax-and-chip for all from some ‘reputable’ company like GSK.

magumba
magumba
Jun 3, 2021 12:50 AM
Reply to  Charlie

With an intended population reduction to approx half a billion the pharmacos will be fighting amongst themselves for market share with many,unless pre approved going under

No one seems to have told them yet though

Dayne
Dayne
Jun 2, 2021 1:53 AM

Let me rephrase:

– Please google the recent mainstream-media story on “Monkey Plays Pong With His Mind, Using Elon Musk’s Neuralink”.

– I am quite sure at this point that by 2023-2025, most of humanity is slated to become that monkey. Only it will be ‘somebody’ else interfacing with our brains, and it won’t be Pong they’ll be playing.

Could they make this any MORE obvious?…

Roy
Roy
Jun 2, 2021 3:39 AM
Reply to  Dayne

Shortly, when computer viruses jump from machines to human beings we’ll all have to get the McAffee vaccine…

magumba
magumba
Jun 3, 2021 12:52 AM
Reply to  Roy

If and when that happens i’ll have the perfect excuse to start flinging my own waste where and when i see fit

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
Jun 2, 2021 1:51 AM

Are the LSE-Fabian Rolling Stones going to do public relations for Bill Gates like they with Start Me Up and Windows 95…

“You’re so Injectable….”

Can’t help suspecting they’ve been supping the elixir of youth, sharing the Peter Pan loving cup with Fauxi.

Moneycircus
Moneycircus
Jun 2, 2021 2:40 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

There’s more to the Win95 advert than you may spot at first glance.

Check out the commercial from 30 seconds: the sequence of images is curious to say the least.

Commuters stream into subways and stations. An office workers throws a piece of paper which becomes a paper plane. Cut to people having breakfast, a waiter serving coffee and buns.

Out of nowhere, a fireball — first viewed directly, then on a computer/television screen.

Commuters look over their shoulders, one person, then another… down Manhattan’s tall, narrow streets – anticipating the Naudet brothers’ perfectly-timed documentary shot.

‘On the head, mate’ — a soccer player celebrates his accuracy ( not an American footballer, BTW, and not much to do with PCs, either.)

Then, viewed from afar, across the still waters… The Twin Towers.

Recall Capt. Dan Hanley/Christopher Bollyn argue that 9/11 was originally planned to happen in the 1990s.

Recall Microsoft’s Satanic Abramovic commercial, published on Good Friday, that led to public outrage.

These people have form.

Kate
Kate
Jun 2, 2021 11:42 AM
Reply to  Moneycircus

I’ve never seen that commercial before. Wow.

Empty Shells 24/7
Empty Shells 24/7
Jun 2, 2021 1:29 AM
wardropper
wardropper
Jun 2, 2021 4:18 AM

It was hard to get past the completely mad school-boy hero worship at the beginning, but Fuellmich, as usual, is perfectly calm and wonderfully clear.

John
John
Jun 2, 2021 1:27 AM

The vaccine is the virus

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 2, 2021 12:17 AM

It would be interesting to incorporate the Russian/Chinese/Cuban/Iranian real vaccines for a comparison. Real, because they are not mRNA, as far as is known?

Rumor has it that the pandemic hype only serves to make people take the gene therapy injection. Genetically modified humans. What could go wrong?

Jeffrey Strahl
Jeffrey Strahl
Jun 2, 2021 1:26 AM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

Vaccines based upon what? Have they actually used the alleged “virus”?

Nottheonly1
Nottheonly1
Jun 2, 2021 1:40 AM
Reply to  Jeffrey Strahl

As far as I am aware the Eastern vaccines are vaccines based on available corona viruses. Those, who have been isolated. That is to say that they are not covidwhatever vaccines. H1N1 variants. However, considering the amount of false information now circulating, no real verifiable data seems to exist. Here is the latest about the Cuban vaccine:

https://www.bioworld.com/articles/504357-cubas-soberana-02-sars-cov-2-vaccine-candidate-moves-to-phase-iii-trials

Truth Prevails
Truth Prevails
Jun 2, 2021 2:16 AM
Reply to  Nottheonly1

The old East Vs West propaganda… Shills still haven’t figured out we know what’s up? Sputvik and China “vaccines” are adenovirus, exactly the same type as the Oxford-Astrazeneca. Putin and Xi answer to the same people as Biden, Trudeau, Boris Johnson and the rest.

Putin is a known zionist, look at what’s happening in Russia. It has become nazi Germany, with young Christian men being groomed for war with non stop propaganda about the evil “west”. There is no left or right, there is no east or west, there’s humanity vs zionism, that’s it.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/sputnik-v-covid-19-vaccine-how-much-do-we-know-about-its-side-effects

Sputnik V is a two-part adenovirus viral vector vaccine. The Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccineTrusted Source, also an adenovirus-based vaccine.

https://www.rt.com/russia/524253-mandatory-vaccinations-necessity-medvedev/

Russia is also apart of this depopulation agenda, so is Iran and many others… Everything is a stage, they are all acting. Ali Khamenei and Mahmoud Abbas studied at Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow, it’s common knowledge. Unfortunately for establishment, the illusions are fading faster then people taking the “vaccines”.

Viruses don’t exist!

Peter
Peter
Jun 2, 2021 4:26 AM
Reply to  Truth Prevails

“Putin and Xi answer to the same people as Biden, Trudeau, Boris Johnson and the rest.” Also Modi Drumpf and Netanyahoo. They report to the central banking cartel. Which is why this global hoax could be carried out. Those who stray like JFK and Magafuli are cut down.

Violet
Violet
Jun 2, 2021 8:06 AM
Reply to  Truth Prevails

They do exist, they are called exosomes a part of your immune system.

Rhisiart Gwilym
Rhisiart Gwilym
Jun 2, 2021 8:24 AM
Reply to  Truth Prevails

If I were you, TP, I’d have another look at that so-called ‘truth’ which you claim is prevailing. One of the less persuasive cospithirries, I’d estimate. ‘Putin the zionist’ indeed! Hah!

Violet
Violet