WATCH: How (and When and Why) to Cite Your Sources – #SolutionsWatch
Today on #SolutionsWatch, James Corbett goes into further detail about the theory and practice of source citation. In addition to the hows and whys of citing sources, James also addresses the weaponization of the “What’s your source?” question and how people can use citations to improve communication, not interfere with it.
Sources, shownotes and links – as well as audio versions and download options – can be found here. Previous episodes of #SolutionsWatch can be found here and here.
Follow us on Telegram for regular updates & commentary
SUPPORT OFFGUARDIAN
If you enjoy OffG's content, please help us make our monthly fund-raising goal and keep the site alive.
For other ways to donate, including direct-transfer bank details click HERE.
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient . . .
James, you missed a few stops on your journey through history. Think 1991 and independence; the transfer of several billion dollars from the Kremlin to Kolomoisky; and the Israeli training and equipping of the Azov battalion.
—
The Ukraine Crisis: What You Need to Know – The Deep Background
by James Corbett
corbettreport.com
February 27, 2022
https://corbettreport.substack.com/p/the-ukraine-crisis-what-you-need
as I noted in my recent Questions for Corbett episode on this crisis, your understanding of history depends entirely on where you “start the clock” on the history of recent events. If you started the clock on February 24, 2022, then the matter is simple: the Russians suddenly declared war on Ukraine and began an “unprovoked and unjustified” invasion of that country.
But why not start the clock on February 19, 2022 . . .
Why stop there? Why not start the clock in January . . .
Or how about going back to last September . . .
Or maybe we should begin the story in February 2014 . . .
But then, why not hark back to the sniper fire in Maidan square later that month . . .
Then again, we could cast our minds back to Victoria Nuland’s infamous “fuck the EU” phone call
Or we could look back to 2013
But perhaps the clock is best started in 1990
Etc
Corbett (What you need to know):
There would have been no “separatist war” in the Donbas had it not been for the opposing forces created by Girkin (aka Igor Strelkov) and Kolomoisky.
Auto translation from Russian
https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2014/11/20/108018-strelkov-spuskovoy-kryuchok-voyny-nazhal-ya
Strelkov: I pulled the trigger of war
Nov 20, 2014
The former commander-in-chief of the armed formations of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People’s Republic, Igor Strelkov, said that he was responsible for military operations in eastern Ukraine. He said this in an interview with the newspaper “Tomorrow”.
https://zavtra.ru/blogs/kto-tyi-strelok
“If our detachment had not crossed the border, in the end it would have ended, as in Kharkov, as in Odessa. There would have been several dozen killed, burned, arrested. And that would be the end of it. And practically the flywheel of the war, which is still going on, launched our detachment,” Strelkov said in an interview with the editor-in-chief of the publication, Alexander Prokhanov.
Igor Strelkov also said that an important role in the hostilities was played by Russian servicemen who allegedly came to the Donbass while “on vacation”.
“Separate units of the militia were subordinate to them. But mostly the “vacationers” were advancing on Mariupol. When they left, both the front line and the opportunities remained shaky,” Strelkov said.
The former commander of the DPR said that during the fighting in the Mariupol region, the separatists were forbidden to seize the city
“Mariupol was empty, there were no Ukrainian soldiers there for two days, it was possible to take it without a fight. But there was an order not to occupy. Not just an order to stop, but an order not to borrow in any case,” Strelkov explained.
Recall that in mid-August, Igor Strelkov (Girkin) was removed from the post of commander-in-chief of the armed formations of the DPR. After leaving the Donetsk region, he began to criticize the leadership of the DPR and LPR. At the end of August, in an interview with Rossiya 24, Strelkov said that some ordinary soldiers “preferred to spend their holidays not on the beach, but among us, among brothers who are fighting for their freedom.”
What’s weird is everyone seems to say the media lie but those same people when you make what seems a wild claim ask “have you got a credible source for that?” And they mean the lying media. I’m all for just offing 90% of all people in the west. Pointless fuckers.
Off Topic (ish)
Does anyone at Offg watch/listen to Quantum of Conscience, Matt McKinley?
He has tremendous insight, humour & his take on what is happening in our “reality” is incredible. He’s popped out the other end of “Rabbit holes” and has framed them as someone with a deep knowledge of pretty much all of them. I’m recommending him as I believe it would be beneficial for many on this path.
Quantum of Conscience. On YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCA3tbHe2O7q0ryWamx696fA
91.6K subscribers ‧ 426 videos. For those who can see what most cannot.
The citing of historic sources should lead to establishing pattern – pattern builds on the past and predicts the future.
https://patternofhistory.wordpress.com/
Getting 95.8% agreement is something any genuine “right wing” organisation would be concerned about. Because it smells like Bolshevism!
—
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/17/gop-base-ukraine
The Ukraine war divides the Republican Party approximately evenly. Around 4 in 10 Republicans say we should decrease or end our financial assistance to Ukraine, but about the same number say we should continue as is, or even increase funding. But to watch two big forums featuring GOP presidential candidates on Friday and over the weekend, you’d think supporting Ukraine was an unthinkable position in the conservative movement.
Turning Point USA’s founder Charlie Kirk disclosed the results of a straw poll Sunday that had been conducted among the conference’s thousands of young attendees. The most lopsided issue? Ukraine. Nearly 96 percent said they do not support “U.S. involvement,” according to Kirk.
—
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/whopping-ninety-six-percent-oppose-supporting-ukraine-against-russia-in-turning-points-action-straw-poll
Whopping NINETY-SIX Percent Oppose Supporting Ukraine Against Russia in Turning Point Action Straw Poll
By Caleb Howe
Jul 16, 2023
9908 comments
A huge 95.8% of attendees in the Turning Point Action conference straw poll said they oppose the United States supporting Ukraine against Russia, Charlie Kirk announced on the stage in Florida on Sunday. The Turning Point Action conference saw about 6,000 attendees for Donald Trump’s keynote speech this weekend at the Palm Beach County Convention Center.
“We asked the question, ‘Do you support U.S. involvement in the war in Ukraine?’” said Kirk on Sunday. “95.8% of you said no.”
—
Nearly Unanimous Opposition to Support for Ukraine in TPUSA Straw Poll
AmericaNewz
Jul 17, 2023
Candace Owens: In her own words, supposedly!
The same logic is pushed by the likes of Steve Bannon. They claim that Ukraine and Ukrainians don’t exist – that they are not distinct from Russia and Russians – and therefore cannot be genocided. It’s one of the sickest positions ever invented and it’s why the will of the Ukrainians as expressed in the 1991 referendum must and will be enforced.
Of course, rather than being her own thoughts, it’s far more likely that Owens is just an IIA asset (see earlier post) who switched from Left to Right as part of her assignment. In her follow up video (“Russian Propagandist”) she says nothing to defend her central claim that there is no difference between Ukraine and Russia, or Ukrainians and Russians. Moreover, despite mentioning that Kolomoisky was behind Burisma and Zelensky, she fails to mention that he received several billion dollars from Abramovich, a.k.a. “Putin’s wallet” (see earlier post).
—
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Ukrainian_independence_referendum
A referendum on the Act of Declaration of Independence was held in Ukraine on 1 December 1991.[1] An overwhelming majority of 92.3% of voters approved the declaration of independence made by the Verkhovna Rada on 24 August 1991.
—
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burisma
As the 2012 study of Burisma done by the Anti-Corruption Action Center found the true owner of Burisma was none other than billionaire-oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky.[35] Kolomoisky had a “controlling interest” in Burisma.
—
https://www.mediamatters.org/candace-owens/candace-owens-ukraine-wasnt-thing-until-1989-ukraine-was-created-russians
From the March 15, 2022, edition of The Daily Wire’s Candace
CANDACE OWENS (HOST): Wow, “genocidal colonization” is interesting. Again, going back to my point about people being stupid, you know – he’s not trying to commit a genocide of the Ukrainians. That obviously makes no sense because there’s very – there is no difference, ethnically, between Ukrainians and Russians, obviously. Ukraine wasn’t a thing until 1989. Ukraine was created by the Russians. It was, you know, they speak Russian. So, it’s absolutely ridiculous. And, again, this entire episode has been exposing to you how ignorant people are about the goals of Vladimir Putin. He has goals. The goal is not just to get rid of Ukrainians. That makes entirely no sense. It would not be helpful for him.
