33

WATCH: Eye-Bouncing – #SolutionsWatch

Propaganda is only effective if we watch it. In fact, if we let it into our consciousness, then it doesn’t matter how we react to it; they’ve already got us.

On the latest edition #SolutionsWatch, James Corbett explores the idea of eye-bouncing and how we can use it to turn our focus away from what we don’t want and towards what we do.

Sources, shownotes and links – as well as audio versions and download options – can be found here. Previous episodes of #SolutionsWatch can be found here and here.
Follow us on Telegram for regular updates & commentary

SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN

If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.

For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.

2.9 10 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

33 Comments
newest
oldest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ZenPriest
ZenPriest
Dec 7, 2022 2:31 PM

I don’t like this “eye-bouncing”. If it’s making you look away, you’re still beholden to it. The architects of this stuff understand human nature, they know that to make something forbidden makes it irresistible.
How would it even work when you went out? It would dominate your time. Still controlling you. You would have to be a hermit.
Better to reach the point where it’s like you got the glasses on. That’s all I see now. Pathetic coercive slogans OBEY, CONSUME, WATCH THIS, GIVE US YOUR ENERGY.
If you’re continually having to look away from stuff, you might wanna review your lifestyle in general (people you associate with, places you go, what you watch/read).

Edwige
Edwige
Dec 7, 2022 9:19 AM

Nice Crowleyian scarlet woman in the picture….

Look into what happened to Crowley’s real scarlet women – it didn’t turn out well for any of them (alcoholism, prostitution, suicide….. ).

Victor G.
Victor G.
Dec 7, 2022 10:28 AM
Reply to  Edwige

Speaking of Crowley, Edwige … could you let us know where to find the book you mentioned the other day, ‘The Wings of the Beetle’? Thanks.

Nelly
Nelly
Dec 7, 2022 4:30 PM
Reply to  Victor G.

“The Winged Beetle” Try that

Victor G.
Victor G.
Dec 8, 2022 1:30 PM
Reply to  Nelly

Correct. Thank you.

Victor G.
Victor G.
Dec 8, 2022 5:46 PM
Reply to  Nelly
Martin Usher
Martin Usher
Dec 7, 2022 8:56 PM
Reply to  Edwige

Its not Crowleyan majik that’s used, its everyday stage magic — divert the audience’s attention while the trick is performed. Works every time.

Almost every time – there has to be a deliberate attempt to divert / deceive. Back over 50 years ago a couple of young students took up residence in the same house as a friend lived in. One was good looking in a young lady sense, the other had a body that could literally stop a room dead. As things turned out I’ve been married to the “quite good looking” one for, well, for ever (she’s now a ‘lady of a certain age’) and because of that I got to know the looker quite well. They’re both physicists and as it turns out having a body like a supermodel is actually quite a drawback if you want to get any real work done. Quite apart from the social aspects having a couple of ‘Ds’ stuck on your front can really get in the way of manipulating equipment. So its not entirely true that sex sells; under that ‘scarlet woman’ is someone’s daughter, a person who’s just like everyone else, foibles, insecurities and all.

As for Crowley and Co. they bring to mind a bunch of primitive people who’ve stumbled across a container with some ancient symbol on it, a triangle with a dot in the middle with three radiating segments pointing at each side. They don’t know what it they’re having fun with the material, it glows, it seems to give them power and so on. They’re one with the Gods. Until their hair and teeth fall out (the Gods must be displeased with them). I daresay science will discover what Crowley was playing with one day but whatever it was it didn’t do any of the participants any good. Crowley himself ended up in ‘magical retirement’ in Eastbourne…..off season its pretty close to Hell, perhaps?

niko
niko
Dec 7, 2022 3:14 AM

“Propaganda is only effective if we watch it. In fact, if we let it into our consciousness, then it doesn’t matter how we react to it; they’ve already got us.”

See no evil, hear no evil…and then try to figure out why others around you are marching off to war or wearing face diapers and dropping dead. If propaganda slips into consciousness and grabs hold (Gotcha!) no matter how we might process it, would its career critics count as the ultimate case of controlled opposition?

It’s a damned-if-you-do-or-don’t catch-22: what you don’t know, or do, can kill you when subject to EMFs and subliminal messaging. Armies of hidden persuaders have dedicated themselves to programming consciousness by unconscious conditioning ever since Bernays translated Uncle Sig’s psychoanalysis into mass advertising and population control. By now, it’s unknown unknowns, as Rumsfeld might remind us from the other side of death, all the way down the rabbit holes of social engineering. Or as Nietzsche put it, if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.

