WATCH: COVID19/11 – Katharine Gun
Episode two of Narratives Intertwined
COVID19/11: Narratives Intertwined is OffG’s new series of short interviews with prominent voices in the alternate media, vocal Covid sceptics and leading figures in the 9/11 truth movement.
The series is intended to both mark the 20th anniversary of the World Trade Center collapse, and discuss how that event helped shape the modern world and, in turn, set the stage for the Covid “pandemic”.
*
Episode two of Narratives Intertwined features Katharine Gun, the ex-GCHQ translator turned whistleblower, who was charged under the Official Secrets Act for leaking evidence of diplomatic corruption in the run-up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Since then she has become a prominent anti-war and pro-free speech advocate. The 2019 film Official Secrets, starring Keira Knightley, is based on her experience.
In her interview, Katharine discusses the impact of 9/11 on her political development, the hijacking of the Covid narrative and the importance of free speech to any kind of civilized, open and honest debate.
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
My brother used to work with Katherine when he was at GCHQ.
Well said, Ms. Gun. Clear and spot on!
“There is a major construction project going on.”
[04:10]
—
Trial set to resume for men accused of plotting 9/11 terror attacks
CBS News
Sep 6, 2021
Nearly 20 years after the 9/11 terror attacks, the trial for the men accused of plotting the attacks is set to resume after a 19-month pause due to COVID-19. The defendants, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-described architect of the attacks, arrived at the U.S. prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, over a decade ago. CBS News senior investigative correspondent Catherine Herridge joins CBSN’s Debra Alfarone from Guantanamo Bay with the latest.
“Juvenile”?
Interesting choice of words.
I wish we wouldn’t use the term Covid Skeptic. I believe, we shouldn’t use it.
It denotes doubt. It legitimizes them.
We are not doubtful.
It also focuses on an illness (following their lead), not on the crimes perpetrated against humanity, the devastating of human rights and spirit through a world criminal tyranny and the implementation of a world government of the elites, by the elites and for the elites and all the darkness that animates such greed.
This is why we are not doubtful.
Language is a weapon. In the information war, one of the biggest weapons we have.
I believe it is important to reflect and understand this. In fact, I am very surprised by this poor choice of language by Off-Guardian and others.
Let’s use our weapons to our benefit, not the enemy’s.
Thanks Off-G for this video post.
Totally agree. There is no doubt. People seem to think that to express certainty is to be unscientific but that is not the case where certainty exists. Where certainty exists NOT to express certainty is unscientific.
Precisely!
True certainty is virtually impossible scientifically. All conclusions are provisional. Certainty is an emotional human response that reflects very little of external reality.
Not to agree or disagree with your statement, nor engage in a philosophical or sophistic argument about what certainty is, but you are missing and diverting the point of the thread.
Are you not certain that what is happening is a crime against our human rights? And that it is not about a real or imagined virus but about socioeconomic, political and psychological control of the population?
If you are certain, then please consider dropping the expression Covid Skeptic as it does not benefit us but rather plays against us.
Thank you and keep up the good work.
That term (the c word) is a code word, an NLP trigger. Don’t use it at all. Call it the fake virus, or anything. Don’t use their terms.
I thought the film was good.
I believe the most expedient time you can spend investigating 9/11 is in watching this one hour film from Russian, Olga Klimova. The Table of Contents (below) and transcript are provided underneath the film. http://www.earthlyfireflies.org/911-fraud/ ANALYSIS OF THE OFFICIAL STORY The 9/11 official story Media fakery ingredients and facts Story Ingredient 1. Can plane collapse a building? What the experts say 1) Could there be enough heat to melt steel? 2) Could a plane even go through steel? And why there’s no even damage occurred to the airplane? 3) Could ‘free fall’ of buildings be possible? Conspiracy theories Three levels of the awareness of conspiracies 9/11 conspiracy theorists What 9/11 was in reality How the towers were brought down – the actual demolition process How they prevented taking private images Preventive 1. Smoke screen Preventive 2. Electromagnetic storm paralyzed all cell phones and cameras Preventive 3. Drills early that day… Read more »
Thanks for that. I like the final overall message of the documentary and I shall go back to studying Tolstoy. It also starts to explore the fake imagery of the planes, which seems very probably and plausible. I wish it had been done in more detail to be convincing as well (at least to me). I have a few issues with that narrative and analysis: The electromagnetic storm to paralyze phones and cameras It is somehow implied that phones were used to take pictures. I don’t think that was the case in 2001. Could electromagnetic rays disable digital cameras? If so, I don’t think they could disable mechanical cameras, which is reasonable to assume were everywhere in New York at the time, owned by journalists, residents and tourists. Those professional or amateur photographers would rush to take out their cameras and take pictures from wherever they were at the time,… Read more »
— Planes There is zero doubt about the planes, Diego. Planes don’t melt into buildings, airliners couldn’t fly at the stated speeds at that altitude and all the other evidence (or lack of) supports no planes. There is absolutely nothing at all to suggest any of the four planes were real. I know someone who was in NY and he said he saw a plane which he didn’t see actually fly into the building – I cannot say what he saw – a hologram? – but the footage does not show real planes, that’s for sure. — Electromagnetic storm I agree you’d expect people to have mechanical cameras that weren’t affected. — That most live witnesses would rush home to see everything from the TV and not live? It’s all just speculation, isn’t it? People may have been herded away somehow. I do not know. — That the perpetrators created… Read more »
But does it fit fake better than it fits real?
Everything that looks real might be fake. But we’re only justified in assuming fake if there’s actual evidence it can’t be real.
The bodies of the jumpers for example are exactly consistent with what human bodies look like after high impact trauma. No evidence for fake there at all.