—
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candace_Owens
Owens worked for the conservative advocacy group Turning Point USA between 2017 and 2019 as its communications director.[7] In 2021, she joined The Daily Wire, where she hosts Candace, a political talk show.[8]
—
Candace Owens SCORCHES Bias Media for Labeling Her a Russian Propagandist
Candace Owens Podcast
Mar 24, 2022
Candace Owens offers a fiery response to bias media companies who try to take her out of context and label her something that she is not.
Ukraine didn’t exist until 1917. And Ukrainians are quite frankly the biggest psychos in Europe.
You don’t know what Bolshevism is or what it means without Google. Here have some facts turning points doesn’t like about the Gulag
https://www.globalresearch.ca/truth-about-soviet-gulag-surprisingly-revealed-cia/5751858
So Gulag was not that bad?
What about “surprisingly true facts” about Yagoda, Beria and Dzerzhinsky. Were they also misunderstood Santa Clause figures with small children on their knees?
Facts against Beria? A few women who you would t believe today after metoo showed it’s true colours and some builders, yes builders, who said the bodies found at his old residence were from his era. When they weren’t. They’re from the 1800s. So best of luck with that. My Gulag article comes from the CIAs internal records. Your gulag “facts” will be by anti commie historians who pretended they’d been through the archives. Like Robert conquest (the purge author who admitted before his death that holodomor was nonsense and that Stalin didn’t go around killing people after a fellow anti commie historian called Stephen G wheatcroft held a debate with him in private leaked emails.) Or Solzhenitsyn who’s own family debunked him who claimed 66 million WHITE Christians were killed in the Gulag alone. Hard to do that when even the archives prove that only 18 million people entered the Gulag between 1918-1960. What they (the CIA) say in public and private are two different things. Gulag was prison. Less than 2% could be considered political prisoners and 99% of those were communists. They were paid in the Gulag and we’re even given reduced sentences for filling quotas. Bolshevism by the way hinny means majority. Yagoda was shot for piss poor investigations and refusing to investigate a bloc he belonged to, the bloc of rightists. What did dzershinsky do to upset you? Don’t tell me you’re one of the many poles or ukronazis who claims Stalin ate all their granddad’s grain and stole their slaves but can’t name their grandad or his village he was allegedly starved in?! Enjoy your cappie propaganda moron
Did you even read the article?! Probably not because you’re an idiot with an agenda predetermined by others for you.
The smart way to keep people passive and obedient . . .
So which country and class of citizenry are NOT part of the “everything you need to know” debate?
—
https://www.mediaite.com/politics/ben-shapiro-takes-thinly-veiled-shot-at-tucker-carlson-j-d-vance-over-ukraine-demagoguery-comes-at-pretty-high-cost
Jul 17, 2023
The Daily Wire’s Ben Shapiro took a thinly-veiled shot at Tucker Carlson and Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH) over their approaches to debating the war in Ukraine on Monday, musing that “demagoguery” comes at a “pretty high societal cost.”
Last Friday, Carlson hosted a series of Q&As with Republican presidential candidates, sparring with some — and most notably former vice president Mike Pence — over their perspectives on the conflict.
Shapiro appeared to come to the aid of Pence and others of his mindset on Twitter Monday morning.
“Ukraine is becoming a litmus test for Republican candidates because of the bad-faith argument that if you think we must fund Ukraine in its war against Russia, you don’t care about American poverty. This is wrong. The two issues are not connected,” argued Shapiro.
—
Everything You Need to Know About the Russia/Ukraine Conflict
Ben Shapiro
Mar 12, 2022
Ben Shapiro breaks down everything you need to know about the conflict between Russia and Ukraine.
Interesting quote:
‘Elites are always searching for ways to advertise their virtue and assert their authority. They believe they are entitled to view science as a source of authority rather than a process, and they try to appropriate science, suitably and incorrectly simplified, as the basis for their movement. Movements need goals, and these goals are generally embedded in legislation. The effect of legislation long outlasts the alleged science. As long as scientists are rewarded for doing so they are unlikely to oppose the exploitation of science.” – Richard L Lindzen, Professor Emeritus of Atmospheric Sciences, MIT’
From an interesting article that reviews an interesting book: https://www.globalresearch.ca/godless-fake-science/5825224
Just like with the finally unravelling “fact-checker” racket, it’s getting to where I evaluate the veracity of someone’s claim not so much from the claim itself, but by how vigorously it’s attacked. What seems lacking — profoundly — among the perpetraitors & minions of all this, is humility, honesty, with their insufferable libertine narcissism, you won’t find a sauce for this!!
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/cdc-advice-suggesting-trans-women-can-safely-breastfeed-fails-to-mention-risks-to-baby/
CDC to blame again for not disclosing risks. And,there no such thing and a trans woman,btw.
“Trans-genderism’, when backed by legal penalties for mis-pronouning, functions as State promoted ideology…Trans-genderism sows confusion and uncertainty…The State is intentionally using confusion as a means of social control’…(anon)…
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/covid-origins-connect-the-dots/ a must read.. Robert F. Kennedy, and Ron Unz.. two strong persons connect the dots.. Humanity is under attack..
Unz? Really? We’re under attack alright but Ron Unz isn’t going to save you. Neither is James Corbett with his ‘Solutions’.
Corbett is a voluntarist. Aka a anarchist but more lazy. He thinks people will just be good. He’s like 90% of Western communists socialists anarchists and communists. They just think good will happen because they say so.
Hiding in plain sight…
‘Globalists are now combining the climate change issue with international finance and monetary authority. In other words they aint hiding the fact that the climate change agenda is part of “The Great Reset” agenda. They are even suggesting that the threat of climate change be used as a springboard for giving global banks more power to dictate the circulation of wealth and for deconstructing the existing system so it can be replaced with something else.’
alt-market.us/globalists-suggest-finance-shock-and-climate-controls-to-launch-their-great-reset/
? Were the Chinese, the Russians, and Third World countries invited ? And, if not, Why Not ?
The CCP in June hosted the summer WEF “new champions” for the 11th year in Tianjin
Annual Meeting of the New Champions | World Economic Forum (weforum.org)
They also litter the wordsphere with “green” BUT keep on building more coal power stations with Weftern green staying mum. The PRC was such a good profit center, sniff, sniff. Cheap, hard labor without rights, what’s more to want thought Kissinger in 1971 talking to Mao.
CPC antonym you Jude lover. Communist party of China. We need to deal with sheeple like you in an extremely brutal manner.
Off course China, Russia, the 3 world were invited to the Reset.
This is the whole idea with the great reset, to align the too big difference in resource consumption between US/EU and the rest of the world.
Nobody wants to give away privileges, and therefore they have to use unusual tools to get especially US down to a reasonable level.
Transfer of wealth to East which will be the new Financial and economic center.
NEW PANDEMIC REHEARSAL: Paralytic Respiratory Virus
@ 25 minutes
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/ed-dowd-they-cant-run-from-this-data/
BREAKING NEWS !!
Noam has a new book !
It’s titled ‘DISMANTLING DISSENT’
Just jokin :-}
Sighting your sauces !
“My mum says….”
There’s only How Mr Corbett no why. To lay out as to why first discover as to what the language is chiefly over little problem there, it’s of course Indian Ink.
There was no “neo-nazi Azov battalion”. Instead, there was a “psyop battalion”. It was created to give the impression of “nazis” and thereby a pseudo casus belli. Surely, James, you can handle that level of dual-citizen organised, “by deception” subterfuge? Indeed, given your proven knowledge of history, the failure to even consider that possibility would be a “stand-down” – presumably ordered. It would be the equivalent of secret service agents leaving their posts at the back of the presidential limo; or the US air defence going AWOL one sunny Tuesday morning. It’s the dog that didn’t bark! Do I need to cite my sources or should we encourage people to engage in their own heuristic searching?