We are what we do, too. If analysis makes for paralysis, action can be a liberating kind of knowledge of living at a different level of realization. Only trouble is that for reality like masses being mentally lost in worlds of screens and hallucinations to be changed at social levels requires others with whom to act politically. So one may be left alone in zombie land to wander and wonder around others who just keep dropping dead (Gotcha!).

Luís
Luís
Dec 7, 2022 2:44 AM

All fine, apart from the fact that “consciousness” doesn’t exist.
This is a 100% pagan word and doctrine, new age pagan agenda which has conditioned legions of people into believe in the existence of a ‘consciousness’. I see this term mentioned in the majority of the ‘alternative’ media… 🙄
The fraudulent Freud – a luciferian cabalist – helped spread this bogus belief.
We’ve got an eternal soul, and a ‘conscience’, aka, the ability and discernment to distinguish good from bad!!!

ophiaps
ophiaps
Dec 6, 2022 9:09 PM

Eye-Bouncing

“The pot calling the kettle black” 

jubal hershaw
jubal hershaw
Dec 6, 2022 7:38 PM

More propaganda from JC.

You always get my attention JC, watching you is a habit of mine.
Maybe i should eye-bounce your videos, break the habit ?

The Anecdote. The Christian guy averts his eyes from temptation, calls it eye-bouncing.
Self-control. Wants to stay on the straight and narrow (Loves his wife).(Distrusts himself).
Does the same with news items etc.,. They too can seduce him out of his ideological safe zone.

Like the clever people who claim they cant be hypnotised, many clever people who watch tv news claim they’re not affected because they know propaganda when they see it.

JC. Rupert Sheldrake thinks the whole damn universe evolves out of habit. Even eye-bouncing.

WorkingClassHero
WorkingClassHero
Dec 6, 2022 7:14 PM

It’s true. That’s why one should tune into jimmy corbet and not the main stream. This way he can spoon feed you all the propaganda second hand. Same, but different.

You can also come here for the latest scoop as all the main stream bullshit is repeated over and over.

ZenPriest
ZenPriest
Dec 6, 2022 2:04 PM

Let us speak no more of faulty solutions, the majority of which simply fuel the beast. The only solution is to change oneself. To fix the fault that allows the manifestation of evil in the first place. When you purify yourself, you purify those around you as well. And evil cannot tolerate (exist in) an environment.
Anyone saying “that’s not good/fast enough”, good luck with wishing that others will change. You’re just feeding the endless beast system merry go round.
Again: elevate yourself to the highest level of consciousness imaginable. No more need to listen to ten thousand faulty solutions.

ZenPriest
ZenPriest
Dec 7, 2022 6:56 AM
Reply to  ZenPriest

This is why you know Corbett is compromised. He keeps you locked into the dialogue, into the ‘game’. All intellect based. We know its a spiritual war, so why are people trying to win by intellectual, material means?

Sam - Admin2
Admin
Sam - Admin2
Dec 7, 2022 8:07 PM
Reply to  ZenPriest

That’s poor logic. Dismantling an opponent’s argument is very important. You might find most people in alt. media are ‘compromised’ using your definition. Try not to be a spiritual fascist, goodness and love can travel along many different roads. 🙂 A2

WillianHill
WillianHill
Dec 6, 2022 10:50 AM

Corbett, as usual in step with the US security state, in advocating for polarization, which is serving them so well, in creating absurdist opposing forces, both puppets of the state. 

Graham Greene
Graham Greene
Dec 6, 2022 6:15 PM
Reply to  WillianHill

So Corbett is in on the game too! Hmmm, I rather doubt it, but you never know. What I do surmise – but I may be wrong – is that there is a swarm of would be revolutionists working for and in receipt of monies from the powers-that-be. They are just too over the top to be genuine. This is an unfortunate fact of political life, but there you go. Jack London had it nailed in his novel, The Iron Heel. As published in 1907. Well worth a read.

Edwige
Edwige
Dec 6, 2022 10:23 AM

Some awareness of the propaganda is essential to a grasp of what the current agenda is. Complete ignorance is dangerous.

Corbett’s recent output I’m finding somehwat mixed. On the one hand, his analysis of the climate scam with Ryan Christian was very good. On the other hand, he and Pilato on NWNW (5555 in numerology incidentally) had a strange rant against “Flat Earthers” two weeks ago. Where are Flat Earthers “war lovers”? Where do Flat Earthers deny surveillance satellites? On the latter, they deny that satellites are in space but locate them in the upper atmosphere. Corbett ended up appearing to say you’re with us or against us sounding like Dubya while at the same time criticising those who “divide” the community. Flat Earthers are some of the most staunch anti-vaxxers yet he deliberately alienates them?