I regret that sentence, Sophie. This is my complete case for death and injury staged. Of the purported evidence for death and injury: All of it fits fake, while some of it favours fake over real and none of it favours real over fake. I claim that this dead body is inconsistent with what a body looks like regardless of trauma and I make my case as comprehensively as possible. If you have a case to say that the object presented is, in fact, a dead body, please make your case. Warning: gruesome. https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/9-11-fake-dead-body.html I said I wouldn’t discuss this aspect of 9/11 any more and this is definitely it, Sophie, unless you come back with a good case for the dead body above or any other dead body or any other purported evidence favouring real over fake. That I am prepared to discuss but other than that, I’ve made… Read more »
I have read your text at that link. Your case is basically that YOU, a non-medically qualified person with ZERO experience of observing the effects of major trauma on human bodies, don’t believe it looks like a real body would after falling 80+ floors to the ground. You offer NO evidence to support your opinion. You don’t compare the photo to other photos of people who died in a similar way. You don’t, even after I suggested it, ask the opinion of some qualified professionals who deal with trauma death and injury. You offer your uninformed opinion. Ok, now I offer mine – High impact literally liquifies the contents of a body. Flesh and bone and organs turn to mush and at the same time the pressure of rapid deceleration squeezes this mush out of the containing skin at various points of weakness, leaving the skin looking like an empty… Read more »
I would very much like to compare the body to bodies produced from a similar situation but I cannot find one, Sophie, if you’ve got one please point me to it. A friend who is a nurse says the body doesn’t look like a real body, particularly the legs and the feet. Perhaps you don’t think her sufficiently medically qualified, Sophie, but in any case my argument is more that the object doesn’t look like a body at all, regardless of trauma, for example, the pink material looks like fabric and I see no reason that trauma would transform flesh to look like fabric – if you have reason to believe that flesh can be transformed to look like fabric please let me know what it is or if you think that the pink material indeed looks like flesh please give your reasons. I say the pink material looks like… Read more »
Is your ‘nurse friend’ a trauma nurse? Does she have experience with comparable injuries? If so then ask her to contribute an analysis to your currently fact-free page. That would boost your credibility massively.
If she ain’t a trauma expert – find someone who is!
OF COURSE you can find photos of people who died from jumping off high buildings! Do you have no initiative? Don’t just Google. Make inquiries. Do actual research for once!
What would you accept as a “skerrick” of evidence for real over fake? If it “looks fake” you think it’s fake. But if it “looks real” you also think it’s fake. What falsifies your hypothesis? What would disprove it in your opinion? If the answer is “nothing” – you have a serious problem 🤔
Small point but why do you keep obsessively using my name, Petra? It feels a bit creepy Petra. Doesn’t it, Petra?
You’re only treating the body as something that’s suffered trauma rather than a body regardless. A body is a body trauma or not and things can be ascertained outside of the trauma. My “nurse friend” is not a trauma nurse but she’s familiar with bodies as we all are. I think you’re putting too much weight on the trauma aspect while ignoring the fact that a body is a body. I am not going to research beyond what I’ve done because I am satisfied the body is fake … and I’m also satisfied that there is absolutely overwhelming evidence that 100% supports and favours the hypothesis that 9/11 was a massive Full-Scale Anti-Terrorist Exercise pushed out as a real event where the only major physical occurrence was destruction of buildings. I won’t discuss this again with you, Sophie. You still haven’t supplied a single skerrick of evidence that favours real… Read more »
🤦♀️🤦♀️ This is your much-vaunted reasoning skills I take it? A body will always look the same no matter what happens to it. Drop it from 80 floors, push it through a mincer, it’s still a body and will look like every other body!
Speechless. Truly.
so, your ‘I just follow the facts’ boasting means you cherry pick and twist some facts to support what you want to believe, then completely stop following the facts in case they prove your belief is wrong.
Where is your single skerrick of evidence that favours real over fake?
The fact it LOOKS REAL! Just like if it LOOKED FAKE it would be evidence for it being fake.
Apologies Sophie I wFtasn’t clear. As neither of us is an expert in trauma victims let’s leave the dead body out of argument and turn to other purported evidence. Two examples which clearly favour fake over real are the alleged injured Marlene Cruz and Pasquale Buzzelli. We are shown Marlene in a hospital bed allegedly in the mental hospital Bellevue with the name of the hospital clearly displayed behind her which is in contradiction to reality plus the fact that she’s being interviewed with her head raised from her pillow which is also against reality. Similarly for Pasquale we are told that he fell 22 floors as one of the towers collapsed and he returned to work within 3 months with no injury to speak of. These two are clearly examples of “revelation of the method” or “hidden in plain sight” which always features in their psyops. So putting aside… Read more »
Bellevue is NOT just a mental hospital!
I know Bellevue well! It has a big ER/trauma department and would be a natural place to take casualties on 9/11.
Jeez, Petra, all you need to do is Google ffs! It’s sickening that you brag and boast endlessly about how fact-based you are, when you barely bother to do even rudimentary research.
I haven’t bothered to check the rest of your ‘facts’ – but I think YOU should. 🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
My apologies, I read that it was a mental hospital, however, fortunately when they over-egg the omelette with their fakery there’s usually a few different aspects to fall back on so if you’re wrong about one aspect the other aspects will work. The way that Marlene is lifting her head from the pillow is not consistent with someone who was supposedly in a lift blasted by a bomb and why would someone hold their head awkwardly in that position for any reason?
https://youtu.be/TSGZYP–wz0
Pasquale’s testimony is ridiculous in the extreme.
https://nymag.com/nymetro/news/sept11/2003/n_9189/
Regardless of what I put forward that I believe favours fake over real you are yet to put anything forward that you feel favours real over fake. Are you going to do that Sophie?
Petra – the guy in the vid actually comments on the way she is holding her head and suggests someone told her to for the camera. How on God’s green earth do you get from that to “she’s holding her head weird, it must be fake”??