Ukraine first had to be “nazified” in order to justify the Russian invasion.
—
The Israel Lobby Protects Neo-Nazis in Ukraine
Nov 28, 2014
Based on “How the Israel Lobby Protected Ukrainian Neo-Nazis”
by Max Blumenthal, AlterNet.
More on U.S. support of neo-Nazis in Ukraine:
http://stpeteforpeace.org/ukraine.html
Transcript:
An amendment to the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that would have forbidden US assistance, training and weapons to neo-Nazis and other extremists in Ukraine was dropped at the request of two of the largest Jewish pressure groups in the United States. Introduced by Democratic Representative John Conyers, the amendment would have explicitly barred those to have offered “praise or glorification of Nazism or its collaborators, including through the use of white supremacist, neo-Nazi, or other similar symbols” from receiving any form of support from the US Department of Defense.
But the amendment was dumped after Congress faced pressure from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Simon Wiesenthal Center, two of the loudest pro-Israel groups in the US. Despite their stated mission to combat anti-Semitism and violent extremism, the ADL and Wiesenthal Center refused to support Conyers’ proposal on the grounds that right-wing Ukrainian parties – with documented records of racist extremism – had “moderated their rhetoric.”
But this is not supported by facts on the ground in Ukraine. Ukraine’s US-supported President Petro Poroshenko is leading the nationalists’ dream with a war in the East, and Ukraine’s leading party, the People’s Front, is pocked with far-right militants, including Andriy Parubiy, the co-founder of the neo-Nazi-inspired Social National Party.
Besides Parubiy, the People’s Front included Andriy Biletsky, leader of the Azov military, an overtly neo-Nazi fighting force that has been on the front lines of the battle in eastern Ukraine. Unlike the Svoboda party, the Azov militia does not even feign moderation. “The historic mission of our nation in this critical moment is to lead the White Races of the world in a final crusade for their survival,” Biletsky recently wrote. “A crusade against the Semite-led Untermenschen” an infamous phrase used in Nazi Germany to describe Jews, gypsies and communists.
Azov fighters are united by their nostalgia for Nazi Germany and embrace of open fascism. Sporting swastika tattoos, the battalion “flies a neo-Nazi symbol resembling a Swastika as its flag,” according to Andrew Kramer of the New York Times.
Azov is precisely the sort of neo-Nazi organization that Conyers’ NDAA amendment would have deprived of US assistance. But when the congressman sought support from the ADL and the Wiesenthal Center in moving forward, he was rebuked. The amendment died a quiet death and Azov’s American supply line remained intact.
ADL’s current posture is in stark contrast to it’s stance earlier this year, when its outgoing leader Abraham Foxman noted the Svoboda party’s “history of anti-Semitism and platform of ethnic nationalism” and demanded the party renounce its past glorification of Stepan Bandera, a World War Two-era Nazi collaborator who has become a symbol of Ukrainian nationalism.
When the Ukrainian parliament failed to pass a bill this October honoring Bandera’s Ukrainian Rebel Army, about 8000 supporters of Svoboda and the extremist Right Sector marched on the building, attacking riot police with homemade weapons while waving Banderist flags and Svoboda banners.
Svoboda’s leader, Oleh Tyahnybok, once called for the liberation of his country from the “Muscovite-Jewish mafia.” In 2010, following the conviction of the Nazi death camp guard John Demjanjuk for his supporting role in the death of nearly 30,000 people at an extermination camp, Tyahnybok flew to Germany to praise him as a hero who was “fighting for truth.”
So one minute the ADL is rightfully admonishing Ukrainian neo-Nazi groups, and the next minute it’s clamoring to give them heavy weaponry? An ADL lobbyist shed light on this paradox by stating, “the focus should be on Russia,” making it clear that the ADL’s position is based on geopolitics, not to fight “anti-Semitism and all forms of bigotry” as their mission statement claims.
They don’t even attempt to hide it. This is the “casus belli”!
Follow the money:
Putin > Abramovich > Kolomoisky > Azov Battalion
—
https://www.timesofisrael.com/toxic-russian-oligarchs-come-under-increased-scrutiny-in-israel
March 14, 2022
It was a flight heard around the world — or at least on the feeds of people who follow flight tracker accounts. On Sunday evening, a private plane belonging to Israeli-Russian oligarch Roman Abramovich was spotted landing in Tel Aviv from Moscow.
Abramovich, who was described by the oligarchs researcher as “Putin’s wallet” and one of his moneymen charged with buying assets in Western countries, is no stranger to sanctions. . . . The researcher said that Abramovich and others are Putin’s “cash handlers where [he] has almost complete control,” and he “uses them to access Western systems.”
—
https://genius.com/Vladimir-putin-press-conference-on-the-situation-in-ukraine-annotated
Press conference on the situation in Ukraine
President Vladimir Putin of Russia takes questions from the Russian media on March 3, 2014, following Russian military action in Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.
Released: March 4, 2014
For example, Mr Kolomoisky was appointed Governor of Dnepropetrovsk. This is a unique crook. He even managed to cheat our oligarch Roman Abramovich two or three years ago. Scammed him, as our intellectuals like to say. They signed some deal, Abramovich transferred several billion dollars, while this guy never delivered and pocketed the money. When I asked him [Abramovich]: “Why did you do it?” he said: “I never thought this was possible.” I do not know, by the way, if he ever got his money back and if the deal was closed. But this really did happen a couple of years ago. And now this crook is appointed Governor of Dnepropetrovsk. No wonder the people are dissatisfied. They were dissatisfied and will remain so if those who refer to themselves the legitimate authorities continue in the same fashion.
—
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/neo-nazi-azov-battalion-is-a-threat-from-within
Neo-Nazi Azov Battalion is a threat from within
Apr 17, 2022
On 13 Apr 2014, the Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Arsen Avakov, issued a ruling sanctioning the set-up of new paramilitary forces of up to 12,000 people. The Azov Battalion was formed on 05 May 2014 at Berdinsk by a white nationalist. This outfit was regulated by the Ministry of Interior of Ukraine and branded as ‘Special Tasks Patrol Police’. Initially, it was funded independently, and one of the leading financiers was a Jewish-Ukrainian billionaire and oligarch, Igor Kolomoyskyi. Many political party members of the ‘Patriot Party’ of Ukraine joined this organization.
—
https://www.algemeiner.com/2014/06/24/ukraine-jewish-billionaires-batallion-sent-to-fight-pro-russian-militias
June 24, 2014
Ukraine: Batallion Backed by Jewish Billionaire Sent to Fight Pro-Russian Militias
Among those going into battle from the Ukrainian side are some 500 trained fighters in the self-declared Azov battalion, backed by Jewish energy magnate and Dnipropetrovsk region governor, Igor Kolomoisky, according to Israel’s Ma’ariv daily. . . . A source at Ukraine’s National Security and Defense Council, cited by Voice of Russia, claimed that “Kolomoisky is the most outspoken opponent of the plan on settling the situation in the East of Ukraine.”
I just dont understand, if deep state in west are able to take out that many presidents and unwanted figures, why can Russia only come up with bombing a little command center in a minor town in Ukraine when their whole country is in jeopardy?
Kremlin is freezing when it comes to touching bolsheviks and our “equal partners”.
They can’t quite bring themselves to say it, that the Azov Battalion was an Israeli operation – with IDF contractors playing the key roles and the finances routed through Kolomoisky. Instead, it must have been a paradoxical “connection” between Israel and neo-nazis – the latter being effectively non-existent prior to 2014.