Personally, I don’t mind Corbett’s cosmology (who can know for certain?) – but I do mind him sniping at something with strawmen while refusing an open discussion of the issue. Others in the alt-media like William Ramsey or Jay Dyer aren’t Flat Earthers but have allowed open discussion or admit they don’t know. Corbett’s more probably a fool (he’s assumed it’s nonsense and never looked at it seriously so makes assumptions about its beliefs that aren’t what it claims) but knavery can’t be ruled out. There is so much evidence on this topic now easily available it’s getting harder and harder to make excuses for people who appear completely ignorant of its basics. It’s not difficult to find evidence that we can see too far in ways that refraction seems unable to explain and that therefore there must be something wrong with mainstream cosmology (which given the manifest problems with major claims of mainstream biology and physics shouldn’t be surprising).

Alternatively, “the science” is true and things like this aren’t blatant mockery:
https://www.space.com/40374-uranus-clouds-smell-rotten-eggs.html

Veri Tas
Veri Tas
Dec 6, 2022 8:55 PM
Reply to  Edwige

Satellite are all in near earth orbit (NEO), as they cannot penetrate further. Nor can “space” shuttles.

semaj
semaj
Dec 7, 2022 10:48 AM
Reply to  Veri Tas

Trouble is many people believe this shit. I still believe that the only thing thats been into space is our imagination. Operation Goldfish Bowl anyone??

YourPointBeing
YourPointBeing
Dec 7, 2022 10:34 AM
Reply to  Edwige

James Corbett – just another JC figure.

Jesus Fucking H Christ

Howard
Howard
Dec 7, 2022 5:14 PM
Reply to  Edwige

Hmmm. So Mssrs. Corbett and Pilato smugly dismissed flat earthers? (I missed that edition.)

Which begs the question: is Mr. Corbett’s smug dismissal of climate change as a hoax and a scam also without benefit of much information?

(BTW, I’m going to “downvote” this comment just to get the ball rolling.)
(Oh, the system won’t let me. Sorry.)

Hank
Hank
Dec 6, 2022 9:30 AM

Have a laugh.

If you don’t have the time to watch the whole lot go to 14.50 mark.

George Mc
George Mc
Dec 6, 2022 11:54 AM
Reply to  Hank

Brilliant! This is the kind of routine that should have been delivered (and for all I know WAS delivered) at the very beginning. But then power obsessed totalitarianism has always loathed humour.

Violet
Violet
Dec 6, 2022 7:51 AM

comment image

Graham Greene
Graham Greene
Dec 6, 2022 6:18 PM
Reply to  Violet

It not only a conspiracy theory – agreement on that, but it is also a crushing bore not worth looking at.

Violet
Violet
Dec 6, 2022 7:37 PM
Reply to  Graham Greene

Very true that’s why I chucked the bloody thing out years ago 📺

MattC
MattC
Dec 6, 2022 6:01 AM

Interestingly, with sub zero temperatures arriving across Western Europe and so many people already in fuel poverty, the legacy media chatter about global warming is quietening. These shrills for the robber barons of today know full well that their narrative won’t wash in these circumstances, so they will serve up some other false news as a distraction from the reality. It handily avoids having to explain where all that Arctic air came from, when they have been telling us that the world is down to its last few polar bears.

So the “eye bouncing” technique should be applied to any establishment output.

Penelope
Penelope
Dec 6, 2022 1:26 AM

This is mostly new info in video form. I have never seen anything so frightening, yet so obviously true. They are already doing it; they just haven’t told us yet.
 
https://zeeemedia.com/ Scroll down to the Aman Jabbi interview

obsean
obsean
Dec 6, 2022 2:31 PM
Reply to  Penelope

The thing to have is some kind of paint gun…this will quickly disable the network of ‘eyes’

Penelope
Penelope
Dec 6, 2022 10:20 PM
Reply to  Penelope

I think they may have taken down the site, but globalresearch has picked up the video:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/invisible-prison-has-been-built-just-you/5801314

Ann Caddigan
Ann Caddigan
Dec 6, 2022 12:47 AM

Eye opening great stuff. Sort of like a playful gut punch, yet hit me right between the eyes.
Thanks, James.

Edwige
Edwige
Dec 6, 2022 9:53 AM
Reply to  Ann Caddigan

“Right between the eyes”….

Oh, in the pineal gland I suppose.