You are coming across – in all seriousness – as genuinely deranged right now.
Okaay, Sophie, this is proving much more difficult than I thought it would be. Perhaps moving on so blithely from the dead body was a mistake so I think we really should get the dead body sorted as to me it’s so obviously fake. Warning: gruesome https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/9-11-fake-dead-body.html While my nurse friend isn’t currently a trauma nurse she has worked in emergency and seen accident victims and she says quite categorically that the object is not a body. One thing she pointed out is that when a head suffers severe impact a pool of blood forms around it and we see no blood around the head. Even if the person landed sitting rather than on their back we’d expect the head to be severely impacted when it hit the pavement I think. My questions: 1. Let’s look at the flat pink tube which I anticipate we both agree represents a left… Read more »
Apologies. Questions 3 and 4 are both numbered 3. Please regard the second item numbered 3 as Question 4 and I’d like to revise Question 3 as – for a start – it’s not framed as a question. I tried to edit but too late.
Question 3 revised:
I found images of trauma at a website and the image linked to shows a patient with protruding small intestine due to a machete injury. The clearly defined sausage-like appearance doesn’t, in my opinion, resemble the much looser sausage-y appearance of what we are shown and nor does this image of the large intestine at the second link (my impression was that the contents were meant to resemble entrails) but perhaps you’d say the contents are other parts of the body? Can you name what inside parts of the body you believe what we are shown represent?
https://reference.medscape.com/features/slideshow/shockingtrauma#13
https://3d4medical.com/blog/the-large-intestine
Oh gosh, is that all?
I just replied with a little analysis of the video.
It is waiting spam check.
Just to let you know, as already some of my comments didn’t make it out of the spam hole.
Thanks.
Whitney Webb has written several articles about how the same people keep getting recycled to do these horrendous acts of cruelty and evil. Her piece on Dark Winter is a thread connector.
What Ms. Gun says is vital. We are stripping away our ability to think when we prevent people from speaking or being able to hear others. Censorship prevents learning and self reflection, the testing of one’s ideas. The disaster this has wrought lies all around us.
Someone else you might ask for a brief statement is is the great German journalist Mathias Bröckers. He was one of the very first to see 9/11 for what it was — I read his article in Telepolis the day after the attacks. A brave man.
He has just published a collected edition of his bestselling books on 9/11, with a new introduction. Over the last 20 years he’s worked tirelessly to inform and educate Germans about that scam&coup. He’s fluent in English, by the way.
Bröckers is also wide awake to the “Covid” fraud, and has spoken about it extensively in monthly podcasts with his admirable colleagues Robert Fleischer and Dirk Pohlmann. They’re all aware of OffGuardian and have cited your work repeatedly.
His website:
https://www.broeckers.com/
He just mentioned you again today, in his latest blogpost:
Der “Off Guardian” hat gerade eine Podcast-Serie über die verflochtenen Narrative gestartet: Covid 19/11.
(“OffGuardian has just launched a series of podcasts about the tangled narratives, entitled ‘Covid 19/11’.”)
https://www.broeckers.com/2021/09/07/covid-19-11/
Hey maybe Katharine also knows 9/11 half-truther bullshitters Annie Machon and David Shayler.Nice couple. Look them up.
tip of the spear was israeli arts projects all over the area
and the arts froup b thing and gelatine
war deception destruction murder
very little art
no sir
unless one calls kaballa spirit cooking art
demonology more like
and oded yinon projects
Katherine Gunn was a hero with balls of steel to do what she did. Its not possible to over estimate the respect she has for making the stand she did. A person with principle, courage and integrity who stood up face to face with the spook community and said ‘you aren’t wearing any clothes’.
She has exposed by such action the craven cowards and sheep into today’s govt who have rolled over with 2020/1’s version of 911.
With an ounce of such integrity in any of the govt or its medical proxies today and this scam would be over.
A great series so far and really well made
You don’t need to be a whistleblower to be a helpful member of society. Katharine Gun is both.
Was she not allowed to speak on her case i.e. was she not allowed to say that what she witnessed as diplomatic corruption confirmed in her that she should not trust official narratives?
Every man and his dog knows that it would and should have been relatively simple to establish whether there were planes hijacked and destroyed on that fateful day. It would have been a simple matter to establish the identity of each plane from the part-numbers from the wreckage of undercarriage or engine bits-and-pieces at the scene [of the crime]. If that wasn’t done … then you have your answer staring you in the face. NO need for 20 year debates and obfuscation/s. You won’t even need to read the excellent works by Christopher Bollyn, or Thierry Meyssan, et al.
Good point, but people like Bollyn get closer to the actual evidence than we can here…
It’s good to know exact details of the ‘coincidental exercises’ taking place on that day, for example, not to mention the actual names of officials involved in the non-existent ‘oversight’ of these events.
Some of the people involved will talk 20 years on, whether for money, for publicity, or just for the sake of a clearer conscience.
And we should listen, if we are to have a hope of recognizing such infestations of political termites in the future and summoning appropriate exterminators to deal with them.
Was Flighttracker available then?
The key to understanding 9/11 is within 15 seconds of the news breaking of the explosion in the north tower. Planes do not glide into buildings like ghosts before exploding. . TV stations showed an airplane shaped hole with a fire inside with the commentary: we have unconfirmed reports of an airplane crashing into the tower. If a huge passenger plane had an IMPACT on a solid object like a steel frame skyscraper, there would be nothing unconfirmed about it. There would be a scene of utter devastation on the ground below in addition to inside the tower. The “live” footage of the second crash came with a five minute delay and some CGI planes. The first takes of the second explosion did not show any plane; that only came minutes later. Random passerby only reported explosions. One woman in Battery Park reported hearing a huge “sonic boom” type sound,… Read more »
Or you’re 100% wilfully self-deluding, rraa. Or trying to get us involved in endless pointless arguments about it. Please take your trolling elsewhere.