—
Press TV: Zionism and Ukraine
Mar 12, 2022
vanessa beeley
Ukraine: The Zionist Connection
Images from the war in Ukraine have dominated the headlines over the last few weeks. But the Jewish identity of Ukraine’s President Zelensky, has been used by many in the West, to cover NATO’s manifest alliance with Neo-Nazi battalions in the war against Russia. But it’s not just NATO that’s working with these Neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine. Israel is arming, and its military personnel are even fighting alongside explicitly Neo-Nazi units
The Zionist regime has supplied arms to the Ukraine military including the Nazi Azov battalion which traces its antecedents to Nazi collaborators in the 1939-45 war. Azov Battalion members have been photographed toting Tavor rifles built by Israeli Military Industries a subsidiary of Elbit Systems. In February 2016 it was revealed that Elbit Systems would be part of a group investing in Ukraine’s defense establishment. Haaretz newspaper revealed in 2018 that A Ukrainian military training school website indicates that training there is provided by former IDF officers and that its instructors were trained by Israelis… It notes that the school trains units of the National Guard, whose members include Azov militiamen.
Odessa in southern Ukraine has been referred to at the ‘Gates of Zion’. Both Leon Pinsker founder of ‘Lovers of Zion’ a forerunner of the Zionist movement and the revisionist Zionist leader Vladimir Jabotinsky, hailed from Odessa. Jabotinsky historically supported the Ukrainian nationalists including their leader Symon Petliura. Zionist sources today credit Petliura with responsibility for the deaths of 50,000 Jews in the pogroms in the 1920s. But Jabotinsky maintained that Petliura was not an anti-Semite, even going so far as to state: “When I die, you can write on my grave: ‘This was the person who signed an agreement with Petliura’”
Panel discussion with Lowkey and David Miller
Lost in the woods alright. Pity your internet wouldn’t also fuck off.
Corbett (2:20):
Oh dear, James! Where do we start? Perhaps:
Shadow Gate
https://odysee.com/@millieweaver:c/shadowgate:4
ShadowGate – Full Documentary
August 14, 2020
—
https://odysee.com/@millieweaver:c/Shadow-Gate-2.0:4
Shadow Gate 2.0 – Full Documentary
October 16, 2020
On the day Shadow Gate had an early release, a well planned targeted smear campaign by media outlets and social media influencers was launched to distract away from the subtle panic the military industrial complex was going through in the background. What was so dangerous about Shadow Gate and our whistleblowers that the documentary created such a knee-jerk reaction? That is the subject of this documentary.
—
https://odysee.com/@Talpiot:b/BRENDON-TALKS-WITH-PATRICK-BERGY:0
I have an informal chat with Patrick Bergy.
Brendon Lee O’Connell
Recorded: March 31, 2021
We’ll talk IIA (Interactive Internet Activities) and the waves of fake channels, fake media, fake personalities online. We’ll talk Operation Mocking bird and the CIA Culture War and why people do not grasp that the alt media is as compromised as the msm.
I’m not sure that PB wants to go full tilt at a counter intelligence op against the likes of my fave people, I’ll let him tread as carefully as he wants. Though, I suspect PB will be willing to give an opinion.
My greatest wish is that you all cease with, “Can I trust you?” And start thinking in terms of taking what resonates and leaving the rest. I watch Tucker Carlson, he does not pretend to be anything else than a MSM opinion piece purveyor, I take what I need, then leave the rest. But alt media stars like alleged dissident investigative journalist Whitney WEBB are a different story. She is a “plant”. A “Ficus”. She is not with us to tell us “The Truth” as best she can. She is an ideologue, a political operative. She gives you “only so much” then backs off the rest. She does enough to capture the audience, then does “just enough” to keep it. She is slick, well funded, well supported, her computers work. Imagine someone exposing Davos, Israel and the subversion of the United States political process. She is totally pro Iran and Pro Russia – both of whom are obviously deeply in bed with Israel and China on the Belt and Road. She will not tell you about Iranian president Rouhani in Scotland for six years hanging with Jack Straw and Lord Levy – one step down from Lord Jacob Rothschild himself. She wont tell you, or make a regular point on their love of Chatham House and the Royal Institute of International Affairs and Davos. She wont amplify the relationship between Iranian foreign minister Zarif and Chatham House rent boy Senator John Kerry. She wont tell you about the self evident deals between Iran and China and therefore Israel – she wont give you that “big picture”. That’s what we call a “limited hangout”, a very important mechanism of control. With the information out there ALREADY, “they” must capture that “emerging market” and “re-direct” it, “deflect it”, “channel it”…away from the key point. Honest brokers are attacked, sidelined, marginalized and maybe made dead after being made broke.
George Webb convinced Danial Hopsicker to take down his expose on Whitney WEBB and Mint Press News, an Iranian millionaire funded intelligence op. George Webb hangs with NATO Psyche Warfare planner Robert David Steel, the most self evident “turd in the punch bowel” ever created and good friend of Roger STONE, friends with Dynology IIA operator Jim Jones, son of Dynology founder General Jones. Nothing to see here?
The “big picture” is the Rothschild Pan Eurasian trading block – the McKinder World island. Welding Israel, Russia, Iran and China together to create a Superstate controlled by Israeli technology (stolen out of the US) and Chinese manufacturing capacity. Understand that “big picture”, you understand the details and how they connect. You get those “aha” moments and you “know” how THAT connects to THIS.
Let us…attend…
is that why he got maduke fined 500million..and is now on twitter for selling the lie called the steal….
O’Connell wrote that 2 years ago. The definition of “alt-media” has since expanded to include the likes of Tucker Carlson. It’s inclusivity based on self-identification or something!
I doubt Russia and China are so naive as to partner with the Israelis, much as the Israelis would love to extend their tentacles. Israel is no part of BRICS…
Israel, Germany, Russia and China are very much in an unofficial alliance – i.e. Kissinger’s Belt & Road project. Israel is more of a Soviet state than a US one, though it’s always needed US technology and military support in order to survive. It’s been covered extensively by O’Connell, but unfortunately he flipped-out a few days ago and deleted a number of channels – Youtube, Bitchute, Brighteon. This is a short example:
https://odysee.com/@Talpiot:b/44.CLIP-ALEX-JONES-ADMITS—ISRAEL-HAS-SOLD-THE-U.S-OUT-TO-CHINA_INFO-WARS-EXTRACT:8
44. (Clip) Alex Jones Admits – Israel Has Sold The U.S Out To China
March 24, 2021
Brendon O’Connell – Talpiot
Alex Jones handlers have allowed him to speak about Israel and it’s Russia, China alliance. He’s only 4 years late.
—
This is the Real War
Pompeo Slapping Down Netanyahu
https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/pompeo-and-netanyahu-deliver-remarks-ahead-meeting-in-jerusalem-live-627827
Pompeo puts Netanyahu on the spot over China and coronavirus
Iran, coronavirus, Trump peace plan on the meeting’s agenda.
May 13, 2020
Pompeo’s public comments were an escalation of public pressure on Israel regarding the China issue, to which Netanyahu replied noncommittally.
The Secretary of State continued in this vein in an interview with KAN, saying: “We want the Chinese people to be successful, but we don’t want the Chinese Communist Party to have access to Israeli infrastructure and to Israeli communication systems – all of the things that put Israeli citizens at risk, and in turn – put the capacity for America to work alongside Israel on important projects at risk as well. We think these risks are very real, and we share information about that.”
Pompeo added that he thinks Netanyahu and Blue and White leader Benny Gantz, with whom he met, fully understood the risks, even more so after China “deceived the world” about the severity of coronavirus.
—
The Day Trump Got Laughed At
Germany Reacts to Trump’s UNGA Speech
Sep 25, 2018
Bloomberg Quicktake: Now
Watch the German delegation’s response at UNGA when Trump says “Germany will become totally dependent on Russian energy if it does not immediately change course.”
Interactive Internet Activities (IIA Operations)
—
I’ve found the term “Interactive Internet Activities” in a DoD document, but I’ve not found 3-12.2 (2010) or the 2007 document.
https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod
JP 3-12, Cyberspace Operations, 8 June 2018
https://irp.fas.org/doddir/dod/jp3_12.pdf
Appendix C – References
2. Department of Defense Publications
e. Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum, Policy for Department of Defense (DOD) Interactive Internet Activities, June 8, 2007.
—
Brendon Lee O’Connell
The Lives of Others – IIA Operations – James O’Keefe & Patrick Bergy
Dec 2021
Two minute intro
https://www.brighteon.com/e56d868e-a828-4e76-a607-8a6aa5c41ddd
Full video (45 min)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2CKVQqD9mFuu
—
The O’Connell video references the following talk by Frances Stonor Saunders – which I assume (by the date given below) was recorded in May 2000
Frances Stonor Saunders – The Cultural Cold War (National Archives)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frances_Stonor_Saunders
Uploaded: Jun 26, 2021
By: Adam Fitzgerald
Frances Saunders talked about how the Central Intelligence Agency created the Congress for Cultural Freedom in 1947 as a secret program of cultural propaganda in Western Europe. The program focused on creating and sponsoring pro-American arts and literature. Following her remarks she answered questions from the audience. Frances Saunders is the author of The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters, published by the New Press. (5-23-2000)
O’Connell has now gone and deleted his Odysee account.
This is the above “Chat With Bergy”
https://odysee.com/@SlavesNoMore:b/PATRICK-BERGY-EXPOSES-PROUD-BOYS-LEADERSHIP—ROGER-STONE-AS-IIA-ASSETS:1
An assortment of other videos:
https://odysee.com/$/discover?t=brendon%20oconnell
Carry on Down the Babbitt Hole
a.k.a. The Jan 6 “Riot” / “Insurrection” / “Shooting”
Featuring many of our favourite IIA operatives
By Wooz News
Act 1: Everything Wrong With The Capitol Shooting In 21 Minutes Or Less
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DYlb92zMkj41
Feb 8, 2021
Dedicated to the memory of Jeff C.
The simulated riots in DC was a powder-keg long in the making. The evidence for preplanning and setting up a situation for disaster is overwhelming. In this episode, we’re going to show you how a little stage direction and fake blood became an instrumental role in furthering the division of the nation. Strap yourselves in- it’s going to be a bumpy ride… down the Babbitt hole.
—
Act 2: Everything Wrong With The Capitol Riots In 889 Angles
https://www.bitchute.com/video/oGBwsi2zjrJ3
July 12, 2023
Dedicated to the memories of David, Komel, and Rani Crowley. May their murderers fall at the feet of swift justice.
The simulated riots in DC was a powder-keg long in the making. The evidence for preplanning and setting up a situation for disaster is overwhelming. In Act 1 we applied the Homeland Security and Evaluation Program and how a little stage direction and fake blood were instrumental in the shooting of Ashli Babbitt.
Here in Act 2, our two and a half year investigation starts at the beginning of the Jan. 6 event; in chronological order, and through the lens of 889 angles.
Strap yourselves in- it’s going to be a bumpy ride… down the Babbitt hole.
—
Caravan To Midnight – A Scripted Affair
Discussion with John B Wells and Wooz News
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1FSfqYsFANT8
March 3, 2021
While many a mainstream newscaster recently barked out false narratives about President Trump using “dog whistle” political tactics to incite mayhem on Jan. 6th, in DC, Wooz’s keen ears, eyes, and sense of smell detected a much different falsehood at play on the 6 o’clock news. He knew right away these mutts were just strays performing “stupid human tricks”. Some of them even had their papers in their back pockets, while others later howled out confessions that they were indeed paid protestors. There hasn’t been this much farcical film making depicting chaos in combat since 101 Dalmatians ran onto the set of Braveheart.
The media game is a “dog eat dog” world. Wooz News is the creative alias of a seasoned documentary maker, editor, and improv actor who is all too familiar with the trickery and tactics of mainstream media. Especially as it has been used to sway political opinions and public perceptions.
Dogs just know what real and what is not, don’t they? As the insightful host of Wooz News, Wooz, a wiley well-spoken Jack Russell cross is definitely “Best in Show” for his abilities to sniff out; deception, trick photography, the use of staging, special effects, and of course those lovely people we know as “crisis actors” working from a scripted narrative.
Wooz is quite at home on the lavish set of his popular show. His playful wit and humor cushion the blows between asking the tough questions and speaking the doggone truth about what he has dug up that week in the world around him. Wooz likes a good game of fetch but definitely prefers hardball to fluffy toys and puffy stories.
Wooz then broke the story by painstakingly breaking down and compiling a composite montage of many different videos taken at the scene that day. It is now an insider’s expose’ that would impress legendary Lords of the lens from Kubrick to Hitchcock. He is not doing any of this to become rich, especially Seth Rich. This dangerous revelation is indeed very serious in its nature and has prompted the need for the name and the identity of “His Masters Voice” to remain somewhat anonymous.
Here’s my favourite source, which I often cite:
“Never believe anything just because somebody said it.”
[Buddha]
As an addendum to that excellent advice , never believe anything government funded experts assert as indisputable truth . In pragmatic America and Britain these days , what the majority believes is true is “Truth” . In China and Russia a similar form of truth is arrived at by other means , but Platonic truths remain difficult if not impossible to discern once infected by politics ?
Indeed.
So we must be careful to keep politicians away from our ‘Platonic truths’, just as we should keep ‘the authorities’ away from our children.
I suppose most political ideologies come in waves.
For example my childhood education, way back, was pretty strict, undoubtedly because WW2 had recently come to an end.
Military thinking pervaded the attitudes of all our teachers, as well as a fair amount of propaganda.
(Don’t get me started on the fact that military thinking still pervades the BBC – there they still pine for the days when any public event could be commentated upon in reverential hushed tones by a member of the Dimbleby family…)
Yet in spite of all that, some basics of real life were learnt, and ‘virtual reality’ was kept firmly in its rightful place – in the science-fiction books.
Political thoughts are governed by fateful ticks., not words in print of one’s own choosing that means a dying death.
It never ceases to amaze me how far we are descending into complete madness.
According to a recent article on the CHD website, there is now something called “chestfeeding” whereby, through the use of various chemicals, a biological man can now breastfeed a baby.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-endorses-chestfeeding-biological-males/
The CDC is, of course, involved in establishing guidelines and recommendations. In answer to the question, “Can transgender parents who have had breast surgery breastfeed or chestfeed their infants?” we find this:
If you read the CHD article, it’s pretty clear that meeting “the nutritional needs” of these infants involves poisoning them, in addition to destroying whatever is left of the biological life of the male involved.
Some links:
https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/breastfeeding-special-circumstances/maternal-or-infant-illnesses/breast-surgery.html
https://www.cdc.gov/nutrition/emergencies-infant-feeding/health-equity.html
It’s interesting that this explosion of transgenderism has largely coincided with the “coming out” of the Great Reset. When it comes to politics I don’t hold much of a belief in coincidence.
Now can we all see what mainstream medicine is all about, what ‘flavour’ and leanings it has?
Bingo!
Insanity ?
Or a call to the lemmings to swarm over the cliff ?
(Real lemmings do not commit mass suicide. That is a myth.)
Probably both.
A BB LOL! Birthing Baby Bro Bra..good heavens right lads cover them nipples. Mechanically obsolete although some still need the grease. This is a Biden’s Woke Kitty Kat for sure.
It is, indeed, amazing how far into insanity our ‘representatives’ are prepared to sink.
In such a bizarro world of anti-humanness, it’s a bit difficult to focus in on the most truly bizarre.
But my vote goes to the “pasteurized human milk.” Pasteurized? Human milk? That is way beyond insane.
Mindboggling for sure.
Genital mutilation- where does it come from? Is it just there as a “traditional ” human error? No- it seems to come from the “chosen” slaves of the false god, like most anti-humanness around…. In all places where it is supposedly traditional- they have been already infiltrated by the “righteous” ones….
Why are Americans continuing to circumcise male babies when neither a legit medical reason nor a Christian doctrine exist to prescribe it?
Because child abuse, and especially sexual child abuse, is how the system propagates itself, and that is where it will be stopped.
Vaccine improved Mrna pasteurized human nanobot milk….with flour. Good for your teeth.