There’s nothing ‘self-deluding’ about rraa’s comment, but of course the details are only relevant to those bringing scientifically-based court cases, or those who have never questioned the official story before (do such people really exist…?).
For me, WTC7 is THE smoking gun – in spades.
Almost nothing else needs to be said about that day, because, like Watergate, it is the attempted cover-up which casts a military-grade searchlight upon the guilty parties.
Somewhere on record is a judge at some kind of 911 hearing several years ago, who asked, “What’s Building Seven?”
That question speaks volumes.
‘Based on the fact that there was no crash scene outside the towers, it
is 100% sure that passenger planes did not crash into the towers. All
the rest is conjecture as to what really happened, but the starting
point needs to be this fact.’
….
There are absolutely no aerial vids to see of that ‘fateful day’. It would’ve been a field day for any photographer….however distressing/traumatic it might’ve been.
The images of ‘falling people’ are also faked.
You are right, the aerial vids would have shown the absence of a crash scene. But there is a whole hour of footage of people walking around calmly right underneath the burning towers and reporters asking them: did you see what happened? Firefighters were entering the towers throughout that whole hour. None of that would have been possible. If an airplane had really exploded and crashed outside the tower, they might not even have been able to enter it from the ground level.
I strongly think passenger planes did not hit either WTC1 or 2, the plane seen in the only video of the WTC1 crash is not a 767. That said, what hit the towers is pretty irrelevant, flying objects did not bring them down. Arguing about what hit the towers is like seeing a video of someone being punched in the face, and a half hour later their head explodes, and then people start arguing about the punch, whether it was a martial arts technique,…..
Well, if there are no hijacked planes hitting the towers, the whole terror narrative collapses. So in that sense I would say it is relevant.
North tower – 20 stories CANNOT crush 90 to the ground.
Newton said so and no-one has proven him wrong so far.
The worm turns… (On the next thread).
Just when you thought this Punch and Judy couldn’t get any worse. Read this MIT article. Seriously
https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218
The article is dated December 2019…
They don’t mention the dye used in the article but I’ve looked it up. Luciferase
WTF!!!!!
i.e the vaccine passports are a red herring. If you vaccinated you already marked.
By the time this lot get through with the umpteen vax one will be very tattooed I would think….wonder how they work out how many lives they would have saved with vax in under developed countries ….given the toxic nature of many vax.,,
33,782 Coronavirus Cases and 23,903 Active in NSW – COVID LIVE 21% in ICU are jabbed
UK Column News – 3rd September 2021 Coronavirus Act Renewal Vote this Week Westminster MPs portray emergency powers as ‘cock up’. https://www.ft.com/content/967f2266-9a1e-4a8f-ad9e-5cdc535165e0 Media Plays Down Lockdown Impact on Mental Health Official statistics are provisional and manipulated Office for National Statistics uses age-standardised graphic in stead of absolute numbers. Only for Apr-Jul 2020, very early in the Lockdown. ONS says coroners can “take months or even years” to register a suicide’ provisional data, subject to change, enables timely analysis. Mail Article: – https://archive.is/7UMsQ Brian Gerrish: it is sad to see the ONS under pressure to massage data. Vaccine Passports Hit Pakistan Will close motorways to unvaccinated drivers Pakistan Highways Patrol Tweet — Islamabad Clampdown: No petrol in Lahore from Sep 1 No motorway access from Sep 15 No domestic flights from Sep 30 No shopping in malls from Sep 30 without 2 shots No hotels and restaurants from Sep 30 without 2 shots No… Read more »
We need a Carrington Event
Why would You want all the NPP’s blow up? That would be the last nail in mankind’s coffin.
Don’t You worry though – a look at a seismic monitor will reveal that there is something much bigger in the making. “Tectonic plate” stuff and it is happening
while all these stories about deadly idiots in control are churned out to distract the many.
The psychopathic reset won’t work. A little imagination about the forces at play willhelp to understand that any future of man will look nothing like it conjures up right now. Man’s future is back to the roots for those who will survive the changes.
Sources please. Thanks. A2
I’ve posted this here before and this theory is quite popular amongst a subset of the ‘covid’ scam aware, mainly those who claim secret knowledge or insight yadee ya… a regular (around every 7000 years) catastrophe cause by crustal displacement and associated flooding.. the memory of which is arcanely stored in myth and astrology.. . . for the coming cataclysm, people are being vetted for worthiness by an ancient organization that will take ‘the best of us’ through the winnowing etc etc etc.. by testing our ability to survive (those that refuse the jabs and recommendations of the maggot media etc..) this book written by an ex CIA spook and banned or at least partly censored by the alphabets… ‘the adam and eve story’.. available on archive.org.. don’t forget your cocoa when you curl up for a night time read..it may be your last one… then again it might be… Read more »
These kinds of ideas have always interested me. Why would anyone assume that a race who kills a bunch of people is advanced, worth following etc. Who wants to be taken into their fold? They sound like Klaus to me– losers!
according to this theory ‘jill’, most will die anyway due to the catastrophe… after such events only 1% of life survives… so these ahem, benevolent ancient masters are making sure the best of the herd survives.. to be taken into their secret underground shelters… thus the fake plague.. (like most of these pseudo mythological cults consistency of narrative is conveniently lacking)..
what use a secret underground shelter will be after crustal displacement deposits them under a mile of sludge and mud, seems to have eluded them…
NB: crustal displacement is most certainly a reality and may well be on it’s way.. when ? who cares..
Oh and don’t forget the libraries of genetic data… and of course the giant seed banks of all earths flora secreted in bunkers at the north pole…
this part is verifiable..
A good day to you, too. And good luck.