It would be very valuable to have a compilation of mainstream sources of information that show the lies for what they are. Because any non-mainstream source is simply never looked at (“fake news”, Far right” “Russia” “Trump-Qanon” etc)
for example: Vaccines (can) cause cancer- source : FDA
Investigating Viruses in Cells Used to Make Vaccines; and Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Transmission of Viruses to Humans | FDA
(this is for “traditional vaccines” using “attenuated virus” or whatever BS term they came up with. )
and:
“Is curing patients a sustainable business model?” Goldman Sachs analysts ask(Source: Ars Technica)
“Is curing patients a sustainable business model?”
Sweet Lord…
It depends on whose business is the model.
My guillotine reconstruction business, for example, is really thriving right now, even if not universally popular…
But it is universally popular, its just not popular here on Earth.
Off course not. You dont have to be an City of London analyst or science professor from Yale to figure that out.
Curing patients is bad business all over.
In fact many patients who was cured returned to their old habits to get sick again, because they missed the time when someone cared for them.
The Doctor, the nurses, their families, jumping around with flowers, chocolate, medicine, daily visit from the Chief Physician and his team, everyone looking concerned about your state of business.
When you are most ill, your children, even your own mother and father have their lawyer behind them when they visit you in the hospital, concerned about the other family members will try to suck as much out of you when you are dead.
Its like usury. A little dime/illness per day will keep your life at Bay.
Curing (or trying to cure with treatment) is a good business, prevention, now that is bad business.
Killed not dead Kriegster poppy seed. Are you beyond your depths…glug glug.
Why did the Off-G bring back comment voting? To satisfy people who are actually looking for a video game?
Cant go wrong with James.
I like him.
Lynch Pin, now he’s offically allowed bath’s bc hemp whats not to like. ☺
James is a stand up guy.
He has done some great stuff..
Your alternative update on #COVID19 for 2023-07-15. EJCI batch-dependent safety BNT162b2 mRNA jab: 1 in 20 for EJ6134, 1 in 1000 for EW6126. Vit D 50+ ngmL (blog, gab, tweet).
I know, it works, right? I talk to people who wear masks every chance I get and tell them that masks don’t work and Covid-19 is fake and I tell them to read Off Guardian and Global Research for a good source of the truth. Every time, man, they immediately take off their masks, start singing hallelujah, and give me a big hug. It’s like I’ve set them free. Exhilarating.
P.S. There’s a lot of good stuff about the Great Reset on Global Research today.
Good idea for a feelgood movie.
It still appalls me to see that people are still wearing the ridiculous things.
It’s not even virtue signalling.
Here’s what it is:
“I have successfully resisted facts, information, logic, common sense and persuasion all my life, and I’m not going to stop now.”
Sometimes I try to give them the benefit of the doubt and pretend they must be dying from some kind of respiratory ailment or something, but probably not.
US barely seen them after people had a media lead panic attack. Twenty was something else to be around in public. Little wonder their flu shot out the window lol!
“I have taken a vow to help all other living things by consuming less oxygen”.
This could mean you have common sense
Big Sister Eighty Four in case you hadn’t noticed you do now right?
You need to give them mainstream sources – it takes some more digging but there is plenty of material.
He’s right. I visit a fair number of credible web sites every day. Reader comments often include links to complete rubbish, or contain virulent (yet empty) hyperbole. The hyperbole attracts reply in more radical hyperbole, and the beat goes on. It is frustrating…
For those who haven’t forgotten that administrative persons have admittedly been at war with civil populations for the last 100 years, here’s a list of events: >>>
American Domestic Bioterrorism Program
Building the case to prosecute members of Congress, presidents,
HHS and DOD secretaries and federal judges for treason under 18 USC 2381.
KATHERINE WATT
APR 28, 2022
American Domestic Bioterrorism Program – by Katherine Watt (substack.com)
An example of proper citing: IHL – Treaties & Commentaries – FULL (un.org)
Another christian failing to understand the foundation of their slavery.
I don’t care so much about the source, as the source may want to remain hidden for their own safety.
What the source claims can be relevant though, like this gem, people cant remember the last mass shooting so what is the motive for waiting 50 years to come clean on some things.
https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/credit-suisse-inquiry-will-keep-files-secret-50-years-paper-2023-07-15/
Obviously evil hides the truth while insisting you report it or face the consequences of obstructing their laws.
I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again, I started watching James Corbett in 2015 after having seen my first documentary (that has since been taken down) about 9/11. I have learned a great deal from Corbett Report, and from links that members have provided.
One such link was to Attorney Dan Sheehan’s college lectures. Watching them explains better than anything I have seen or read just exactly how the sausage gets made. And sold.
In any case, I don’t always agree with Corbett, and often take umbrage at his snarkiness, but good lord, what is with the take-down.
Funny thing is, no one was yelling about Corbett the gatekeeper prior to the the past year or so.
The constant tear-down on alternative media has become as depressing as what happened in 2016. The constant unrelenting vilification of Trump. (And, no, I was not a supporter by any means).
We’re all grown ups here. Can’t we discern for ourselves what we deem “gatekeeping” or “controlled opposition”?
I’m just happy that people are providing information that is covered up and ignored by the mainstream media.
I would never have known, or studied, the real history of the United States and the deep state machinations if it was not for Corbett and others.
The video may have been removed from gootube, but if you go to his website you can find all the videos he’s ever made.
Oh, I meant the first video I ever watched of 9/11. It wasn’t Corbett’s. It eventually led me to Corbett.
I am talking about the homemade videos people did about 9/11. The nitty gritty ones. You will never find them on youtube anymore! Only the “documentaries” on imbd or whatever that site is.
Only the google approved ones.
“I’m just happy that people are providing information that is covered up and ignored by the mainstream media”.
Yes, Judith. Me too. I’m so thankful for you all here.
Good one, we are adults and able to filter out what we need.
Hello judith: I have a difficult time watching Mr Corbett’s presentations. It’s not that he’s lacking information, as he’s dead straight on many issues. I think it’s his teacher/student method of speaking that turns a lot of people off. That said. You might enjoy this. >
Here’s Why You Don’t Live In A Democracy Anymore
June 4, 2023
Here’s Why You Don’t Live In A Democracy Anymore – YouTube
How Corporations overthrew Democracy, detailing the specific measures instituted around the globe that have sought to guarantee private profits for major transnational corporations at the expense of democracy — measures that have included everything from violent coups to international “free trade” agreements that are anything but free…
Wow, this was great. Thank you!
Along the same lines, I just watched the first episode of Glen Greenwalds new show System Update.
PLEASE – I’m not here to argue about Glen Greenwald!
Only to say that on this first episode he gives a great report on all of the military and letter agency people that end up on TV. It’s hilarious. Well, it would be hilarious if it wasn’t so horrendous.
I can’t seem to link it, but it was on the Children’s Health Defense “Defender” site, and you can also access on internet.
System Update.
“Funny thing is, no one was yelling about Corbett the gatekeeper prior to the the past year or so.”
Well, for starters, he only recently became a regular guest on the CHD morning program with Meryl Nass, which could be considered the steel bolted gate itself.
For me, a big one his steadfast refusal to look into the Rockefeller involvement in the creation of the concept of viruses (and their “treatments”), despite having previously made two documentaries detailing their shenanigans. On this he is just fingers in the ears “lalala I can’t hear you”.
Or maybe he just disagrees with that concept.
Or he’s not sure how he feels about it.
Many are not sure how they feel about that concept.
Not all independent sites can cover every single issue.
Well said.
Judith.
We are source obsessed – and we need to break ourselves of that childish habit.
Citing a source is little more than “My daddy told me!”
Imagine how extensively we must research a source to determine if it’s a reliable source or if it’s propaganda disguised as a source or if it’s actually little more than someone’s opinion dressed up to look resourceful or if it’s a fake.
Where did this idea come from that opinions are meaningless gibberish which can only be taken seriously if backed by someone else’s opinions? It’s total absurdity.
I remember a James Corbett Report about New York City effectively killing nursing home residents. It was backed by a perfectly valid looking “source”: a memo from the NYC Health Department. Turns out, those kinds of memos are sent without signature or any official’s name – in other words, there was no earthly way to verify if it was legitimate or if it was a fake. Ergo, it was no reliable source.
“Where did this idea come from that opinions are meaningless gibberish which can only be taken seriously if backed by someone else’s opinions?”
I was asked for “science based” sources twenty years ago when I said I did not believe that Muslim terrorists all over the world were planning to divert my flight and kill me.
Twenty years later I was careful to give the same person a source (for my opinion that U$ Covid Labs were set up long before Wuhan) the scientist (Dr. David Martin) was dismissed as “a wellknown conspiracy theorist”.
From these two opposite tactics by the same person, I believe that a Believer will ask for a science based source if you contradict their Faith, and reject a science based source if it contradicts their Faith.
Reminds me of that 1971 hit single “Science, science, everywhere there’s science, blocking out the scenery, breaking my mind.” by the Five Man Electric Band…Even Opinion Polls now claim to be “science based”…
Close but no cigar, it was signs signs blocking out the scenery, those were the golden years, long gone but still holding them accountable.
“he golden years, long gone”
Even longer gone, Ogden Nash:
“I think that I shall never see
A billboard lovely as a tree,
I think unless the billboard fall
I’ll never see a tree at all”.
We tend to ignore patent nonsense, and ask for links only when a statement clashes with our dogma. This happens even here. If one is serious, it is usually a simple matter to look up an issue on one’s own.
“My daddy told me!” is not that bad.
Its quite better than “I read it in The Sun”, or “my university professor said it, and he is from Yale and a member of Skull and Bones”.
James says we should cite our sources. >>> Happy Halloween from 2016… <<<
Excerpt: “In this review, we summarize the available information on regulating factors and the mechanisms of GFNs toxicity, and propose some challenges and suggestions for further investigations of GFNs, with the aim of completing the toxicology mechanisms, and providing suggestions to “improve the biological safety” of GFNs and facilitate their wide application.” [Quotation marks are mine]
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms
Published: October 31, 2016
Toxicity of graphene-family nanoparticles: a general review of the origins and mechanisms | Particle and Fibre Toxicology | Full Text (biomedcentral.com)
OK. Now what?
Hi Paul, – re: citing sources.
Even when, for example, certain sources are cited and their contents are demolished, half of the time it appears to matter little, as nothing much is done about it when it needs to be done, and if anything, what little is eventually done is always done too late after the horse has bolted. The Convid plandemic, virus and vaccine con now in its ‘aftermath’ is a typical example. It understandably took many people long enough to figure out the scam, and many others still haven’t figured it out yet and probably are not likely to do so because they have simply had enough regarding the whole issue. That’s unfortunate. So its just as you say:
OK. Now What?
Hello CO-: Ya. It’s become a freight train to Hell. The majority of the public are continuing to party and avoid the whole charade. However, there are a few dissidents barking loudly at airplanes. >
Please take the time to read the International Peace Proclamation.There are copious legal and material facts presented on the web site.
The American States Assemblies
The American States Assembly (americanstatenationals.org)
Regarding actual “legal” status of the former Republic of the United States of America. > Granna’s Bites #4 condenses the situation rather well. > Granna’s Bites #4 – YouTube
Ms. Von Reitz happens to be educated (a rarity) also a judge. The drop down menus at the bottom of the page are perhaps educational, yet do not define criminal prosecution of the perpetrators… Thanks for posting.
Interesting stuff Paul.
3 different entities calling themselves the “United States” (of America) namely, the Union, the Federal Republic and the Municipal Government – rather confusing when talking about the United States as a corporation if they have not really been united to form a single body, bearing in mind their historical roots.
Hello CO-: It is more than confusing, and that’s why it was done. The original Articles of the Confederation were very clear regarding prohibitions against persons bearing Titles of Nobility from participation within government agency. The Articles of Confederation (article) | Khan Academy These prohibitions were also clearly stated in the Original 13th Amendment of the Constitution, which was “erased” approximately 1861. The Organic Act of 1871 also contributed to the alleged confusions of jurisdictional dictate…
The establishment of the American BAR Association (See term: Esquire) sealed the deal, and we now have a “legal” system to prove how it all worked out… It’s a shit show, and civil populations seem to enjoy the stench.
Yes Paul, civil populations “seem to enjoy the stench” because of the constant social, ideological and politico-legal conditioning they have been bombarded with by the State and other ideological apparatuses.
Unfortunately, the “legal” apparatus or “system” and its ideology prevails over the common law and most people still cannot tell the difference between the two, and probably wouldn’t want to know either.
But, if that situation does not change then it is difficult to see how we can go forward toward any real concrete system of justice and freedom based on common law principles.
Yes, very frustrating. When I mention Common Law courts, most people think I’m referring to Common Law marriages or co-habitation. Their ignorance has become a noose around their necks…
Here’s an example of how common law has been grafted by international “interests” in order to nullify its usage. >
International Common Law Court Of Justice 2023 (lawluxury.com)
It gets more interesting Paul with a dialogue that was cited in the reference entitled: Frequently Asked Questions, for example:
I was recently invited to a conference on international arbitration law, where I heard about the case of the German Lusitania. This was a ship that was sunk by a German U-boat in 1915. There were many survivors, and they sued Germany for damages in the court of the United States.
In the light of our previous posts which court of the “United States” is being referred to here? The court of the Union, the Fed or the Municipal Government?
“OK. Now what?”
OK, you have a review article with loads of sources that describe details of Laboratory Methodology and Experimental Results.
Now, you can go to the Lab, reproduce their Methodology and see if you get the same Experimental Results.
“Science advances slowly, slowly
Creeping on from point to point” — Alfred, Lord Tennyson.
Nick, if the form of knowledge on which the experiments are based and the methodological protocols used for their reproduction do not derive from science, can the results that the so-called ‘scientists’ happen to ‘reproduce’ really be called scientific or something else?
That is, given the fact that empiricism and rationalism are epistemologies – theories of knowledge, which are philosophical theories not scientific theories since they derive from philosophy nor science itself. That also applies when these epistemologies are combined. However, I do not think this deters those who are conducting experiments they just ignore the problems which arise from it. That’s partly why certain aspects of mainstream science remains in the quagmire and also pretends that subjectivity has no influence regarding their alleged ‘objectivity’.
Virology is perhaps a good example. I won’t go into that here, because more than enough has already been discussed regarding this issue in previous posts from the beginning of the plandemic onwards.
When James himself becomes the focus of investigation.
JAMES CORBETT IS NOT YOUR FRIEND
https://dannyboylimerick.website/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/JAMES-CORBETT-IS-NOT-YOUR-FRIEND.pdf
James on why the existence of a virus never deserved mention for 3 years straight.
https://www.facebook.com/720360436/videos/797890365056028/
The link to Chapman is interesting, the rest not so much.
Another figure in the alt-media who gained much traction during Convid gave an interview here:
https://www.thehighersidechats.com/the-ethical-skeptic-overcoming-embargoes-syndicate-anti-wisdom-the-mysteries-of-life/
So he’s admittedly “ex”-naval intelligence and here he is pushing the inter-dimensional aliens’ agenda?….
James makes a very good argument here. People should check it out.
The actions of governments and the medical establishment regarding the psuedo-pandemic are no more justified if viruses exist than if they don”t.If most people understood that viruses don’t exist, certainly that would undermine the PTB’s Narrative. However, if we are talking about what most people should understand, they wouldn’t have had a credulous response to the Covid Narrative in the first place.
I have wondered if people like Christine Massey have ever been part of social movements, working with groups of people on a political agenda. You move forward, not by getting 100% agreement on everything, but by moving forward (taking action) on those things you do agree upon while at the same time trying to bring people closer to agreement – arguing your case – on those things where you don’t.
I think the fact he is another “JC” is a bigger red flag than trying to tie him somehow to the peerage.