“Long-planned marches” are always going to give our opponents an equally long time to plan their disruption.
We need more things to happen which will take ‘the authorities’ by surprise,
otherwise it is they who will continue to shock and outrage us forever.
I love the bit where “Media Plays Down Lockdown Impact on Mental Health”…
Well, they would, wouldn’t they…?
The most lobotomized industry in the world shouldn’t even be asked what its opinion of mental health might be.
Well it’s great to know at my age, i can spend an extra hour a day on the monkey bars.
As long as i wear my mask that is.
Are you sure monkeys have to wear masks…?
🙂
In the mid-seventies America faced a new and escalating crisis, with US commercial jets being hijacked for geopolitical purposes. Determined to gain the upper hand in this new form of aerial warfare, two American multinationals collaborated with Defense Advanced Projects Agency (DARPA) on a project designed to facilitate the remote recovery of hijacked American aircraft. Brilliant in both concept and operation, “Home Run” (not its real code name) allowed specialist ground controllers to listen in to cockpit conversations on the target aircraft, then take absolute control of its computerised flight control system by remote means. From that point onwards, regardless of the wishes of the hijackers or the flight deck crew, the hijacked aircraft could be recovered and landed automatically at an airport of choice, with no more difficulty than flying a radio-controlled model plane. The engineers had no idea that almost thirty years after its initial design, Home Run’s… Read more »
What four aircraft ?
Don’t get sucked into the ‘no planes’ distraction, J. Ignore.
sounds suspiciously like a CIA/Mossad bolt on to run cover for the fact that a ‘system’ was available to prevent such an event occurring…
just like they use ‘simulations’ to cover the operations they are running.. 9/11..7/7.. Covid 2019 etc etc..
you are after all dealing with imbeciles( though a higher functioning one than the ‘common’ variety)..
Is it me, or are there 4 comments missing?
Admin… are you going to post this video on Bitchute as well? I’ve repeatedly tried to watch both the Katharine Gun and Robin Monotti interviews here, and the videos won’t play. Keeps coming up ‘segment failed retry’, then tried to watch them on the Odysee site and the same thing happened. Also tried to watch in Telegram and no go there. Only found the Robin Monotti clip on Bitchute 10 mins ago, which I’ve just finished watching.
Anyone having problems playing the video, find out how to delete your browser cache and cookies and this should solve the problem. Alternatively, download Opera or Brave browsers and try those. Please report back and I’ll upload alternative links tomorrow if necessary.
Many thanks. A2
Thanks for the tips Sam👍
Thanks Sam. I downloaded Opera, and video is now playing perfectly well. Cheers.
plays ok for me
p.s you edit and make the above clips sam..?
Use a VPN. No doubt they all honey traps but they work. Nordvpn is pretty good.
33,782 Coronavirus Cases and 23,903 Active in NSW – COVID LIVE Hey Gezzah, 21% of people in ICU in NSW are now jabbed, they are the people on vents mainly. but still they screech jab, jab, jab
You can always go to an online-down loader, like https://www.tubeoffline.com/ .
There you go down and choose your source (e. g. “Bitchute”), Then you go up again and fill in die video-link.
Prediction. The next ‘variant’ will be more virulent., ie, spreads faster, ‘vaccine’ resistant, spread by kids, or cats, or dogs, or goldfish, though my money is on ‘by kids’ (warn any surviving Grannies), causes blood clotting, resistant to ventilators.. Though most likely a combination of these..
There must be another ‘variant’ about to be discovered (ie ‘unleashed’), as the green stickers telling passengers on Sydney’s public buses where to sit (social distancing) have returned to the bus seats. (Coinciding with reports of alleged concerns by bus drivers about their “safety’ around ‘unvaxxed’ passengers.)
Prediction is based on the appearance of ‘covid’ signage appearing on the local buses days before previous ‘mysterious outbreak’ was announced.
“Coinciding with reports of alleged concerns by bus drivers about their “safety’ around ‘unvaxxed’ passengers”
I was on a bus the other day and the driver sneezed into his mask while wearing it and continued wearing it. But apparently un vaxxed are the problem.
I watched a guy in a Doctors waiting room remove his mask to sneeze and then put it back on! Ha ha ha morons
yes the classic sneeze protection force field 😄
Maybe the expelled snot helps as an adhesive to keep the mask firmly in place on the face or acts as a kind of sealant which provides more protection.
it seems, all these variants are originating at the altar of some highly conservative apocalyptic church!
It will be “a beast” – Brett Sutton.
It will “spread at the speed of light” – Dan Andrews
barak obama and osama bin laden are the same guy
srsly
look at pics
Katherine kept looking around as though expecting the police to batter the door down and or someone to come through the window. The smart phone-looking video didn’t help with that appearance. Very strange.
There wasn’t much to bite on in this. I guess more is coming, so we’ll see.
And the endless lies and bullshit continue in Australia. I think I’m emigrating to Cuba or Afghanistan.
IN Cuba kids have to be vaccinated against covid before they go to school. Cuba doesn’t sound much fun either. Russia or Romania, maybe.
Not many places left to escape to. It’s a wholesome deception that has quasi every politician on board. Plus – never underestimate to be a “foreigner” to where You go. No matter how much money You have. Worse if You don’t have any. Then You will be unwanted competition for the “locals”.
No, people need to club their own politicians towards truth and responsibility.
I’ve long admired Cuba’s resistance to US domination and subversion, but I wish Cuba’s leaders were equally resistant to pseudo-science. It’s very disappointing to see how easily they too have succumbed. The religion of hi-tech allopathic medicine is almost universal now, at least among governments.
But maybe the Cubans are craftier than we know. They have developed their own vaccine. Is it possible it’s a placebo, a saline solution or something similar? They might be placating the WHO and protecting their own people while keeping that notorious “international community” off their backs.