Most of the “clues” are occulted but only slightly, no need to go sliding down the rabbit hole.
Almost certainly an intelligence asset, bought, paid for.
See also “Russell Brand” (bonus points for spotting the connection between these 2 – that is that RB has the age another “JC” died tattooed on his arm)
Very much a case of Guilt By Association, wouldnt you say ?
Thankfully my family name is not on the Peerage List. I’ve enough faults…
Referencing James himself. James Corbett – the epitome of research and attention to obscure detail – on why he has failed to even mention the no virus possibility for more than 3 years:
“Isolated Terrain”Comedy Duo Corbett and Broze bring down the house
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/isolated-terrain
The “viruses don’t exist” trope is very likely an intelligence operation to discredit the convid truth movement.
Any average Joe can google “virus images” and, skimming past the usual CGI, can see a bunch of electron microscope images of specific structures with given names. Therefore, viruses exist and the conspiracy theorists are insane like the flat earthers, or deliberately trying to get people to die from pandemics, etc.
The only intelligent counter-narrative is:
“Viruses are not proven to cause disease or to do many of the things virology claim they do. “Asymptomatic hosts” and enforced/ coercive vaccination has no basis on any science or even logic.
Regardless of the facts of biology of health and disease, governments cannot sign secret contracts with pharma, use the military and police and mass coercion through employers to dictate “Public Health” medical interventions!
The WHO is not an elected body, it is largely privately and US government-funded and democratic governments have no obligation to obey its “science” directives! fullstop! Lockdowns, masking, vaccinations of chidren, medical apartheid and “biosecurity” are extremely harmful, malicious practices without scientific basis and do not belong to the future of humanity”.
The rest is the bleeting of sheep.
This not the only area where Corbett failed.
Even Dr Mike Yeadon revealed in his recent ( I think fourth in a series ) interview with James Delingpole that he is willing to seriously consider the no virus possibility, and that this ties in with his questioning of absolutely everything since the utter outrages of the Plandemic were levelled at us in an unending barrage. This is extraordinary considering his long and successful history at Pfizer and in big pharma. In my eyes, Dr Yeadon has been one of the most consistent and sensible voices, and one I remember from very early on in the Plandemic, with his stark and unequivocal warning…which was not to take these injections under any circumstances. So I salute him and will pay attention to anything he has to say, including changing long held beliefs.
Hey James, are you in Japan or Canada these days. How much are you raking in a week? I know it’s a lot. OG, why have you been relentlessly punting this guy for literally years? Is this some kind of syndication?
Well we have to have some sort of competition to offset your own compelling wisdom…
At least he keeps some people in touch with a few important issues.
The fact that OffG features him regularly doesn’t mean we have to swallow everything he says.
Like every other contributor here, he is judged by adults according to his merits.
I don’t see the problem, although I don’t personally like his style at all.
He’s in the same league as Joe Rogan, Whitney Webb, Timcast, et al. They are absolute assets. They are scripted. They are promoted. So yes, I do have a problem with it as they take us all for fools and openly lie by omission, or misdirect in pretty much everything they do. They aren’t making big bucks for telling us the truth, I can assure you of that. They leave out the crucial information every single time. That is actually the reason for them being there. But hey, each to their own…I just ranted, as he is constantly punted on OG.
You may be right.
I lost interest in him some time ago.
I’ll always enjoy your comments Ward 🙂 Sorry, had to blow off some steam and I’m pretty sure I am right about JC, despite Sam’s and OG’s obvious love affair with the guy as he once again suggests mob dancing or planting some organic seeds as the balloon goes up over our heads.
Well, as long as you’re ‘pretty sure you’re right’. 🙄 No, I’m not currently having a love affair with Corbett. Is this an example of NOT being toxically adolescent?
Well I’ll say that you certainly seem to come running to defend JC if anybody puts him down, and his videos are featured here a nauseating amount of times. In times like this, when we are literally drowning in disinformation, how do you even trust sources anyway, when the internet is pretty much controlled by the handlers. One’s instincts are probably one’s most valuable defense mechanism right now. Your accusation of my being ‘toxically adolescent’ are as unfounded as you say my opinion of James Corbett is. But fire away. He’s a big day in NYC gatekeeper and that is enough for me.
https://blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-james-corbett/
https://dannyboylimerick.website/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/JAMES-CORBETT-IS-NOT-YOUR-FRIEND.pdf
I checked out your two sources. Both calling Corbett various levels of gatekeeper, one source links to the other regarding evidence of this, so really this is one source, plus the second source relies heavily on some ‘geneology (sic)’ by Miles Mathis who, according to the author, “does the best Geneology (sic) research on the internet”. This, I admit, had me spitting my coffee.
Mathis’ version of genealogy seems to be spotting the same names (or similar names) in registers and assuming those people are not only directly related but all in cahoots.
I do not defend Corbett if he in any way implies there aren’t serious problems with the official Flight 77 story… I notice your source is careful to say Corbett hasn’t made any statement to this effect. Corbett dismissed some fake missile videos and didn’t go further. That’s a shame, sure, but perhaps for various reasons he prefers to remain neutral on that. I can understand, since the whole 9/11 truth scene has been gutted from the inside by DEWs and Judy Wood.
I was simply saying let’s not defame people without evidence. I called for your evidence and, if this is the best you’ve got, I was right to query it.
Critical thinking skills come in handy. The capacity to understand basic deductive, logical reasoning. If you don’t want to trust anything then fine, but in that case don’t cherry pick (extremely scanty) sources which support your view. Be consistent.
(btw, is this an example of you not engaging in unworldly and banal paranoia?)
A2
In the last source you referred to namely, JC-is-not -your -friend. The author of the piece wrote:
In my opinion, Corbett is obfuscating and mixing in some lies with many truths.
That reminds me of an earlier argument I had with another poster regarding propaganda. I argued that so-called ‘propaganda’ is not all based on lies, as it contains both information and disinformation otherwise people in general would tend not believe it (as they can either relate to the truth of it and probably in other cases, fall for the disinformation aspect as well –> association by contiguity).
So, in that sense its up to people themselves to use their own power of discernment (if they have any) to separate the ‘gold from the dross’ which may also presupposes some prior or broader background knowledge and information (from other different sources) of the issue being dealt with or discussed. If that’s not the case, they may more easily fall-foul to the lies and deception disguised as the “truth”.
I’m disappointed in your comment Ward. I’ve always enjoyed your comments. Maybe you should have a really hard think about why he is always promoted here. And perhaps be a little less distrusting of consensus which is after all supposedly the point of places like OG…but perhaps OG has been effective, hence your sarcastic comment.
Would you mind linking to your sources re. Corbett’s alleged fortune?
He’s a very prolific guy, who’s been doing this for years, and I can totally see many people wishing to support him for providing a useful alternative view. That’s very different from what you appear to be implying, however.
Unfortunately with Corbett’s larger platform comes inevitable accusations like yours, that he’s controlled. For which you’ve provided zero evidence, I might add.
Note: ‘useful alternative view’ isn’t the same as having to agree with someone all the time or trust implicitly everything that comes out of their mouth. As Corbett says, always check out the sources yourselves!
I personally think any sort of cursory teardown of someone based on zero evidence is a very weak position to take. It appeals to a culture of judgemental, pessimistic, adolescent oneupmanship, a conformist policing of all opinion which doesn’t surrender all hope and all nuance, or dares to suspend judgement/judge per case based on evidence/merit.
This sort of toxicity bullies all conversation into unworldly, banal paranoia very quickly.
So can we watch out for that, and cite our sources? Thanks, A2
I said he’s raking it in, not sitting on a fortune. I’m not privy to who pays him and why his videos have that odd fusion studio vibe to them. It’s a hunch. My hunches have served me well this last three years. Sorry if it bums you out and you find my comment toxic. Banal paranoia is certainly a thing, but not a thing I have brought into this world, aided or abetted in any shape or form.
Nothing wrong with “raking in” an income if it is done ethically…. Just my two pennies’ worth.