Cuba’s covid vaccine:
https://www.google.com/search?q=cuba%27s+covid+vaccine&oq=cuba%27s+covid+vaccine&aqs=chrome..69i57.8475j0j1&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
“There are a lot of unanswered questions.” Reminds me of an encounter in late August 2003. On the way to the underground station I ran into a former colleague, an actress, American, very striking-looking, very “arty”, great clothes, wild long hair, a vehement “liberal”, someone I had known for years and got on quite well with. She greeted me with a big smile, a hug & a kiss and suggested we go for a quick coffee at the little bistro we’d just met outside. So we went in, sat down at one of the half-dozen tiny tables and ordered coffee. We chatted about our kids etc, and then she asked what I was up to work-wise, expecting to hear about a play or something. So I handed her a flyer and told her I was co-organising a conference to mark the second anniversary of 9/11, entitled “Unanswered Questions”. Her brow… Read more »
It’s almost like these people know the truth and can’t stand to hear it. But actually what they know and can’t stand is the Conspiracy Theory. Perhaps this is the reason why CTs are widely spread but always with some touch of falsehood. All you need is a knowledge of Newton’s Laws and the impact video, or even a still, but it always comes with a serving of nonsense like ‘rockets don’t work in a vacuum’, pi = 4 or ‘nobody died’. You even get, ‘yes, they went to the moon’ to fox the unbelievers. When I sent a link to the impact video to my sister she came across ‘nobody died’ and said my friend’s brother was killed and it disturbed her whole life after that. For years she would cut me off on the subject but when covid came along her group were unbelievers so the door was… Read more »
Well, there are false flags massacres which were staged with crisis actors in which nobody died and there are false flag massacres where thousands died. Two examples of the former from the USA experience are the Sandy Hook elementary school fake massacre and the Boston Marathon fake massacre. Three examples of the latter are the JFK hit, 9/11 of course, and the Las Vegas massacre. The last example was even more confusing because it was intentionally a hybrid event with some crisis actors, but there is no doubt that several score of innocents were murdered by gunfire in it. Are you saying that even for staged events in which innocents were purportedly killed and maimed by the score but was all staged for its media impact, we should stifle ourselves not to call out the truth for fear of being labelled a CT? As to your example above, and perhaps… Read more »
I agree, fake people and fake deaths form the pageant, but probably some real casualties are also needed. It’s an amplifier.
I stifle myself all the time, constantly, I need friends and family. They know where I sit but it’s like ‘no politics or religion’ in pubs as was.
All right, devil’s advocate. You just told her that the whole world she believed in is total nonsense. If that comes in, suddenly, unexpectedly, I can imagine that your words felt like an assault to her. Listening to what you said, was not only like saying that her whole world was fake, but that she is fake as well. That is where cognitive dissonance starts and for that reason I perfectly understand her reaction. Heck, it has taken me a few years to disentangle all the nonsense I have been spoon fed with, and I am still unlearning. If all of that unlearning would have come to me in an instant, I might have screamed as well. Did you ever try to talk with her again? How do you feel about this encounter? You think you acted correctly? The devil’s advocate would say: you were impolite. But that is only… Read more »
I don’t want her side of any story… Drama queen in action… Sorry no more patience, and running out of politeness in emergency situations
I appreciate your understanding comment, Willem, and I am rather surprised to see some very intolerant reactions to it – especially here. To take my own situation as an example: When your own wife of many years falls for enough of the nonsense to get jabbed twice, that doesn’t mean you throw her out of the window like some old books you no longer read. You have to understand – for your own sake too – what it was that led your long-trusted and solid companion to change her mind about this particular issue, and why it is suddenly so easy for her to see your attacks on her views to be personal attacks. You also have to deal with the fact that the majority of the world thinks like that. It’s rather like the now-old-fashioned view that God doesn’t exist. When Nietzsche pronounced in a book, “God is Dead”,… Read more »
She was not an infant, she was an adult in her forties. I was not breaking the news that the tooth fairy doesn’t exist; I was answering her question — “What are you working at these days?” — honestly, calmly and politely. Of course I did not “assault” (!) her, verbally or in any other way. I was perfectly friendly, quiet and respectful throughout, and I gave her an invitation to a conference. Naturally it’s up to her whether or not she attends that event, but an invitation is not an assault. (The flyer flew to the floor when she flounced out in a tizzy.) If an adult experiences it as an “assault” when it’s politely suggested that her government might possibly be lying to her, then that adult needs to grow up. (I did not say that to her, but that is what I thought and still think. So… Read more »
Yes a devil’s advocate. The phrase itself is nonsense indicative of the Roman Church. It involves, for those who do not know, the question of a person being promoted to sainthood, and the “devil’s advocate” is appointed to show that that “elevation” is unwarranted. But what if the candidate was truly a real scumbag, say a religious Tony Fauci or Bill Gates for example? Then wouldn’t our Prince of Lies advocate wish the candidate to be successful in reaching official sainthood? As to being “impolite” by honestly responding to her direct question without going into any sort of diatribe, who was grossly impolite in this encounter? The woman was obviously an acquaintance and not a close relative or close friend. Is there a purpose for wasting one’s time with a fanatic Cult Covidian type when our best path to staving off the dystopian future is dealing with people with at… Read more »
She was not an infant, she was an adult in her forties. I was not breaking the news that the tooth fairy doesn’t exist; I was answering her question — “What are you working at these days?” — honestly, calmly and politely. Of course I did not “assault” (!) her, verbally or in any other way. I was perfectly friendly, quiet and respectful throughout, and I gave her an invitation to a conference. Naturally it’s up to her whether or not she attends that event, but an invitation is not an assault. (The flyer flew to the floor when she flounced out in a tizzy.) If an adult experiences it as an “assault” when it’s politely suggested that her government might possibly be lying to her, then that adult needs to grow up. (I did not say that to her, but that is what I thought and still think. So… Read more »
Yes, she was and maybe still is a sorry person.
I stopped talking to friends about the obvious,
when they loudly proclaimed:
“I don’t want hear about it!”
None of them remained a “friend”.
I’m a lockdown sceptic. I think “covid” sceptic may be a bit too open to misinterpretation. I’ve always believed the threat to be grossly exaggerated. And I will not take a Covid vaccine. However, I am also a “911 truth” sceptic. So, I’m not with probably most people who come on here over this. What I find objectionable is the sort of nasty cynicism, frankly misanthropy, that underlies this and other narratives. This belief that 9/11 and covid (and a whole host of other things) are the creations of some “mystical” evil elite that is somehow immortal. I’m sorry, I just don’t buy into this narrative. And that is what it is – a narrative. “But it’s true!” you scream. No, it isn’t – it’s a narrative. I’m not saying it’s false either – I’m not making any judgment about it. All you can really say is that it’s a… Read more »
Either you accept the laws of physics literally stopped applying on 9/11 in lower Manhattan or you accept the official story is impossible.
That’s the choice.
The writing was on the wall. If the “people” could accept the 9/11 narrative my God you could tell them anything and they would believe it including this covid nonsense.
My first reaction when I realised it wasn’t another shitty Graham Greene movie, was CIA
It probably also prepared the way at the top end, shaking out anyone with moral purpose across the board, repeated for every show that followed. It became normal so that this was the world as it is, for them at least.
The official story is impossible because it’s nonsense : it’s self-contradictory in a number of ways. (1) For physical laws applying or not applying, there are all kinds of natural phenomena that look convincingly like conflicting with the laws of physics. (2) And those “laws of physics” are just our crude conceptions of how the world works. (3) Lastly, there are perfectly able critical minds of physicists to whom the event in question looks like a gravitational collapse. (4) (1) James Corbett’s coverage (2) of such one I just read in “Hidden Nature – The Startling Insights of Viktor Schauberger” (3) Not only it provides the basis for the so-called crisis of modern physics, but people like Rupert Sheldrake have been explaining how the very conception of ‘natural law’ is flawed (4) my friends, Denis Rancourt, and likely many others So, to get back to the beginning : Since the… Read more »
Sceptic!! If you sceptical about covid and 9/11 …. forget it. I give up. It’s all horseshit and has been for a very long time. This is the Kali Yuga.
When I first heard of the Kali Yuga, I had trouble understanding what they meant by an age of untruth. It’s becoming clearer now. 🙂
You do realise this goes for your pompusly written, under researched position, too right?
No immortal evil ‘elite’, John. Just the worst depths of standard human psychology. Available everywhere, with the right motivations. Happens continuously in many places. Gangster-capitalism, for example.
BTW, John: How’s your knowledge of standard physics? Lacking, apparently. As Admin. Sophie points out, for the official bollocks about 11/9 to be true, basic physics had to be suspended on that day. Catch up, do. Get the necessary education to understand what you’re talking about, before bloviating at length here.
“Controlled explosion. No. That is just absurd and deeply cynical. And what would be the point? There is none.”
Mr Gullible I presume?
Nasty cynicism comes after you got fucked and couldn’t retaliate… it’s a protection mecanism… there are others. Mistical or not, they want to kill you with a vaccine, how do you feel about that?… under reacting is just as insane as over reacting you know… I wanna say “more”..
The 9/11 Anthrax was manufactured at US BioWeapons establishment Fort Detrick Maryland. No narrative ….. just an old fashioned investigation by the FBI.
Wow. I’m surprised you got 63 dislikes for pointing out that an alternative narrative is still but a narrative and not truth. I agree with you there. However if you have a closer look at some of the footage and arguments coming from those who you are calling ‘cynics’ you might be surprised at how blatantly obvious that the ‘WTC attacks’ could not have happened in the way the official story proclaims. It is only logical to then ask why, in whose interest is it to cover up the mountain of contradictory evidence and insist on a fixed and implausible official narrative. I don’t agree that asking these sorts of questions and trying to make sense of it all is cynical.
W.H.O. has “ears” – spying over internet for any mention of covid 19.
EARS stands for Early AI-supported Response with Social Listening. In short, it’s an artificial intelligence that combs the internet for any mention of COVID-19, analyzes discussions, and collects data on such for researchers to use. It’s everything Edward Snowden warned us about and more.
https://www.theorganicprepper.com/the-who-world-health-organization-has-ears/
I don’t care.
o
And who do you think gives a shit whether you care or not?
Very interesting.
Sounds like Panopticon Porn. Convince people they are continuously monitored and they self-censor so you don’t need to actually monitor them.
True, and for that I reason I don’t care either.
AI is mostly nonsense anyway. Life is not a game of chess, but that is about the only thing AI excels in.
Example: AI cannot even tell me with this automatic word correct if I spelled ‘excels’ right or wrong as I, apparently, hardly use the word
It loves to spell convid as Covid or COVID-19 though. How come?
Duckduckgo’s AI actually misspells words for you and creates ‘Office 365’ from ‘offg’. Curious that. I wonder who is paying them?
bingo well said
To make sense of 9/11 American version , refrain from calling the object of the Saudi attack ,”The World Trade Center” and refer to it as the “bankster towers” where a lot of the worlds dirtiest business was conducted.
The Saudi attack? You are really trying to tell us that two airliners knocked down 3 steel frame hi rises, causing WTC7 to come down in 5-6 seconds, at time achieving free fall acceleration rate, and WTC 1 and 2 to come down at a rate only a bit slower than gravitational free fall, 2 being hit second and less directly but coming down first, after 56 minutes, and 1 coming down after 102 minutes? And in the process causing horizontal ejections of large structural members, leaving behind large amounts of molten iron and steel, … in general showing about 10 characteristics of demolition and none of the equal number of characteristics associated with fires? So which famous bridge are you selling?
No, not you Jeffrey. Jim is referencing the sane.
I would consider myself sane in most instances.
I agree with Jeffrey. Whatever it was, and it sure wasn’t two planes and some jet fuel, I would never refer to it as the Saudi Attack. There may have been Saudi’s involved in the planning and execution. Along with many other nationalities.
Not so many; I saw only the usual suspects: U$, Israeli, dual U$/Israeli citizenship, and UK. The most prominent Saudi figures were “Bush” Bandar, head of Saudi Secret Service, and the Bin Laden family, guests at the Bush ranch.
The whole ridiculously overblown fuss about ‘Saudi involvement’ is a distraction based on the fact that there were a few people in the al Saud power structure who cooperated with the real plotters to get the designated patsies into the US with the right papers, so that they could be set up to take the rap.
I recall you saying in a comment to a previous article that you had no opinion about 9/11 because you weren’t there. Well you’ve just revealed that you do, in fact, have an opinion.
Read ‘Where did the Towers go?’. It would have been impossible to set up a controlled demolition. They have some very sophisticated weaponry neither you nor I know about.
I was in regular contact with Judy Wood back in 2006-7. When i pointed out to her the ample amounts of structural steel piled up at the WTC site after 9/11, she insisted these photos were all faked (as she contended all the steel was turned to dust). Same with all the evidence of molten metals. Not at all impossible to set up a controlled demolition, with Turner Construction, HQ inside the towers, doing a contract on retrofit of the structures, headed by a close Dubya friend, with the security company having Marvin Bush and cousin Wirt Walker on the board of directors, and numerous other contacts inside the towers. Kevin Ryan did a four part series on demolition access to the towers.
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0907/S00124/kevin-r-ryan-demolition-access-to-the-wtc-towers.htm
Joseph Farrell has an interesting theory that perhaps there was a combination of weaponry used to bring the towers down.
I’d say that’s most likely. I have a notion of a certain weapon used, but it’s totally speculative, i don’t know if it existed then or exists now. I do think that nanothermite and high explosives cannot explain all observable phenomena related to the destruction of the WTC, but do not believe ray weapons are a necessary part of the explanation.
Can you say what you think the certain weapon might have been or what phenomena can’t be explained by CD/thermite?
Nanothermite covers it all. A well-understood technology amongst the US military establishment at that time, with several facilities actually adept at making it. Lot’s of it found unexploded in the WTC dust, of course.
I can help You out – via science. Go to the IRIS or USGS seismic monitor network. Zoom in on Manhattan. In the “Settings”, select “Show Sensors” – All seismic monitors in the area will be displayed. Select those monitors closest to Manhattan. Go to the station of that monitor. It contains all the data from the day it went online. (If that data was not scrubbed – but the scrubbing of many stations would be necessary and is improbable.) Search for the date in question. Look at the seismic registrations of two large events on that day. You will find the events at the time the buildings were desintegrated into molecular structures. How deep us Your understanding of “Seismicity”? If necessary, find the explanation about the magnitude of any event and how magnitude is used to figure out how much energy was released. Both “earthquakes” in Manhattan had a… Read more »
The seismic impulses were 2.1 and 2.2. They were discussed here by a prominent French seismic expert. .André Rousseau, “Were Explosives the Source of the Seismic Signals Emitted from New York on September 11, 2001?” Journal of 9/11 Studies, vol. 34, November 2012. This peer-reviewed published article has not been challenged in the scientific literature.
http://journalof911studies.com/resources/RousseauVol34November2012.pdf
Jim Hoffman at 911Research authored an article about the expansion of the dust clouds created by the destruction of the two main towers, and the amount of energy necessary for that expansion could not be explained by any conventional weaponry or nano-thermite. IMO. I think an experimental nano-chemical was used, a binary substance, meaning it requires two chemicals to be active, and the two are kept apart till the action is needed. Both of them fluids or powders. One is added to the fluid circulating through the air conditioning system. The other is placed in packets spread all over the structural frame next to the air conditioning fluid. Upon plane impacts, the packets are opened via a signal, either some sonic device or microwave or……..and the second ingredient is mixed with the first, creating a nano-chemical which is super-corrosive, etching and eating up the steel frame in many spots, and… Read more »
Thank you for a rational, thoughtfully presented non-binary theory that isn’t asserted with hysterical certainty. I wish we could have more such thinking on this subject!
How does this idea jive with findings of the red-gray chips?
And they ‘only’ used it on the WTC? That’s a lot of wasted dollars for the research then, not that they care when those dollars come from us.
I think you’re right but it’s a little too far down the rabbit hole for people who’ve only just started to wrap their heads round the covid narrative .
If Kevin is right, show us the technology. More to the point, explain the physics of these exotic ‘weapons’. Good luck!
Not only was it entirely possible to rig the buildings for CD, but the evidence for it being done is conclusive. No need to pay any heed to the ‘unknown energy weapons’ tosh: a distraction which was only floated by the rear-guard actors protecting the real USAmerican and zionistani perpetrators, to muddy the waters.
There you are John and Jim: the basic physics which you poor self-deluders clearly lack. And Jeffrey’s sample is just that: a sample of the larger body of basic physics which makes a complete nonsense of the official 11/9 bollocks. Do catch up on basic reality before bloviating!
About 50% of the material making up each Tower turned into fine dust (less than 100 microns across) and some twisted steel beams in seconds, with hardly any noise. The underground lake of steel remained molten for months. A government department detected radioactivity and various isotopes. Tens of thousands suffered from cancer. Is that “demolition” or “controlled demolition” for you?